Trump meets with Zelensky and says higher NATO defense spending may deter future Russian aggression

Trump meets with Zelensky and says higher NATO defense spending may deter future Russian aggression
In this handout photograph taken and released by the Ukrainian Presidential Press Service on June 25, 2025, Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky shakes hands with US President Donald Trump during their meeting on the sideline of the NATO summit in The Hague. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 25 June 2025
Follow

Trump meets with Zelensky and says higher NATO defense spending may deter future Russian aggression

Trump meets with Zelensky and says higher NATO defense spending may deter future Russian aggression
  • “Europe stepping up to take more responsibility for security will help prevent future disasters like the horrible situation with Russia and Ukraine,” Trump said
  • Zelensky, on social media, said he discussed with Trump the possibility of Kyiv producing drones with American companies and buying US air defense systems

THE HAGUE: President Donald Trump met with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky on the sidelines of the NATO summit Wednesday and suggested that increased spending by the trans-Atlantic alliance could help prevent future Russian aggression against its neighbors.

NATO members agreed to raise their spending targets by 2035 to 5 percent of gross domestic product annually on core defense requirements as well as defense-and security-related spending. That target had been 2 percent of GDP.

“Europe stepping up to take more responsibility for security will help prevent future disasters like the horrible situation with Russia and Ukraine,” Trump said at the summit-ending news conference shortly after seeing Zelensky. “And hopefully we’re going to get that solved.”

Trump also reiterated his belief that Russian President Vladimir Putin wants to end the war in Ukraine that began with Moscow’s invasion in February 2022.

“He’d like to get out of this thing. It’s a mess for him,” Trump said. “He called the other day, and he said, ‘Can I help you with Iran?’ I said, ‘No, you can help me with Russia.’”

Trump’s meeting with Zelensky was their first face-to-face session since April, when they met at St. Peter’s Basilica during Pope Francis’ funeral. Trump also had a major confrontation with Zelensky earlier this year at the White House.

Zelensky, on social media, said he discussed with Trump the possibility of Kyiv producing drones with American companies and buying US air defense systems. “We can strengthen each other,” he wrote.

He said he also talked to Trump about “what is really happening on the ground.”

“Putin is definitely not winning,” Zelensky said.

Trump left open the possibility of sending Kyiv more US-made Patriot air defense missile systems.

Asked by a Ukrainian reporter, who said that her husband was a Ukrainian soldier, Trump acknowledged that sending more Patriots would help the Ukrainian cause.

“They do want to have the antimissile missiles, OK, as they call them, the Patriots,” Trump said. “And we’re going to see if we can make some available. We need them, too. We’re supplying them to Israel, and they’re very effective, 100 percent effective. Hard to believe how effective. They do want that more than any other thing.”

Over the course of the war, the US has routinely pressed for allies to provide air defense systems to Ukraine. But many are reluctant to give up the high-tech systems, particularly countries in Eastern Europe that also feel threatened by Russia.

Trump laid into the US media throughout his news conference but showed unusual warmth toward the Ukrainian reporter.

“That’s a very good question,” Trump said about the query about Patriots. “And I wish you a lot of luck. I mean, I can see it’s very upsetting to you. So say hello to your husband.”

Ukraine, which is not a NATO member, has been front and center at recent alliance summits. But as the group’s latest annual meeting of leaders opened in the Netherlands, Zelensky was not in the room. The Trump administration has blocked Ukraine’s bid to join NATO.

The conflict with Russia has laid waste to Ukrainian towns and killed thousands of civilians. Just last week, Russia launched one of the biggest drone attacks of the war.

During Trump’s 2024 campaign for the White House, the Republican pledged a quick end to the war. He saw it as a costly boondoggle that, he claimed, would not have happened had he won re-election in 2020. Since taking office in January, he has struggled to find a resolution to the conflict and has shown frustration with both Putin and Zelensky.

Zelensky spent Tuesday in The Hague shuttling from meeting to meeting. He got a pledge from summit host the Netherlands for military aid, including new drones and radars to help knock out Russian drones. The White House did not allow press coverage of Zelensky’s nearly hourlong meeting with Trump.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced that the United Kingdom will provide 350 air defense missiles to Ukraine, funded by 70 million pounds ($95 million) raised from the interest on seized Russian assets.


Trump threatens federal intervention in Chicago, government takeover in D.C.

