Asian garment industry braces for higher US tariffs

Asian garment industry braces for higher US tariffs
An employee checks the quality of clothes at a garment factory in Katunayake, Sri Lanka, on July 12, 2025. (REUTERS)
Short Url
Updated 13 July 2025
Follow

Asian garment industry braces for higher US tariffs

Asian garment industry braces for higher US tariffs
  • High tariffs might force companies to shut down or move to countries that offer lower tariff rates
  • The US is negotiating a deal with India, while reciprocal tariff for Pakistan hasn’t been announced

Dhaka/Phnom Penh: Across Asia, unions and industry groups are raising alarms over the impact of higher tariffs by the United States on garment workers.

High tariffs might force companies to shut down or move to neighboring countries that offer lower tariff rates, resulting in a loss of jobs, they say.

“The potential loss of jobs will cut the income and ability for workers to sustain their daily lives,” said Ath Thorn, vice president of the Coalition of Cambodian Apparel Workers’ Democratic Union, which represents 80,000 workers across 40 factories.

Several countries in Asia have gotten notice of new tariff rates imposed by the United States to take effect August 1, after a 90-day pause on tariffs came to an end.

Manufacturing hubs such as Bangladesh and Cambodia will face high tariffs of 35 percent and 36 percent respectively, while neighboring countries are still negotiating with the US government.

US President Donald Trump announced new tariffs through official letters posted on his social media platform, Truth Social, on July 8.

The US is the largest garment export destination for Bangladesh. The country’s exports to the US totaled $8.4 billion last year and of that, garments comprised $7.34 billion.

Also in 2024, Cambodia exported nearly $10 billion worth of goods to the US, which accounted for nearly 40 percent of the nation’s total exports, according to government customs statistics.

More than half of US imports from Cambodia were garments, footwear and travel goods such as luggage and handbags, a sector that makes up nearly half of the country’s export revenue and employs more than 900,000 workers.

Unions and industry groups warn that these workers could be hit hard with job losses if the high tariffs force companies to move to countries under lower tariff rates or shut down altogether.

While Cambodia is looking at a tariff rate reduction from 49 percent in April, anxiety permeates its garment industry, which employs hundreds of thousands of people and is one of the developing nation’s key economic pillars.

Meanwhile, the US and Vietnam have struck a trade agreement that set 20 percent tariffs on Vietnamese goods.

With a neighbor next door with a significantly lower tariff, many companies may choose to leave Cambodia, said Yang Sophorn, president of the Cambodian Alliance of Trade Unions, which represents thousands of women who support their families as garment workers.

The fear is echoed by experts in Bangladesh, which faces a 35 percent tariff.

Selim Raihan, a professor of economics at the Dhaka University, said if tariff rates on Bangladesh’s competitors like India, Indonesia and Vietnam prove to be lower, Bangladesh would face a serious competitive disadvantage.

Such a disadvantage could make supply chain decision-making more difficult and erode the confidence of buyers and investors, Raihan said.

“As production costs rise and profit margins shrink due to the tariff, many garment factories may be forced to scale back operations or shut down entirely,” Raihan said.

In Bangladesh, the 35 percent tariff announced by the US is more than twice the current 15 percent rate on Bangladeshi goods.

“With more than doubling tariff rates, can you imagine how the cost of the products will rise?” asked Mohiuddun Rubel, a former director of Bangladesh’s garment manufacturers’ association BGMEA and now additional managing director at textile maker Denim Expert Ltd.

The question is what happens to the tariffs for main competitor countries like India and Pakistan, said Rubel.

The US is negotiating a trade deal with India, while reciprocal tariff rates for Pakistan have not been announced yet.

OUTSIZED EFFECT ON WOMEN

Potential layoffs within the garment industry will have an outsized effect on women workers, which Sophorn said would cripple entire families.

“If these women lose their jobs because high tariffs force factories to shut, it will not only impact Cambodia’s economy, but now children may not be able to go to school and aging parents may not be able to afford medicine,” Sophorn said.

“The situation for women garment workers is already bad, but it will get worse if these tariffs were to come into effect.”

Many of the women she represents have taken bank loans to support their families and work in the garment industry to pay off their debts.

“If they lose their job, it means they will lose everything,” Sophorn said.

Tariffs would directly affect a sizable chunk of the four million workers in Bangladesh’s garment industry, most of whom are women from low income and rural backgrounds, Raihan said.

Thorn suggested Cambodia continue negotiations to get the tariffs down or find other ways to export more products, generate more income and create more work.

“If not, we will face problems,” he said.


