King Charles hosts Macron in first European state visit since Brexit

Short Url
Updated 08 July 2025
Follow

King Charles hosts Macron in first European state visit since Brexit

Britain's King Charles, Queen Camilla, French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte Macron attend a welcome ceremony.
  • Charles is expected to emphasize “the multitude of complex threats” both countries face when he speaks at the castle later
  • Macron posted on X on his arrival that “there is so much we can build together”

LONDON: King Charles welcomed French President Emmanuel Macron to Britain on Tuesday for the first state visit by a European leader since Brexit, their warm greeting symbolising the return of closer ties between the two countries.

Macron, treated to a British state visit for the first time, enjoys a strong personal relationship with the king, and there were smiles as the pair met alongside their wives Brigitte and Queen Camilla, watched over by soldiers on horseback, in ceremonial uniform of blue tunics and scarlet plumes.

Charles is expected to emphasize “the multitude of complex threats” both countries face when he speaks at the castle later, while Macron posted on X on his arrival that “there is so much we can build together.”

Accompanied by heir to the throne Prince William, and his wife Princess Catherine, the group climbed into several horse-drawn carriages for a procession in Windsor which finished in the medieval castle’s courtyard, west of London.

Since the election of Prime Minister Keir Starmer last year, Britain has been trying to reset ties with European allies, and Charles will want to play his part in setting the tone of the visit before the political talks get underway.

“Our two nations share not only values, but also the tireless determination to act on them in the world,” the 76-year-old monarch, who is still undergoing treatment for cancer, will say later.

While Macron’s three-day trip is filled with meetings about economic issues and foreign affairs, the first day of the state visit, which comes 16 years after the late Queen Elizabeth hosted then French president Nicolas Sarkozy, is largely focused on pageantry, and heavy in symbolism.

Before heading to London on Tuesday afternoon to address parliament, Macron joined Charles to inspect the Guard of Honour. He was due to have lunch with the family and tour the Royal Collection, paintings and furniture amassed by the Windsors over the centuries.

The monarch’s right eye was noticeably red when he met Macron. A Buckingham Palace source said he had suffered a burst blood vessel in one eye which was unrelated to any other health condition.

The day will end with a state dinner back at Windsor Castle, including speeches by Charles and Macron in front of about 150 guests.

“It’s wonderful that we’re going down the path of welcoming European leaders once again,” Alastair King, the Lord Mayor of the City of London, who will host a banquet in Macron’s honor on Wednesday, told Reuters.

Migrants deal

Later in his trip, Macron and Starmer’s discussions will focus on a range of issues, including how to stop people-smuggling and improve economic and defense ties at a time when the United States is retrenching from its traditional role as a defender of European security.

Although there have been tensions over the shape of post-Brexit ties and how to stop asylum seekers from crossing the Channel in small boats, Britain and France have been working closely together to create a planned military force to support Ukraine in the event of a ceasefire with Russia.

British officials are hoping that Macron will agree to a pilot of an asylum seekers’ returns deal. This would involve Britain deporting one asylum seeker to France in exchange for another with a legitimate case to be in Britain, thereby disrupting the business model of people-smuggling gangs.

A record number of asylum seekers have arrived in Britain on small boats from France in the first six months of this year. Starmer, trailing behind Nigel Farage’s insurgent, right-wing Reform UK party in the polls, is under pressure to come up with a solution.

France has previously refused to sign up to such an agreement, saying Britain should negotiate an arrangement with all the EU countries.


UK counterterror laws applied ‘too broadly,’ risk ‘overreach’: Report

UK counterterror laws applied ‘too broadly,’ risk ‘overreach’: Report
Updated 7 sec ago
Follow

UK counterterror laws applied ‘too broadly,’ risk ‘overreach’: Report

UK counterterror laws applied ‘too broadly,’ risk ‘overreach’: Report
  • Current definition of terrorism ‘creates uncertainty,’ should be tightened: Commission
  • Legislation used to ban Palestine Action requires far more parliamentary scrutiny

LONDON: Laws used in the UK to ban the group Palestine Action have been applied “too broadly,” a review into counterterrorism legislation has found.

The review, led by former Judge Declan Morgan, has determined that the UK definition of terrorism creates “uncertainty and overreach in its application” and needs to be tightened.

The 15-person Independent Commission on UK Counter-Terrorism Law, Policy and Practice added that cases related to property damage should only include “serious risk to life, national security, or public safety, or involving arson, explosives, or firearms.”

Palestine Action was proscribed as a terrorist organization in the UK on July 5 after several incidents, including a break-in at a Royal Air Force base that saw two military aircraft sprayed with paint.

The ban, which is being challenged in the High Court, makes supporting the group a criminal offense punishable by up to 14 years in prison.

But the review said proscription of any group should only occur where a risk to the public from acts of terrorism exists, and that if not renewed, bans should lapse after five years.

“The commission heard evidence that, without careful calibration, counter-terrorism powers risk being applied too broadly — capturing behaviour that is harmful but not terrorist,” it said.

“When a group is proscribed, individuals can face prosecution for membership, inviting or expressing support, or wearing associated symbols or uniforms,” the report added.

“Providing funding or handling property linked to a proscribed organisation may constitute a criminal offence, and any act carried out for the benefit of a proscribed group can be treated as an act of terrorism.

“These far-reaching implications can create confusion, deter lawful civic engagement, and strain relations with communities connected to affected organisations — particularly where banned groups also pursue political objectives.”

Proscription, the report said, should be subject to far more parliamentary scrutiny in future.

The banning of Palestine Action has led to a series of protests across the UK featuring people holding placards stating: “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action.”

Almost 2,000 people have been arrested for taking part in the protests under the Terrorism Act.

The report said going forward, people should only be charged under sections 12 and 13 of the act “where there is clear intent to commit the offence.”

That could impact cases such as that of Kneecap rapper Liam Og O hAnnaidh, who was charged under section 13 for allegedly holding up a flag of the banned Lebanese group Hezbollah at a gig earlier this year. The case against him was dismissed due to a technical error in September.

Change Preferred Languages

Select Your Preferred Languages

Tap to add languages one at a time (Maximum 5)

Selected: 0/5
Tap to add languages...

We are now in 50 languages

Please login or register with your email to select your preferred languages