‘Serious problem’: Afghan capital losing race against water shortages

‘Serious problem’: Afghan capital losing race against water shortages
Experts have long sounded the alarm over Kabul’s water problems, which are worsening even as many international players have backed off big infrastructure projects and slashed funding to Afghanistan. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 21 May 2025
Follow

‘Serious problem’: Afghan capital losing race against water shortages

‘Serious problem’: Afghan capital losing race against water shortages
  • The Taliban authorities have launched projects ranging from recycling water to building hundreds of small dams across the country, but larger interventions remain hampered by financing and technical capacity

KABUL: Every week, Bibi Jan scrapes together some of her husband’s meagre daily wage to buy precious water from rickshaw-drawn tankers that supply residents of Afghanistan’s increasingly parched capital.

Kabul faces a looming water crisis, driven by unruly and rapid urbanization, mismanagement over years of conflict, and climate change, meaning people like Bibi Jan are sometimes forced to choose between food and water.

“When my children have only tea for a few days, they say, ‘You bought water and nothing for us’,” the 45-year-old housewife told AFP, describing reusing her supplies for bathing, dishes and laundry.

Experts have long sounded the alarm over Kabul’s water problems, which are worsening even as many international players have backed off big infrastructure projects and slashed funding to Afghanistan since the Taliban government took power in 2021.

“There could be no ground water in Kabul by 2030” without urgent action, the UN children’s agency UNICEF warned last year.

Other experts are more cautious, citing limited consistent and reliable data, but say the situation is clearly deteriorating.

A 2030 cliff is a “worst-case scenario,” said water resources management expert Assem Mayar.

But even if slated development projects are completed in a few years, it “doesn’t mean the situation would become better than now,” Mayar said.

“As time goes on, the problems are only increasing,” he added, as population growth outstrips urban planning and climate change drives below-average precipitation.

The Taliban authorities have launched projects ranging from recycling water to building hundreds of small dams across the country, but larger interventions remain hampered by financing and technical capacity.

They remain unrecognized by any country since they ousted the Western-backed government and imposed their severe interpretation of Islamic law, with restrictions on women a major sticking point.

They have repeatedly called for non-governmental groups to reboot stalled projects on water and climate change, as Afghanistan faces “some of the harshest effects” in the region, according to the United Nations.

The water and energy ministry wants to divert water from the Panjshir river to the capital, but needs $300 million to $400 million. A dam project near Kabul would ease pressures but was delayed after the Taliban takeover.

For now, Kabul’s primary drinking water source is groundwater, as much as 80 percent of which is contaminated, according to a May report by Mercy Corps.

It is tapped by more than 100,000 unregulated wells across the city that are regularly deepened or run dry, the NGO said.

Groundwater can be recharged, but more is drawn each year than is replenished in Kabul, with an estimated annual 76-million-cubic-meter (20-billion-gallon) deficit, experts say.

“It’s a very serious problem... Water is decreasing day by day in the city,” said Shafiullah Zahidi, who heads central Kabul operations for the state-owned water company UWASS.

Water systems designed decades ago serve just 20 percent of the city’s population, which has exploded to around six million over the past 20 years, said Zahidi.

At one of Kabul’s 15 pumping stations, maintenance manager Mohammad Ehsan said the seven-year-old well is already producing less water. Two others nearby sit dry.

“The places with shallower water levels are dried out now,” said 53-year-old Ehsan, who has worked in water management for two decades, as he stood over an old well.

It once produced water from a depth of 70 meters (230 feet), but a newer well had to be bored more than twice as deep to reach groundwater.

At one of the two large stations in the city, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) recently procured four new pumps where only one had been functioning.

“If that pump collapsed for any reason, that means stopping the service for 25,000 beneficiary households,” which now have uninterrupted water, said Baraa Afeh, ICRC’s deputy water and habitat coordinator.

Everyone in Kabul “should have 24-hour service,” said Zahidi, from the state water company.

But in reality, Bibi Jan and many other Kabulis are forced to lug water in heavy jugs from wells or buy it from tankers.

These suppliers charge at least twice as much as the state-owned utility, with potable water even more pricy in a country where 85 percent of the population lives on less than a dollar a day.

Bibi Jan said she has to police her family’s water use carefully.

