Los Angeles firefighters brace for threat of more powerful winds
Los Angeles firefighters brace for threat of more powerful winds/node/2586576/world
Los Angeles firefighters brace for threat of more powerful winds
Fire fighters spray water and soap to eliminate hotspots in a wooden wall next to the Getty Vllage Museum on Jan. 12, 2025 in the Pacific Palisades neighborhood of Los Angeles, California. (AFP)
Los Angeles firefighters brace for threat of more powerful winds
Local officials urged residents to stay vigilant throughout the day on Wednesday and be prepared to evacuate at a moment’s notice
Some 6.5 million people remained under a critical fire threat
Updated 15 January 2025
Reuters
LOS ANGELES: The threat of powerful wind gusts combined with bone-dry humidity in Los Angeles on Wednesday could pose a severe test for firefighters who have been battling to keep monstrous fires in check since last week.
Local officials urged residents to stay vigilant throughout the day on Wednesday and be prepared to evacuate at a moment’s notice, even after tamer-than-expected winds over the last 24 hours.
“We want to reiterate the particularly dangerous situation today. Get ready now and be prepared to leave,” County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath said during a news conference on Wednesday.
Some 6.5 million people remained under a critical fire threat as winds were forecast to be 20 to 40 miles (32-64 km) an hour with gusts up to 70 mph and humidity dropping into the single digits during the day, the National Weather Service said.
The combination of low humidity and strong winds has further dried out the brush, increasing the risk of fire, Los Angeles City Fire Chief Kristin Crowley said.
“The danger has not yet passed,” she said, noting that firefighters have seen up to 40 mph winds on Wednesday.
The death toll from the fires stood at 25. The estimate of structures damaged or destroyed held steady at over 12,000, portending a Herculean rebuilding effort ahead. Entire neighborhoods have been leveled, leaving smoldering ash and rubble. In many homes, only a chimney is left standing. Some 82,400 residents were still under evacuation orders with other 90,400 facing evacuation warnings, County Sheriff Robert Luna said.
Winds were tamer than expected on Tuesday, letting firefighters extinguish or gain control of some small brush fires that ignited. No major wildfires erupted in the area, as had been feared.
During the day, the milder-than-expected conditions also allowed some 8,500 firefighters from at least seven states and two foreign countries to hold the line on the Palisades and Eaton fires for the second day running.
The Palisades Fire on the west edge of town held steady at 23,713 acres (96 square km) burned, and containment nudged up to 19 percent — a measurement of how much of the perimeter was under control. The Eaton Fire in the foothills east of the city stood at 14,117 acres (57 sq km) with containment at 45 percent. The fires have consumed an area the size of Washington, D.C.
“In the past 24 hours, there has been little to no fire growth on both incidents,” Cal Fire Incident Commander Gerry Magaña said.
A fleet of aircraft dropped water and retardant into the rugged hills while ground crews with hand tools and hoses have worked around the clock since the fires broke out on Jan. 7, with the aircraft occasionally grounded by high winds.
Crowley and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass fielded questions on Wednesday about a Los Angeles Times report that 1,000 firefighters were on standby but not quickly deployed after fire broke out on Jan. 7.
“We did everything in our capability to surge where we could,” Crowley said.
Southern California has lacked any appreciable rain since April, turning brush into tinder as Santa Ana winds originating from the deserts whipped over hilltops and rushed through canyons, sending embers flying up to two miles ahead of the fires.
Private forecaster AccuWeather estimates total damage and economic loss between $250 billion and $275 billion, which would make it the costliest natural disaster in US history, surpassing Hurricane Katrina in 2005.
Trump says Ukraine-Russia talks might be going well
Updated 15 sec ago
Reuters
ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE: US President Donald Trump on Sunday said the US-brokered talks to end the war between Ukraine and Russia might be going OK, adding there’s a time when you have to put up or shut up.
At a meeting between US and Russian envoys earlier this week, it was said that the fastest way to broker a ceasefire in Ukraine was to support a strategy that would give Russia ownership of four eastern Ukrainian regions it attempted to annex illegally in 2022, people familiar with the situation told Reuters.
