‘Frightening’: Trump’s historic power grab worries experts

‘Frightening’: Trump’s historic power grab worries experts
US President Donald Trump's long shadow has extended far beyond Washington’s institutions, pushing into private realms his predecessors avoided. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 19 July 2025
Follow

‘Frightening’: Trump’s historic power grab worries experts

‘Frightening’: Trump’s historic power grab worries experts

WASHINGTON: Donald Trump has spent six months testing the limits of his authority like no other modern US president, say analysts — browbeating Congress and the courts in a power grab that may come to define his second term.

Since January, the Republican leader has repeatedly pushed to secure more power for himself, calling for judges to be axed, firing independent watchdogs and sidestepping the legislative process.

Barbara Perry, a University of Virginia professor and an expert on the presidency, called Trump’s successes in shattering the restraints on his office “frightening.”

“All presidents have been subject to Congress’s and the Supreme Court’s checks on their power, as well as splits in their own political parties,” she said.

“Trump has faced almost none of these counterpoints in this second term.”

It is all a far cry from his first stint in office, when Trump and his supporters believe he was hamstrung by investigations and “deep state” officials seeking to frustrate his agenda.

But those guardrails have looked brittle this time around as Trump has fired federal workers, dismantled government departments and sent military troops into the streets to quell protest.

He has also sought to exert his influence well beyond traditional presidential reach, ruthlessly targeting universities and the press, and punishing law firms he believes have crossed him.

Checks and balances

The US system of checks and balances — the administration, the courts and Congress as equal but separate branches of government — is designed to ensure no one amasses too much power.

But when it comes to Trump’s agenda — whether ending diversity efforts and birthright citizenship or freezing foreign aid — he has largely dodged the hard work of shepherding bills through Congress.

Policies have instead been enacted by presidential edict.

Six months in, Trump has already announced more second-term executive orders than any American leader since Dwight Eisenhower in the 1950s.

He has even sought to bend the economy to his will, escalating attacks on the chief of the independent central bank in a bid to lower interest rates.

Once a robust restraining force against presidential overreach, the Republican-led Congress has largely forsaken its oversight role, foregoing the investigations that previous presidents have faced.

That has left the judiciary as the main gatekeeper.

But Trump has managed partly to neuter the authority of the federal bench too, winning a Supreme Court opinion that mostly reduces the reach of judges’ rulings to their own states.

In his first term the high court made Trump immune from prosecution for actions taken as part of his official duties — no matter how criminal.

And almost every time Trump has turned to the country’s highest legal tribunal to rein in the lower courts in his second term, it has obliged.




The shadow of US President Donald Trump is shown on the text of The Declaration of Independence during the first presidential debate with Trump and Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden at Case Western Reserve University on September 29, 2020 in Cleveland, Ohio. (AFP/File)

'Project 2025'

His long shadow has extended far beyond Washington’s institutions, pushing into private realms his predecessors avoided.

Trump has picked fights with elite universities, prestigious law firms and the press — threatening funding or their ability to do business.

The arts haven’t escaped his clunking fist either, with the 79-year-old taking over the running of the Kennedy Center in Washington.

Trump has claimed falsely that the US Constitution gives him the right to do whatever he wants as the ultimate authority over government activities.

This so-called “unitary executive theory” was pushed in the “Project 2025” blueprint for government produced by Trump’s right-wing allies during last year’s election campaign.

Although he disavowed “Project 2025” after it became politically toxic, Trump’s own platform made the same claims for expansive presidential powers.

Pessimistic about the other branches’ ability to hold the administration to account, the minority Democrats have largely been limited to handwringing in press conferences.

Political strategist Andrew Koneschusky, a former senior Democratic Senate aide, believes the checks on Trump’s authority may ultimately have to be political rather than legal or constitutional.

He points to Trump’s tanking polling numbers — especially on his signature issue of immigration following mass deportations of otherwise law-abiding undocumented migrants.

“It’s not entirely comforting that politics and public opinion are the primary checks on his power,” Koneschusky said.

“It would be better to see Congress flex its muscle as a co-equal branch of government. But it’s at least something.”