Trump threatens federal intervention in Chicago, government takeover in D.C.
Updated 13 sec ago
Follow

Trump threatens federal intervention in Chicago, government takeover in D.C.

Trump threatens federal intervention in Chicago, government takeover in D.C.
  • Chicago, other cities do not share D.C.’s federal status
  • Violent crime has fallen in Washington, Chicago, data shows

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said on Friday he would probably expand his crime crackdown to Chicago, intervening in another city governed by Democrats, and threatened to take full control of Washington, D.C., rather than only its policing.

Saying without evidence that violent crime was out of control in the nation’s capital, Trump deployed D.C. National Guard soldiers and federal agents on the streets last week with a mandate to reduce crime.

“It was horrible and Mayor Bowser better get her act straight or she won’t be mayor very long, because we’ll take it over with the federal government, run it like it’s supposed to be run,” Trump told reporters, referring to Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser.

Recent statistics, which Trump dismissed, show crime has declined in the US capital since a 2023 peak.

Washington is a unique federal enclave, established in the US Constitution and falling under the jurisdiction of Congress, not belonging to any state.

In 1973, Congress passed the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, allowing residents to elect a mayor and council members.

Continuing his off-the-cuff remarks at the White House, Trump mused about extending his efforts to other cities. He has declined to explain how the federal government could intervene in local law enforcement in cities outside of the federal enclave of D.C.

“Chicago is a mess,” Trump said, deriding its mayor. “And we’ll straighten that one out probably next.”

Trump said some of his supporters in Chicago have been “screaming for us to come.”

“I did great with the Black vote, as you know, and they want something to happen,” he said. “So I think Chicago will be our next, and then we’ll help with New York.”

As in Washington, crime, including murders, has declined in Chicago in the last year.

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson said he took Trump’s comments seriously but has not received formal communication from the administration about federal law enforcement or military deployments.

The mayor said Trump’s approach has been “uncoordinated, uncalled for and unsound.” He added: “There are many things the federal government could do to help us reduce crime and violence in Chicago, but sending in the military is not one of them.”

New York City, also criticized by Trump, has reported a steady decline in violent crime in recent decades, and now has a relatively low murder rate among big American cities. Trump also threatened federal government intervention in San Francisco, another city governed by Democrats.

While the Republican president has cast his efforts as an urgent move to help residents feel safe again, Democrats and other critics say he aims to expand the powers of the president beyond the bounds of the Constitution and assert federal control over cities run by Democratic officials.

The US Constitution’s Tenth Amendment generally prevents the federal government from commandeering state or municipal officials and from intervening in states’ legal and criminal justice systems unless citizens’ constitutional rights are being violated. 


With no Ukraine peace deal, Trump again threatens Russia sanctions

With no Ukraine peace deal, Trump again threatens Russia sanctions
Updated 23 August 2025
Follow

With no Ukraine peace deal, Trump again threatens Russia sanctions

With no Ukraine peace deal, Trump again threatens Russia sanctions
  • Russia says agenda ‘not ready’ for Zelensky meeting
  • Work on Ukraine’s proposed security guarantees underway

WASHINGTON/KYIV: US President Donald Trump renewed a threat to impose sanctions on Russia on Friday if there is no progress toward a peaceful settlement in Ukraine in two weeks, showing frustration at Moscow a week after his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska.

“I’m going to make a decision as to what we do and it’s going to be, it’s going to be a very important decision, and that’s whether or not it’s massive sanctions or massive tariffs or both, or we do nothing and say it’s your fight,” Trump said.

He was unhappy about Russia’s deadly strike on a factory in Ukraine this week, he said.

“I’m not happy about it, and I’m not happy about anything having to do with that war,” Trump told reporters at the White House.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, meanwhile, said on Friday that Russia was doing everything it could to prevent a meeting between him and Putin, while Russia’s foreign minister said the agenda for such a meeting was not ready.

Zelensky has repeatedly called for Putin to meet him, saying it is the only way to negotiate an end to the war.

Trump had said he had begun the arrangements for a Putin-Zelensky meeting after a call with the Russian leader on Monday that followed their Alaska meeting on August 15.

Zelensky accused Russia of stalling.

“The meeting is one of the components of how to end the war,” he said on Friday at a press conference in Kyiv with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. “And since they don’t want to end it, they will look for space to (avoid it).”

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told NBC there was no agenda for such a summit.

