Zelensky says excluding Ukraine from US-Russia talks about war is ‘very dangerous’

Zelensky says excluding Ukraine from US-Russia talks about war is ‘very dangerous’
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy gestures as he speaks during an interview with The Associated Press in Kyiv on Feb. 1, 2025. (AP Photo)
Short Url
Updated 02 February 2025
Follow

Zelensky says excluding Ukraine from US-Russia talks about war is ‘very dangerous’

Zelensky says excluding Ukraine from US-Russia talks about war is ‘very dangerous’
  • Zelensky’s remarks followed comments Friday by Trump, who said American and Russian officials were “already talking” about ending the war
  • Without security guarantees from Ukraine’s allies, Zelensky said, any deal struck with Russia would only serve as a precursor to future aggression

KYIV, Ukraine: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Saturday that excluding his country from talks between the US and Russia about the war in Ukraine would be “very dangerous” and asked for more discussions between Kyiv and Washington to develop a plan for a ceasefire.
Speaking in an exclusive interview with The Associated Press, Zelensky said Russia does not want to engage in ceasefire talks or to discuss any kind of concessions, which the Kremlin interprets as losing at a time when its troops have the upper hand on the battlefield.
He said US President Donald Trump could bring Russian President Vladimir Putin to the table with the threat of sanctions targeting Russia’s energy and banking system, as well as continued support of the Ukrainian military.
“I think these are the closest and most important steps,” he said in the interview in the Ukrainian capital that lasted for more than an hour.
Zelensky’s remarks followed comments Friday by Trump, who said American and Russian officials were “already talking” about ending the war. Trump said his administration has had “very serious” discussions with Russia, but he did not elaborate.
“They may have their own relations, but talking about Ukraine without us — it is dangerous for everyone,” Zelensky said.
He said his team has been in contact with the Trump administration, but those discussions are at a “general level,” and he believes in-person meetings will take place soon to develop more detailed agreements.
“We need to work more on this,” he said, adding that Trump understandably appeared to be focused on domestic issues in the first weeks after his inauguration.