 


South Korea prosecutors raid party HQ after ex-first lady arrested

South Korea prosecutors raid party HQ after ex-first lady arrested
Updated 6 sec ago
Follow

South Korea prosecutors raid party HQ after ex-first lady arrested

South Korea prosecutors raid party HQ after ex-first lady arrested
  • Former first lady Kim Keon Hee was arrested late Tuesday on a range of charges including stock manipulation and corruption, prosecutors said
SEOUL: South Korean prosecutors raided the headquarters of the former party of jailed ex-president Yoon Suk Yeol on Wednesday to gather evidence in an election meddling case against his wife, a day after she was arrested on corruption and other charges.
Former first lady Kim Keon Hee was arrested late Tuesday on a range of charges including stock manipulation and corruption, prosecutors said.
Her arrest came hours after Seoul Central District Court reviewed the prosecutors’ request for an arrest warrant against the 52-year-old.
The court granted the warrant, citing the risk of tampering with evidence, after prosecutors submitted an 848-page opinion laying out Kim’s alleged “unlawful acts.”
Prosecutors said Wednesday they raided the People Power Party office to collect evidence of Kim’s alleged meddling in parliamentary elections.
Yoon quit the party in May after his removal from office but endorsed its candidate in the snap presidential election that was won by the Democratic Party’s Lee Jae Myung.
Opposition leader Song Eon-seog slammed the raid as “nothing short of gangster behavior.”
“I cannot contain my outrage at the Lee Jae Myung administration’s ruthless political persecution and retaliation against the opposition, spearheaded by the special prosecution,” Song said at a news briefing.
With the arrest, South Korea now has a former president and first lady both behind bars for the first time in the nation’s history.
The charges against Kim include violations of capital market and financial investment laws, as well as political funds laws.
The arrest caps a dramatic fall for the former first couple after Yoon’s stunning martial law declaration on December 3, which saw soldiers deployed to parliament but was swiftly voted down by opposition MPs.
Yoon, a former top prosecutor, was impeached and removed from office in April over the martial law declaration, prompting the country to hold a snap election in June.
He has been in detention since July 10.
Last week, Kim underwent hours-long questioning by prosecutors, who filed for an arrest warrant the next day.
“I sincerely apologize for causing trouble despite being a person of no importance,” Kim said as she arrived at the prosecutors’ office on Wednesday.
Controversy has long surrounded Kim, with lingering questions about her alleged role in stock manipulation.
Public criticism was reignited in 2022 when a left-wing pastor filmed himself presenting her with a Dior handbag that she appeared to accept.
She is also accused of interfering in the nomination process for MPs in Yoon’s party, a violation of election laws.
Yoon, as president, vetoed three special investigation bills passed by the opposition-controlled parliament that sought to probe the allegations against Kim, with the last veto issued in late November.
A week later, Yoon declared martial law.
Investigators also searched an interior company allegedly linked to Kim in connection with suspected favoritism in repairs to the presidential office.
While she would typically have been held at the same detention center as her husband, prosecutors on Monday requested that she be detained at a separate facility about 20 kilometers (13 miles) away.
Her Presidential Security Service protection was terminated once the warrant was issued.
Kim can be held for up to 20 days as prosecutors prepare to formally indict her, legal expert Kim Nam-ju told AFP.
“Once Kim is indicted, she could remain detained for up to six months,” the lawyer said.
The former first lady can challenge the warrant in court as unlawful, “but given the current circumstances, there appears to be a high risk of evidence destruction, making it unlikely that the warrant will be revoked and the individual released,” he added.
“Another option is bail, but this too is not granted if there are concerns about the destruction of evidence.”

Vietnam wants to be the next Asian tiger and it’s overhauling its economy to make it happen

Vietnam wants to be the next Asian tiger and it’s overhauling its economy to make it happen
Updated 44 min 34 sec ago
Follow

Vietnam wants to be the next Asian tiger and it’s overhauling its economy to make it happen

Vietnam wants to be the next Asian tiger and it’s overhauling its economy to make it happen
  • Vietnam is launching its biggest economic overhaul in a generation, aiming to become Asia’s next “tiger economy with reforms focused on tech, green energy and AI
  • For the first time, the ruling Communist Party is calling Vietnam’s private sector the most important force in the economy

HANOI: Beneath red banners and a gold bust of revolutionary leader Ho Chi Minh in Hanoi’s central party school, Communist Party chief To Lam declared the arrival of “a new era of development” late last year. The speech was more than symbolic— it signaled the launch of what could be Vietnam’s most ambitious economic overhaul in decades.

