Russian military convoy attacked in Chechnya

Russian military convoy attacked in Chechnya
One Russian soldier was killed in an attack on a military convoy in Chechnya on Thursday, Russian state media reported. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 8 sec ago
Follow

Russian military convoy attacked in Chechnya

Russian military convoy attacked in Chechnya
  • Unknown assailants attacked the convoy on the outskirts of Grozny, the capital of Chechnya
  • Moscow fought a series of bloody wars over Chechnya in the 1990s and early 2000s

MOSCOW: One Russian soldier was killed in an attack on a military convoy in Chechnya on Thursday, Russian state media reported.
Unknown assailants attacked the convoy on the outskirts of Grozny, the capital of Chechnya in Russia’s mountainous North Caucasus.
“Unknown people attacked a military convoy in the Grozny suburbs,” the state-run RIA Novosti news agency quoted the local unit of the Rosgvardia, Russia’s National Guard, as saying.
“One serviceman was killed and a second was wounded,” it added.
“Measures are being taken to find and detain the attackers.”
Moscow fought a series of bloody wars over Chechnya in the 1990s and early 2000s, wiping out rebel forces that sought to secede from Russia and that the Kremlin blamed for insurgent attacks across the country.
Strongman local leader Ramzan Kadyrov has ruled the region for almost two decades, securing huge handouts from Moscow in exchange for his unwavering loyalty to President Vladimir Putin.
Independent rights groups say Kadyrov rules the region as his personal fiefdom, ruthlessly cracking down on his opponents and drastically curbing human rights.


Former UK minister of state criticizes Conservative leadership hopeful Jenrick’s stance on Palestine

Former UK minister of state criticizes Conservative leadership hopeful Jenrick’s stance on Palestine
Updated 17 sec ago
Follow

Former UK minister of state criticizes Conservative leadership hopeful Jenrick’s stance on Palestine

Former UK minister of state criticizes Conservative leadership hopeful Jenrick’s stance on Palestine
  • Alan Duncan was speaking in a video interview with Palestinian journalist Ahmed Alnaouq
  • Duncan highlighted Jenrick’s controversial statements at the Conservative Party conference earlier this month

LONDON: A former UK minister of state has condemned the Conservative Party leadership hopeful Robert Jenrick, calling him an “extremist” and warning that his position on Israel and Palestine would make him a “disaster” as leader of the party.

Alan Duncan was speaking in a video interview with Palestinian journalist Ahmed Alnaouq, which was published on Thursday by Palestine Deep Dive.

During the interview, Duncan highlighted Jenrick’s controversial statements at the Conservative Party conference earlier this month, where Jenrick vowed to build the British Embassy in Jerusalem if the Foreign Office did not agree to relocate it.

“This man is an extremist. He does not believe in any kind of two-state solution although he says he does, he knows nothing about it. He takes his script entirely from the Conservative Friends of Israel and the Israelis, so he would be a disaster if he were leader of the Conservative Party,” Duncan said.

Duncan, who most recently served as UK minister of state for Europe and the Americas from 2016 to 2019 in the Conservative government of the time, also criticized the influence of lobbying organizations such as Conservative Friends of Israel, accusing them of shaping UK foreign policy on Israel.

He described how donor money and back channels have influenced Conservative Party decisions, saying: “It goes straight into number 10 Downing Street” and “tells the Foreign Office what to do.”

Duncan expressed skepticism about the Conservative government’s commitment to its official stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

While the UK’s stated policy views Israeli settlements as illegal and supports the establishment of a Palestinian state, Duncan claimed that senior Conservative officials did not genuinely believe in these policies.

“They didn’t really believe in international law as far as I can see,” he added, accusing them of hypocrisy when it came to Israel.

When asked about Kemi Badenoch, the other Conservative leadership contender, Duncan admitted that he was unsure of her stance on foreign policy. He lamented the lack of experience and understanding of the Middle East among UK politicians.

“I haven’t got a clue what her views are on foreign policy, I simply do not know,” he said. “And it’s one of the problems of all British politics now is that those in Parliament have got no real experience of the region, they haven’t really learned the history and they just have very, very simple attitudes and this is dangerous.”