Trump’s China tariff shocks US importers. One CEO calls it ‘end of days’
Over the years, American companies have set up supply chains that depend on thousands of Chinese factories
Now Trump is demanding that manufacturers return production to America, hurting American importers and Chinese factories they rely on
Updated 13 April 2025
AP
WASHINGTON: Rick Woldenberg thought he had come up with a sure-fire plan to protect his Chicago-area educational toy company from President Donald Trump’s massive new taxes on Chinese imports.
“When he announced a 20 percent tariff, I made a plan to survive 40 percent, and I thought I was being very clever,” said Woldenberg, CEO of Learning Resources, a third-generation family business that has been manufacturing in China for four decades. “I had worked out that for a very modest price increase, we could withstand 40 percent tariffs, which was an unthinkable increase in costs.”
His worst-case scenario wasn’t worst-case enough. Not even close.
The American president quickly upped the ante with China, raising the levy to 54 percent to offset what he said were China’s unfair trade practices. Then, enraged when China retaliated with tariffs of its own, he upped the levies to a staggering 145 percent.
Woldenberg reckons that will push Learning Resource’s tariff bill from $2.3 million last year to $100.2 million in 2025. “I wish I had $100 million,” he said. “Honest to God, no exaggeration: It feels like the end of days.” ‘Addicted’ to low-price Chinese goods
It might at least be the end of an era of inexpensive consumer goods in America. For four decades, and especially since China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001, Americans have relied on Chinese factories for everything from smartphones to Christmas ornaments.
As tensions between the world’s two biggest economies — and geopolitical rivals — have risen over the past decade, Mexico and Canada have supplanted China as America’s top source of imported goods and services. But China is still No. 3 — and second behind Mexico in goods alone — and continues to dominate in many categories.
Products of Learning Resources, an educational toy company whose products are manufactured in China, are shown at a showroom in Vernon Hills, Illinois, on April 11, 2025. (AP Photo)
China produces 97 percent of America’s imported baby carriages, 96 percent of its artificial flowers and umbrellas, 95 percent of its fireworks, 93 percent of its children’s coloring books and 90 percent of its combs, according to a report from the Macquarie investment bank.
Over the years, American companies have set up supply chains that depend on thousands of Chinese factories. Low tariffs greased the system. As recently as January 2018, US tariffs on China averaged just over 3 percent, according to Chad Bown of the Peterson Institute for International Economics.
“American consumers created China,” said Joe Jurken, founder of the ABC Group in Milwaukee, which helps US businesses manage supply chains in Asia. “American buyers, the consumers, got addicted to cheap pricing. And the brands and the retailers got addicted to the ease of buying from China.” Slower growth and higher prices
Now Trump, demanding that manufacturers return production to America, is swinging a tariff sledgehammer at the American importers and the Chinese factories they rely on.
“The consequences of tariffs at this scale could be apocalyptic at many levels,” said David French, senior vice president of government affairs at the National Retail Foundation.
The Yale University Budget Lab estimates that the tariffs that Trump has announced globally since taking office would lower US economic growth by 1.1 percentage points in 2025.
The tariffs are also likely to push up prices. The University of Michigan’s survey of consumer sentiment, out Friday, found that Americans expect long-term inflation to reach 4.4 percent, up from 4.1 percent last month.
“Inflation’s going up in the United States,” said Stephen Roach, former chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia and now at Yale Law School’s China Center. “Consumers have figured this out as well.” “No business can run on uncertainty”
It’s not just the size of Trump’s tariffs that has businesses bewildered and scrambling; it’s the speed and the unpredictability with which the president is rolling them out.
On Wednesday, the White House said the tariffs on China would hit 125 percent. A day later, it corrected that: No, the tariffs would be 145 percent, including a previously announced 20 percent to pressure China to do more to stop the flow of fentanyl into the United States.
China in turn has imposed a 125 percent tariff on the US effective Saturday.
“There is so much uncertainty,” said Isaac Larian, the founder of MGA Entertainment, which makes L.O.L. and Bratz dolls, among other toys. “And no business can run on uncertainty.”
His company gets 65 percent of its product from Chinese factories, a share he is trying to winnow down to 40 percent by the end of the year. MGA also manufactures in India, Vietnam and Cambodia, but Trump is threatening to levy heavy tariffs on those countries, too, after delaying them for 90 days.
