UK launches armed forces review after NATO summit

UK launches armed forces review after NATO summit
Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer holds a press conference at the end of the NATO 75th anniversary summit at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center in Washington, DC on July 11, 2024. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 16 July 2024
Follow

UK launches armed forces review after NATO summit

UK launches armed forces review after NATO summit
  • The review, which will be headed by former defense secretary and NATO secretary general George Robertson, will “ensure a ‘NATO-first’ policy is at the heart of Britain’s defense plans”

LONDON: UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer — just back from a NATO summit — launched on Tuesday a review of Britain’s armed forces to set out a path to increasing defense spending to 2.5 percent of GDP.
The ministry of defense said the “Strategic Defense Review” would begin work “immediately in recognition of the urgency of the threats facing the UK,” and aim to deliver a report in the first half of 2025.
Launched less than two weeks after coming to power, prioritising the review is the government’s response to Conservative Party efforts to cast doubts about Labour’s commitment to defense.
During the election campaign, popular attack lines from the Tories included Starmer’s lack of timeframe for increasing defense spending and claims that Labour was a “danger” to national security.
At last week’s NATO summit in Washington, Starmer reaffirmed the UK’s support for the Western military alliance and its “serious commitment” to spending 2.5 percent of its GDP on defense.
The review, which will be headed by former defense secretary and NATO secretary general George Robertson, will “ensure a ‘NATO-first’ policy is at the heart of Britain’s defense plans.”
Starmer said the review would make sure “that defense spending is responsibly increased.”
It will be overseen by current defense secretary John Healey, who said “at the start of a new era for Britain, we need a new era for defense.”
“The Review will ensure that Defense is central to the future security of Britain and to its economic growth and prosperity,” Healey added.
The defense secretary had urged NATO to consider moving toward a 2.5 percent goal at the 75th anniversary summit last week, with NATO allies having committed in 2014 to reach a 2-percent goal.
Other specific aims of the review include “bolstering Ukraine in its fight against Russian aggression” and to “modernize and maintain the nuclear deterrent.”
Starmer at the summit recommitted to £3 billion ($3.9 billion) a year of military support for Ukraine until 2030-31.


Biden talks with Zelensky, announces new military aid for Kyiv

Biden talks with Zelensky, announces new military aid for Kyiv
Updated 10 sec ago
Follow

Biden talks with Zelensky, announces new military aid for Kyiv

Biden talks with Zelensky, announces new military aid for Kyiv

WASHINGTON: US President Joe Biden spoke with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky on Friday and announced a new round of military aid for Kyiv, the White House said.
The call between the two leaders came ahead of Ukraine’s independence day, and on the same day that Washington announced sweeping sanctions against hundreds of individuals and companies tied to Russia’s invasion of the country.
“I am proud we will announce a new package of military aid for Ukraine today,” Biden said in a statement, without specifying the dollar value of the assistance.
“The package includes air defense missiles to protect Ukraine’s critical infrastructure; counter-drone equipment and anti-armor missiles to defend against Russia’s evolving tactics on the battlefield; and ammunition for frontline soldiers and the mobile rocket systems that protect them,” he said.
“Russia will not prevail in this conflict. The independent people of Ukraine will prevail — and the United States, our allies, and our partners, will continue to stand with them every step of the way,” Biden added.
The United States has been a key military backer of Ukraine, committing more than $55 billion in weapons, ammunition and other security aid since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in February 2022.
The latest aid announcement comes as Ukrainian troops press an attack into Russia’s western Kursk region — an offensive that is the most serious attack by a foreign army on Russian territory since World War II.
Earlier on Friday, the US Treasury, State and Commerce departments announced new sanctions that build on a raft of existing measures enacted against Russia over the invasion.
The sanctions target nearly 400 individuals and entities both inside and outside of Russia “whose products and services enable Russia to sustain its war effort and evade sanctions,” the US Treasury Department announced in a statement.
Among those sanctioned were 60 Russia-based defense and technology firms “critical for the sustainment and development of Russia’s defense industry,” it added.
The State Department said in a separate statement that it was responsible for 190 of the sanctions, and that Treasury was responsible for close to 200 others.
It added that its designations “aim to disrupt sanctions evasion and target entities in multiple third countries,” including China, along with businesses supporting the development of Russian energy projects.
Alongside the sanctions unveiled Friday, the Commerce Department announced it was taking “aggressive action” to further restrict the supply of items made in the United States, or labeled as such, to both Russia and Belarus, due to “the Kremlin’s illegal war on Ukraine.”
“Today’s actions will further constrain Russia’s ability to arm its military by targeting illicit procurement networks designed to circumvent global export controls,” the department said in a statement.