The nearly three-year war in Ukraine is at a crossroads. Trump promised to end the fighting within six months of taking office, but the two sides are far apart, and it is unclear how a ceasefire deal would take shape. Meanwhile, Russia continues to make slow but steady gains along the front, and Ukrainian forces are enduring severe manpower shortages.
Most Ukrainians want a pause in fighting to rebuild their lives. The country faces near-daily Russian attacks on homes, and strikes on power systems have plunged entire cities into darkness.
Millions of Ukrainians have been displaced, unable to return to their homes after vast tracts of the country’s east have been reduced to rubble. Nearly a fifth of Ukraine is now occupied by Russia. In those areas, Moscow-appointed authorities are swiftly erasing any hint of Ukrainian identity.
With Trump back in the White House, Ukraine’s relationship with the US, its largest and most important ally, is also at a tipping point.
In an initial phone call with Trump during the presidential campaign, Zelensky said, the two agreed that if Trump won, they would meet to discuss the steps needed to end the war. But a planned visit by Trump’s Ukraine envoy, Keith Kellogg, was postponed “for legal reasons” Zelensky said. That was followed by a sudden foreign aid freeze that effectively caused Ukrainian organizations to halt projects.
“I believe that, first and foremost, we (must) hold a meeting with him, and that is important. And that is, by the way, something that everyone in Europe wants,” Zelensky said, referring to “a common vision of a quick end to the war.”
After the conversation with Trump, “we should move on to some kind of format of conversation with Russians. And I would like to see the United States of America, Ukraine and the Russians at the negotiating table. ... And, to be honest, a European Union voice should also be there. I think it would be fair, effective. But how will it turn out? I don’t know.”
Zelensky cautioned against allowing Putin to take “control” over the war, an apparent reference to Russia’s repeated threats of escalation during President Joe Biden’s administration.
Without security guarantees from Ukraine’s allies, Zelensky said, any deal struck with Russia would only serve as a precursor to future aggression. Membership in the NATO alliance, a longstanding wish for Kyiv that Moscow has categorically rejected, is still Zelensky’s top choice.
NATO membership is the “cheapest” option for Ukraine’s allies, and it would also strengthen Trump geopolitically, Zelensky argued.
“I really believe that these are the cheapest security guarantees that Ukraine can get, the cheapest for everyone,” he said.
“It will be a signal that it is not for Russia to decide who should be in NATO and who should not, but for the United States of America to decide. I think this is a great victory for Trump,” he said, evidently appealing to the president’s penchant for winners and business deals.
In addition, Zelensky said, Ukraine’s 800,000-strong army would be a bonus to the alliance, especially if Trump seeks to bring home US troops who are stationed overseas.
Other security guarantee proposals should be backed up by sufficient weapons from the US and Europe, and support for Kyiv to develop its own defense industry, he said.
Zelensky also said a French proposal to put European forces in Ukraine to act as a deterrent against Russian aggression is taking shape, but he expressed skepticism, saying many questions remained about the command-and-control structure and the number of troops and their positions. The issue was raised by French President Emmanuel Macron and with Trump, he said.
“I said in the presence of the two leaders that we are interested in this as a part of the security guarantee, but not as the only guarantee of safety,” he said. “That’s not enough.”
He added: “Imagine, there is a contingent. The question is who is in charge? Who is the main one? What will they do if there are Russian strikes? Missiles, disembarkation, attack from the sea, crossing of the land borderline, offensive. What will they do? What are their mandates?”
Asked if he put those questions directly to Macron, he smiled and said: “We are still in the process of this dialogue.”
Following a statement by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio that the war has set Ukraine back by 100 years, Zelensky urged Rubio to visit Ukraine.
Rubio “needs to come to Ukraine, first of all, to see what Russia has done,” the Ukrainian president said. “But also to see what the Ukrainian people did, what they were able to do for the security of Ukraine and the world, as I said, and just talk to these people.”
 


Pakistan asks illegal foreigners, Afghan Citizen Card holders to leave by March 31

Pakistan asks illegal foreigners, Afghan Citizen Card holders to leave by March 31
Updated 58 min 46 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan asks illegal foreigners, Afghan Citizen Card holders to leave by March 31

Pakistan asks illegal foreigners, Afghan Citizen Card holders to leave by March 31
  • Islamabad has in the past blamed militant attacks and crimes on Afghan citizens
  • “Pakistan has been a gracious host and continues to fulfil its commitments and obligations as a responsible state,” the country’s interior ministry said

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s interior ministry on Friday asked all “illegal foreigners” and Afghan Citizen Card holders to leave the country before March 31, warning they would otherwise be deported from April 1.
Islamabad has in the past blamed militant attacks and crimes on Afghan citizens, who form the largest portion of migrants in the country. Kabul has rejected the accusations.
“Pakistan has been a gracious host and continues to fulfil its commitments and obligations as a responsible state,” the country’s interior ministry said in a statement. “It is reiterated that individuals staying in Pakistan will have to fulfil all legal formalities.”
Pakistan launched its repatriation drive of foreign citizens, most of whom are Afghan, in 2023, but had said they were first focusing on foreigners with no legal documentation.
More than 800,000 Afghans hold an Afghan Citizen Card in Pakistan, according to UN data. Another roughly 1.3 million are formally registered with the Pakistan government and hold a separate Proof of Residence card. The statement did not specify how PoR holders would be affected.
The UN says that more than 800,000 Afghans have returned to Afghanistan from Pakistan since the repatriation drive began and that in total Pakistan hosted around 2.8 million Afghan refugees who crossed the border during 40 years of conflict in their homeland.
Among those are tens of thousands of Afghans in the process for resettlement to the United States and other Western nations following their withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021 as the Taliban took over.