“Putin is ready to meet with Zelensky when the agenda would be ready for a summit. And this agenda is not ready at all,” he said.

The statement echoed Moscow’s established rhetoric about a leaders’ meeting being impossible unless certain conditions were met.

Asked for his response to Lavrov’s comments and what the next steps are, Trump told reporters earlier on Friday: “Well, we’ll see. We’re going to see if Putin and Zelensky will be working together. It’s like oil and vinegar a little bit.”

‘He may be coming’

Trump had taken sanctions off the table in preparation for his summit in Anchorage with Putin. But at the same White House event where he mentioned possible sanctions, he showed a photograph of his meeting with Putin on the red carpet in Alaska, saying Putin wanted to attend the World Cup 2026 soccer tournament in the United States.

“I’m going to sign this for him. But I was sent one, and I thought you would like to see it, it’s a man named Vladimir Putin, who I believe will be coming, depending on what happens. He may be coming, and he may not, depending on what happens,” Trump said.

Trump’s comments did not address the fact that Russia was banned from international competitions such as the World Cup after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine and has not taken part in qualification for the 2026 tournament, which will be hosted by the US, Canada and Mexico.

During a visit to a nuclear research center on Friday, Putin said Trump’s leadership qualities would help restore US-Russia relations.

“With the arrival of President Trump, I think that a light at the end of the tunnel has finally loomed. And now we had a very good, meaningful and frank meeting in Alaska,” Putin said.

Thousands of Ukrainian civilians have been killed in the full-scale invasion of Ukraine that Russia launched in 2022. Analysts estimate that more than a million soldiers on both sides have been killed or wounded and fighting is continuing unabated, with both sides also attacking energy facilities.

Russia has maintained its longstanding demand for Ukraine to give up land it still holds in two eastern regions while proposing to freeze the front line in two more southerly regions Moscow claims fully as its own and possibly hand back small pieces of other Ukrainian territory it controls.

Zelensky meanwhile has dropped his demand for a lengthy ceasefire as a prerequisite for a leaders’ meeting, although he has previously said Ukraine cannot negotiate under the barrel of a gun.

At the press conference with Rutte, Zelensky said they had discussed security guarantees for Ukraine. He said the guarantees ought to be similar to NATO’s Article 5, which considers an attack on one member of the alliance as an attack against all.

Rutte said NATO allies and Ukraine are working together to ensure security guarantees are strong enough that Russia will never try to attack again.

“Robust security guarantees will be essential, and this is what we are now working on to define,” he said. 


Spain’s deadly wildfires ignite political blame game

Spain’s deadly wildfires ignite political blame game
Updated 22 August 2025
Follow

Spain’s deadly wildfires ignite political blame game

Spain’s deadly wildfires ignite political blame game
  • As happened after last year’s deadly floods in the eastern region of Valencia, the fires have fueled accusations that politicians mishandled the crisis

MADRID: As helicopters dump water over burning ridges and smoke billows across the mountains of northern Spain, residents from wildfire-stricken areas say they feel abandoned by the politicians meant to protect them.

A blaze “swept through those mountains, across those fresh, green valleys, and they didn’t stop it?” said Jose Fernandez, 85.

He was speaking from an emergency shelter in Benavente, where he took refuge after fleeing his nearby village, Vigo de Sanabria.

While praising the care he received at the shelter, run by the Red Cross, he gave the authorities “a zero” for their handling of the disaster.

Blazes that swept across Spain this month have killed four people and ravaged over 350,000 hectares over two weeks, according to the European Forest Fire Information System or EFFIS.

Three of those deaths were in the region of Castile and Leon, where Vigo de Sanabria is located, as well as a large part of the land consumed by the fires.

As happened after last year’s deadly floods in the eastern region of Valencia, the fires have fueled accusations that politicians mishandled the crisis.

“They committed a huge negligence,” said 65-year-old Jose Puente, forced to flee his home in the village of San Ciprian de Sanabria.

The authorities were “a bit careless, a bit arrogant,” and underestimated how quickly the fire could shift, he added. He, too, had taken refuge at the Benavente shelter.

“They thought it was solved, and suddenly it turned into hell,” said Puente.

Both men are from villages in the Sanabria lake area, a popular summer destination known for its greenery and traditional stone houses, now marred by scorched vegetation from wildfires.

Spain’s decentralized system leaves regional governments in charge of disaster response, although they can request assistance from the central government.

