Arab Americans’ vote will matter in this election, Middle East Institute panel hears

Tarek Ali Ahmad - Why Arab Americans’ vote really matters in this year’s election
0 seconds of 27 secondsVolume 90%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
00:27
00:27
 
Short Url
Updated 29 October 2024
Follow

Arab Americans’ vote will matter in this election, Middle East Institute panel hears

Arab Americans’ vote will matter in this election, Middle East Institute panel hears

LONDON: Just days before Americans head to the polls to decide who will be the next US president, Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Kamala Harris find themselves neck and neck in the race for the White House. With the contest balanced on a razor’s edge, any minor development at this point could be enough to decisively swing the vote.

Although they make up just 1 percent of the total electorate, Arab Americans represent a significant constituency in several swing states, where even a handful of votes could influence the election outcome. As such, neither of the main candidates can afford to take their votes for granted.

That is why Arab News teamed up with polling agency YouGov to survey the attitudes of Arab Americans across all geographies, age ranges, genders and income brackets to see which way the community was leaning, and what issues mattered to them most.

What became abundantly clear from the survey was that Arab Americans are not a monolith motivated by any single issue. Domestic matters, such as the economy and the cost of living, loomed large, while border security and abortion rights were also key considerations.

However, it was the plight of the Palestinians that emerged as the biggest issue for Arab Americans of all generations; namely the ongoing Israeli offensive against Hamas in Gaza and the perceived failure of President Joe Biden’s administration to rein in Israel.




Asked which candidate they were most likely to vote for, 45 percent said Trump while 43 percent opted for Harris. (AFP/File)

Brian Katulis, a senior fellow for US foreign policy at Middle East Institute, who moderated a special panel discussion on Monday to examine the poll findings, said the prominence of the Palestinian issue in this election showed there was still a role for the US to play in the region.

“Within the political discussion we’re having in this country, it does imply that there’s actually a strong interest in the US engaging more deeply in the Middle East — just doing it in the right way,” said Katulis.

“There’s a serious difference over who and which candidate is the right way. But for those who’ve said that we should just pull back from the region, restrain ourselves, there’s some who say that, but I think there’s a general impulse here that we need to actually delve more deeply into trying to solve — or not solve, but engage — these questions in a proper way in the region itself, but then politically here at home.”

Asked to place six key issues in order of priority, 26 percent of Arab Americans polled by YouGov said the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is their chief concern. The economy and the cost of living were not far behind, representing the chief concerns for 19 percent of respondents.

“The highest priority, in terms of issues that Arab Americans face, the Palestinian-Israeli conflict came at 26 percent — the highest — then followed by the economy and cost of living,” Lara Barazi, a freelance data consultant and former research director at YouGov, told the MEI panel.

Palestine appeared to be of most concern to Arab Americans in lower income brackets: 37 percent of those earning under $40,000, falling to 22 percent among those paid $80,000 or more.

“These are their issues that kind of mirror what’s going on right now in the US, not only for Arab Americans, when we look at income,” said Barazi.




If Harris does beat Trump to the presidency, it remains unclear whether she will shift the Democratic Party’s stance on Israel. (AFP/File)

“The highest priority goes to the Palestinian conflict. It’s 41 percent of the lowest earners who support the Palestinian-Israeli conflict versus the highest earners. Basically, they’re interested in the economy, cost of living and the Palestinian conflict, but they do put a lot of weight on the economy and cost of living.”

What was also interesting about the findings was how much of a priority the Middle East conflict was for respondents identifying as Republican, Democrat and independent.

“We see that the highest (ranking) for the Palestinian-Israeli conflict comes from independents and the lowest comes from Republicans,” said Barazi. “Only 17 percent of Republicans said that the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is a top priority for us, while cost of living comes the highest for Republicans.”

Despite Trump being perceived as more supportive of the Israeli government than Harris, many Arab Americans indicated in the poll that they would still vote for him, which suggested they are penalizing the Democrats over the Biden administration’s perceived failure to rein in Israel.

