Majority of Arab American voters support continuing US military presence in Mideast: Poll

Special Majority of Arab American voters support continuing US military presence in Mideast: Poll
Four percent of Arab Americans support US military action against sanctions Iran. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 23 October 2024
Follow

Majority of Arab American voters support continuing US military presence in Mideast: Poll

Majority of Arab American voters support continuing US military presence in Mideast: Poll

LONDON: A majority of Arab-American voters support a continuing US military presence in the Middle East, but when it comes to dealing with Iran, 41 percent would prefer to see fewer sanctions and more diplomacy and incentives, according to a survey conducted for Arab News by YouGov.

However, 32 percent support a more aggressive stance, believing the US should not only be applying maximum diplomatic pressure but should also increase sanctions against Iran.

Eleven percent believe the new US administration should maintain the current pressure on Tehran. Only 4 percent support the use of military force against Iran by the US.

The poll’s finding of an appetite for diplomacy over sanctions surprised Joseph Haboush, a former non-resident scholar at the Middle East Institute and Washington correspondent for Al Arabiya English.




A majority of Arab-American voters support a continuing US military presence in the Middle East. (AFP)

“From the conversations that I’ve had over the years in the Arab-American community, I thought it would be more prevalent for Arab Americans to take a more hawkish approach toward Iranian proxies and other groups, but the poll shows that that isn’t 100 accurate,” he told the Arab News-sponsored “Ray Hanania Radio Show.”

Nevertheless, 52 percent believe the US should either maintain its military presence in the Middle East (25 percent) or increase it (27 percent). Thirty-eight percent think the US should reduce its military footprint in the region.

“That’s another interesting element,” said Haboush. “They want the US to work its diplomatic channels, but at the same time they don’t want the US to leave from a military point of view.

Opinion

This section contains relevant reference points, placed in (Opinion field)

“I think the belief is that once the military presence is gone, the overall interest is gone, and then … they’re left to look to other powers that may not be as influential as they’d like.”

It would “be great for policymakers here in Washington to have a look at this poll because it’s reflective of how much people in the region want US involvement and think that it’s productive.

“At the same time, the policies we’ve seen toward Gaza and now in Lebanon are putting a dent in the US image abroad. But despite that, folks still want to see some sort of US involvement.

“The reality of the matter, for better or worse, is that the US is the only side that’s going to be able to bring these wars to an end, or at least put some sort of pressure on the Israelis.”




Only 4 percent support the use of military force against Iran by the US. (AFP)


Caroline Rose, director of the Project on Post-Withdrawals Security Landscapes at the New Lines Institute for Strategy and Policy in Washington, D.C., said: “It’s clear that Arab Americans clearly recall the costs of sudden withdrawal in the region and value America’s deterrence with malign terrorist organizations, militias and other forces that undermine security.

“After the US pulled out of Iraq in 2011, the emergence of the Islamic State (Daesh) compelled it to redeploy its forces in 2017.

Read our full coverage here: US Elections 2024: What Arab Americans want

“The Trump administration’s sudden announcement of withdrawal from northeast Syria ushered in new security risks for local actors on the ground, such as Syria’s Kurdish communities, as it invited a Turkish offensive and encroachment from the Syrian regime and Iran-aligned militant groups.

“The Trump administration’s incremental draw-down effort in 2020, reducing 5,000 US personnel in Iraq to 2,500 in the wake of escalation with Iran over the killing of IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps) Gen. (Qassem) Soleimani, ultimately didn’t incite the level of regional chaos that the Syria withdrawal announcement did in October 2019.




“The Trump administration’s sudden announcement of withdrawal from northeast Syria ushered in new security risks for local actors on the ground,” said Caroline Rose. (AFP)

“However, it did set the groundwork for a more long-term strategy for withdrawal in Iraq that could very well create further space for Iran and Iran-sponsored groups to exploit in the country.

“The elephant in the room additionally affecting Arab-American hesitancy for seeing the US military presence in the Middle East withdrawn, of course, is the memory of a botched Afghanistan withdrawal in 2021 that fully displayed the potential consequences of an immediate evacuation of US forces.”