The regions hit hard by the wildfires — Castile and Leon, Extremadura, and Galicia — are all governed by the conservative Popular Party or PP, which also ruled Valencia.

The PP, Spain’s main opposition party, accuses Socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez of having withheld aid to damage regions run by conservatives.

The government has hit back, accusing the PP of having underfunded public services needed to face such emergencies. They argue that these regions refused to take climate change seriously, which fueled the wildfires.

The wildfires have also highlighted long-term trends that have left the countryside vulnerable.

Castile and Leon suffer from decades of rural depopulation, an aging population, and the decline of farming and livestock grazing, both of which once helped keep forests clear of tinder.

Spending on fire prevention — by the state and the regions — has dropped by half since 2009, according to a study by the daily newspaper ABC, with the steepest reductions in the regions hit hardest by the flames this year.

“Everything has been left in God’s hands,” said Fernandez, expressing a widely held view by locals hit by the fires.

Spain’s environmental prosecutor has ordered officials to check whether municipalities affected by wildfires complied with their legal obligation to adopt prevention plans.

In both Castile and Leon and Galicia, protesters — some holding signs reading “Never Again” and “More prevention” — have taken to the streets in recent days calling for stronger action from local officials.

The head of the regional government of Castile and Leon, the Popular Party’s Alfonso Fernandez Manueco, has come under the most scrutiny.

Under his watch in 2022, the region suffered devastating wildfires in Sierra de la Culebra that ravaged over 65,000 hectares.

He has defended the response this year, citing “exceptional” conditions, including an intense heatwave. He has denied reports that inexperienced, last-minute hires were sent to fight the fires.

Jorge de Dios, spokesman for the region’s union for environmental agents APAMCYL, who has been on the front line fighting the fires in recent days, criticized working conditions.

Most of the region’s firefighting force “only works four months a year,” during the summer, he said.

Many are students or seasonal workers who participate in “two, three, four campaigns” before leaving.

“We are never going to have veterans,” he said, adding that what was needed were experienced firefighters capable of handling “situations that are clearly life or death.”

 


Hegseth fires general whose Iran strikes assessment angered Trump

Hegseth fires general whose Iran strikes assessment angered Trump
Updated 22 August 2025
Follow

Hegseth fires general whose Iran strikes assessment angered Trump

Hegseth fires general whose Iran strikes assessment angered Trump
  • Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Kruse served as head of the US Defense Intelligence Agency
  • The agency's preliminary assessment after US strikes on Iran found that its nuclear program had been set back only a few months

WASHINGTON: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth fired a general on Friday whose agency’s initial intelligence assessment of damage to Iranian nuclear sites from US strikes angered President Donald Trump, according to two people familiar with the decision and a White House official.

Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Kruse will no longer serve as head of the US Defense Intelligence Agency, according to the people, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it publicly.

The firing comes a few months after details of the preliminary assessment leaked to the media. It found that Iran’s nuclear program has been set back only a few months by the US strikes, contradicting assertions from Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

In a news conference following the June strikes, Hegseth lambasted the press for what he claimed was an anti-military bias but did not offer any direct evidence of the destruction of Iranian nuclear production facilities.


Dutch foreign minister resigns over Israel sanctions

Dutch foreign minister resigns over Israel sanctions
Updated 22 August 2025
Follow

Dutch foreign minister resigns over Israel sanctions

Dutch foreign minister resigns over Israel sanctions
  • Veldkamp said he was unable to take meaningful measures against Israel after a cabinet debate on possible sanctions

THE HAGUE: Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp resigned on Friday after a cabinet meeting failed to agree sanctions against Israel.

“I see that I am insufficiently able to take meaningful additional measures to increase pressure on Israel,” Veldkamp told ANP after a cabinet debate on possible sanctions against Israel was deadlocked.

Last month Veldkamp declared far-right Israeli ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich unwelcome in the Netherlands.

On Thursday he said he wanted to take further steps against Israel, but later acknowledged he lacked confidence he could act effectively in the coming weeks or months.

The minister said the steps he had proposed were “seriously discussed” but encountered resistance in successive cabinet meetings.

“I feel constrained in setting the course I consider necessary as foreign minister,” he said.

The Netherlands was among 21 countries that signed a joint declaration on Thursday condemning Israel’s approval of a major West Bank settlement project as “unacceptable and contrary to international law.”