Duncan’s scathing remarks underscored growing divisions within the Conservative Party over its approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, as leadership hopefuls such as Jenrick adopt increasingly hard-line positions.

He also took aim at former UK government minister Michael Gove.

“Now one thing that was a disgrace was (Michael Gove) when he was minister, who is another completely sold-out sympathizer of Israeli extremism,” he said.

“He passed a law which said that local councils were not allowed to have a policy of boycotting Israeli produce even if they’re illegal, so you end up with one arm of the UK government saying Palestinian settlements are illegal and another arm of British government protecting illegal activity in those Palestinian settlements, and Parliament was pathetic in opposing this piece of legislation.”

Duncan also said that not enough value was placed on Palestinian lives by the British political class.

“I don’t think people in Parliament are sitting there and thinking quite what the devastation of the Gaza Strip actually looks like and means to people in terms of human suffering,” he said.

“They don’t even stop to think about it. Someone like Jenrick says: ‘Oh well, you know Hamas are dreadful, we’ve got to eliminate them,’ as if you can. I mean, he says nothing about the origins of this problem. So, he is a disgrace,” he said.

The former minister also criticized the current Labour government’s lack of a genuine commitment to a two-state solution, dismissing the rhetoric from both major parties as “waffle” and a reflection of ignorance about the situation on the ground.

Duncan’s candid remarks are likely to reignite debate about the UK’s foreign policy direction, particularly as the Conservative Party prepares to select its next leader.


What led to Modi-Xi handshake and thaw in India-China ties

What led to Modi-Xi handshake and thaw in India-China ties
Updated 12 min 3 sec ago
Follow

What led to Modi-Xi handshake and thaw in India-China ties

What led to Modi-Xi handshake and thaw in India-China ties
  • Indian PM, Chinese president meet on sidelines of BRICS Summit in Kazan, Russia
  • First formal talk between parties since 2020 deadly clashes on disputed India-China border

NEW DELHI: After years of tensions, signs of a thaw are emerging in Indian-Chinese relations, experts say, following the meeting of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Xi Jinping in Russia.

Modi and Xi met on Wednesday on the sidelines of the BRICS Summit in Kazan. It was their first formal talk since the 2020 clashes on the disputed border between India and China led to a military buildup on both sides.

 

The 3,440 km-long Himalayan border has been a cause of tensions for decades and the two countries fought a war over it in 1962. The clash in Galwan Valley in 2020 was their worst confrontation since then, with at least 20 Indian and four Chinese soldiers killed.

The military standoff that followed affected bilateral business ties, leading to India banning several Chinese mobile apps, including TikTok, and stopping passenger flights to China.

Rounds of negotiations taking place over the past four years had not yielded any resolution but during Wednesday’s meeting, Modi and Xi agreed to “explore a fair, reasonable and mutually acceptable solution to the boundary question,” the Indian Ministry of External Affairs said in a statement.

It was widely seen as a “positive first step” signaling a thaw, Manoj Kewalramani, chairperson of the Indo-Pacific Research Program and a China studies fellow at the Takshashila Institution in Bangalore, told Arab News.

“Having this sort of abnormality in the relationship does not suit either side in the long run. So, there has been this impetus that we need to find some pathway to arriving at some sort of a new balance in the relationship,” he said.

“From an Indian point of view, of course engaging with China is important … you can’t necessarily have an abnormal high-intensity tense border area with such a neighbor for a long period of time.”

 

For China, too, trying to normalize the relationship was needed, especially in the increasingly hostile external environment.

“Whether it is in the South China Sea, East China Sea; whether it’s the issues with Russia and Ukraine; or whether it’s tensions in the Middle East, there’s an increasingly strained external environment,” Kewalramani said. “It makes sense to have some sort of a tactical understanding with a country like India, at least to begin with, and try to normalize that relationship.”

Mohan Guruswamy, chairman of the Centre for Policy Alternatives in New Delhi, said it was mutual geopolitical and economic interests that had compelled the leaders of the world’s two most populous countries to officially shake hands for the first time in nearly five years.

“India realizes that its place in the new world order — which is emerging — cannot be rated high unless China agrees. For instance, Britain, America, France, (and) Russia all agreed to India’s being in the UN Security Council. Only China disagrees. If China takes out its objections, then there is no objection to India’s membership,” he said.

