Pressure mounting on police to reverse ban on pro-Palestine march at BBC

Pressure mounting on police to reverse ban on pro-Palestine march at BBC
The march’s organizers, the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) and its coalition partners, issued a joint statement urging the police to reconsider their decision. (Getty Images)
Short Url
Updated 13 January 2025
Follow

Pressure mounting on police to reverse ban on pro-Palestine march at BBC

Pressure mounting on police to reverse ban on pro-Palestine march at BBC
  • London’s Met Police banned rally amid concern over “serious disruption” to nearby synagogue
  • Organizers pledge to hold Jan. 18 march following widespread backlash

LONDON: Calls are growing for London’s Metropolitan Police to reverse their decision to ban a planned pro-Palestine demonstration that was set to take place on Saturday outside the BBC headquarters.

The march’s organizers, the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) and its coalition partners, issued a joint statement on Monday urging the police to reconsider their decision.

They also highlighted their commitment to proceeding with the protest, albeit along a revised route, following widespread backlash.

“PSC are calling on all those who support an immediate ceasefire and an end to Israel’s genocide in Gaza, as well as everyone who believes in the democratic right to protest, to join us in London at 12 p.m. on Jan. 18,” the group said.

“We will assemble in Whitehall, which will allow us to form up in massive numbers in an orderly fashion, and we will march toward the BBC.”

In a statement sent to Arab News on Monday evening, Met spokesperson Chris Humphreys said that authorities were aware of the proposed new route and would meet with PSC representatives on Tuesday to discuss the matter further.

“The Palestine Solidarity Campaign has announced a new route for its march this Saturday. This route is a reversal of the original one that had been advertised,” said Humphreys.

“It is not one we have agreed and it would breach the conditions that have been imposed under the Public Order Act.

“We imposed those conditions because we were satisfied, after carefully considering the evidence, that a demonstration forming up in the vicinity of a synagogue on a Saturday, when congregants would be attending Shabbat services, would cause serious disruption. Our assessment is that a demonstration ending and dispersing from the same place would have the same impact.”

The decision to ban the march, announced last week, came amid concerns about potential “serious disruption” to a nearby synagogue.

The police invoked the Public Order Act to prevent the rally — initially agreed upon in November — from gathering at the BBC’s headquarters.

The Metropolitan Police said that their decision followed consultations with local community and business representatives, including members of the synagogue’s congregation located “very close” to the rally’s proposed starting point.

The PSC has rejected claims that the march poses a threat to Jewish communities.

In a previous statement, the group said: “There has not been a single documented case of a threat or incident at a synagogue in relation to the national Palestine marches that have taken place over the last 15 months of the Gaza genocide.”

Ben Jamal, the PSC’s director, said on Monday: “Hundreds of thousands of people wish to continue to protest at our government’s ongoing complicity with Israel’s genocide against the Palestinian people.

“They also wish to protest at the complicity of the BBC, which has failed to report the facts of this genocide, as revealed in recent investigations. There are no legitimate grounds for the police to impede our proposal to march from Whitehall to the BBC, finishing with a rally outside its HQ. We call upon the Met Police to make clear they will drop any conditions which will deny the right to protest as planned.”

Over the weekend, hundreds of political, social and cultural figures voiced their support for the right to demonstrate in solidarity with Palestine.

A letter organized by a Jewish bloc that regularly takes part in Palestine marches was signed by more than 700 members of the Jewish community.

Among the signatories were Holocaust survivors and their descendants, who also penned a public letter supporting the rally.

The PSC said that they have written to the police requesting a meeting about the march.

The PSC have been contacted for comment.


