X CEO Linda Yaccarino resigns after two years at the helm of Elon Musk’s social media platform

0 seconds of 1 minute, 30 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
01:30
01:30
 
Short Url
Updated 10 July 2025
Follow

X CEO Linda Yaccarino resigns after two years at the helm of Elon Musk’s social media platform

X CEO Linda Yaccarino resigns after two years at the helm of Elon Musk’s social media platform
  • Yaccarino announced her resignation in a post, saying “the best is yet to come as X enters a new chapter”
  • Elon Musk hired Yaccarino, a veteran ad executive, in May 2023 after buying Twitter for $44 billion

X CEO Linda Yaccarino said she’s stepping down after two bumpy years running Elon Musk’s social media platform.

Yaccarino posted a positive message Wednesday about her tenure at the company formerly known as Twitter and said “the best is yet to come as X enters a new chapter with” Musk’s artificial intelligence company xAI, maker of the chatbot Grok. She did not say why she is leaving.

Musk responded to Yaccarino’s announcement with his own 5-word statement on X: “Thank you for your contributions.”

“The only thing that’s surprising about Linda Yaccarino’s resignation is that it didn’t come sooner,” said Forrester research director Mike Proulx. “It was clear from the start that she was being set up to fail by a limited scope as the company’s chief executive.”

In reality, Proulx added, Musk “is and always has been at the helm of X. And that made Linda X’s CEO in title only, which is a very tough position to be in, especially for someone of Linda’s talents.”

Musk hired Yaccarino, a veteran ad executive, in May 2023 after buying Twitter for $44 billion in late 2022 and cutting most of its staff. He said at the time that Yaccarino’s role would be focused mainly on running the company’s business operations, leaving him to focus on product design and new technology. Before announcing her hiring, Musk said whoever took over as the company’s CEO ” must like pain a lot.”

In accepting the job, Yaccarino was taking on the challenge of getting big brands back to advertising on the social media platform after months of upheaval following Musk’s takeover. She also had to work in a supporting role to Musk’s outsized persona on and off of X as he loosened content moderation rules in the name of free speech and restored accounts previously banned by the social media platform.

“Being the CEO of X was always going to be a tough job, and Yaccarino lasted in the role longer than many expected. Faced with a mercurial owner who never fully stepped away from the helm and continued to use the platform as his personal megaphone, Yaccarino had to try to run the business while also regularly putting out fires,” said Emarketer analyst Jasmine Enberg.

Yaccarino’s future at X became unclear earlier this year after Musk merged the social media platform with his artificial intelligence company, xAI. And the advertising issues have not subsided. Since Musk’s takeover, a number of companies had pulled back on ad spending — the platform’s chief source of revenue — over concerns that Musk’s thinning of content restrictions was enabling hateful and toxic speech to flourish.

Most recently, an update to Grok led to a flood of antisemitic commentary from the chatbot this week that included praise of Adolf Hitler.

“We are aware of recent posts made by Grok and are actively working to remove the inappropriate posts,” the Grok account posted on X early Wednesday, without being more specific.

Some experts have tied Grok’s behavior to Musk’s deliberate efforts to mold Grok as an alternative to chatbots he considers too “woke,” such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini. In late June, he invited X users to help train the chatbot on their commentary in a way that invited a flood of racist responses and conspiracy theories.

“Please reply to this post with divisive facts for @Grok training,” Musk said in the June 21 post. “By this I mean things that are politically incorrect, but nonetheless factually true.”

A similar instruction was later baked into Grok’s “prompts” that instruct it on how to respond, which told the chatbot to “not shy away from making claims which are politically incorrect, as long as they are well substantiated.” That part of the instructions was later deleted.

“To me, this has all the fingerprints of Elon’s involvement,” said Talia Ringer, a professor of computer science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.

Yaccarino has not publicly commented on the latest hate speech controversy. She has, at times, ardently defended Musk’s approach, including in a lawsuit against liberal advocacy group Media Matters for America over a report that claimed leading advertisers’ posts on X were appearing alongside neo-Nazi and white nationalist content. The report led some advertisers to pause their activity on X.