Larian estimates that the price of Bratz dolls could go from $15 to $40 and that of L.O.L. dolls could double to $20 by this year’s holiday season.
Even his Little Tikes brand, which is made in Ohio, is not immune. Little Tikes depends on screws and other parts from China. Larian figures the price for its toy cars could rise to $90 from a suggested retail price of $65.
He said MGA would likely cut orders for the fourth quarter because he is worried that higher prices will scare off consumers. Calling off China production plans
Marc Rosenberg, founder and CEO of The Edge Desk in Deerfield, Illinois, invested millions of dollars of his own money to develop $1,000 ergonomic chairs, which were to start production in China next month.
Now’s he’s delaying production while exploring markets outside the US, including Germany and Italy, where his chairs wouldn’t face Trump’s triple-digit tariffs.He said he wants to see how the situation plays out.
The US flag flutters at the US consulate general in Shanghai on April 12, 2025. (AFP)
He had looked for ways to make the chairs in the United States and had discussions with potential suppliers in Michigan, but the costs would have been 25 percent to 30 percent higher.
“They didn’t have the skilled labor to do this stuff, and they didn’t have the desire to do it,” Rosenberg said. Making Chinese imports go ‘kaput’
Woldenberg’s company in Vernon Hills, Illinois, has been in the family since 1916. It was started by his grandfather as a laboratory supply company and evolved over the years into Learning Resources.
The company specializes in educational toys such as Botley: The Coding Robot and the brainteaser Kanoodle. It employs about 500 people — 90 percent in the United States — and makes about 2,400 products in China.
Products of Learning Resources, an educational toy company whose products are manufactured in China, are shown at a showroom in Vernon Hills, Illinois, on April 11, 2025. (AP Photo)
Woldenberg is reeling from the size and suddenness of Trump’s tariffs.
“The products I make in China, about 60 percent of what I do, become economically unviable overnight,” he said. “In an instant, snap of a finger, they’re kaput.”
He described Trump’s call for factories to return to the United States as “a joke.”
“I have been looking for American manufacturers for a long time ... and I have come up with zero companies to partner with,” he said.
The tariffs, unless they’re reduced or eliminated, will wipe out thousands of small Chinese suppliers, Woldenberg predicted.
That would spell disaster for companies like his that have installed expensive tools and molds in Chinese factories, he said. The stand to lose not only their manufacturing base but also possibly their tools, which could get caught up in bankruptcies in China.
Learning Resources has about 10,000 molds, weighing collectively more than 5 million pounds, in China.
“It’s not like you just bring in a canvas bag, zip it up and walk out,” Woldenberg said. “There is no idle manufacturing hub standing fully equipped, full of engineers and qualified people waiting for me to show up with 10,000 molds to make 2,000 products.”
UK finance minister eyes closer EU ties, warns ‘profound’ impact of tariffs
Britain’s economy returned to growth in February with its fastest expansion in 11 months, beating economists’ expectations
Updated 13 April 2025
Reuters
ONDON: British finance minister Rachel Reeves wrote in a column for the Observer due to be published on Sunday that she wants to achieve “an ambitious new relationship” with the European Union while still negotiating a trade deal with the United States.
In a separate article from Reeves’ column on Saturday, the Observer said the finance minister wrote that tariffs introduced by US President Donald Trump will have a “profound” effect on Britain and world economies.
Reeves will say that she is “under no illusion about the difficulties that lie ahead,” according to the Observer.
“The Labour party is an internationalist party. We understand the benefits of free and fair trade and collaboration. Now is not the time to turn our backs on the world.”
The finance minister plans to advocate for a “more balanced global economic and trading system” at the upcoming International Monetary Fund meeting later this month.
Britain’s economy returned to growth in February with its fastest expansion in 11 months, beating economists’ expectations and placing it on a slightly firmer footing as it braces for the impact of the tariffs.
Meanwhile, Pamela Coke-Hamilton, the director of the United Nations trade agency, said on Friday that tariffs and countermeasures could have a “catastrophic” impact on developing countries, hitting even harder than foreign aid cuts.