“I tell them, ‘I’m not a miser but use less water.’ Because if the water runs out then what would we do?”


Lawsuit targets militant groups as complicit in deaths of US citizens in Hamas attack

Lawsuit targets militant groups as complicit in deaths of US citizens in Hamas attack
Updated 52 min 22 sec ago
Follow

Lawsuit targets militant groups as complicit in deaths of US citizens in Hamas attack

Lawsuit targets militant groups as complicit in deaths of US citizens in Hamas attack
  • The lawsuit, filed Thursday in federal court in Washington, also names Iran, Syria and North Korea, which are already facing legal action in the US for the Oct. 7 assault
  • There are more than 140 plaintiffs in the lawsuit, which seeks at least $7 billion

WASHINGTON: Lawyers for US victims of the 2023 Hamas attack on Israel are suing various groups that have been designated by the federal government as terrorist organizations, alleging they participated, aided or provided material support for the assault.

The lawsuit, filed Thursday in federal court in Washington, also names Iran, Syria and North Korea, which are already facing legal action in the US for the Oct. 7 assault, which led to the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas.

“Our son’s life was senselessly cut short,” David and Hazel Brief said in a statement released by the Anti-Defamation League. “We believe it is critical that those responsible for the horrific terror inflicted that day are held accountable in a court of law, to ensure the record is clear as to who helped support, plan and carry out the violence that day.”

There are more than 140 plaintiffs in the lawsuit, which seeks at least $7 billion. They’re US citizens who died or were wounded or their American family members, the ADL and law firm Crowell & Moring said.

Iran, Syria and North Korea have not formally responded to a similar lawsuit filed by others in 2024. The US has deemed them to be state sponsors of terrorism, and Washington has designated Hamas as what’s known as a specially designated global terrorist group. The lawsuit also names the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Lebanon’s Hezbollah, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and other groups.

The lawsuit cites the findings of a report published by the United Nations Human Rights Council’s Independent International Commission of Inquiry.

Under federal law, foreign governments can be held liable, in some circumstances, for deaths or injuries caused by acts of terrorism or by providing material support or resources for them.

The plaintiffs, if successful, might qualify for payments from a fund created by Congress that allows American victims of terrorism to receive payouts. The money comes from seized assets, fines or other penalties leveled against those that do business with a state sponsor of terrorism.

The war in Gaza began in 2023 when Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel, killing around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducting 251 others. Forty-eight hostages remain in Gaza, around 20 of them believed by Israel to be alive, after most of the rest were released in ceasefires or other deals.

The Palestinian death toll in the Israel-Hamas war has surpassed 65,000, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which is part of the Hamas-run government. It does not say how many were civilians or combatants but says women and children make up nearly half the dead.

The Justice Department last year filed criminal charges against Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar and other senior militants, saying they conspired to murder US nationals in the Oct. 7 attack. Sinwar was killed by Israeli forces in October 2024.

Hamas, which does not accept Israel’s existence, says it is waging an armed struggle for Palestinian rights and is not at war with the United States.


Senate Democrats push White House to recognize Palestinian state

Senate Democrats push White House to recognize Palestinian state
Updated 18 September 2025
Follow

Senate Democrats push White House to recognize Palestinian state

Senate Democrats push White House to recognize Palestinian state
  • Non-binding legislation introduced calling for demilitarized Palestine, release of hostages
  • Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkley: ‘Israel is no longer interested’ in reaching an agreement

LONDON: A resolution has been introduced by a group of Democratic senators in the US in a bid to get the White House to recognize a demilitarized Palestinian state.

The non-binding legislation proposed by Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkley comes ahead of the UN General Assembly in New York on Sept. 23, where a number of states have indicated that they will recognize Palestine.

A similar piece of legislation has been proposed by California Democrat Ro Khanna in the House of Representatives.

Earlier this week, a UN commission said it believes there are reasonable grounds to suspect that Israel is responsible for genocide in Gaza.

The resolution calls on Hamas to lay down its arms and release all remaining hostages, while demanding that Israel halt its war in Gaza and settlement expansion in the West Bank.

Other signatories include Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, Tina Smith of Minnesota, and Vermont’s Peter Welch and Bernie Sanders.