A federal judge last year dismissed X’s lawsuit against another nonprofit, the Center for Countering Digital Hate, which has documented the increase in hate speech on the site since it was acquired by Musk.

X is also in an ongoing legal dispute with major advertisers — including CVS, Mars, Lego, Nestle, Shell and Tyson Foods — over what it has alleged was a “massive advertiser boycott” that deprived the company of billions of dollars in revenue and violated antitrust laws.

Enberg said that, “to a degree, Yaccarino accomplished what she was hired to do.” Emarketer expects X’s ad business to return to growth in 2025 after more than halving between 2022 and 2023 following Musk’s takeover.

But, she added, “the reasons for X’s ad recovery are complicated, and Yaccarino was unable to restore the platform’s reputation among advertisers.”

Analysts have said that some advertisers may have returned to X to avoid alienating Trump supporters during the height of Musk’s affiliation with the president and his base. Legal threats may have also played a part — whether from X or from the Federal Trade Commission, which is investigating Media Matters over its reporting that hateful content has increased on X since Musk took over, resulting in an advertiser exodus. Media Matters has in turn sued the FTC, claiming it seeks to punish protected speech.


White House restricts reporters’ access to part of press office

White House restricts reporters’ access to part of press office
Updated 01 November 2025
Follow

White House restricts reporters’ access to part of press office

White House restricts reporters’ access to part of press office
  • Journalists are now barred if they do not have prior approval to access the area known as Upper Press, near the president's office
  • he policy comes amid wider restrictions on journalists by the Trump administration, including new rules at the Pentagon 

WEST PALM BEACH: US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday barred reporters from accessing part of the White House press office without an appointment, citing the need to protect “sensitive material.”

Journalists are now barred if they do not have prior approval to access the area known as Upper Press — which is where Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt’s office is located and is near the Oval Office.

Reporters have until now been able to freely visit the area, often wandering up to try to speak to Leavitt or senior press officers to seek information or confirm stories.

Media are still allowed to access the area known as “Lower Press,” next to the famed White House briefing room, where more junior press officers have their desks, the memo said.

The policy comes amid wider restrictions on journalists by the Trump administration, including new rules at the Pentagon that major outlets including AFP refused to sign earlier this month.

The change at the White House was announced by the National Security Council in a memorandum titled “protecting sensitive material from unauthorized disclosure in Upper Press.”

“This memorandum directs the prohibition of press passholders from accessing... ‘Upper Press,’ which is situated adjacent to the Oval Office, without an appointment,” said the memo, addressed to Leavitt and White house Communications Director Steven Cheung.

“This policy will ensure adherence to best practices pertaining to access to sensitive material.”

It said the change was necessary because White House press officers were now routinely dealing with sensitive materials following “recent structural changes to the National Security Council.”

Trump has gutted the once powerful NSC, putting it under the control of Secretary of State Marco Rubio, after former National Security Adviser Mike Waltz was reassigned in May following a scandal over the use of the Signal app to plan strikes on Yemen.

Trump’s administration has made a major shake-up to access rules for journalists since his return to power in January.

Many mainstream outlets have seen their access to areas like the Oval Office and Air Force One reduced, while right-wing, Trump-friendly outlets have been given more prominence.

The White House also banned the Associated Press news agency from key areas where Trump speaks after it refused to recognize his order changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.

 


Sky News team confronted by Israeli troops during West Bank reportage

Sky News team confronted by Israeli troops during West Bank reportage
Updated 31 October 2025
Follow

Sky News team confronted by Israeli troops during West Bank reportage

Sky News team confronted by Israeli troops during West Bank reportage
  • Adam Parsons and his crew were filming at an olive grove that was the site of a recent attack by Israeli settlers when soldiers approached
  • The reportage highlighted Palestinians’ abandonment of the annual olive harvest, a consequence of the deteriorating security situation

LONDON: A Sky News reporting team was confronted by Israeli troops during a recent assignment in the West Bank, the network disclosed on Friday.

