Biden’s decision to drop out crystallized Sunday. His staff knew one minute before the public did

Biden’s decision to drop out crystallized Sunday. His staff knew one minute before the public did
1 / 2
It was at his home in Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, where US President Joe Biden made a decision on July 21, 2024, to drop out of his reelection battle with Donald Trump, in a historic move that plunges the already turbulent 2024 White House race into uncharted territory. (AFP)
Biden’s decision to drop out crystallized Sunday. His staff knew one minute before the public did
2 / 2
US Secret Service and local police guard a checkpoint near the home of US President Joe Biden in Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, on July 21, 2024. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 22 July 2024
Follow

Biden’s decision to drop out crystallized Sunday. His staff knew one minute before the public did

Biden’s decision to drop out crystallized Sunday. His staff knew one minute before the public did
  • It wasn’t until Saturday evening that Biden began to come to the conclusion that he would not run for reelection
  • By Sunday evening, Biden for President had formally changed to Harris for President.

WASHINGTON: At 1:45 p.m. Sunday, President Joe Biden’s senior staff was notified that he was stepping away from the 2024 race. At 1:46 p.m., that message was made public.
It was never Biden’s intention to leave the race: Up until he decided to step aside Sunday, he was all in.
His campaign was planning fundraisers and events and setting up travel over the next few weeks. But even as Biden was publicly dug in and insisting he was staying in the race, he was quietly reflecting on the disaster of the past few weeks, on the past three years of his presidency and on the scope of his half-century career in politics.
In the end, it was the president’s decision alone, and he made it quietly, from his vacation home in Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, sick with COVID-19, the first lady with him as he talked it through with a small circle of people who have been with him for decades.
“This has got to be one of the hardest decisions he’s ever made,” said Sen. Chris Coons, D-Delaware, the president’s closest ally in Congress, who spoke with him Sunday. “I know he wanted to fight and keep going and show that he could beat Donald Trump again, but as he heard more and more input, I think he was wrestling with what would be the best for the country,” Coons said in an interview with the Associated Press.
This story is based on interviews with more than a dozen people familiar with the president’s thinking over the past few weeks, days and hours as he made his decision. They spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity to talk about private discussions.
Deciding to leave the race
It wasn’t until Saturday evening that Biden began to come to the conclusion that he would not run for reelection. He started writing a letter to the American people.
Biden had been off the campaign trail for a few days, isolated because of COVID-19, when it all started to deeply sink in — his worsening chances of being able to defeat Donald Trump with so much of his party in open rebellion, seeking to push him out of the race — not to mention the persistent voter concerns about his age that were only exacerbated by the catastrophic debate.
Biden was at his beach home with some of his and Jill Biden’s closest aides: chief strategist Mike Donilon, counselor to the president Steve Ricchetti, White House deputy chief of staff Annie Tomasini, and Anthony Bernal, senior adviser to the first lady.
By Sunday, his decision crystallized. He spoke multiple times with Vice President Kamala Harris, whom he would endorse. He informed White House chief of staff Jeff Zients, and his longtime aide and campaign chairwoman Jen O’Malley Dillon.
A small group of senior advisers from both the campaign and the White House were assembled for the 1:45 p.m. call to relay Biden’s decision, while his campaign staff released the social media announcement one minute later.
“It has been the greatest honor of my life to serve as your President. And while it has been my intention to seek reelection, I believe it is in the best interest of my party and the country for me to stand down and to focus solely on fulfilling my duties as President for the remainder of my term,” Biden wrote.
Just about a half-hour later came his public vote of support for Harris. It was a carefully choreographed strategy meant to give the president’s initial statement full weight, and to put a period on the moment before launching forward into the next step.
“Today I want to offer my full support and endorsement for Kamala to be the nominee of our party this year,” Biden said in another post on X. “Democrats — it’s time to come together and beat Trump.”
Elizabeth Alexander, Jill Biden’s communications director, said, “down to the last hours of the decision only he could make, she was supportive of whatever road he chose.
“She’s his biggest believer, champion, and always on his side, in that trusted way only a spouse of almost 50 years can be,” Alexander said.
About the debate
It’s not like things had been going great before the June 27 debate. In an August 2023 poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research, fully 77 percent of US adults said Biden was too old to be effective for four more years. Not only did 89 percent of Republicans say that, but so did 69 percent of Democrats.