US exempts tech imports in another tariff step back after China retaliates strongly
The move came as retaliatory Chinese import tariffs of 125 percent on US goods took effect Saturday, with Beijing standing defiant against its biggest trade partner
The exemptions will benefit US tech companies like Nvidia and Dell, as well as Apple, which makes iPhones and other premium products in China
Updated 13 April 2025
AFP
WASHINGTON: The Trump administration has exempted a raft of consumer electronics from its punishing import tariffs — offering relief to US tech firms and partially dialling down a trade war with China.
A notice late Friday by the US Customs and Border Protection office said smartphones, laptops, memory chips and other products would be excluded from the global levies President Donald Trump rolled out a week ago.
The move came as retaliatory Chinese import tariffs of 125 percent on US goods took effect Saturday, with Beijing standing defiant against its biggest trade partner.
The exemptions will benefit US tech companies like Nvidia and Dell, as well as Apple, which makes iPhones and other premium products in China.
And they will generally narrow the impact of the staggering 145 percent tariffs Trump has imposed this year on Chinese goods entering the United States.
US Customs data suggests the exempted items account for more than 20 percent of those Chinese imports, according to senior RAND researcher Gerard DiPippo.
Washington and Beijing’s escalating tariff battle has raised fears of an enduring trade war between the world’s two largest economies and sent global markets into a tailspin.
The fallout has sent particular shockwaves through the US economy, with investors dumping government bonds, the dollar tumbling and consumer confidence plunging.
Adding to the pressure on Trump, Wall Street billionaires — including a number of his own supporters — have openly criticized the whole tariff strategy as damaging and counter-productive.
‘Best news possible’
Daniel Ives, senior equity analyst at Wedbush Securities, called the US exemptions the “best news possible” for tech investors.
The exclusions remove “a huge black cloud” that had threatened to take the US tech sector “back a decade” and significantly slow AI development, Ives said in a note.
Many of the exempted products, including hard drives and computer processors, are not generally made in the United States, with Trump arguing tariffs are a way to bring domestic manufacturing back.
Commenting on the exemptions announcement, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt insisted that the likes of Apple and Nvidia were still “hustling to onshore their manufacturing in the United States” as soon as possible.
Many analysts, however, say it will likely take years to ramp up domestic production.
With tariffs still in force on less complex products, Trump’s “exemptions will not reshore iPhones or tech goods and they will not reshore either cheap goods we can’t and won’t produce at home,” New York University economist Nouriel Roubini posted Saturday on X.
The president’s policy was “contradictory, dissonant, inconsistent and incoherent... taken by the seat of the pants,” he added.
‘Not afraid of Trump's bullying’
Even with Washington and Beijing going toe to toe and financial markets in turmoil, Trump has remained adamant that his tariff policy is on the right track.
Beijing has vowed not to give in to what it sees as bullying tactics, and — in his first comments on the tensions — President Xi Jinping stressed Friday that China was “not afraid.”
Economists warn the disruption in trade between the tightly integrated US and Chinese economies will increase prices for consumers and could spark a global recession.
The US alone buys up 16.4 percent of Chinese exports, according to Beijing’s trade data, making for total exchanges between the two countries worth $500 billion — with the US sending significantly less the other way.
China’s Commerce Minister Wang Wentao told the head of the World Trade Organization (WTO) that US tariffs will “inflict serious harm” on poor nations.
“The United States has continuously introduced tariff measures, bringing enormous uncertainty and instability to the world, causing chaos both internationally and domestically within the US,” Wang told WTO chief Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala in a call.
The White House says Trump remains “optimistic” about securing a deal with China, although administration officials have made it clear they expect Beijing to reach out first.
UK government to take control of British Steel under emergency law
The Chinese owners of British Steel have said it is no longer financially viable to run the two furnaces at the Scunthorpe site, where up to 2,700 jobs have been at risk
Jingye bought British Steel in 2020 and says it has invested more than £1.2 billion ($1.5 billion) to maintain operations but is losing around £700,000 a day
Updated 13 April 2025
AFP
LONDON : The UK government said it was taking control of Chinese-owned British Steel on Saturday after rushing an emergency law through parliament to avert the shutdown of the country’s last factory that can make steel from scratch.