Merkley told the New York Times: “We need to have an immediate ceasefire, the hostages returned and an inundation of aid. But we also need a vision for where we go so that 30 years from now, there is a peaceful and prosperous Middle East where we’re not caught in the grip of this conflict.”

He added: “I grew up with the framework of the best path to peace is to always stand with Israel, because they will feel the confidence to reach an agreement, but Israel is no longer interested. They’re interested in taking the West Bank. They’re interested in taking Gaza.”

Van Hollen said recent Israeli activity in Gaza was a “campaign of ethnic cleansing,” adding: “The best viable way forward that provides both security and dignity and self-determination for both Israelis and Palestinians alike is a two-state solution.”

The proposal is unlikely to pass the Republican-led Senate, with no senators from the governing party backing it at this time.


President Trump backs former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair’s proposal for Gaza transitional authority

President Trump backs former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair’s proposal for Gaza transitional authority
Updated 18 September 2025
Follow

President Trump backs former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair’s proposal for Gaza transitional authority

President Trump backs former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair’s proposal for Gaza transitional authority
  • Body would administer territory for several years

LONDON: US President Donald Trump has endorsed former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair’s proposal for a postwar plan in Gaza, giving him two weeks to rally international support for the initiative, The Telegraph reported on Thursday.

The plan, drafted by the Tony Blair Institute, calls for the creation of a temporary governing body known as the Gaza International Transitional Authority.

The body, to be established under the auspices of the UN, would administer the territory for several years before transferring authority to a reformed Palestinian Authority.

According to The Times of Israel, the draft proposal describes the GITA as the “supreme political and legal authority for Gaza during the transitional period.” It would include at least one Palestinian representative, senior UN officials, prominent international business figures, and “strong representation of Muslim members.”

The blueprint rules out the forced displacement of Palestinians, instead proposing a Property Rights Preservation Unit to guarantee the rights of Palestinians in Gaza who voluntarily leave the territory, including a right of return.

It also calls for the disarmament of Hamas and the formation of an international force to assist Gaza’s civil police in preventing the group’s resurgence.

Blair has been working on what he terms the “day after” plan since the outbreak of the conflict in October 2023, meeting senior Trump officials and regional leaders to build support.

Trump formally endorsed the proposal during an Aug. 27 meeting at the White House, where his son-in-law Jared Kushner has played a leading role in shaping postwar options.

While Israel has rejected the Palestinian Authority taking on a direct role in Gaza, reports suggest it has engaged “constructively” with Blair’s proposal. However, renewed Israeli military operations in Gaza City and recent strikes on Hamas leaders in Qatar have raised questions over the viability of the plan.

Blair’s institute has declined to comment publicly on the proposal.


Starmer says UK protects free speech ‘jealously’ and ‘fiercely’

Starmer says UK protects free speech ‘jealously’ and ‘fiercely’
Updated 18 September 2025
Follow

Starmer says UK protects free speech ‘jealously’ and ‘fiercely’

Starmer says UK protects free speech ‘jealously’ and ‘fiercely’
  • The British leader said the killing of US conservative influencer Charlie Kirk last week was “shocking”
  • US Vice President JD Vance claimed free speech is “in retreat” across Europe

CHEQUERS: UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Thursday that Britain protects freedom of speech “jealously” and “fiercely” after US criticism and several cases have focused attention on British laws.

“Free speech, it’s one of the founding values of the United Kingdom, and we protect it jealously and fiercely and always will,” Starmer told a press conference with US President Donald Trump at the end of a state visit to the UK.

“We will bear down on any limits of free speech,” Starmer vowed, but warned that “I draw a limit between free speech and the speech of those that want to peddle paedophilia and suicide (on) social media to children.”

The British leader added the killing of US conservative influencer Charlie Kirk last week was “shocking ... to everybody who believes in free speech and in democracy.”

Free speech has recently hit the headlines in the UK over various cases, which have drawn criticism from US figures.

Debate also swirled around last year’s sentencing of a woman to 31 months in prison for writing on X “Set fire to all the... hotels (housing asylum seekers)... for all I care,” as anti-immigration, far-right riots spread across England.

US Vice President JD Vance has been particularly vocal about the issue, raising it with Starmer during a White House meeting in February.

Vance previously claimed free speech is “in retreat” across Europe, and doubled down on the remarks during Starmer’s visit, claiming that “infringements on free speech” had affected British people.