“There is a realization in India also that we need China. And China has a trade surplus with India which is almost $40-50 billion a year. They would like to keep that, and they would also like to invest in India, because they realize that India is a big market.”

If the normalization proceeds and if there is enough political will for it to continue, it will have an impact on international politics and relations, especially in the Global South.

“There will be some elements of collaboration,” said Prof. Varaprasad Sekhar Dolla from the Center for East Asian Studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi.

“It will have an impact on the multipolar world that is unfolding.”


Greece wants Turkish crackdown on migrant smugglers

Greece wants Turkish crackdown on migrant smugglers
Updated 24 October 2024
Follow

Greece wants Turkish crackdown on migrant smugglers

Greece wants Turkish crackdown on migrant smugglers
  • Greek Migration Minister Nikos Panagiotopoulos is expected to discuss the issue with Turkish Interior Minister Ali Yerlikaya in November
  • Disasters involving would-be asylum seekers occur regularly off the coast of Greece, one of the main countries through which people seek to enter the EU

ATHENS: Greece is to ask neighboring Turkiye to crack down harder on gangs trafficking would-be asylum seekers, a senior migration official said on Thursday.
“We are not doing enough about migrant smugglers. We are raising the issue with our European peers and our Turkish neighbors,” the official said on condition of anonymity.
“The cooperation which we intend to intensify with Turkiye will focus on the war against smuggling networks,” the source added.
Migration Minister Nikos Panagiotopoulos is expected to discuss the issue with Turkish Interior Minister Ali Yerlikaya in November.
More than 37,000 asylum seekers entered Greece in the first nine months of the year, mainly from Turkiye, according to ministry figures.
Arrivals are predicted to reach 50,000 by the end of the year.
Disasters involving would-be asylum seekers occur regularly off the coast of Greece, one of the main countries through which people fleeing poverty or war in Africa, Asia and the Middle East seek to enter the European Union.
Several people have drowned in migrant boat sinkings in recent days.
Greek government officials have stressed that the country’s camps — which can accommodate some 50,000 asylum seekers while their claims for refuge are processed — are not currently under pressure.
But two key new facilities have faced obstacles.
The EU in 2021 allocated 155 million euros ($167 million) to the Greek government to build new camps on the Aegean islands of Lesbos and Chios.
But work on both projects has been held up by local opposition.
In Chios, the plan may have to be scrapped altogether, the ministry official admitted on Thursday.
Lesbos, meanwhile, has faced an ongoing dispute about widening a road through a pristine forest to the new camp, which is nearly complete.


UK reiterates call for Lebanon ceasefire at donor conference, pledges more than $32m in aid

UK reiterates call for Lebanon ceasefire at donor conference, pledges more than $32m in aid
Updated 24 October 2024
Follow

UK reiterates call for Lebanon ceasefire at donor conference, pledges more than $32m in aid

UK reiterates call for Lebanon ceasefire at donor conference, pledges more than $32m in aid
  • UK pledged £15 million ($19.4 million) to support Lebanon’s humanitarian needs, including food, medicine and clean water
  • Additional £10 million to match public donations

LONDON: The UK government renewed its call for an immediate ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah during the Lebanon Support Conference held in Paris on Thursday.

Minister for the Middle East Hamish Nicholas Falconer delivered the UK’s position as the humanitarian crisis in Lebanon continues to worsen.

“The situation in Lebanon is worsening daily, and civilian casualties are mounting,” Falconer said, highlighting the importance of swift action.

“The risks of further escalation cannot be overstated. We cannot let Lebanon become another Gaza.”

Falconer reaffirmed the UK’s support for Israel’s right to self-defense, citing Hezbollah’s rocket attacks on northern Israel as the origin of the conflict.

“Let us not forget that this conflict started when Hezbollah launched rockets at northern Israel, forcing the Israelis to flee their homes,” he added.

The minister also called on Iran to halt its involvement in the region, urging Tehran to “immediately halt those attacks, and stand down its proxies.”

The UK pledged £15 million ($19.4 million) to support Lebanon’s humanitarian needs, including food, medicine and clean water, with an additional £10 million to match public donations made through the Disasters Emergency Committee appeal for Gaza, Lebanon and the wider region.