Bosnian Serb leader Dodik asks Serbs to quit federal police, judiciary

Bosnian Serb leader Dodik asks Serbs to quit federal police, judiciary
Updated 07 March 2025
Follow

Bosnian Serb leader Dodik asks Serbs to quit federal police, judiciary

Bosnian Serb leader Dodik asks Serbs to quit federal police, judiciary
  • The call follows a series of moves that risk pushing Bosnia into greater uncertainty
  • “We have ensured them a job, while preserving their legal status, ranks, and positions,” said Dodik

SARAJEVO: Bosnian Serb leader Milorad Dodik on Friday called on ethnic Serbs to quit the federal police force and courts and join the government of the deeply divided country’s Serb statelet.
The call follows a series of moves that risk pushing Bosnia into greater uncertainty a week after Dodik was convicted for defying an international envoy charged with overseeing the Balkan country’s peace accords.
“We have ensured them a job, while preserving their legal status, ranks, and positions. They will receive the same salary, or even a higher salary than they had,” said Dodik, who is the president of Bosnia’s Serb statelet Republika Srpska (RS).
Dodik later added there were no plans for violent escalation but insisted that the RS had “the ability to defend itself, and we will do that.”
Earlier this week, Dodik signed a raft of bills into law that banned the central police and judiciary from his statelet.
Dodik pushed the legislation through the RS parliament last week, after he was sentenced to a year in prison and banned from office for six years for refusing to comply with decisions made by Christian Schmidt — the international envoy charged with overseeing Bosnia’s peace accords.
The legislation has escalated tensions in Bosnia and is proving to be a key test for its fragile, post-war institutions.
Dodik later said he planned to ignore a summons from Bosnia’s chief prosecutor who is investigating Dodik for allegedly undermining the constitution.
Since the end of Bosnia’s inter-ethnic war in the 1990s, the country has consisted of two autonomous halves — the Serb-dominated RS and a Muslim-Croat statelet.
The two are linked by weak central institutions, while each has its own government and parliament.
The high representative holds vast powers in Bosnia — including the ability to effectively fire political leaders and strip them of power.
Dodik’s conviction last week was linked to his role pushing through two laws in 2023 previously annulled by the high representative Schmidt.
The legislation refused to recognize decisions made by the high representative and Bosnia’s constitutional court in the RS.
This followed months of tensions, as Dodik engaged in a bitter feud with Schmidt.
For years, Dodik has pursued a relentless separatist agenda that has put him on a collision course with Bosnia’s institutions.
The RS president has repeatedly threatened to pull the Serb statelet out of Bosnia’s central institutions — including its army, judiciary and tax system, which has led to sanctions from the United States.


European leaders downplay skepticism from Trump about NATO solidarity

European leaders downplay skepticism from Trump about NATO solidarity
Updated 07 March 2025
Follow

European leaders downplay skepticism from Trump about NATO solidarity

European leaders downplay skepticism from Trump about NATO solidarity
  • Māris Riekstins, Latvia’s ambassador to NATO, stressed the military alliance remained the most important platform for addressing transatlantic security issues
  • In Spain, Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said his country would raise defense spending to reach NATO’s target faster than previously committed