The Gaza mothers separated from their newborns by war

The Gaza mothers separated from their newborns by war
Updated 3 min 1 sec ago
Follow

The Gaza mothers separated from their newborns by war

The Gaza mothers separated from their newborns by war
  • “I’m crying all the time,” says Hanane Bayouk, whose children are in the West Bank

JERUSALEM: As their first birthday approaches, the triplets Gaza-native Hanane Bayouk gave birth to in Jerusalem before the war have seen their mother just once, and she fears she will “die without them.”
The 26-year-old had to return to the Palestinian territory alone after giving birth to Najoua, Nour, and Najmeh on August 24, 2023, because her Israeli travel permit had expired.
Bayouk received a permit to exit Gaza and give birth in annexed East Jerusalem’s Al-Maqased Hospital after seven years of painful IVF procedures.
She caught a glimpse of her children in their incubators, “barely an hour and a half,” before driving back to Gaza after her permit “expired and the hospital told me to leave.”
Bayouk was supposed to return in early October after her daughters had spent several weeks in incubators, which were in short supply in hospitals in Gaza even before the Israel-Hamas war erupted last October.
Two days after she applied for a new exit permit on Oct. 5, Hamas commandos blasted through the Erez terminal, the only entry point from Gaza into Israel.
Once in Israel, the militants carried out an unprecedented attack that left 1,198 people dead, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on Israeli official figures.
Israel’s retaliatory military campaign has killed 40,265 Palestinians in Gaza, according to the territory’s Health Ministry, which does not give details of civilian and militant deaths.  The UN rights office says most of the dead have been women or children.
Like Bayouk, Heba Idriss found herself surrounded by war and unable to return to Jerusalem to get her only daughter, Saida, born prematurely at the Maqased two months earlier.
The 27-year-old had hoped to bring her newborn back to her husband Saleh at their home in Shujaiya, in the northern Gaza Strip.
Instead, the couple has been displaced nine times by Israeli air strikes or evacuation orders, and her husband Saleh has only seen pictures of Saida.
“I want to see my daughter. I suffer so much from being separated from her,” she said in tears.
Hanane Bayouk, too, has been forced from her home and now lives in a displacement persons’ camp in the south, sharing a tent with seven of her in-laws.
“It drives me crazy. It took me so long to get pregnant, and now I’m crying all the time,” she said on one of the rare days she was able to get through on Gaza’s struggling phone network.
“Sometimes, I think I’d like for my daughters to return to Gaza before I die because I have never kissed them, but then I get a hold of myself and tell myself they should be safe far from the war,” she said.
Back at the Maqased, neonatal intensive care unit director Hatem Khammach says that in normal times, there would not have been space to keep Nour, Najmeh, and Najoua for so long.
But the number of births at the hospital has fallen sharply as Israel has stopped issuing travel permits to mothers from Gaza and slashed the number given to mothers from the occupied West Bank.
With more checkpoints closed more often, even those with permits struggle to access specialist treatment in Jerusalem.
“Before the war, we had seven or eight Gaza babies in our department, which can host 30 at a time,” Khammach said.
Since October, none have come, “many sick people from the West Bank can’t reach us.”
But the hospital’s health workers keep busy, like those who call Bayouk to let her speak to her three daughters on the phone.
“My husband can’t do it. I do it, and I cry every time we hang up. I’m afraid my daughters will grow up without knowing me,” Bayouk said.


Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says he’s suspending his presidential bid and doesn’t want to help Harris

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says he’s suspending his presidential bid and doesn’t want to help Harris
Updated 7 min 8 sec ago
Follow

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says he’s suspending his presidential bid and doesn’t want to help Harris

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says he’s suspending his presidential bid and doesn’t want to help Harris
  • Disowns court filing that said he would be endorsing Republican candidate Donald Trump
  • Says his supporters can continue to back him in the majority of states where they are unlikely to sway the outcome

PHOENIX, Arizona: Robert F. Kennedy said Friday he’s suspending his independent presidential bid and will seek to remove his name from the ballot in battleground states because he believes his presence in the race would help Democratic nominee Kamala Harris.
He said his supporters can continue to back him in the majority of states where they are unlikely to sway the outcome. Kennedy took steps to withdraw his candidacy in at least two states late this week, Arizona and Pennsylvania.
Kennedy said the move followed conversations with Donald Trump over the past few weeks.
Before the speech, his campaign had said in a Pennsylvania court filing Friday that he would be endorsing Trump for president. However, a spokesperson for Kennedy said the court filing had been made in error.
“Mr. Kennedy has not endorsed President Trump,” said spokesperson Stefanie Spear. “The filing was made by an attorney and not reviewed by the campaign.” She said the filing would be updated.
Kennedy’s independent campaign also requested that he be removed from the Pennsylvania ballot, though it was not immediately clear that he was officially dropping out of the race.
Kennedy had a speech planned in Arizona on Friday to discuss “the present historical moment and his path forward,” according to his campaign. Hours later, Trump will hold a rally in neighboring Glendale. Trump’s campaign has teased that he will be joined by “a special guest,” though neither campaign responded to messages about whether Kennedy would be that guest.
A late-stage endorsement in the presidential race could give the former president a modest boost from Kennedy’s supporters.
A year ago, some would have thought it inconceivable that a member of arguably the most storied family in Democratic politics would work with Trump to keep a Democrat — Vice President Kamala Harris — out of the White House. Even in recent months, Kennedy has accused Trump of betraying his followers, while Trump has criticized Kennedy as “the most radical left candidate in the race.”
The Pennsylvania filing came Friday in a case in which Kennedy was defending his paperwork to get on the ballot in the battleground state against a challenge by two Democratic activists.
The filing said that, “as a result of today’s endorsement of Donald Trump” he was requesting the dismissal of his campaign’s nomination papers so that he would not appear on Pennsylvania’s ballot.
Kennedy already has secured ballot access in several states, including battlegrounds like Michigan and Nevada. Some secretaries of state said it’s too late for him to remove himself even if he wants to do so.
Cheri Hardmon, a spokesperson for Michigan’s Department of State, said its law requires presidential electors be selected at the fall state convention, and that already happened, which means his name will remain on the state’s ballot.
And in Wisconsin, where Kennedy has filed for ballot access and is awaiting approval, there is “no mechanism for him to ‘take back’ the filing,” according to Wisconsin Elections Commission spokesperson Joel DeSpain.
The Kennedy and Trump campaigns have ramped up their compliments to each other and engaged in behind-the-scenes discussions in recent weeks, according to those familiar with the efforts. Both campaigns have spent months accusing Democrats of weaponizing the legal system for their own benefit. And both have hinted publicly that they could be open to joining forces, with the shared goal of limiting Harris’ chances.