And it hadn’t gotten any better by April, when more than half of US adults thought Biden’s presidency hurt the country on issues like the cost of living and immigration.
But Biden had insisted — to himself, to the nation, to his supporters — that he would be able to bring voters around if he got out there, told people about his record, explained it to them. Talked to them. Looked them in the eye.
He had a lifetime of experience that told him that if he stuck to it, he’d overcome. His campaign was so confident, in fact, that they arranged to go around the Commission on Presidential Debates to set up a series of faceoffs with Trump under a new set of rules.
That produced the June 27 debate that set Biden’s downfall in motion. Biden gave nonsensical answers, trailed off mid-sentence and appeared to stare blankly in front of an audience of 51 million people. Perhaps most distressing to other Democrats, Biden didn’t go after Trump’s myriad falsehoods about his involvement in the violence around the insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021, abortion rights or immigration.
Biden and his team blamed the night on so many different things. He had a cold. He was jet-lagged. He needed to get more sleep. That night opened the door for his party to push him out.
A slow acceptance
Publicly and privately Biden was fighting to stay in the race. He was working to convince voters that he was up for the task for another four years. He was frustrated by the Democrats coming out publicly against him, but even angrier about the leaks and anonymous sources relaying how even former President Barack Obama and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi were working to get him to drop out.
It looked like he’d won out a couple times; the chorus of naysayers seemed to die down. He had some well-received speeches mixed with so-so TV interviews and a day featuring an extended news conference in which he displayed a nuanced grasp of policy but also committed a few gasp-inducing gaffes.
But the doubts didn’t go away.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer eventually invited top Biden staff to a meeting on July 11 to talk about their concerns. It didn’t go well. Senators expressed their concerns, and almost none of them said they had confidence in the president. But even afterwards, Schumer was worried it wasn’t getting to Biden.
Following the meeting, Schumer called Democratic House Leader Hakeem Jeffries, former Speaker Nancy Pelosi and former President Obama. Schumer decided that day to request a meeting with Biden.
At a July 13 meeting in Rehoboth, Schumer told Biden he was there out of love and affection. And he delivered a personal appeal focused on Biden’s legacy, the country’s future and the impact the top of the ticket could have on congressional races — and how that could potentially affect the Supreme Court. That same day came the attempted assassination of Donald Trump.
Schumer told the president he didn’t expect him to make an immediate decision, but he hoped Biden would think about what he said, according to a person familiar with the conversation.
Biden responded, “I need another week,” and the two men hugged.
Sunday's decision
It was full steam ahead until Biden pulled the emergency brake.
The president had lost his voice, but he was recovering well and his doctor had sent an update to the public shortly before 1 p.m. on his condition. His small circle decided to post the statement on X on Sunday, rather than let it leak out for days before he was prepared to address the nation, which he is expected to do sometime early this week.
Much of his campaign was blindsided, and it was clear by how little had changed after he dropped out. For hours after the announcement, Biden’s campaign website reflected that he was still running and KamalaHarris.com still redirected to Biden’s page.
Even Harris’ statement announcing her intent to succeed Biden was sent from “Joe Biden for President.”
After the public announcement, Zients held a senior staff call, and sent out an email, and spoke with members of Biden’s Cabinet, emphasizing to them that nothing had changed when it came to the business of governing and that the administration still had a lot of work to do, according to two people with knowledge of the message. And the president was also making personal calls.
“Team — I wanted to make sure you saw the attached letter from the President,” Zients wrote in the staff email. “I could not be more proud to work for President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and the American people — alongside all of you, the best White House team in history. There’s so much more to do — and as President Biden says, ‘there is nothing America can’t do — when we do it together.’”
Vermont Sen. Peter Welch, a Democrat who had called for Biden to bow out, was gardening with his wife when the news broke, and said he was momentarily “stunned.” Senators texted each other questioning if it was really happening.
Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal was at an event in his state, and there was spontaneous applause when it was announced to the crowd that Biden wouldn’t run, he said.
There was a sense of excitement and energy in the crowd “that has been completely lacking,” Blumenthal said.
“It was also, let’s be blunt, a sense of relief,” he said. “And a sense of reverence for Joe Biden.”
By Sunday evening, Biden for President had formally changed to Harris for President.
O’Malley Dillon told campaign staff their jobs were safe, because the operation was shifting to a campaign for Harris.
 