Asked which candidate they were most likely to vote for, 45 percent said Trump while 43 percent opted for Harris, although this gap could easily be narrowed — or slightly widened — by the survey’s 5.93 percent margin of error.

The slightly higher support for Trump than for Harris comes despite the fact that 40 percent of those polled described themselves as Democrats, 28 percent as Republicans and 23 percent as independents.

The findings were somewhat puzzling, especially as Trump has announced his intention to expand his 2017 travel ban on people from seven majority-Muslim countries (Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen) and has said if elected he would bar Palestinian refugees from entering the US, policies that few Arab Americans would support.

Nevertheless, it appears Biden’s record on the Middle East over the past year has been the deciding factor for many.

Also taking part in Monday’s MEI panel discussion, Yasmeen Abu Taleb, a White House reporter at The Washington Post, said the Democrats never expected the issue of Palestine to hang over the campaign in the way that it has.




Despite Trump being perceived as more supportive of the Israeli government than Harris, many Arab Americans indicated in the poll that they would still vote for him. (AFP/File)


“We’ve never seen the issue of Palestine be this big of a political issue for this long,” she said. “I think in the Biden administration, there was a sense that people would be really angry and protest for a month or two. They hoped the war would be over by January.

“They were always wildly optimistic that this was not going to hang over them as an election issue. And here we are, more than a year later, and it’s still a key driver of the election. I think that’s an important signal of how much the politics have shifted on this.

“I don’t think we’ve seen this in US politics, where the debate has been this intense and sustained.”

If Harris does beat Trump to the presidency, it remains unclear whether she will shift the Democratic Party’s stance on Israel or if the policy of the Biden administration, of which she is part, will remain broadly unchanged.

“Obviously it depends on who wins but I do think if you saw a Harris presidency, it’s not going to be the dramatic change that people are pushing for,” said Abu Taleb. “But I do think there are signs that the Democratic Party is shifting on Israel, and in subtle but important ways.”

Although the Arab News-YouGov poll focused on Arab American opinion, the panel discussion naturally expanded to the prevailing attitudes among the Arab populations and leaderships in the Middle East. Tarek Ali Ahmad, head of research and studies at Arab News, said that many in the Middle East are holding their breath.

“People are essentially just waiting for the election day to come,” he added. “That’s when everyone’s going to be like, OK, now we can finally stop this election game, campaigning, and we can actually get to solid, concrete policy that will affect what’s going to happen, whether or not we’re going to see an actual end to the conflict, or we’re going to see even further.

“We haven’t heard anything in terms of preference to whichever candidate comes through. But at the same time, we cannot dismiss the fact that any incoming president will have a lot to clean up with regards to everything that’s happening on the ground.”




“So there’s so many different aspects that come to shift public opinion on the ground with regards to who’s going to be president,” Ali Ahmad said. (AFP/File)

On whether or not the Arab world has any preference for the US presidency, Ali Ahmad said many in the region have remained tight-lipped, preferring to wait and see the outcome of this closely fought race.

“There’s a lot of different points of view and there’s no real proper preference for either candidate because of the fact that it’s just such a razor-thin difference,” he said.

“Now you have people on the ground talking about how, essentially, every single event that occurs causes a shift in opinion, from (Israel) entering into Lebanon, from the bombing of Iran, to even Biden’s resignation from the nomination.

“So there’s so many different aspects that come to shift public opinion on the ground with regards to who’s going to be president.”

Reflecting on the significance of the role of the Arab American constituency in the election, Ali Ahmad said many seem to recognize their vote can make a significant difference.

“The reason why there’s a big turnout, as we said, nine out of 10 Americans are set to go vote, is that 80 percent of those who responded found that their vote actually counts and will matter in this year's election,” he said.

“They really feel that they could actually change it and make that difference, whether it is to punish the Democrats or whether it is to actually vote for an independent.”