Dangerous dreams: Inside Internet’s ‘sleepmaxxing’ craze

Dangerous dreams: Inside Internet’s ‘sleepmaxxing’ craze
Updated 07 August 2025
Follow

Dangerous dreams: Inside Internet’s ‘sleepmaxxing’ craze

Dangerous dreams: Inside Internet’s ‘sleepmaxxing’ craze
  • One so-called insomnia cure involves people hanging by their necks with ropes or belts and swinging their bodies in the air
  • The explosive rise of the trend underscores social media’s power to legitimize unproven health practices, particularly as tech platforms scale back content moderation

WASHINGTON: From mouth taping to rope-assisted neck swinging, a viral social media trend is promoting extreme bedtime routines that claim to deliver perfect sleep — despite scant medical evidence and potential safety risks.

Influencers on platforms including TikTok and X are fueling a growing wellness obsession popularly known as “sleepmaxxing,” a catch-all term for activities and products aimed at optimizing sleep quality.

The explosive rise of the trend — generating tens of millions of posts — underscores social media’s power to legitimize unproven health practices, particularly as tech platforms scale back content moderation.

One so-called insomnia cure involves people hanging by their necks with ropes or belts and swinging their bodies in the air.

“Those who try it claim their sleep problems have significantly improved,” said one clip on X that racked up more than 11 million views.

Experts have raised alarm about the trick, following a Chinese state broadcaster’s report that attributed at least one fatality in China last year to a similar “neck hanging” routine.

Such sleepmaxxing techniques are “ridiculous, potentially harmful, and evidence-free,” Timothy Caulfield, a misinformation expert from the University of Alberta in Canada, told AFP.

“It is a good example of how social media can normalize the absurd.”

Another popular practice is taping of the mouth for sleep, promoted as a way to encourage nasal breathing. Influencers claim it offers broad benefits, from better sleep and improved oral health to reduced snoring.

But a report from George Washington University found that most of these claims were not supported by medical research.

Experts have also warned the practice could be dangerous, particularly for those suffering from sleep apnea, a condition that disrupts breathing during sleep.

Other unfounded tricks touted by sleepmaxxing influencers include wearing blue- or red-tinted glasses, using weighted blankets, and eating two kiwis just before bed.

‘Actively unhelpful, even damaging’

“My concern with the ‘sleepmaxxing’ trend — particularly as it’s presented on platforms like TikTok — is that much of the advice being shared can be actively unhelpful, even damaging, for people struggling with real sleep issues,” Kathryn Pinkham, a Britain-based insomnia specialist, told AFP.

“While some of these tips might be harmless for people who generally sleep well, they can increase pressure and anxiety for those dealing with chronic insomnia or other persistent sleep problems.”

While sound and sufficient sleep is considered a cornerstone of good health, experts warn that the trend may be contributing to orthosomnia, an obsessive preoccupation with achieving perfect sleep.

“The pressure to get perfect sleep is embedded in the sleepmaxxing culture,” said Eric Zhou of Harvard Medical School.

“While prioritizing restful sleep is commendable, setting perfection as your goal is problematic. Even good sleepers vary from night to night.”

Pinkham added that poor sleep was often fueled by the “anxiety to fix it,” a fact largely unacknowledged by sleepmaxxing influencers.

“The more we try to control sleep with hacks or rigid routines, the more vigilant and stressed we become — paradoxically making sleep harder,” Pinkham said.

Melatonin as insomnia treatment

Many sleepmaxxing posts focus on enhancing physical appearance rather than improving health, reflecting an overlap with “looksmaxxing” — another online trend that encourages unproven and sometimes dangerous techniques to boost sexual appeal.

Some sleepmaxxing influencers have sought to profit from the trend’s growing popularity, promoting products such as mouth tapes, sleep-enhancing drink powders, and “sleepmax gummies” containing melatonin.

That may be in violation of legal norms in some countries like Britain, where melatonin is available only as a prescription drug.

The American Academy of Sleep Medicine has recommended against using melatonin to treat insomnia in adults, citing inconsistent medical evidence regarding its effectiveness.

Some medical experts also caution about the impact of the placebo effect on insomnia patients using sleep medication — when people report real improvement after taking a fake or nonexistent treatment because of their beliefs.

