Pakistan condemns US strikes on Iran nuclear sites, warns of regional escalation

Short Url
Updated 22 June 2025
Follow

Pakistan condemns US strikes on Iran nuclear sites, warns of regional escalation

Pakistan condemns US strikes on Iran nuclear sites, warns of regional escalation
  • Analysts warn of regional blowback, rising energy costs
  • Cross-border security risks also heighten for Pakistan

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan on Sunday condemned US airstrikes targeting Iran’s key nuclear facilities, as experts warned that further escalation could push the Middle East toward a wider war with dangerous economic and security consequences for countries like Pakistan.

The strikes, carried out by the US military early Sunday, hit three Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz. The attacks came amid Israel’s ongoing campaign against Iran’s nuclear program, which Israeli officials claim is nearing weaponization, an allegation Iran denies, insisting its activities remain peaceful and under international safeguards.

US President Donald Trump warned Tehran against retaliation, saying Washington could target more sites “with precision, speed and skill.” Iran has said it “reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest, and people.”




The map outlines main the facilities of Iran's nuclear programme which were targetted by US strikes on June 22, 2025. (Reuters)

In a statement released on Sunday afternoon, Pakistan’s foreign office said it was “gravely concerned at the possible further escalation of tensions in the region” and described the US strikes as a violation of international law.

“Pakistan condemns the US attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities which follow the series of attacks by Israel,” the statement read. “Any further escalation of tensions will have severely damaging implications for the region and beyond.”

Pakistan said Iran had the legitimate right to defend itself under the UN Charter and urged all parties to respect international humanitarian law, protect civilian lives and “immediately bring the conflict to an end.”

“Recourse to dialogue, diplomacy, in line with the principles and purposes of the UN Charter remain the only viable pathway to resolve the crises in the region,” the statement added.

Tensions flared on June 13 when Israel launched airstrikes against what it described as Iran’s military leadership and nuclear infrastructure. Iran, a signatory to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), has since retaliated with missile attacks on Israeli targets. The United States, Israel’s closest ally, has now directly joined the campaign.

Experts warn the latest US strikes undermine global arms control norms and would have both economic and security implications for Pakistan.

Dr. Rabia Akhtar, an expert on nuclear security, said attacking a safeguarded nuclear program “destroyed the very space diplomacy depends on.” 

“If the response to nuclear restraint is pre-emptive force, you normalize the idea that only the bomb ensures sovereignty,” she said. 

Syed Ali Zia Jaffery, deputy director at the Center for Security, Strategy and Policy Research at the University of Lahore, said the latest US strikes had dealt a “severe blow” to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT).

“Iran, which is a party to the NPT, might decide to leave that treaty which will be a massive loss for the non-proliferation regime,” Jaffery told Arab News.

He said Tehran now had the right under international law to target US installations in the Middle East and could step up attacks on Israel in response. Jaffery also warned that if Iran were to block the Strait of Hormuz, it would have “serious consequences” for the global economy.

Indeed, a wider Middle East conflict could disrupt oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, through which about one-fifth of global oil passes, adding to price pressures for Pakistan, which relies heavily on imported fuel.

“More than 30 percent of the energy transits through the strait and one should expect an astronomical rise in oil prices and other tradables passing through the Strait of Hormuz,” said Pakistan’s former ambassador to Iran, Asif Durrani.

Instability could also spill over Pakistan’s 900-kilometer border with Iran in Balochistan, an area prone to separatist militancy and cross-border attacks by armed groups.

The crisis also raises questions about how Islamabad will navigate its delicate balancing act between Iran, other Gulf partners, and the United States, which remains one of Pakistan’s largest trading partners and a critical source of military and economic assistance. How Pakistan manages these competing ties amid an escalating regional conflict could test its diplomacy in the coming weeks.