“We are working with the Lebanese Armed Forces, the sole legitimate defender of that state, to support security and stability,” Falconer said. He was accompanied by Air Marshal Harvey Smyth, a senior UK military officer leading efforts to support Lebanon’s defense forces. Smyth added that British forces stand “ready to do more.”

The UK government also called for the protection of aid workers, particularly those working with the UN, and condemned threats to the safety of UN peacekeepers in the region.

“The aid workers striving to alleviate suffering in Lebanon must be able to carry out their duties in safety — including UN workers, who have a vital role to play in resolving armed conflict and mitigating its impact,” Falconer said.

He also reiterated the UK’s stance on a political resolution to the conflict, calling for a solution in line with UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which aims to secure long-term peace on both sides of the Israel-Lebanon border.

“A political solution (consistent with 1701) is the only answer — and the only way to secure a stable future for those on both sides of the Blue Line,” he said.


Bangladesh bans student wing of Sheikh Hasina’s party under terrorism law

Bangladesh bans student wing of Sheikh Hasina’s party under terrorism law
Updated 24 October 2024
Follow

Bangladesh bans student wing of Sheikh Hasina’s party under terrorism law

Bangladesh bans student wing of Sheikh Hasina’s party under terrorism law
  • Ban in response to pressure from student movement that toppled Hasina
  • Experts warn against banning of political groups, polarization of society

DHAKA: Bangladesh’s interim government has banned the student wing of the Awami League party of ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina’s, citing the group’s role in the deadly violence during the recent popular uprising.

A gazette notification issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs on Wednesday night said the Bangladesh Chhatra League was banned under the Anti-Terrorism Act with immediate effect.

The ministry accused the BCL of misconduct over the past 15 years, including violence, harassment and exploitation of public resources.

The notification said there was evidence of the group’s “conspiratory, destructive and provocative acts against the nation along with various terror activities” during the nationwide protest that forced Hasina to flee to India.

Initially peaceful student-led demonstrations started in Bangladesh in early July against public-sector job quotas. Two weeks later, they were met with a violent crackdown by security forces aided by BCL activists, which according to UN estimates left more than 600 people dead.

The violence led to a nationwide uprising, which on Aug. 5 forced Hasina to leave for neighboring India and an interim cabinet led by Nobel Peace laureate Muhammad Yunus took charge.

There was no comment from the Awami League as many of its leaders have been arrested over accusations of their role in the unrest, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party — the main opposition party, whose members were persecuted during Hasina’s 15-year rule — was not enthusiastic about the ban.

“What we believe in is the rule of law. Whenever any such decision is taken, it ought to be made through a process of law. Anything that is extraordinary and beyond due process will always have some pitfalls. I believe, if a public hearing or some more clear legal process was adhered to prior to invoking such a decision, it would be more acceptable,” Nawshad Jamir, BNP’s international affairs secretary, told Arab News.

“BCL has done some most heinous crimes in the past however, even then, they are also entitled to a fair justice system.”

The banning of BCL and crackdown on Awami League comes in response to escalating demands from the student movement that organized the July protest. The movement’s members have been also calling for the removal of President Mohammed Shahabuddin — an Awami League member, who in accordance with Bangladesh’s constitution remained in office after Hasina’s resignation.

Prof. Touhidul Islam, who teaches conflict resolution at Dhaka University, warned against growing social polarization if the interim government was going to achieve national reconciliation, which was one of the first promises made by Yunus as he took office.

“This ban will have a significant influence in the broader political scenario of the country,” he said.

“When there is polarization in society, it always keeps away the concept of reconciliation. The focus should be on minimizing the differences. We are cautiously watching the political developments at the moment.”

The banning of political entities did not contribute to “healthy politics and a democratic system,” Prof. Zarina Rahman, former public administration lecturer at Dhaka University, told Arab News.

“If someone, or an organization, is found to be a terrorist or anti-social element, they should be tried. Someone should be charged with specific accusations,” she said.

“We have a common tendency to remove the head in case of a headache ... If someone violates the rules, we should hold him or her responsible for the particular misdeeds. The authorities should try this method first.”