“Many of these tips come from non-experts and aren’t grounded in clinical evidence,” said Pinkham.

“For people with genuine sleep issues, this kind of advice often adds pressure rather than relief.”


Meta facing $1bn lawsuit for livestreaming Oct. 7 Hamas attack

Meta facing $1bn lawsuit for livestreaming Oct. 7 Hamas attack
Updated 06 August 2025
Follow

Meta facing $1bn lawsuit for livestreaming Oct. 7 Hamas attack

Meta facing $1bn lawsuit for livestreaming Oct. 7 Hamas attack
  • Victims accuse Facebook, Instagram of being ‘pipeline for terror’
  • Case could set precedent for social media companies

LONDON: Survivors and relatives of Israeli victims of the Oct. 7 Hamas attack have filed a lawsuit against Meta, accusing the American tech giant of enabling and amplifying the atrocities through its platforms.

The plaintiffs are seeking nearly 4 billion shekels ($1.17 billion) in damages. The figure comprises 200,000 shekels for each victim whose suffering was broadcast or documented on Meta platforms and 20,000 shekels for every Israeli who was exposed to the footage.

The suit, filed with the Tel Aviv District Court, could set a precedent for social media companies. It alleges that Facebook and Instagram became “a pipeline for terror,” allowing Hamas militants to livestream and upload videos of killings, kidnappings and other atrocities.

The plaintiffs claim Meta failed to block or remove the footage in real time and left some content online for hours or even days.

Israeli news website Ynet reported that the legal action was initiated by the Idan family, who said Hamas gunmen stormed their home, held them hostage and murdered their eldest daughter, Maayan — all while livestreaming the attack on the mother’s Facebook account. The father, Tsachi, was abducted to Gaza and later killed.

“They livestreamed the murder of our daughter, our other children’s trauma and our cries for help,” the mother was quoted as saying.

“Facebook and Instagram enabled the broadcast of a brutal terror attack. And Meta is still allowing the footage to circulate.”

Another plaintiff said she learned of her grandmother Bracha Levinson’s abduction and death only after Hamas uploaded the footage to her Facebook page.

The lawsuit also includes claims from members of the public who say they were exposed to graphic and traumatic content simply by logging on to the platforms that day. They accuse Meta of failing to act quickly to protect users from the livestreamed violence. The platforms, they argue, became “an inseparable part of Hamas’ terror infrastructure.”

Meta is also accused of violating victims’ privacy and dignity, and of profiting from the viral spread of the footage. Plaintiffs argue that the company failed to activate rapid response systems or prevent its algorithms from promoting the violent content.

“Our hearts go out to the families affected by Hamas terrorism,” a Meta spokesperson said, adding that the company had set up dedicated teams working round the clock to remove the content and continued to remove any material that supported or glorified Hamas or the Oct. 7 attack.

The case is one of several filed in Israel and the US targeting actors accused of aiding or enabling Hamas propaganda and logistics. Last month, families of more than 120 victims sued the Palestinian Authority, claiming its “pay-for-slay” policy — providing monthly stipends to convicted attackers or their families — constituted material support for the massacre.


Latin America News Agency launches Arabic service

Latin America News Agency launches Arabic service
Updated 06 August 2025
Follow

Latin America News Agency launches Arabic service

Latin America News Agency launches Arabic service
  • Move part of efforts to build media, cultural ties between regions, LANA says

LONDON: The Latin America News Agency has launched a news service in Arabic, the first of its kind on the continent.

“From now on, all our content — website, video scripts, image data — is fully available in Arabic, in addition to Spanish and English,” the agency said on Wednesday.

The new service was part of the company’s efforts to build stronger “media and cultural ties” between Latin America and the Arab world and “facilitate access to reliable and up-to-date content,” it said.