Vietnam aims to get rich by 2045 and become Asia’s next “tiger economy” — a term used to describe the earlier ascent of countries like South Korea and Taiwan.

The challenge ahead is steep: Reconciling growth with overdue reforms, an aging population, climate risks and creaking institutions. There’s added pressure from President Donald Trump over Vietnam’s trade surplus with the US, a reflection of its astounding economic trajectory.

In 1990, the average Vietnamese could afford about $1,200 worth of goods and services a year, adjusted for local prices. Today, that figure has risen by more than 13 times to $16,385.

Vietnam’s transformation into a global manufacturing hub with shiny new highways, high-rise skylines and a booming middle class has lifted millions of its people from poverty, similar to China. But its low-cost, export-led boom is slowing, while the proposed reforms — expanding private industries, strengthening social protections, and investing in tech, green energy. It faces a growing obstacle in climate change.

“It’s all hands on deck...We can’t waste time anymore,” said Mimi Vu of the consultancy Raise Partners.

The export boom can’t carry Vietnam forever

Investment has soared, driven partly by US-China trade tensions, and the US is now Vietnam’s biggest export market. Once-quiet suburbs have been replaced with industrial parks where trucks rumble through sprawling logistics hubs that serve global brands.

Vietnam ran a $123.5 billion trade surplus with the US trade in 2024, angering Trump, who threatened a 46 percent US import tax on Vietnamese goods. The two sides appear to have settled on a 20 percent levy, and twice that for goods suspected of being transshipped, or routed through Vietnam to avoid US trade restrictions.

During negotiations with the Trump administration, Vietnam’s focus was on its tariffs compared to those of its neighbors and competitors, said Daniel Kritenbrink, a former US ambassador to Vietnam. “As long as they’re in the same zone, in the same ballpark, I think Vietnam can live with that outcome,” he said. But he added questions remain over how much Chinese content in those exports might be too much and how such goods will be taxed.

Vietnam was preparing to shift its economic policies even before Trump’s tariffs threatened its model of churning out low-cost exports for the world, aware of what economists call the “middle-income trap,” when economies tend to plateau without major reforms.

To move beyond that, South Korea bet on electronics, Taiwan on semiconductors, and Singapore on finance, said Richard McClellan, founder of the consultancy RMAC Advisory.

But Vietnam’s economy today is more diverse and complex than those countries were at the time and it can’t rely on just one winning sector to drive long-term growth and stay competitive as wages rise and cheap labor is no longer its main advantage.

It needs to make “multiple big bets,” McClellan said.

Vietnam’s game plan is hedging its bets

Following China’s lead, Vietnam is counting on high-tech sectors like computer chips, artificial intelligence and renewable energy, providing strategic tax breaks and research support in cities like Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, and Danang.

It’s also investing heavily in infrastructure, including civilian nuclear plants and a $67 billion North–South high-speed railway, that will cut travel time from Hanoi to Ho Chi Minh City to eight hours.

Vietnam also aspires to become a global financial center. The government plans two special financial centers, in bustling Ho Chi Minh City and in the seaside resort city of Danang, with simplified rules to attract foreign investors, tax breaks, support for financial tech startups, and easier ways to settle business disputes.

Underpinning all of this is institutional reform. Ministries are being merged, low-level bureaucracies have been eliminated and Vietnam’s 63 provinces will be consolidated into 34 to build regional centers with deeper talent pools.

Private business to take the lead

Vietnam is counting on private businesses to lead its new economic push — a seismic shift from the past.

In May, the Communist Party passed Resolution 68. It calls private businesses the “most important force” in the economy, pledging to break away from domination by state-owned and foreign companies.