British politician and leader of the hard-right Reform party Nigel Farage asked before a US congressional committee: “At what point did we become North Korea?“

He was speaking after award-winning comedy writer Graham Linehan was arrested and charged earlier in September over three social media posts against a transgender person.

Tech billionaire and X owner Elon Musk has also accused Britain of being a “police state.”

When asked by a reporter whether the cancellation of Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night show over the comedian’s comments about Kirk on Wednesday was a case of free speech being threatened, Trump replied: “Jimmy Kimmel was fired because he had bad ratings... so you can call that free speech, or not, he was fired for lack of talent.”


Ukraine pushes back some Russian advances, Zelensky says

Ukraine pushes back some Russian advances, Zelensky says
Updated 18 September 2025
Follow

Ukraine pushes back some Russian advances, Zelensky says

Ukraine pushes back some Russian advances, Zelensky says
  • Zelensky said his troops had reclaimed 160 square kilometers of land near the eastern coal mining town of Dobropillia
  • He did not say when Ukraine made the gains, but said Russia had “suffered thousands of losses“

KYIV: Ukrainian forces have pushed back some of the advances Russia made over the summer, President Volodymyr Zelensky said Thursday, calling the operation an “important success” after months of battlefield setbacks.

Zelensky said his troops had reclaimed 160 square kilometers (62 square miles) of land near the eastern coal mining town of Dobropillia, where Russia pierced Ukraine’s defenses in August.

US President Donald Trump, meanwhile, expressed mounting frustration at his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin for not halting the invasion.

Russia, which has been chipping away at Ukrainian territory for months, did not immediately comment on Ukraine’s claims but announced Thursday that more than 700,000 of its soldiers were fighting on the front line.

Diplomatic efforts to end the three-and-a-half year war have fallen apart in recent months, with Russia last week announcing peace talks were on “pause” and Zelensky warning Russia still wanted to occupy “all of Ukraine.”



Following a meeting with troops in the eastern Donetsk region on Thursday, Zelensky said his army was “achieving results” in an ongoing counteroffensive there.

“Since the start of the operation, our warriors have already liberated 160 square kilometers,” he said in a video address.

He said Ukrainian forces had “cleared” Russian troops from an additional 170 square kilometers of land, but had not yet formally taken the territory.

Zelensky did not say when Ukraine made the gains, but said Russia had “suffered thousands of losses.”

“Ukraine is quite rightly defending its positions, defending its land,” he added.

DeepState, an online battlefield tracker linked to the Ukrainian army, showed Russian troops made rapid advances near Dobropillia last month but that some of their gains had evaporated in recent weeks.

- Putin ‘let me down’ -

Ukraine and its Western allies say Russian troops are making huge losses for comparatively small territorial gains, while leaving towns and villages destroyed in their wake.

Trump, who has been seeking to broker an end to the war, said Thursday he was disappointed in Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin’s apparent refusal to accept a peace deal.

“He’s let me down. He’s really let me down,” Trump said at a press conference with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Britain.

Trump promised to end the war quickly after taking office in January, but has failed to extract concessions from the Kremlin, despite a landmark summit with Putin in Alaska in August.

Russia accuses European countries of frustrating the peace process, but Kyiv and its European allies say Putin is deliberately stalling to buy time and seize more Ukrainian territory.

Russia, which currently occupies around a fifth of Ukraine, accelerated its advances over the summer and has indicated it will achieve its war goals via military means if a peace deal is not possible.

Moscow claims five Ukrainian regions as its own, including Crimea, which it annexed in 2014.

Tens of thousands of people — including civilians — have been killed since Russia invaded, with towns and cities across the east and south of Ukraine left in ruins.

Millions of people have been forced to flee their homes in the biggest war in Europe since World War II.

A Russian air strike on the Donetsk region town of Kostiantynivka earlier Thursday killed five people, Ukrainian police said.

The town lies about eight kilometers (five miles) from the front line and is surrounded by Russian troops on three sides, according to DeepState.

Kyiv has been trying to hit back with long-range strikes on Russia’s vital oil sector, with the latest attack on Thursday morning triggering a fire at a refinery in the central Bashkortostan region, some 1,400 kilometers (870 miles) behind the front line.