Grenfell fire inquiry reveals Muslim survivors were denied halal food during temporary relocation

Grenfell fire inquiry reveals Muslim survivors were denied halal food during temporary relocation
Updated 9 sec ago
Follow

Grenfell fire inquiry reveals Muslim survivors were denied halal food during temporary relocation

Grenfell fire inquiry reveals Muslim survivors were denied halal food during temporary relocation
  • Kensington and Chelsea Council should have done more to cater to people from diverse backgrounds
  • Tower residents had been observing Ramadan, yet halal food was not provided at all hotels

LONDON: An inquiry has revealed that Kensington and Chelsea Council “badly failed” Muslim survivors of the Grenfell Tower fire by denying them access to halal food while they were temporarily resettled at hotels.
The Independent reported on Wednesday that the inquiry’s final report found that the 2017 fire that had killed 72 people was a result of “decades of failure” by central government and the construction industry to act on the dangers of flammable cladding.
According to the inquiry, Kensington and Chelsea Council should have done more to cater to people from diverse backgrounds because most of the tower residents had been observing Ramadan, yet halal food was not provided at all hotels.
Also, it was impossible to observe the requirement to eat at set times during the holy month.
The inquiry’s findings prompted criticism from the Muslim Council of Britain’s Secretary-General Zara Mohammed, who told the Independent: “The treatment of minority and faith communities by the council highlights wider structural and systemic issues that must be tackled.
“Grenfell remains a stark reminder and trauma for so many, not just the fire but for the way the most vulnerable in our society are treated.
“Much must be learned now, and for those who have been waiting for justice, meaningful change is essential,” said Mohammed.
Dr. Shabna Begum, CEO of the Runnymede Trust, linked race, Grenfell and wider housing inequalities — and warned that it was “a matter of time until a tragedy of the same scale will happen again.”
“The Grenfell fire was a preventable tragedy, marred at every point by structural and direct racism — from those who were killed, to the treatment of survivors, the bereaved, and the wider community, as the latest report from the inquiry confirms. Seven years since, there is still no justice for the victims and thousands of unsafe buildings still stand across the country,” she said.
“People of color are feeling the harshest impacts of the housing crisis, disproportionately live in unsafe and unsuitable homes, and are often funnelled into the poorest quality and least desirable social housing. As a bare minimum, everyone should have access to safe, suitable, affordable housing,” she added.
The Grenfell inquiry report highlighted the lack of support for people from migrant backgrounds whose first language was not English.
“Those who obtained information about the support available were the first to receive assistance, while those who did not were left behind,” it said.
Interpreters were often not provided, and in some cases, were provided but in the wrong language, the report found.
A Black Lives Matter spokesperson said: “The report confirms what we already know — that we live in a society where a hierarchy of human worth is premised upon the color of your skin, and where ease in accessing basic social goods such as decent housing is determined by your class and race.”
There were also barriers to mental health support for survivors, according to the report.
The head of policy at Action for Race Equality, Meka Beresford, hoped the lessons and recommendations from this report were taken seriously, “as a matter of utmost urgency.”
“Those impacted by the Grenfell tragedy have been systematically failed at every stage,” she told the newspaper.
“The final report published today is clear — if you are Black or Brown, a Muslim, or spoke English as an additional language, you were faced with barriers to even the most basic forms of support following the fire.
“Decades of failure predated the tragedy, and we must not wait any longer to put an end to the pervasive institutional racism and Islamophobia in Britain today,” Beresford said.