MADRID: European Union leaders on Friday downplayed skepticism from US President Donald Trump about solidarity among NATO members a day after they backed plans to spend more on defense amid wavering US support.
After European leaders committed Thursday to freeing up hundreds of billions of euros for security, Trump said he was “not so sure” that the military alliance would come to the United States’ defense if the country were attacked.
“We are loyal and faithful allies,” French President Emmanuel Macron said late Thursday in response, expressing “respect and friendship” toward US leaders and adding that France was “entitled to expect the same.”
Māris Riekstins, Latvia’s ambassador to NATO, stressed the military alliance remained the most important platform for addressing transatlantic security issues. He emphasized the commitment from his country — which shares a nearly 300-kilometer (186-mile) border with Russia — to defense spending.
The Baltic country last month said spending should be increased to 4 percent of GDP next year and move toward 5 percent.
Trump’s repeated warnings that he would make European allies face the threat of Russia alone has spurred countries that for decades faltered on defense spending to find ways to bolster their security and back Ukraine in its war against Russia.
On Thursday, EU leaders signed off on a move to loosen budget restrictions so that willing EU countries could increase their military spending.
Following the emergency talks in Brussels, Trump again suggested that the US could abandon its NATO commitments if member countries didn’t meet the alliance’s defense spending targets. He expressed doubt that other allies will come to the defense of the US — though they have done so after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, the only instance in which the Article 5 mutual defense guarantee was invoked.
The US president has criticized the alliance for years, arguing that European members have not contributed enough toward their own security.
In Spain, Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said his country would raise defense spending to reach NATO’s target faster than previously committed. But he did not specify when the eurozone’s fourth-largest economy — and NATO laggard — would hit the 2 percent of GDP military spending target.
Spain spent an estimated 1.28 percent of GDP on defense last year. Italy and Belgium also spent less than the 2 percent target last year, according to NATO estimates.
NATO members pledged in 2014 to spend at least 2 percent of GDP on defense, which 23 countries were expected to meet last year amid concerns about the war in Ukraine. Spain, which ranked last among NATO members for the share of GDP it contributed to the military, previously said it would reach that target by 2029.
Sánchez emphasized Spain’s commitment to European security and to backing Ukraine — though he stated that the security threats faced by the southern European nation were of a different nature than what European allies on the bloc’s eastern front face from Russia.
Still, he said, “it’s clear that we all have to make an effort and an accelerated effort.”
Though he did not name Trump, the Spanish leader on Thursday argued for a stronger, more unified Europe, saying that “while some (leaders) raise walls and tariffs, we build bridges and close trade agreements.”
Meanwhile, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni made comments that appeared to backtrack on previous support for Ukraine joining NATO. She argued that extending the alliance’s mutual defense guarantees to Ukraine without granting it membership would ensure “stable, lasting and effective security.”
Sweden on Friday marked its first anniversary as a member of NATO, with posts on social platform X from Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson and the Ministry for Foreign Affairs.
Neither mentioned Trump’s comments but focused on “a more secure Sweden and a stronger NATO.”


Kyiv seeks more information about Meloni proposal for security guarantees

Kyiv seeks more information about Meloni proposal for security guarantees
Updated 07 March 2025
Follow

Kyiv seeks more information about Meloni proposal for security guarantees

Kyiv seeks more information about Meloni proposal for security guarantees
  • Ukraine is seeking security guarantees from its Western allies ahead of any peace talks to end Russia’s invasion
  • It wants NATO membership but the United States under President Donald Trump has rejected this

KYIV: Kyiv said on Friday it was asking Italy for more information about a proposal by Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni to extend NATO’s mutual defense umbrella to Ukraine without offering it alliance membership or sending peacekeeping troops.
Ukraine is seeking security guarantees from its Western allies ahead of any peace talks to end Russia’s invasion. It wants NATO membership but the United States under President Donald Trump has rejected this.
Britain, France and other countries are also drawing up plans to deploy European troops to safeguard a potential ceasefire under a future peace deal. Russia opposes such plans but Trump has said he believes Moscow might agree.
Meloni, leader of a far-right nationalist party in Italy, is an ally of Trump but has remained a strong public supporter of Ukraine.
On the sidelines of an EU summit in Brussels on Thursday, she said extending NATO’s Article 5 collective security agreement would be a more “lasting solution” than sending European peacekeepers or granting Kyiv full membership.
Article 5 of NATO’s founding treaty requires all alliance members to consider an attack on any of them to be an attack on all.
“We welcome this statement as part of the discussion on providing Ukraine with long-term security guarantees and ensuring security and peace in general,” Ukrainian Foreign Ministry spokesman Heorhii Tykhyi said at a briefing in Kyiv.
“As for this proposal specifically, we are in contact with our Italian colleagues to clarify the specifics of this proposal,” Tykhyi said, adding that Ukraine still wants its partners to send troop contingents as part of any peace effort.
Deputy Prime Minister Olha Stefanishyna told Ukrainian television on Friday that Meloni’s idea was “very pragmatic.”
Following a massive Russian air strike on Ukraine’s energy system on Friday, President Volodymyr Zelensky repeated a call made earlier this week for a truce covering air and sea, though not ground troops, as a first step toward peace.