At UN climate talks in Brazil, the only sign of the United States is an empty chair

At UN climate talks in Brazil, the only sign of the United States is an empty chair
Updated 10 sec ago
Follow

At UN climate talks in Brazil, the only sign of the United States is an empty chair

At UN climate talks in Brazil, the only sign of the United States is an empty chair
  • Brazil President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, whose nation is hosting these talks, urged negotiators not to forget that “the climate emergency is an increase of inequality”

BELEM, Brazil: A litany of recent weather disasters rang long Monday at the opening of UN climate negotiations: Hurricane Melissa in Jamaica, a deadly tornado in Brazil, droughts and fire in Africa. Against that backdrop, activists used an empty chair to drive home the absence from these talks of the United States, the world’s richest nation and second-biggest carbon polluter.

World leaders highlighted the devastation wrought on some of the world’s poorest places to show the need to work collectively to fight global warming, which is fueling extreme weather. But any united front will be without the US, one of only four nations missing the talks, along with tiny San Marino and strife-torn Afghanistan and Myanmar.

The 195 nations who did come to Belem, a weathered city on the edge of the Brazilian Amazon, for the talks known as COP30 were told that only together can they swiftly reduce the emissions from coal, oil and gas that cause climate change.

While the activists’ empty chair primarily illustrated the US absence, it was also intended to be a call-out for other nations “to step in and step up,” Danni Taaffe with Climate Action Network International told The Associated Press.

Those leading the talks sounded a similar note.

“Humanity is still in this fight. We have some tough opponents, no doubt, but we also have some heavyweights on our side. One is the brute power of the market forces as renewables get cheaper,” United Nations climate secretary Simon Stiell said.

A clear mandate

Brazil President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, whose nation is hosting these talks, urged negotiators not to forget that “the climate emergency is an increase of inequality.”

“It deepens the perverse logic that defines who is worthy of living and who should die,” Lula said.

This year’s talks are not expected to produce an ambitious new deal. Instead, organizers and analysts frame this year’s conference as the “implementation COP.” Countries had a clear mandate: arrive with their updated national plans to fight climate change.

On Monday, the United Nations released updated calculations showing that those national pledges promise to reduce projected 2035 global greenhouse gas emissions 12 percent below 2019 levels. That’s 2 points better than last month, before new pledges rolled in.

Attendees on Monday stressed cooperation, with Stiell saying that individual nations simply cannot cut heat-trapping gas emissions fast enough on their own.

André Corrêa do Lago, president of this year’s conference, emphasized that negotiators must engage in “mutirão” — a local Indigenous term that refers to a group uniting to complete a task.

A united front — without the US

Complicating those calls is the absence of the United States, where US President Donald Trump has long denied the existence of climate change.

The UN’s updated figures Monday depend on a US pledge that came from the Biden administration in December — before Trump returned to the White House and began working to boost fossil fuels and block clean energy like wind and solar. His administration did not send high-level negotiators to Belem, and he began his second term by withdrawing for the second time from the 10-year-old Paris Agreement, the first global pact to fight climate change.

The Paris Agreement sought to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) above the historical average, but many scientists now say it’s unlikely countries will stay below that threshold.

The United States has put more heat-trapping carbon dioxide into the air from the burning of coal, oil and natural gas than any other country. China is the No. 1 carbon polluter now, but because carbon dioxide stays in the air for at least a century, more of it was made in the US.

Palau Ambassador Ilana Seid, who chairs the Alliance of Small Island States, said the US withdrawal “has really shifted the gravity” of the negotiating system.

Trump’s actions damage the fight against climate change, former US Special Envoy for Climate Todd Stern said.

“It’s a good thing that they are not sending anyone. It wasn’t going to be constructive if they did,” he said.

Though the US government isn’t showing up, some attendees including former top US negotiators are pointing to US cities, states and businesses that they said will help take up the slack.

‘A tragedy of the present’

Lula and Stiell said the 10-year-old Paris Agreement is working to a degree, but action needs to be accelerated. They pointed to devastation in the past few weeks including Hurricane Melissa in the Caribbean, typhoons smashing Vietnam and the Philippines and a tornado ripping through southern Brazil.

Scientists have said extreme weather events have become more frequent as Earth warms.

“Climate change is not a threat of the future. It is already a tragedy of the present time,’’ Lula said.

Change Preferred Languages

Select Your Preferred Languages

Tap to add languages one at a time (Maximum 5)

Selected: 0/5
Tap to add languages...

We are now in 50 languages

Please login or register with your email to select your preferred languages