Greenland court extends anti-whaling activist’s time in custody as Japan seeks his extradition

Greenland court extends anti-whaling activist’s time in custody as Japan seeks his extradition
Updated 04 September 2024
Follow

Greenland court extends anti-whaling activist’s time in custody as Japan seeks his extradition

Greenland court extends anti-whaling activist’s time in custody as Japan seeks his extradition
  • The court ruled Wednesday that Canadian-American Paul Watson must remain in detention until Oct. 2 while Denmark’s justice ministry considers the request
  • He was arrested on July 21 when his ship docked in Greenland’s capital

COPENHAGEN: A court in Greenland has again extended the time in custody for a prominent anti-whaling activist as Denmark considers an extradition request from Japan.
The court ruled Wednesday that Canadian-American Paul Watson must remain in detention until Oct. 2 while Denmark’s justice ministry considers the request. Greenland is an autonomous territory of Denmark, which doesn’t have an extradition treaty with Japan.
Watson is the former head of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, whose high-seas confrontations with whaling vessels have drawn widespread attention.
He was arrested on July 21 when his ship docked in Greenland’s capital. Japan’s coast guard sought his arrest over an encounter with a Japanese whaling research ship in 2010, when he was accused of obstructing the crew’s official duties by ordering the captain of his ship to throw explosives.
Watson is said to face up to 15 years in prison.
In a statement, the prosecution noted that Watson has appealed Wednesday’s decision by the Nuuk district court to the High Court of Greenland. One of Watson’s lawyers, Julie Stage, confirmed the appeal.
“We are not satisfied with the outcome,” Stage told The Associated Press.
Omar Todd, the CEO and co-founder of the Captain Paul Watson Foundation, has visited Watson in the detention center outside Nuuk. Todd told the AP on Tuesday that Watson “is doing fine. He is, I guess, getting a little bit accustomed to the life there at the moment. But he is doing well. He is determined and optimistic.”
Watson, who left Sea Shepherd in 2022, was also a leading member of Greenpeace but left in 1977 amid disagreements over his aggressive tactics.


Greta Thunberg arrested at pro-Palestinian demo in Denmark

Greta Thunberg arrested at pro-Palestinian demo in Denmark
Updated 04 September 2024
Follow

Greta Thunberg arrested at pro-Palestinian demo in Denmark

Greta Thunberg arrested at pro-Palestinian demo in Denmark
  • Climate activist occupied a University of Copenhagen building to call for an academic boycott of Israeli universities

COPENHAGEN: Climate activist Greta Thunberg and several others were arrested Wednesday after occupying a University of Copenhagen building to call for an academic boycott of Israeli universities, Danish media reported.
Images on the daily Ekstra Bladet website showed the 21-year-old activist, wearing a black-and-white keffiyeh shawl draped over her shoulders, being escorted out of a campus building by police.
Thunberg herself shared images on Instagram of riot police entering a building where the group “Students against the Occupation” were staging a protest.
“I can’t confirm the names of those arrested, but six people have been arrested in connection with the demonstration,” a Copenhagen police spokesman told AFP.
Three of them “are suspected of forcing their way into the building and blocking the entrance,” he said.
The six were released several hours later, the spokesman told AFP, and video footage published by Ekstra Bladet showed Thunberg walking out of the police station.
Students against the Occupation said in an Instagram statement that “while the situation in Palestine only gets worse, the University of Copenhagen continues cooperation with academic institutions in Israel.”
“We are occupying” the university’s “central administration with one demand: academic boycott now.”
Pro-Palestinian protesters have set up encampments at universities around the United States and Europe since last spring to protest against Israel’s bombardment of Gaza and occupation of Palestinian territories.