Millions of people of Arab descent, primarily from Lebanon, Syria and Palestine, live in Latin America, mostly in Argentina, Brazil and Chile.

Based in Argentina, LANA collaborates with several international and regional agencies, including Reuters, The Associated Press, Turkey’s Anadolu Agency and the Saudi Press Agency.

It also distributes multimedia content and describes itself as Latin America’s “first image bank.”


Georgian journalist is convicted of slapping a police chief at a protest and gets 2 years in prison

Georgian journalist is convicted of slapping a police chief at a protest and gets 2 years in prison
Updated 06 August 2025
Follow

Georgian journalist is convicted of slapping a police chief at a protest and gets 2 years in prison

Georgian journalist is convicted of slapping a police chief at a protest and gets 2 years in prison
  • Mzia Amaghlobeli, founder of two independent media outlets, was convicted in the coastal city of Batumi for the January incident

BATUMI: A prominent Georgian journalist was convicted Wednesday of slapping a police chief during an anti-government protest and sentenced to two years in prison in a case that was condemned by rights groups as curbing press freedom.

Mzia Amaghlobeli, who founded two of Georgia’s independent media outlets, was convicted in the coastal city of Batumi. She was initially charged with assault, an offense that carried a maximum prison sentence of up to seven years, but the judge in the end found her guilty on the lighter charge of resistance, threats or violence against a defender of the public order or other government official.

The case is just one of many to draw protests and international criticism in recent months as the ruling Georgian Dream party has been accused of eroding civil society and democratic rights in the South Caucasus nation.

Chants of support as verdict was read

A visibly gaunt Amaghlobeli, 50, heard the verdict in the Batumi City Court packed with journalists and supporters, while a protest was held outside the courthouse. Sporadic chants of “Free Mzia!” broke out both outside the courthouse and in the courtroom.

She was arrested Jan. 12, one of over 50 people taken into custody on criminal charges from a series of demonstrations in the country of 3.7 million.

Video shared by Georgian media outlets showed Amaghlobeli striking Police Chief Irakli Dgebuadze. Amaghlobeli said that after she was detained, Dgebuadze spat at her and tried to attack her.

Her lawyer told the court she reacted emotionally after getting caught in a stampede, falling, and witnessing the arrest of those close to her. She also said a police investigation was not impartial and she did not receive a fair trial.

In a closing statement Monday, Amaghlobeli described chaotic scenes at the protest.

“In a completely peaceful setting, the police suddenly appear, create chaos, and surround me with masked officers,” she said. “As a result of strong pushes and blows from behind, I fall to the asphalt. Then they trample over me with their feet.”

She added that she was abused at the police station after her arrest.

She also thanked her colleagues and the activists for their continued resistance, and urged them to fight on.

“You must never lose faith in your own capabilities. There is still time. The fight continues— until victory!” she said.

Western countries cite intimidation of journalists

Amaghlobeli is the founder and manager of investigative news outlet Batumelebi, which covers politics, corruption and human rights in Georgia. She also founded its sister publication, Netgazeti.

In a joint statement in January, 14 embassies, including those of France, Germany, the Netherlands and the UK, said Amaghlobeli’s case represented “another worrying example of the intimidation of journalists in Georgia, restricting media freedom and freedom of expression.”

Gypsy Guillén Kaiser, advocacy and communications director for the Committee to Protect Journalists, warned that Amaghlobeli’s case was “a sign of the declining environment for press freedom in Georgia and a symbol for the fight between truth and control.”

“You have to decide whether you’re going to vilify journalists, criminalize them, and present them as nefarious characters with malicious intent in order to control information, or whether you’re going to have a public that is truly free, freely informed and empowered,” Guillén Kaiser said. “And that is a fundamental question for every country and for Georgia specifically right now.”

Leading Georgian officials defended her arrest. Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze accused her of seeking to fulfill a “directive” to discredit police but did not provide proof or say who was behind it.