So far, large multinationals have powered Vietnam’s exports, using imported materials and parts and low cost local labor. Local companies are stuck at the low-end of supply chains, struggling to access loans and markets that favored the 700-odd state-owned giants, from colonial-era beer factories with arched windows to unfashionable state-run shops that few customers bother to enter.

“The private sector remains heavily constrained,” said Nguyen Khac Giang of Singapore’s ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.

Again emulating China, Vietnam wants “national champions” to drive innovation and compete globally, not by picking winners, but by letting markets decide. The policy includes easier loans for companies investing in new technology, priority in government contracts for those meeting innovation goals, and help for firms looking to expand overseas. Even mega-projects like the North-South High-Speed Rail, once reserved for state-run giants, are now open to private bidding.

By 2030, Vietnam hopes to elevate at least 20 private firms to a global scale. But Giang warned that there will be pushback from conservatives in the Communist Party and from those who benefit from state-owned firms.

A Closing Window from climate change

Even as political resistance threatens to stall reforms, climate threats require urgent action.

After losing a major investor over flood risks, Bruno Jaspaert knew something had to change. His firm, DEEP C Industrial Zones, houses more than 150 factories across northern Vietnam. So it hired a consultancy to redesign flood resilience plans.

Climate risk is becoming its own kind of market regulation, forcing businesses to plan better, build smarter, and adapt faster. “If the whole world will decide it’s a priority...it can go very fast,” said Jaspaert.

When Typhoon Yagi hit last year, causing $1.6 billion in damage, knocking 0.15 percent off Vietnam’s GDP and battering factories that produce nearly half the country’s economic output, roads in DEEP C industrial parks stayed dry.

Climate risks are no longer theoretical: If Vietnam doesn’t take strong action to adapt to and reduce climate change, the country could lose 12–14.5 percent of its GDP each year by 2050, and up to one million people could fall into extreme poverty by 2030, according to the World Bank.

Meanwhile, Vietnam is growing old before it gets rich.

The country’s “golden population” window — when working-age people outnumber dependents — will close by 2039 and the labor force is projected to peak just three years later. That could shrink productivity and strain social services, especially since families — and women in particular — are the default caregivers, said Teerawichitchainan Bussarawan of the Center for Family and Population Research at the National University of Singapore.

Vietnam is racing to pre-empt the fallout by expanding access to preventive health care so older adults remain healthier and more independent. Gradually raising the retirement age and drawing more women into the formal workforce would help offset labor gaps and promote “healthy aging,” Bussarawan said.


One of the world’s most polluted cities, Lagos, has banned single-use plastics. It’s not so easy

One of the world’s most polluted cities, Lagos, has banned single-use plastics. It’s not so easy
Updated 47 min 10 sec ago
Follow

One of the world’s most polluted cities, Lagos, has banned single-use plastics. It’s not so easy

One of the world’s most polluted cities, Lagos, has banned single-use plastics. It’s not so easy
  • In Geneva this week, countries including Nigeria are negotiating a treaty to end plastic pollution
  • The city’s over 20 million people contributed 870,000 tons of the world’s 57 million tons of plastic waste in 2024

LAGOS: Nigerian shop manager Olarewanju Ogunbona says he uses Styrofoam and plastic packs at least five times a day — nothing unusual in the megacity of Lagos, one of the world’s most plastics-polluted urban areas.

The city’s over 20 million people contributed 870,000 tons of the world’s 57 million tons of plastic waste in 2024. Lagos state authorities last month imposed a ban on single-use plastics, but residents say weak enforcement and the absence of alternatives have weakened its effectiveness.

Under the law that kicked off on July 1, the use of single-use plastics such as cutlery, plates and straws is banned and offenders risk their businesses being shut down. However, other forms of plastics, which make up a smaller percentage of the city’s waste, are still in use.

The ban is far from being fully implemented, as some shops still display Styrofoam packs on their shelves.

“Sellers are still using it very well,” said Ogunbona, who continues to buy his Styrofoam-packed meals.