 


Trump’s Pentagon shakeup puts military in political spotlight

Trump’s Pentagon shakeup puts military in political spotlight
Updated 25 February 2025
Follow

Trump’s Pentagon shakeup puts military in political spotlight

Trump’s Pentagon shakeup puts military in political spotlight
  • Trump announced late Friday that he was firing top US military officer General Charles “CQ” Brown less than two years into his four-year term as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump has launched a sweeping shakeup of the Pentagon, firing top officers and moving to lay off thousands of civilian workers as he seeks to align the US military with his priorities.
The removal of the officers has pushed the Pentagon into the political spotlight, with Democrats accusing Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth of seeking to politicize the military and ensure it is led by people personally loyal to the president.
Remaining above the political fray is a core principle for the US armed forces, with troops even barred from engaging in some types of political activity in order to maintain the military’s neutrality.
Hegseth has insisted the president is simply choosing the leaders he wants, saying “there is civilian control of the military. Nothing about this is unprecedented.”
Trump “deserves to pick his key national security and military advisory team,” Hegseth told “Fox News Sunday.”
But Senator Jack Reed — the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee — argued that “what Trump and Hegseth are trying to do is to politicize the Department of Defense.”
“It’s the beginning of a very, very serious degradation of the military,” Reed said on ABC’s “This Week.”
Trump announced late Friday that he was firing top US military officer General Charles “CQ” Brown less than two years into his four-year term as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Hegseth then said he was also seeking a replacement for top US Navy officer Admiral Lisa Franchetti, as well as the Air Force vice chief of staff and three top military lawyers.
The shakeup of senior personnel came after the Pentagon announced it aims to cut at least five percent of its more than 900,000-person civilian workforce, saying the decision was taken “to produce efficiencies and refocus the department on the president’s priorities.”

Representative Adam Smith, the ranking Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, said Trump fired Brown as well as thousands of federal employees “not because they weren’t competent or good at their jobs, but because Trump wants sycophants.”
“Anyone who doesn’t pledge loyalty has to go,” Smith said in a video posted on X, adding: “That really undermines the competence and capability of the people serving our country.”
Trump administration officials have defended the firings, with Deputy Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson arguing that the removal of the senior officers is in keeping with past presidential actions.
“Truman fired General MacArthur. Lincoln fired General McClellan. Obama fired General McChrystal. Yet the Fake News still claims we’re in ‘uncharted territory,’” Wilson wrote on X.
But those generals were fired due to specific problems — Douglas MacArthur for overstepping his authority and defying orders, George McClellan for insufficient aggression on the battlefield and Stanley McChrystal because he and his aides reportedly criticized US officials.
No accusations of misconduct have been made against the recently removed officers, with Hegseth saying Brown is “an honorable man” but “not the right man for the moment.”
Seth Jones, president of the Defense and Security Department at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said that while there are various examples of senior officers being relieved, “it has generally been for competence issues.”
“This does not appear to have been, at least to a significant degree, about the competence of General Brown, for example,” and if the removals were not based on performance, “then this is uncommon.”
Jones said he does not however think that “at this point... the vast majority of the uniformed military has been politicized.”
It is when civilian and uniformed leaders disagree that “you judge whether the military has been politicized. Are they giving their best military judgment on an issue, which is what they’re sworn to do? So we’ll have to see,” he said.
 

 


Musk eyes Starlink terminal deployment in US airspace network, Bloomberg News reports

Musk eyes Starlink terminal deployment in US airspace network, Bloomberg News reports
Updated 25 February 2025
Follow

Musk eyes Starlink terminal deployment in US airspace network, Bloomberg News reports

Musk eyes Starlink terminal deployment in US airspace network, Bloomberg News reports

WASHINGTON: Elon Musk’s SpaceX is looking to deploy Starlink satellite Internet terminals to speed up the information technology networks that support the US Federal Aviation Administration’s national airspace system, Bloomberg News reported on Monday.

 


Surge in Arab, Muslim candidates in Illinois elections may be reflected across US: Activists

Surge in Arab, Muslim candidates in Illinois elections may be reflected across US: Activists
Updated 25 February 2025
Follow

Surge in Arab, Muslim candidates in Illinois elections may be reflected across US: Activists

Surge in Arab, Muslim candidates in Illinois elections may be reflected across US: Activists
  • Number of Arabs, Muslims seeking office in Illinois has almost quadrupled compared to 2021
  • Activists say Gaza war, anti-Arab racism, Islamophobia are fueling greater engagement

CHICAGO: The number of Arab and Muslim Americans seeking office in the state of Illinois has almost quadrupled from previous years’ elections, and some activists believe it is a response to the Gaza war, as well as rising anti-Arab racism and Islamophobia.