Pakistan deputy PM says will soon table 27th constitutional amendment in parliament

Pakistan deputy PM says will soon table 27th constitutional amendment in parliament
Updated 6 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan deputy PM says will soon table 27th constitutional amendment in parliament

Pakistan deputy PM says will soon table 27th constitutional amendment in parliament
  • Key proposals include creating constitutional courts, removing protection for provinces’ share in federal resources, and returning education and population to center
  • Analysts say the Pakistan Peoples Party, a key coalition partner in the federal government that has voiced its opposition to the 27th amendment, has little choice but to back it

KARACHI: Pakistan’s Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar said on Tuesday that the government will soon table the much-discussed 27th constitutional amendment in parliament, amid concerns that it could undermine provincial autonomy.

Constitutional amendments in Pakistan require a two-third majority in both houses of parliament and have historically been used to redefine the balance of power between the legislature, judiciary and provinces. The proposed 27th amendment follows the 26th amendment passed in October 2024, which empowered parliament to appoint the Supreme Court chief justice for a fixed term and created a panel of senior judges to hear constitutional cases, a move critics said weakened judicial independence.

Pakistan’s constitution, adopted in 1973, has been amended more than two dozen times, often reflecting the country’s shifting balance among civilian governments, the military and the judiciary. Provisions such as the National Finance

Commission (NFC) award, which governs how federal revenue is shared among provinces, are especially sensitive because they underpin Pakistan’s federal structure and provincial autonomy.

In a post on X on Monday, Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari, a major coalition partner, said Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) had approached his party, seeking support in passing the amendment. He said the proposals included creating constitutional courts, restoring executive magistrates, amending Article 243, which defines the command and control of the armed forces, removing protection for provinces’ share in the NFC award and returning education and population planning to the federation.

“Of course, the government is bringing it and will bring it... the 27th amendment will arrive... We will try that it be tabled in accordance with principles, laws and the Constitution,” Dar said in the Senate, the upper house of parliament, adding that the draft amendment would undergo robust debate.

“The government does not have reservations on anything. It is not the case that the amendment is tabled and there is voting on it in a haphazard, ad hoc manner; this will not happen.”

The PPP, a key coalition partner in the federal government that has long claimed credit for spearheading the 18th amendment in 2010, considers it one of its signature democratic achievements. That amendment had significantly strengthened provincial autonomy, devolved several ministries and given provinces a larger share in national resources.

Senator Raza Rabbani, a senior PPP member and one of the architects of the 18th amendment, warned that any attempt to revisit the provincial autonomy will “cast deep shadows over the federation.”

He said the proposed amendment amounted to “a rollback of the 18th amendment” and could reignite divisive nationalist sentiments, arguing that reviving devolved ministries would place an unnecessary financial burden on the federal government that is already struggling to manage its fiscal affairs.

“If Islamabad cannot manage its finances, then let the provinces collect taxes and contribute to federal expenditures through the Council of Common Interests,” he said, cautioning that undoing fiscal devolution would be “counter to the principle of participatory federalism.”

PPP UNLIKELY TO ‘RESIST’ AMENDMENT

Political observers remain skeptical about the PPP’s ability to oppose the amendment.

Lahore-based analyst Salman Ghani said that while the party may protest publicly, it is unlikely to “resist” the amendment in parliament.

“This is happening with 100 percent consent,” he said, adding the PPP was not in a position to say “no” to the amendment which gives more powers to the center.

“During the 18th amendment, the PPP was strong and confident. Today, the balance of power is different. The center needs more resources, and the PPP is in no position to challenge it.”

Ghani believed that the amendment would pass easily in the National Assembly, the lower house of parliament, wherein the ruling PML-N already has the required numbers. “But in the Senate, the government, will need support from the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam–Fazl,” he said. “In the end, the PPP will accept the bitter pill because they are part of this system and cannot afford confrontation.”

Fazil Jamili, a Karachi-based analyst, agreed with Ghani, saying that political parties were not in a position to “resist.”

Calling the proposal “detrimental to democracy,” Jamili said the 27th amendment, as outlined by Bhutto-Zardari, would “certainly roll back the 18th amendment” and erode provincial autonomy and public trust.

“Around the world, federal governments are devolving powers. We are doing the opposite,” he said. “That’s not healthy for democracy in the long run.”

Change Preferred Languages

Select Your Preferred Languages

Tap to add languages one at a time (Maximum 5)

Selected: 0/5
Tap to add languages...

We are now in 50 languages

Please login or register with your email to select your preferred languages