A global treaty on plastics

In Geneva this week, countries including Nigeria are negotiating a treaty to end plastic pollution. Such talks broke down last year, with oil-producing countries opposed to any limits on plastic production. In large part, plastics are made from fossil fuels like oil and gas.

Lagos generates at least 13,000 tons of waste daily, almost a fifth of which is plastics, officials have said. In the absence of a proper waste management system, most of it ends up in waterways, clogging canals, polluting beaches and contributing to devastating floods.

Although the state government has promoted the ban on single-use plastics as a major step, watchdogs are skeptical.

“Its effectiveness is limited without strong enforcement, affordable alternatives for low-income vendors and meaningful improvements in the city’s overwhelmed waste management systems,” Olumide Idowu, a Lagos-based environmental activist, told The Associated Press.

The Lagos state government did not respond to a request for comment.

Scraping off labels with razor blades

With the quest for a better life driving millions of Nigerians to Lagos, some in the city are finding ways to manage the pollution. Recent years have seen a rise of private waste managers and sustainability groups helping to tackle the crisis.

At a sorting site in Obalende, a bustling commercial suburb adjacent to the upscale Ikoyi neighborhood, two women with razor blades scraped labels from plastic soft drink bottles. They uncapped the bottles and threw them into different nets, ready to be compressed and sold for recycling.

Competition has become tougher as more people join the work, the women said. The informal network of waste collectors sell to, or sort for, private waste management companies. They can make around around 5,000 naira ($3.26) a day.

But far more work is needed.

Manufacturers have a key role to play in tackling the plastic waste problem, according to Omoh Alokwe, co-founder of the Street Waste Company that operates in Obalende.

“They need to ... ensure that the plastics being produced into the environment are collected back and recycled,” Alokwe said.

Experts also call for a behavioral change among residents for the law banning single-use plastics to be effective.

Lagos residents need alternatives to plastics, shop owner Ogunbona said. Otherwise, “we will keep using them.”


Zelensky, European leaders to speak to Trump ahead of Putin summit

Zelensky, European leaders to speak to Trump ahead of Putin summit
Updated 13 August 2025
Follow

Zelensky, European leaders to speak to Trump ahead of Putin summit

Zelensky, European leaders to speak to Trump ahead of Putin summit
  • Trump agreed last week to the first US-Russia summit since 2021, abruptly shifting course after weeks of voicing frustration with Putin for resisting the US peace imitative
  • The unpredictability of how the summit will play out has fueled European fears that the US and Russian leaders could take far-reaching decisions and even seek to coerce Ukraine into an unfavorable deal

BRUSSELS/LONDON/KYIV: Europe and Ukraine’s leaders will speak to US President Donald Trump at a virtual meeting on Wednesday ahead of his summit with Russia’s Vladimir Putin, as they try to drive home the perils of selling out Kyiv’s interests in pursuit of a ceasefire.

Trump hosts Putin, a pariah in the West since Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, at talks in Alaska on Friday that the US president has said will serve as a “feel-out” meeting in his efforts to end the Russo-Ukraine war.

Trump agreed last week to the first US-Russia summit since 2021, abruptly shifting course after weeks of voicing frustration with Putin for resisting the US peace imitative. Trump said his envoy had made “great progress” at talks in Moscow.

The US president says both Kyiv and Moscow will have to cede land to end the war. Russian troops have already occupied almost a fifth of Ukraine.

The unpredictability of how the summit will play out has fueled European fears that the US and Russian leaders could take far-reaching decisions and even seek to coerce Ukraine into an unfavorable deal.

“We are focusing now to ensure that it does not happen — engaging with US partners and staying coordinated and united on the European side. Still a lot of time until Friday,” said one senior official from eastern Europe.

Trump’s administration tempered expectations on Tuesday for major progress toward a ceasefire, calling his meeting with Putin in Alaska a “listening exercise.”

The video conference among Trump, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky and the leaders of Germany, Finland, France, Britain, Italy, Poland and the European Union is expected to take place at 1200 GMT (1400 CET), a German government spokesperson said.

NATO’s secretary general will also attend the conference hosted by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz.

Ukraine hopes the meeting will serve — at least partially — as a European counterweight to the summit in Alaska.