Adam Parsons, Sky News Middle East correspondent, recounted that the Israeli military approached as his crew was filming a segment focused on the olive harvest season in Palestine.

“As we film, an Israeli military vehicle comes along a track and stops in a cloud of dust,” he wrote in the reportage titled “Defiance in the West Bank — despite encroaching threat from ‘unwanted neighbours.’”

Parsons continued: “The soldiers emerge and tell us we have to leave for our own protection, claiming that this olive grove is, in fact, a closed military zone.”

The correspondent, who was visiting the site of a recent attack by Israeli settlers on a Palestinian woman, said the military did not clarify what threat necessitated their departure.

Instead, they showed him and his crew a WhatsApp image of a basic map marked by a rectangle, describing it as a military order.

“We’re then told we can’t leave, and that the police are on the way to arrest us. We discuss the law. And then, as suddenly as it started, it’s over — we’re free to go. It’s just another flare-up on the West Bank.”

In a statement to Sky News, the Israel Defense Forces said troops had been deployed “to thwart terrorism.”

The army also stated it “strongly condemns violence of any kind” and announced a review into the attacks reported by the network.

Violence targeting Palestinians in the West Bank has surged dramatically in recent years.

A growing number of settlers, supported by the government and shielded by military protection, have established makeshift outposts in the territory, often with little accountability.

Incidents of intimidation, harassment, violence, and even killings have become a daily occurrence, preventing Palestinians from accessing essential services and their own land, including olive groves.

Faced with worsening conditions, many Palestinians have abandoned the annual olive harvest, a centuries-old tradition typically observed in October and November. 

Israeli settlements in the West Bank are considered illegal under both international and Israeli laws.

Human rights organizations and UN experts described Israel’s actions in the West Bank as one of “total apartheid.”


Watchdogs call for journalist protection amid El-Fasher blackout

This image grab shows RSF fighters holding weapons and celebrating in the streets of El-Fasher in Sudan’s Darfur. (AFP)
This image grab shows RSF fighters holding weapons and celebrating in the streets of El-Fasher in Sudan’s Darfur. (AFP)
Updated 30 October 2025
Follow

Watchdogs call for journalist protection amid El-Fasher blackout

This image grab shows RSF fighters holding weapons and celebrating in the streets of El-Fasher in Sudan’s Darfur. (AFP)
  • As many as 11 journalists have gone missing since the Sudanese city was captured by the RSF, reports the CPJ
  • An estimated 260,000 civilians remained trapped in the North Darfur capital, with blackout severely limiting external communication

LONDON: Human rights and media organizations are calling for the protection of journalists amid a near-total communications blackout in El-Fasher following the city’s fall to the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces.

A limited and scattered stream of reports have emerged of the ongoing humanitarian catastrophe in the North Darfur capital city, with the Sudanese government accusing the RSF of killing over 2,000 civilians during the past weekend.

The Committee to Protect Journalists reported that as many as 11 journalists have gone missing in El-Fasher, including freelance reporter Muhammad Ibrahim. Ibrahim appeared in a video circulated by the RSF on Sunday, showing him being captured while trying to leave the city.

In a statement on Thursday, the CPJ confirmed it had verified the whereabouts of three of the missing, all of whom have fled the city. The remaining journalists remain incommunicado amid ongoing hostilities and the blackout that severely limits external communication.

“The RSF’s claims that it is solely targeting ‘terrorists’ and not civilians replicate a familiar play-book — first denial of civilian harm, then shifting of blame, and then active suppression of journalists attempting to document the truth,” said Sara Qudah, CPJ regional director.

Fighting has escalated since April 2023, when internal conflicts within Sudan’s military regime erupted into open clashes in Khartoum, quickly spreading across the country.

Over the past weekend, the RSF took control of the last Darfur regional capital following an 18-month siege, expanding its influence across the west and southwest of Sudan.

A comprehensive communications blackout appears to be in effect across large areas of North Darfur, severely restricting external access, impeding independent verification and deepening the isolation of journalists and affected communities.