The struggling plant in northern England had faced imminent closure and Prime Minister Keir Starmer said his government “stepped in to save British Steel” with legislation to prevent its blast furnaces going out.
At a rare weekend session, parliament approved the law without opposition to take over the running of the Scunthorpe site, which employs several thousand people and produces steel crucial for UK industries including construction and rail transport.
The government saw its possible closure as a risk to Britain’s long-term economic security, given the decline of the UK’s once robust steel industry.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer speaks during a visit to meet British Steel workers in Appleby Village Hall near Scunthorpe, Lincolnshire, UK, on April 12, 2025. (Pool via REUTERS)
Officials were poised to take over the site after the emergency bill passed into law on Saturday evening, according to UK media reports.
Following its approval Starmer said his administration was “turning the page on a decade of decline” and “acting to protect the jobs of thousands of workers.”
He insisted “all options are on the table to secure the future of the industry,” after a government minister indicated nationalization could be a likely next step.
Earlier, as MPs debated in parliament, the prime minister made a dash to the region where he told steelworkers gathered in a nearby village hall that the measure was “in the national interest.”
He said the “pretty unprecedented” move meant the government could secure “a future for steel” in Britain.
“The most important thing is we’ve got control of the site, we can make the decisions about what happens, and that means that those blast furnaces will stay on,” he said.
It came after protests at the plant and reports that workers had stopped executives from the company’s Chinese owners Jingye accessing key areas of the steelworks on Saturday morning.
The Times newspaper said British Steel workers had seen off a “delegation of Chinese executives” trying to enter critical parts of the works.
Police said officers attended the scene “following a suspected breach of the peace,” but no arrests were made.
State ownership considered
Facing questions about nationalization in parliament, business and trade secretary Jonathan Reynolds said state ownership “remains on the table” and may be the “likely option.”
But he said the scope of Saturday’s legislation was more limited — it “does not transfer ownership to the government,” he explained, saying this would have to be dealt with at a later stage.
Ministers have said no private company has been willing to invest in the plant.
Jonathan Reynolds, Britain's secretary for business, energy and industrial strategy, speaking during a special Parliament session called to pass emergency legislation to save the British Steel company from closing down. (House of Commons handout photo / AFP)
The Chinese owners have said it is no longer financially viable to run the two furnaces at the site, where up to 2,700 jobs have been at risk.
Jingye bought British Steel in 2020 and says it has invested more than £1.2 billion ($1.5 billion) to maintain operations but is losing around £700,000 a day.
Reynolds said “the effective market value of this company is zero,” and that Jingye had wanted to maintain the operation in the UK but supply it with slab steel from China to keep it going.
The Labour government came under fire from the opposition Conservative party for its handling of the negotiations and faced calls from some left-wing politicians to fully nationalize the plant, while unions also urged the government to go further.
Reynolds explained the government had sought to buy raw materials to keep the furnaces running with “no losses whatsoever for Jingye,” but met with resistance.
Instead Jingye demanded the UK “transfer hundreds of millions of pounds to them, without any conditions to stop that money and potentially other assets being immediately transferred to China,” he said. “They also refused a condition to keep the blast furnaces maintained.”
Saturday’s legislation allowed for criminal sanctions and gave the government powers to take over assets if executives fail to comply with instructions to keep the blast furnaces open.
Trump tariffs partly to blame
MPs had left for their Easter holidays on Tuesday and had not been due to return to parliament until April 22 when the rare session was called.
MPs last sat on a Saturday recall of parliament at the start of the Falklands War between Britain and Argentina in 1982.
Scunthorpe in northern England hosts Britain’s last virgin steel plant — which produces steel from raw rather than recycled materials — after Indian firm Tata’s Port Talbot site shuttered its blast furnace last year.
British Steel has said US President Donald Trump’s recent tariffs on the sector were partly to blame for the Scunthorpe plant’s difficulties.
However, fierce competition from cheaper Asian steel has heaped pressure on Europe’s beleaguered industry in recent years.
British Steel has its roots as far back as the Industrial Revolution but took shape in 1967 when the Labour government nationalized the industry, which at the time employed nearly 270,000 people.