Lavrov warns US not to mock Russia’s ‘red lines’

Lavrov warns US not to mock Russia’s ‘red lines’
Updated 04 September 2024
Follow

Lavrov warns US not to mock Russia’s ‘red lines’

Lavrov warns US not to mock Russia’s ‘red lines’
  • Lavrov said the US was losing sight of the sense of mutual deterrence that had underpinned the balance of security between Moscow and Washington since the Cold War
  • “I won’t be surprised by anything — the Americans have already crossed the threshold they set for themselves,” Lavrov told a Russian TV interviewer

MOSCOW: Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, responding to a question about the potential delivery of long-range US missiles to Ukraine, warned the United States on Wednesday not to joke about Russia’s “red lines.”
Lavrov said the US was losing sight of the sense of mutual deterrence that had underpinned the balance of security between Moscow and Washington since the Cold War, and that this was dangerous.
He was commenting on a Reuters report that the US is close to an agreement to supply Ukraine with long-range JASSM cruise missiles that could reach deep inside Russia — for which Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been lobbying.
“I won’t be surprised by anything — the Americans have already crossed the threshold they set for themselves. They are being egged on, and Zelensky of course sees this and takes advantage of it,” Lavrov told a Russian TV interviewer.
“But they should understand — they are joking about our red lines here. They shouldn’t joke about our red lines.”
President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly warned the West since launching what he called his “special military operation” in Ukraine in 2022 not to try to thwart Russia, which has the world’s biggest arsenal of nuclear weapons.
But Washington and its allies have increased military aid to Ukraine, including by providing tanks, advanced missiles and F-16 fighter jets.
That has prompted some Western politicians to suggest Putin’s nuclear rhetoric is a bluff and that the US and NATO should go all-out to help Ukraine win the war. Zelensky has said Ukraine’s incursion into Russia, launched on Aug. 6, makes a mockery of Putin’s red lines.
Lavrov said Washington knew where these limits lay but was wrong if it believed the consequences of any escalation of the war in Ukraine would be suffered mainly by Europe.
“They have a genetic conviction that no one will touch them,” Lavrov said. This, he said, undermined all the principles that had underpinned strategic stability with Washington since Soviet times.
“This feeling of mutual deterrence — for some reason they are starting to lose it. This is dangerous,” he said.

WARNINGS
Lavrov alluded to remarks by White House national security adviser John Kirby, who said in June that President Joe Biden had repeatedly said Washington was not looking for “World War Three.”
Kirby said a major escalation of the Ukraine war could have “disastrous consequences, potentially, across the European continent” and would not be good for US interests.
It was the second time in just over a week that Lavrov has cautioned the US that a third world war would not be confined to Europe.
The Kremlin said on Wednesday Russia was making changes to its nuclear doctrine because Washington and its allies were threatening Russia by escalating the war in Ukraine and riding roughshod over what it called Moscow’s legitimate security interests.
It has not said how it plans to update the policy document setting out the circumstances in which it might use a nuclear weapon, or when the changes will take effect.


Far-right’s victory in German state election puts migrants on edge

Far-right’s victory in German state election puts migrants on edge
Updated 04 September 2024
Follow

Far-right’s victory in German state election puts migrants on edge

Far-right’s victory in German state election puts migrants on edge
  • Razok, 39, fears racism will worsen in Thuringia even if the Alternative for Germany is unlikely to be able to form a government
  • “It’s like having a huge mole on your face as you walk down the street — people look at you in a strange way”