 


Heavy gunfire erupts in South Sudan’s capital Juba

Updated 9 sec ago
Follow

Heavy gunfire erupts in South Sudan’s capital Juba

Heavy gunfire erupts in South Sudan’s capital Juba
The gunfire began around 7 p.m. local time and continued sporadically for more than an hour before dying down
Analysts said the sacking of Akol Koor reflected a power struggle at the highest levels of government

NAIROBI: Heavy gunfire erupted in South Sudan’s capital Juba on Thursday evening after security forces moved to arrest the former head of the intelligence service, according to Reuters reporters and an alert sent to United Nations staff.
The gunfire began around 7 p.m. local time (1700 GMT) and continued sporadically for more than an hour before dying down, Reuters reporters said.
A UN safety alert to staff members in Juba, seen by Reuters, said the shooting was related to the arrest of the former head of the National Security Service (NSS). It urged UN staff to shelter in place.
In early October, President Salva Kiir dismissed Akol Koor Kuc, who had led the NSS since the country’s independence from Sudan in 2011, and appointed a close ally to replace him.
Reached by telephone, a military spokesperson said he was trying to establish what was going on.
Analysts said the sacking of Akol Koor reflected a power struggle at the highest levels of government. It came weeks after the transitional government that Kiir leads announced that elections expected in December would be postponed for a second time.
Rival factions loyal to Kiir and First Vice President Riek Machar fought a civil war from 2013 to 2018 that resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths.
The two have governed together since then as part of a transitional government. There has been relative peace, but the opposing forces clash periodically in addition to frequent fighting among a patchwork of armed groups in rural areas.

Putin says hit Ukraine with new mid-range ballistic missile

Putin says hit Ukraine with new mid-range ballistic missile
Updated 35 min 29 sec ago
Follow

Putin says hit Ukraine with new mid-range ballistic missile

Putin says hit Ukraine with new mid-range ballistic missile
  • Putin said in a televised address that Russia carried out “testing in combat conditions of one of the newest Russian mid-range missile systems”
  • Russia struck the central Ukrainian city of Dnipro with a barrage of missiles early Thursday

MOSCOW: Russian President Vladimir Putin said Thursday that the country’s forces had hit Ukraine with a new mid-range ballistic missile.
Putin said in a televised address that Russia carried out “testing in combat conditions of one of the newest Russian mid-range missile systems... Our engineers named it Oreshnik,” which means hazel tree in Russian.
Russia struck the central Ukrainian city of Dnipro with a barrage of missiles early Thursday.
The Ukrainian air force and President Volodymyr Zelensky accused Russia of apparently using an intercontinental ballistic missile, while Ukrainian experts were still examining the evidence to ascertain the type of missile used.
Putin said in his address that Russia launched a combined strike on a defense industry target in Ukraine.
He described Oreshnik as a “ballistic missile” that was deployed in this case “in a non-nuclear hypersonic configuration,” saying that the “test” had been successful and had hit its target.
Air defenses cannot intercept the Oreshnik, which attacks at a speed of Mach 10, or 2.5-3 kilometers per second, Putin said.
“Modern air defense systems... cannot intercept such missiles. That’s impossible,” he said.
“As of today there are no means of counteracting such a weapon,” the president boasted.
He said Russia was testing the Oreshnik in combat conditions “in response to the aggressive actions of NATO countries toward Russia.”


UK urged to honor ICC’s arrest warrants against Israeli leaders

UK urged to honor ICC’s arrest warrants against Israeli leaders
Updated 21 November 2024
Follow

UK urged to honor ICC’s arrest warrants against Israeli leaders

UK urged to honor ICC’s arrest warrants against Israeli leaders
  • Warrants issued on Thursday against Israel’s ministers, officials of Hamas

LONDON: The British government has been urged by the Council for Arab-British Understanding to immediately honor International Criminal Court arrest warrants issued against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.

The ICC issued the warrants on Thursday for Netanyahu, Gallant, and an official of Hamas, accusing them of war crimes and crimes against humanity over the war in Gaza and the attacks on Oct. 7, 2023, that triggered Israel’s offensive in the Palestinian territory.

CAABU director Chris Doyle emphasized the gravity of the situation, accusing the UK government of failing to hold Israel accountable for its actions in violation of international law.

Doyle said: “This decision highlights how woefully the UK government has handled the situation of Israeli atrocities and war crimes.

“It now must demonstrate, with concrete action, that this government will honor its pledge to uphold respect for international law and the ICC by abiding in full with the ICC decision.”