Last month, during the Republican National Convention, Kennedy’s son posted and then quickly deleted a video showing a phone call between Kennedy and Trump, in which the former president appeared to try to talk Kennedy into siding with him.
Talks between the two camps continued, with close Trump allies quietly lobbying Kennedy to drop out of the race and support the Republican nominee, according to a person familiar with the efforts who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations.
Trump told CNN on Tuesday that he would “love” an endorsement from Kennedy, whom he called a “brilliant guy.” He also said he would “certainly” be open to Kennedy playing a role in his administration if Kennedy drops out and endorses him.
Kennedy’s running mate, Nicole Shanahan, also openly suggested on a podcast this week that his campaign might “walk away right now and join forces with Donald Trump.” While she clarified that she is not personally in talks with Trump, she entertained the idea that Kennedy could join Trump’s administration as secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services.
“I think that Bobby in a role like that would be excellent,” Shanahan said. “I fully support it. I have high hopes.”
Earlier Friday, Shanahan posted on X that she isn’t a Kamala Democrat or a Trump Republican.
“I’m an INDEPENDENT American who is endorsing ideas, not a person or a party,” she wrote. “I will continue working to give a voice to the voiceless and bring power back to the people.”
At Kennedy’s Phoenix event, 38-year-old Casey Westerman, a Chandler, Arizona, resident who works in software sales, said she trusted Kennedy’s judgment and had planned to vote for him, but would support Trump if Kennedy said that was who he was endorsing.
“My decision would really be based on who he thinks is best suited to run this country,” said Westerman, who wore a “Kennedy 2024” trucker hat and voted for Trump in the last two presidential elections.
The scheduled remarks by Kennedy, a son of former Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy and a nephew of former President John F. Kennedy, come as his campaign’s momentum has slipped.
Kennedy Jr. first entered the 2024 presidential race as a Democrat but left the party last fall to run as an independent. He built an unusually strong base for a third-party bid, fueled in part by anti-establishment voters and vaccine skeptics who have followed his anti-vaccine work since the COVID-19 pandemic. But he has since faced strained campaign finances and mounting legal challenges, including a recent ruling from a New York judge that he should not appear on the ballot in the state because he listed a “sham” address on nominating petitions.
Many members of Kennedy’s extended family have been vocal that they don’t see eye to eye politically with Kennedy Jr., and some came out publicly to endorse Biden before he dropped out of the race.
Recent polls put his support in the mid-single digits. And it’s unclear if he’d get even that in a general election, since third-party candidates frequently don’t live up to their early poll numbers when voters actually cast their ballots.
There’s some evidence that Kennedy’s staying in the race would hurt Trump more than Harris. According to a July AP-NORC poll, Republicans were significantly more likely than Democrats to have a favorable view of Kennedy. And those with a positive impression of Kennedy were significantly more likely to also have a favorable view of Trump (52 percent) than Harris (37 percent).
In an interview with MSNBC at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago on Thursday, Harris communications director Michael Tyler said her campaign welcomes Kennedy voters should the independent candidate drop out.
For voters who see Trump as a threat, who are looking for a new way forward, or who want “government to get the hell out of the way of their own personal decisions, there’s a home for you in Kamala Harris’ campaign,” Tyler said.
For Trump, Friday will mark the end of a week’s worth of battleground state visits in which he has sought to draw attention away from Democrats’ celebration of Harris’ presidential nomination in Chicago.
He traveled to Pennsylvania, Michigan, North Carolina and Arizona’s US-Mexico border for events focused on his policy proposals on the economy, crime and safety, national security and the border. He will close out the week Friday with stops in Las Vegas and Glendale.