Multiple sources report that as the RSF advanced it seized journalists, killed a significant number of civilians, and broadcast footage of their operations on social media — a “chilling escalation” in the targeted repression of both the press and the public, according to the CPJ.

An estimated 260,000 civilians are still trapped in the city, half of them children.

“This cycle fosters impunity, stifles independent reporting and erodes accountability,” Qudah said.

“We urge all parties — and the international community — to act immediately to protect journalists, restore communications and ensure accountability for these grave violations.”

On Wednesday, the Sudan Media Forum condemned the attacks, saying they demonstrated “a complete disregard for international law and human dignity.”

The group called on the international community to “exert maximum pressure” on the RSF to allow essential supplies — including food, medicine and aid — to reach the city and to halt what it termed “summary executions” and “ethnically motivated killings.”

The CPJ also urged the imposition of targeted sanctions and accountability measures against RSF leaders, stating: “The world can no longer afford to wait to act in defense of the public’s right to know and for the safety of journalists in El-Fasher.”

Since the war between the RSF and the Sudanese Armed Forces began on April 15, 2023, the RSF has killed at least 14 journalists with dozens more detained, assaulted, raped or disappeared, according to the CPJ’s research.


US jails two men for 25 years over plot to kill Iranian-American reporter

US jails two men for 25 years over plot to kill Iranian-American reporter
Updated 30 October 2025
Follow

US jails two men for 25 years over plot to kill Iranian-American reporter

US jails two men for 25 years over plot to kill Iranian-American reporter
  • Rafat Amirov and Polad Omarov, both members of an eastern European criminal gang, orchestrated a failed plot to assassinate campaigning reporter Alinejad
  • US has accused Iran of seeking to assassinate US officials in retaliation for Washington’s killing of Revolutionary Guards commander Qasem Soleimani in 2020

NEW YORK: A US judge jailed two men for 25 years each Wednesday for a plot allegedly hatched by Tehran to kill Iranian-American journalist Masih Alinejad, her team confirmed to AFP.

Rafat Amirov and Polad Omarov, both members of an eastern European criminal gang, orchestrated a failed plot to assassinate campaigning reporter Alinejad.

“They wanted to see me dead on my porch in Brooklyn and thanks to the law enforcement agencies, I am alive and Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader (of Iran), is humiliated,” Alinejad said outside a Manhattan courthouse following the sentencing, brandishing a sunflower.

“I was nervous but at the same time very empowered to speak the truth,” she added before dancing and singing in Farsi.

Amirov and Omarov were both jailed for 25 years, a spokesman for Alinejad said following the hearing, after prosecutors had sought 55-year terms for each, according to court filings.

According to the Justice Department, the jailed men, members of the eastern European crime network, were “contracted” by Ruhollah Bazghandi — identified as a brigadier general in Iran’s Revolutionary Guards — and other members of his network to murder Alinejad.

In July 2022, a man hired to carry out the assassination was arrested near Alinejad’s New York home with a loaded AK-47 assault rifle, the court heard over the two week trial.

The 49-year-old Alinejad, one of the most prominent dissident campaigners against Iranian authorities, for years has pushed for the abolition of the obligatory headscarf in Iran under the banner of “MyStealthyFreedom.”

She left Iran in 2009.

Charges were unsealed in October 2024 against Bazghandi, a former intelligence officer.

Three other Iranians with “connections to the government of Iran” — Hajj Taher, Hossein Sedighi and Seyed Mohammad Forouzan — were indicted over the affair.

The three are not in US custody and are believed to be in Iran. They face charges of conspiracy to commit murder-for-hire and money laundering.

Tehran has routinely rejected similar US accusations about alleged plots to kill American officials or politicians in the past.

The United States has also accused Iran of seeking to assassinate US officials in retaliation for Washington’s killing of Revolutionary Guards commander Qasem Soleimani in 2020.

The State Department previously announced a $20 million reward for information leading to the arrest of the alleged Iranian mastermind behind a plot to assassinate former White House official John Bolton.