Doyle also called for immediate measures, including a full arms embargo on Israel, the cessation of military and security cooperation, and an end to arms sales while atrocities were allegedly being carried out in Gaza.

CAABU warned that failure to comply with the ICC’s warrants could severely damage the UK’s international standing, making it complicit in alleged crimes against humanity, including forced displacement, apartheid, and genocide.

“The UK’s reputation globally would be trashed,” Doyle cautioned.

The organization stressed that the ICC’s warrants represented a crucial step toward justice and accountability for Palestinians. However, Doyle stressed the need for swift action.

He said: “There is no time to wait; justice delayed is justice denied. The UK needs to uphold international law, accountability, and ensure justice with immediate effect by complying with these arrest warrants.”

The UK government has yet to issue a formal response to the ICC’s decision.


UK says it respects ICC independence as court issues arrest warrants

UK says it respects ICC independence as court issues arrest warrants
Updated 21 November 2024
Follow

UK says it respects ICC independence as court issues arrest warrants

UK says it respects ICC independence as court issues arrest warrants
  • PM Keir Starmer’s spokesperson said: “We remain focused on pushing for an immediate ceasefire to bring an end to the devastating violence in Gaza”

LONDON: Britain respects the independence of the International Criminal Court, Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s spokesperson said on Thursday, after it issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, his ex-defense chief and a Hamas leader.
“We respect the independence of the International Criminal Court, which is the primary international institution for investigating and prosecuting the most serious crimes of international concern,” the spokesperson told reporters.
“There is no moral equivalence between Israel, a democracy, and Hamas and Lebanese Hezbollah, which are terrorist organizations. We remain focused on pushing for an immediate ceasefire to bring an end to the devastating violence in Gaza.”


Russia fires what appears to be intercontinental ballistic missile at Ukraine, Kyiv says

Russia fires what appears to be intercontinental ballistic missile at Ukraine, Kyiv says
Updated 21 November 2024
Follow

Russia fires what appears to be intercontinental ballistic missile at Ukraine, Kyiv says

Russia fires what appears to be intercontinental ballistic missile at Ukraine, Kyiv says
  • Western officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, later told Reuters their initial analysis showed it was not an intercontinental ballistic missile
  • Regardless of its classification, the latest strike highlighted rapidly rising tensions in the 33-month-old war

KYIV: Ukraine said Russia fired what appeared to be an intercontinental ballistic missile at the city of Dnipro on Thursday, in what would be the first use in war of a weapon designed to deliver long-distance nuclear strikes.
Western officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, later told Reuters their initial analysis showed it was not an intercontinental ballistic missile, though they left open the possibility that conclusion could change.
Regardless of its classification, the latest strike highlighted rapidly rising tensions in the 33-month-old war.
Ukraine fired US and British missiles at targets inside Russia this week despite warnings by Moscow that it would see such action as a major escalation.
Security experts said that if Thursday’s strike involved an intercontinental ballistic missile, it would be the first use of such a missile in war. ICBMs are strategic weapons designed to deliver nuclear warheads and are an important part of Russia’s nuclear deterrent.
“Today there was a new Russian missile. All the characteristics – speed, altitude – are (of an) intercontinental ballistic (missile). An expert (investigation) is currently underway,” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in a video statement.
Ukraine’s foreign ministry urged the international community to react swiftly to the use of what it said was “the use by Russia of a new type of weaponry.”
The Ukrainian air force said the missile was fired from the Russian region of Astrakhan, more than 700 km (435 miles) from Dnipro in central-eastern Ukraine. It did not specify what kind of warhead the missile had or what type of missile it was. There was no suggestion it was nuclear-armed.
Asked about the air force statement, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters to contact Russian military for comment.
Ukrainska Pravda, a Kyiv-based media outlet, cited anonymous sources saying the missile was an RS-26 Rubezh, a solid-fueled intercontinental ballistic missile with a range of 5,800 km, according to the Arms Control Association.
The RS-26 was first successfully tested in 2012, and is estimated to be 12 meters (40 ft) long and weigh 36 tons, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). It said the RS-26 can carry an 800-kg (1,765-pound)nuclear warhead.
The RS-26 is classified as an ICBM under a nuclear arms reduction treaty between the United States and Russia, but it can be seen as an intermediate-range ballistic missile when used with heavier payloads at ranges below 5,500 km, CSIS said.