Ramadan in Kashmir: Traders boycott Israeli dates in solidarity with Gaza

Ramadan in Kashmir: Traders boycott Israeli dates in solidarity with Gaza
Updated 07 March 2025
Follow

Ramadan in Kashmir: Traders boycott Israeli dates in solidarity with Gaza

Ramadan in Kashmir: Traders boycott Israeli dates in solidarity with Gaza
  • Despite Israeli dates entering the market at lower prices, Kashmiri traders opt for more expensive Saudi fruits
  • Traders are also involved in raising awareness about Israel’s decades-long occupation of Palestinian lands

NEW DELHI: As Umar Mehraj arranged fruits at his shop in Srinagar, the capital of Jammu and Kashmir, he displayed at least a dozen varieties of dates, carefully sourcing them from various places in the Middle East — making sure none came from Israel.

Dates are a staple food for breaking the fast during Ramadan in the Indian-controlled Himalayan region, where the majority of the population is Muslim.

In previous years, Israeli-labeled fruits have entered the local market, but traders are now trying to prevent that — a gesture of solidarity with Palestine in response to Israel’s ongoing genocidal assault on the people of Gaza and the West Bank.

“We have taken the initiative to boycott Israeli products as much as possible. Thank God, we are successful 100 percent,” Mehraj told Arab News.

“How do we know whether it is from Israel or not? You can see that all the boxes have labels, you can know where they are packaged and what the origin is. This is the time of the internet ... we know (Israeli brands) through WhatsApp groups, Facebook, or Instagram. We avoid dates from those companies in our shops.”

Attacks by Israeli forces have killed at least 61,700 people in Gaza since October 2023, according to the latest estimates by the enclave government’s media office. Most of the civilian infrastructure in Gaza has been either damaged or destroyed, including hospitals, with none remaining fully functional.

“You can see what the global situation is right now. You can see the unprecedented torture being inflicted on our Palestinian brothers and sisters,” said Mohammad Ibrahim Beigh, another dry fruit seller in Srinagar.

“As a trader community, we don’t have any political influence, but we can play our role at the level of commerce. We can boycott.”

Despite Israeli dates entering the Indian market at lower prices than other fruits, Kashmiri traders opt for the more expensive Saudi Arabia or North African varieties.

“Israeli dates are procured at cheaper rates. If we wanted, we could double our profit. Still, we are bringing only Saudi or Moroccan dates, or dates from other Middle Eastern countries,” Beigh said, adding that traders were also involved in raising awareness about how for decades Israel has occupied Palestinian lands, harvested them and labeled the produce as its own.

Amir Salam, who also sells other food products besides dates at his shop, has gone a step further by removing goods from major Western companies featured on the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement’s lists.

“I used to have the dealership of Coke and Pepsi, but ever since Israel started attacking Gaza and killing innocent people, I have given up the dealership of these drinks,” he said.

The efforts resonate well with the people of Kashmir, who like Nasir Khuehami, national convenor of the Jammu and Kashmir Students’ Association, have for decades “seen echoes of their own struggle in Palestine’s fight for dignity and justice.”

The boycott was for him a “peaceful yet powerful assertion” that systematic oppression cannot be normalized.

And it was also one of the means through which Kashmiris could show their support.

“People in Jammu and Kashmir feel strongly about the atrocities happening in Gaza and the suffering the Palestinian people are going through,” said Aijaz Ahamad, a business professional.

“We don’t have power, but we have this weapon of boycott, and we are boycotting Israeli products as a mark of resistance, and in solidarity with the Palestinian people.”