“She attempted to discredit the law enforcement structures, to discredit the police, but she received exactly the kind of response such actions deserve,” he said. “Those who are trying to undermine statehood in Georgia are the ones who are upset by this. But this will not succeed — we will defend the interests of our state to the end.”

Political unrest since a disputed election

Georgia has seen widespread political unrest and protests since its parliamentary election on Oct. 26, which was won by Georgian Dream. Protesters and the country’s opposition declared the result illegitimate amid allegations of vote-rigging aided by Russia.

At the time, opposition leaders vowed to boycott sessions of parliament until a new election could be held under international supervision and alleged ballot irregularities were investigated.

Nearly all the leaders of Georgia’s pro-Western opposition parties have been jailed for refusing to testify at a parliamentary inquiry into alleged wrongdoing by the government of former President Mikhail Saakashvili, a probe that critics of Georgian Dream say is an act of political revenge.

The critics accuse Georgian Dream — established by Bidzina Ivanishvili, a billionaire who made his fortune in Russia — of becoming increasingly authoritarian and tilted toward Moscow, accusations the party has denied. It recently pushed through laws similar to those used by the Kremlin to crack down on freedom of speech and LGBTQ+ rights.

Among controversial legislation passed by Georgian Dream is the so-called ” foreign influence law,” which requires organizations that receive more than 20 percent of their funding from abroad to register as “pursuing the interest of a foreign power.”

That law later was replaced with one called the Foreign Agent’s Registration Act, under which individuals or organizations considered as “agents of a foreign principal” must register with the government or face penalties, including criminal prosecution and imprisonment. Members of civil society fear that the law’s broad definition of “foreign agent” could be used to label any critical media outlet or nongovernmental organization as acting on behalf of a foreign entity.

Many independent news outlets receive grants from abroad to fund their work.

“I think that the main goal of the government was to scare us, for us to leave the country or shut down or change profession,” says Mariam Nikuradze, founder of the OC Media outlet. Most journalists still want to stay in the country, she said, and cover what she described as growing authoritarian rule.

“Everybody’s being very brave and everybody’s very motivated,” she said.


Meta says working to thwart WhatsApp scammers

Meta says working to thwart WhatsApp scammers
Updated 06 August 2025
Follow

Meta says working to thwart WhatsApp scammers

Meta says working to thwart WhatsApp scammers
  • New “safety overviews” provide information about the group and tips on spotting scams, along with the option of making a quick exit

SAN FRANCISCO: Meta on Tuesday said it shut nearly seven million WhatsApp accounts linked to scammers in the first half of this year and is ramping up safeguards against such schemes.

“Our team identified the accounts and disabled them before the criminal organizations that created them could use them,” WhatsApp external affairs director Clair Deevy said.

Often run by organized gangs, the scams range from bogus cryptocurrency investments to get-rich-quick pyramid schemes, WhatsApp executives said in a briefing.

“There is always a catch and it should be a red flag for everyone: you have to pay upfront to get promised returns or earnings,” Meta-owned WhatsApp said in a blog post.

WhatsApp detected and banned more than 6.8 million accounts linked to scam centers, most of them in Southeast Asia, according to Meta.

WhatsApp and Meta worked with OpenAI to disrupt a scam traced to Cambodia that used ChatGPT to generate text messages containing a link to a WhatsApp chat to hook victims, according to the tech firms.

Meta on Tuesday began prompting WhatsApp users to be wary when added to unfamiliar chat groups by people they don’t know.

New “safety overviews” provide information about the group and tips on spotting scams, along with the option of making a quick exit.

“We’ve all been there: someone you don’t know attempting to message you, or add you to a group chat, promising low-risk investment opportunities or easy money, or saying you have an unpaid bill that’s overdue,” Meta said in a blog post.

“The reality is, these are often scammers trying to prey on people’s kindness, trust and willingness to help — or, their fears that they could be in trouble if they don’t send money fast.”