European leaders, who are wary of provoking Trump’s ire, have repeatedly emphasized that they welcome his peace efforts, while underlining that there should be no deal about Ukraine without Ukraine’s participation.

Half a dozen senior European officials told Reuters that they see a risk of a deal being struck that is unfavorable for Europe and Ukraine’s security. They said European unity would be vital if that happened. A source familiar with internal US deliberations said it could not be ruled out that Trump would seek a deal directly with Putin without involving Ukraine or Europe. But the source voiced doubt about that, saying it could cause problems with Kyiv and the EU.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Tuesday the summit will be a “listening exercise” for Trump to hear what it will take to get to a deal.

After the call, Trump and Vice President JD Vance were expected to speak to European leaders at a separate online meeting at 1300 GMT (1500 CET), the German spokesperson said.

That will be followed at 1430 GMT by an online meeting of the “coalition of the willing,” a group of countries working on plans to support Ukraine in the event of a ceasefire.

MOUNTING BATTLEFIELD PRESSURE

A Gallup poll released last week found that 69 percent of Ukrainians favor a negotiated end to the war as soon as possible. But polls also show Ukrainians do not want peace at any cost if that means crushing concessions.

Ahead of the calls, Zelensky said it would be impossible for Kyiv to agree to a deal that would require it to withdraw its troops from the eastern Donbas region, a large swathe of which is already occupied by Russia.

That, he told reporters on Tuesday, would deprive Ukraine of a vast defensive network in the region, easing the way for Russia to mount a new push deeper into Ukraine in the future.

Territorial issues, he added, could only be discussed once a ceasefire has been put in place and Ukraine has received security guarantees.

Moscow’s troops have recently ramped up pressure on the battlefield, tightening their stranglehold on the cities of Pokrovsk and Kostyantynivka in eastern Ukraine.


New Zealand prime minister says Israel’s Netanyahu has ‘lost the plot’

New Zealand prime minister says Israel’s Netanyahu has ‘lost the plot’
Updated 13 August 2025
Follow

New Zealand prime minister says Israel’s Netanyahu has ‘lost the plot’

New Zealand prime minister says Israel’s Netanyahu has ‘lost the plot’
  • Luxon said earlier this week New Zealand was considering whether to recognize a Palestinian state

New Zealand’s Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said on Wednesday that Israel’s leader Benjamin Netanyahu had “lost the plot” as the country weighs up whether to recognize a Palestinian state.

Luxon told reporters that the lack of humanitarian assistance, the forceful displacement of people and the annexation of Gaza were utterly appalling and that Netanyahu had gone way too far.

“I think he has lost the plot,” added Luxon, who heads the center-right coalition government. “What we are seeing overnight, the attack on Gaza City, is utterly, utterly unacceptable.”

Luxon said earlier this week New Zealand was considering whether to recognize a Palestinian state. Close ally Australia on Monday joined Canada, the UK and France in announcing it would do so at a UN conference in September.

The humanitarian crisis in Gaza has reached “unimaginable levels,” Britain, Canada, Australia and several of their European allies said on Tuesday, calling on Israel to allow unrestricted aid into the war-torn Palestinian enclave.

Israel has denied responsibility for hunger spreading in Gaza, accusing Hamas militants of stealing aid shipments, which Hamas denies.

Ahead of Wednesday’s parliamentary session, a small number of protesters gathered outside the country’s parliament buildings, beating pots and pans. Local media organization Stuff reported protesters chanted “MPs grow a spine, recognize Palestine.”

On Tuesday, Greens parliamentarian Chloe Swarbrick was removed from parliament’s debating chamber after she refused to apologize for a comment insinuating government politicians were spineless for not supporting a bill to “sanction Israel for its war crimes.”

Swarbrick was ordered to leave the debating chamber for a second day on Wednesday after she again refused to apologize. When she refused to leave, the government voted to suspend her.

“Sixty-eight members of this House were accused of being spineless,” House speaker Gerry Brownlee said. “There has never been a time where personal insults like that delivered inside a speech were accepted by this House and I’m not going to start accepting it.”

As Swarbrick left, she called out “free Palestine.”