US imposes sanctions on 400 more targets for aiding Russia’s war effort

US imposes sanctions on 400 more targets for aiding Russia’s war effort
Updated 23 August 2024
Follow

US imposes sanctions on 400 more targets for aiding Russia’s war effort

US imposes sanctions on 400 more targets for aiding Russia’s war effort
  • Friday’s sanctions include measures against companies in China involved in shipping machine tools and microelectronics to Russia

WASHINGTON: The United States on Friday imposed sanctions on more than 400 entities and individuals for supporting Russia’s war effort in Ukraine, the State Department said, including Chinese firms that US officials believe are helping Moscow to skirt Western sanctions and build up its military.
Washington has repeatedly warned Beijing over its support for Russia’s defense industrial base and has already issued hundreds of sanctions aimed at restricting Moscow’s ability to exploit certain technologies for military purposes.
Friday’s sanctions include measures against companies in China involved in shipping machine tools and microelectronics to Russia, according to a State Department fact sheet outlining its sanctions against 190 targets. The Treasury Department was imposing the remaining sanctions, an official said.
The State Department’s sanctions include moves aimed at stifling Russia’s energy sector and against companies in Turkiye, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Central Asian economies that the US believes are helping Russia evade sanctions, the State Department said.
“Today’s actions hit Russia where it hurts — degrading its ability to generate revenue through its energy projects and disrupting its acquisition of materiel to supply its war machine,” said Aaron Forsberg, the State Department’s director for economic sanctions policy and implementation.
After seizing Crimea from Ukraine in 2014, Russia launched a full-scale invasion of its neighbor in 2022, triggering a host of new US economic sanctions on Moscow.
The war escalated on Aug. 6 when Ukraine sent thousands of soldiers over the border into Russia’s western Kursk region. Kyiv has since announced a string of battlefield successes, but Russian forces continue to steadily inch forward in eastern Ukraine, pressuring troops worn down by 2-and-a-half years of fighting.
Friday’s sanctions targets include the import-export arm of China’s Dalian Machine Tool Group, which the State Department said had supplied $4 million of dual-use items to Russian companies.
China says it has not provided weaponry to Russia for the war in Ukraine, but defends what it calls normal trade between China and Russia.
The latest US sanctions include measures against firms supplying components used in the Orlan drones that Russia is using in Ukraine.
Washington also sought with the sanctions to disrupt future energy projects in Russia and its shipment of liquefied natural gas (LNG). It targeted Russia’s $21 billion Arctic LNG 2 project, which has already been hit by Western sanctions that have curbed its access to ice-class tankers, and other companies involved in future energy projects in Russia, according to the fact sheet.
The sanctions also targeted companies involved in the shipments, like UAE-based White Fox Ship Management, which the US says recently acquired four tankers to ship LNG.


London unveils design of city’s first memorial to victims of transatlantic slavery

London unveils design of city’s first memorial to victims of transatlantic slavery
Updated 23 August 2024
Follow

London unveils design of city’s first memorial to victims of transatlantic slavery

London unveils design of city’s first memorial to victims of transatlantic slavery
  • Memorial to be located at West India Quay, east London
  • Design inspired by cowrie shells, by artist Khaleb Brooks
  • Memorial to be supported by educational program on slavery

LONDON: London is set to have its first memorial to victims of transatlantic slavery, with the mayor’s office announcing on Friday the design of a long-awaited monument seen by advocates as a step toward confronting the past and its legacies.
The memorial will be located at West India Quay, in east London, where warehouses were built in the early 19th century to receive what the mayor’s office has described as “products of slavery,” such as sugar from plantations in the Caribbean. For over 300 years, British ships forcibly transported more than three million enslaved Africans across the Atlantic Ocean, and the City of London was the financial center of the trafficking.
“We know so much of London’s wealth has been built on the backs of enslaved people,” said London’s deputy mayor for communities and social justice, Debbie Weekes-Bernard, as she announced the winning design.
Inspired by the shape of cowrie shells, widely used as currency across Africa to trade enslaved people, ‘The Wake’, by Khaleb Brooks, will be a seven-meter (23 ft) tall bronze sculpture visitors will be able to enter.
Inside, the walls will list names of enslaved people.
“We are our history, it tells us where we’ve been, where we are and the direction we could go,” Brooks said.
The mayor’s office has pledged 500,000 pounds ($655,750.00) to fund the memorial — expected to be installed in 2026 — but it will also need private donations. The total requirement has not been set.
Weekes-Bernard said she hoped the memorial, which will be supported by an educational program about slavery, will be a “step” to help Britain have a wider conversation about its past.
She said confronting history could help tackle some its legacies today, including racial discrimination. “There needs to be a conversation... (about) how history connects to the experiences that Black communities have today.” There are over 900 representational public monuments, such as statues, busts and plaques, across Britain related to transatlantic slavery but the vast majority are linked to enslavers or white abolitionists, according to a survey mapping such monuments. After the US police killing of George Floyd in 2020, Black Lives Matter protests swept the world, with various statues of enslavers and colonizers being toppled, including the statue of trader Edward Colston in Bristol. Critics argued that such actions amounted to the censoring of history.
The idea of having a slavery memorial in London is not new. Campaign group Memorial 2007 had secured planning permission for a site in Hyde Park, and the backing of the then mayor Boris Johnson, but it did not receive government funding and has not yet been built.
Memorial 2007 campaigner Oku Ekpenyon said: “We just have to keep on pushing.”