BERLIN: Syrian doctor Humam Razok felt relief when he arrived in Germany nine years ago after fleeing Damascus, where he had been jailed twice for his political beliefs.
But the far-right AfD party’s victory in an election on Sunday in the eastern state of Thuringia where he lives, and the daily racism he says his wife encounters, have convinced him to leave the state once she graduates.
Razok, 39, fears racism will worsen in Thuringia even if the Alternative for Germany is unlikely to be able to form a government because other parties refuse to work with it.
“It’s like having a huge mole on your face as you walk down the street — people look at you in a strange way. We are still seen as new or unfamiliar to them,” Razok said.
He was one of more than 10 migrants Reuters spoke to in Thuringia. All shared experiences of racism and said they were anxious about the rise of the far-right.
The nationalist, anti-migrant AfD won nearly 33 percent of votes in Thuringia and came a close second, with over 30 percent of votes, in neighboring Saxony. It is the first far-right party to win a state legislature election in Germany since World War Two.
Razok quickly learned German following his arrival from Syria, and works as an anaesthetist at a hospital near the state capital of Erfurt. He says he is respected by patients and is satisfied with the atmosphere at work but that his wife, who wears a headscarf, faces racism every day.
“I am very careful on the street. If I speak Arabic with my wife, I try to keep it down or switch to German if someone is close by,” Razok said.
He said he was not surprised by the AfD’s election success but was disappointed, and that its rise had emboldened some of his work colleagues to openly voice support for the party.
Other migrants he knows in Thuringia, where foreigners make up 7.6 percent of the population, are also afraid, Razok said.
“Only a minority (of them) still want to live here,” he said, adding that he plans to move to one of Germany’s western states once his wife graduates as a pharmacist.
Skilled workers are desperately needed in Thuringia, where more than three in four health care vacancies could not be filled with a suitable applicant within a year, according to data compiled by the IAB labor market research institute.
If this trend continues, it could exacerbate the labor shortage in Thuringia, where the number of employed people is expected to shrink by about 20 percent by 2040, twice the national average, according to a study by the Bertelsmann Foundation.

MIGRATION TRAUMA
Nearly half the people who voted in Thuringia supported either the AfD or the Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance (BSW), which also called for tighter asylum policies and won 15.8 percent of votes.
German Finance Minister Christian Lindner blamed the outcome on the federal government’s migration policy, saying Germans were fed up with the fact that the government may have lost control of immigration and asylum.
A deadly attack by a Syrian asylum seeker in the western city of Solingen a week earlier had intensified voters’ concerns about unregulated migration, said Hermann Binkert, head of the German Institute for New Social Answers (INSA).
“Also, there is still a bit of that trauma from 2015,” he said, referring to the impact of former Chancellor Angela Merkel’s decision in 2015 to allow over a million asylum seekers to cross the border into Germany.
The Solingen attack prompted Germany’s federal government to introduce measures to tighten asylum policies and accelerate deportations.
The arrival of refugees fleeing war in Ukraine and a rise in asylum applications in 2023 have also fueled public debate on migration, said Zeynep Yanaşmayan-Wegele, a researcher at the German Center for Integration and Migration Research (DeZIM).
She said social problems, such as a lack of affordable housing and labor shortages, were often oversimplified by politicians and wrongly attributed to migration, making it very difficult to “depoliticize” the topic.

HATE CRIMES
Hate crimes surged nearly 50 percent in Germany to 17,007 cases in 2023, according to data released by the Federal Criminal Police Office, which put the rise down largely to a rise in xenophobic offenses which it said were mostly linked to right-wing extremism.
Yara Mayassah, an integration social worker in Erfurt, attributes the AfD’s rise to what she sees as the wrong focus in Germany’s integration policies.
“It’s an awareness problem. Since we arrived in Germany, all initiatives have focused on educating and raising awareness among migrants. But we’ve never worked on raising the awareness of the host community,” Mayassah said.
Ali Hwajeh, 28, a psychology student in Thuringia, said he feared the AfD’s success would embolden its supporters to physically attack refugees.
“I’ll stay for now and see how things develop. If the situation worsens — if there’s aggression, if people get injured— then my decision might change,” he said.