Obama admits 'contradictory’ Syria policy helps Assad

WASHINGTON: President Barack Obama acknowledged that the US-led military campaign against the Islamic State group and Al-Qaeda’s affiliate in Syria is helping Syrian dictator Bashar Assad, a man the United Nations has accused of war crimes.
“I recognize the contradiction,” Obama said in an interview aired Sunday on CBS’ “60 Minutes.” “We are not going to stabilize Syria under the rule of Assad,” whose government has committed “terrible atrocities,” Obama said.
But Obama said he had no choice but to order US air strikes on Assad’s enemies, the Islamic State and the Khorasan Group because, he said, “those folks could kill Americans.”
The Islamic State group, which derived from but has broken with Al-Qaeda, has taken control of large sections of Iraq and Syria. The Khorasan Group is a cell of militants that the US says is plotting attacks against the West in cooperation with the Nusra front, Syria’s Al-Qaeda affiliate.
Asked how Islamic State fighters had come to control so much territory in Syria and Iraq, Obama acknowledged that US intelligence agencies underestimated the threat and overestimated the ability and will of Iraq’s army to fight. Obama said he agreed with his director of national intelligence, James Clapper, who acknowledged that the US “underestimated what had been taking place in Syria.” Obama also said it was “absolutely true” that the US overestimated the ability and will of the Iraqi army.
Republican Sen. John McCain, who lost the presidential election to Obama in 2008 and has been a frequent critic on foreign policy, said in an interview Monday that the administration had miscalculated the necessity for the United States to keep a residual force of troops in Iraq after the war there ended.
“We predicted exactly what would happen. ... It’s like watching a train wreck,” McCain said on CNN. “A residual force would have stabilized the situation. It is a direct result of our failure to leave a residual force there.”
The United States and the government of then-Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki could not come to terms on agreement providing a residual forces of American troops to remain in Iraq.
Both the Islamic State group and the Khorasan Group have been targeted by US airstrikes in recent days; together they constitute the most significant military opposition to Assad, whose government the US would like to see gone.
Obama said his first priority is degrading the extremists who are threatening Iraq and the West. To defeat them, he acknowledged, would require a competent local ground force, something no analyst predicts will surface any time soon in Syria, despite US plans to arm and train “moderate” rebels. The US has said it would not cooperate with the Assad government.
“Right now, we’ve got a campaign plan that has a strong chance for success in Iraq,” Obama said. “Syria is a more challenging situation.”
Earlier Sunday, House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner questioned Obama’s strategy to destroy the Islamic State group. Boehner said on ABC’s “This Week” that the US may have “no choice” but to send in American troops if the mix of US-led airstrikes and a ground campaign reliant on Iraqi forces, Kurdish fighters and moderate Syrian rebels fails to achieve that goal.
“These are barbarians. They intend to kill us,” Boehner said. “And if we don’t destroy them first, we’re going to pay the price.”
Obama, though, made clear he has no interest in a major US ground presence beyond the 1,600 American advisers and special operations troops he already has ordered to Iraq.
“We are assisting Iraq in a very real battle that’s taking place on their soil, with their troops,” the president said. “This is not America against ISIL. This is America leading the international community to assist a country with whom we have a security partnership.”
Only the US can lead such a campaign, Obama said.
“That’s always the case,” he said. “We are the indispensable nation. We have capacity no one else has. Our military is the best in the history of the world. And when trouble comes up anywhere in the world, they don’t call Beijing. They don’t call Moscow. They call us.”