Richard III maligned as hunchback

LONDON: He may have had a twisted spine, but England’s King Richard III was no hunchback, according to a new analysis of the medieval king’s skeleton.
After the bones of the 15th-century king were discovered under a parking lot in central England in 2012, scientists scanned the remains of Richard III’s back and created replicas of each bone to reconstruct his spine. The researchers said while Richard III had a severe case of scoliosis, he was far from the limping “hunchbacked toad” with a withered arm depicted in William Shakespeare’s play.
“Richard had a very squishy spine but it wouldn’t have stuck out that obviously,” said Piers Mitchell of the University of Cambridge, one of the study’s authors. He said it was technically inaccurate to describe Richard III as a hunchback because his spine was bent sideways rather than forward. “Unless you were pretty close to him, it’s unlikely you would have noticed anything very wrong with him,” Mitchell said.
He said the king’s head and neck were straight, but his right shoulder was higher than his left and his upper body was relatively short compared to his limbs.
“With some padded shoulders or if the height of his trousers was adjusted, a sympathetic tailor could have hidden Richard’s twisted back,” Mitchell said. By analyzing the king’s remains, Mitchell and his colleagues also found that his scoliosis developed during adolescence and as a result he was a few inches shorter than he otherwise would have been.
Richard III died in 1485, the last English king killed on a battlefield. The new study was published online Thursday in the journal Lancet.Some historians say the finding confirms contemporary accounts suggesting that Richard III had only a slight deformity.
“There are some people who referred to Richard’s ‘crooked back’ but others are polite enough to ignore it,” said Steven Gunn, an associate professor of history at Oxford University who was not part of the new research.