Google, Amazon agree to Israel’s ‘wink’ demand to signal foreign data access, investigation reveals

Google, Amazon agree to Israel’s ‘wink’ demand to signal foreign data access, investigation reveals
Updated 30 October 2025
Follow

Google, Amazon agree to Israel’s ‘wink’ demand to signal foreign data access, investigation reveals

Google, Amazon agree to Israel’s ‘wink’ demand to signal foreign data access, investigation reveals
  • Leaked documents show agreement is part of a $1.2bn cloud-computing deal, Project Nimbus, signed in 2021

DUBAI: Tech giants Google and Amazon agreed to use a secret code to warn their client, the Israeli government, if their data was being handed over to foreign law enforcement, according to a joint investigation by The Guardian, Israeli-Palestinian publication +972 Magazine, and Hebrew-language outlet Local Call.

The agreement was part of a $1.2 billion cloud-computing deal inked in 2021, known as Project Nimbus. It stemmed from Israel’s concerns that the data it stores on these tech companies’ cloud platforms could end up in the hands of foreign law enforcement authorities.

Tech companies must comply with requests from law enforcement and security agencies to hand over customer data for investigative purposes. Moreover, they are often prohibited from informing the customer that their data has been disclosed.

Therefore, Israeli officials developed the so-called “winking” mechanism, under which Google and Amazon would send secret signals, hidden in payments, to the Israeli government, revealing the identity of the country to which they had been compelled to hand over Israeli data.

According to leaked documents from Israel’s Finance Ministry, which include a finalized version of the Nimbus agreement, payments must be made “within 24 hours of the information being transferred” and correspond to the telephone dialing code of the foreign country, amounting to sums between 1,000 ($308) and 9,999 shekels.

For example, if either firm provided information to authorities in the US, where the dialing code is +1, they would have to send the Israeli government 1,000 shekels.

If they share Israeli data with authorities in Italy, where the dialing code is +39, they would have to send 3,900 shekels.

In cases where the companies concluded they were under a gag order preventing them from indicating which country had received the data, they must pay 100,000 shekels to the Israeli government.

The agreement also includes measures that prohibit the US companies from restricting how the Israeli government and its branches, including the military and security services, use their cloud services.

Both companies’ standard “acceptable use” policies state that their cloud platforms should not be used to violate the legal rights of others, nor to engage in or encourage activities that cause “serious harm” to people.

However, according to an Israeli official familiar with the Nimbus project, there can be “no restrictions” on the kind of information stored in Google and Amazon’s cloud platforms.

The leaked documents state that Israel is “entitled to migrate to the cloud or generate in the cloud any content data they wish.”

Legal experts said the agreement is extremely unusual and risky, as the coded messages could violate legal obligations in the US, where Google and Amazon are headquartered.

“It seems awfully cute and something that if the US government or, more to the point, a court were to understand, I don’t think they would be particularly sympathetic,” a former US government lawyer told The Guardian.

Both Google and Amazon’s cloud businesses have denied evading any legal obligations. Neither responded to The Guardian’s questions about whether they had used the “wink.”

An Amazon spokesperson said that the company has a “rigorous global process for responding to lawful and binding orders for requests related to customer data,” adding that there are no “processes in place to circumvent our confidentiality obligations on lawfully binding orders.”

Google declined to comment on which of Israel’s demands it had accepted in the Nimbus deal, but said it was “false” to “imply that we somehow were involved in illegal activity, which is absurd.”

A spokesperson for Israel’s Finance Ministry said: “The article’s insinuation that Israel compels companies to breach the law is baseless.”

Google and Amazon are “bound by stringent contractual obligations that safeguard Israel’s vital interests,” and “we will not legitimize the article’s claims by disclosing private commercial terms,” the spokesperson added.

Change Preferred Languages

Select Your Preferred Languages

Tap to add languages one at a time (Maximum 5)

Selected: 0/5
Tap to add languages...

We are now in 50 languages

Please login or register with your email to select your preferred languages