In 2021, nine candidates filed for local elections in three counties — Cook, DuPage and Will — where the Arab and Muslim populations are concentrated.

This year, however, 34 Arab and Muslim candidates filed for local offices in the April 1 elections.

Ahmad Sows, president of the Arab American Democracy Coalition — which advocates for voter registration and engagement in the election process — said Gaza has been one of the key factors pushing more Arabs and Muslims into public engagement, including running for local public office.

“The Arab-American community has experienced a profound sense of disillusionment as they witness a lack of genuine representation among politicians for their concerns. The rise in hate crimes against Arabs is deeply troubling, and it feels disheartening to see tax dollars being used to support actions that many perceive as unjust,” he told Arab News.

“When community concerns are raised, responses from some politicians often emphasize unwavering support for Israel, leaving constituents feeling sidelined and unheard. This situation has left many Arab Americans wanting their voices to be truly acknowledged.

“They believe that running for office could be a vital step toward ensuring their community’s perspectives and needs are represented in the political landscape.”

Illinois holds its local elections before many other US states. Sows said the increased engagement in Illinois is indicative of what can be expected in other states where Arab and Muslim Americans have large voter populations, such as California, New York and New Jersey.

There are an estimated 450,000 Arab Americans in Illinois, about 10 percent of the national population living around the city of Chicago. Illinois has the fifth-largest Arab and Muslim population among US states.

Mohammed Jaber, a local schoolteacher elected to serve on the District 230 board — which has three high schools with significant Arab and Muslim populations — told Arab News that local elections are often taken for granted by all voters.

But he stressed that local elections offer Arabs and Muslims the best opportunity to directly engage American public policy.

“Our community understands that if you want to influence the nation’s national and international policies, such as in Palestine and Lebanon, you have to first influence public attitudes on the local level where you live,” said Jaber, the first Arab and Muslim to serve on the District 230 high school board representing Palos, Orland Park and Tinley Park. 

“The most effective way to do that is to run for and win election to local offices, from schools to villages, libraries and park boards.

“That’s where you can help change the false perceptions that the public has about Arabs and Muslims.”

Four efforts to elect an Arab or Muslim to the District 230 school board failed, in 1992, 2002, 2004 and 2008.

However, Jaber said the district became more accepting as the community became more engaged and involved.

Today, the Arab and Muslim student population of District 230’s three high schools has tripled, to about 25 percent of the nearly 7,700 students, he added.

However, the board last week voted against Jaber’s proposal to shift student finals in May 2026 to avoid conflicting with Eid. “We have to keep fighting to make our voices heard,” he said.

Tasneem Amine, a candidate who hopes to join Jaber on District 230 as a trustee, said her parents encouraged her to help people and pursue a career in law or public diplomacy.

“I always liked to speak up whenever I saw something wrong. I was truly passionate about helping others. I was never a bystander,” she told Arab News.

“I’ve attended several board meetings before, and although the current District 230 board has been fantastic, I truly believe that our community would benefit from having a young voice on the board who offers a fresh perspective.”

Amine, who graduated from the District 230 school system, added: “We need more Arab leaders to represent our community. Muslim constituents make up a large percentage of District 230, and therefore we need more representation as there’s power in numbers.

“Of course, however, I’m committed to representing all constituents regardless of background, because every voice matters.”

She said: “It’s time we have seats at the table, not just a single seat. This is the minimum we owe to a community that has worked hard and continues to contribute in meaningful ways.”

Lena Matariyeh, who is running for a trustee position on the influential Orland Township board — which represents large and growing Arab and Muslim populations — said the community must be more active, vocal and engaged.

“I believe in strong, community-focused leadership that prioritizes the well-being of all residents,” she told Arab News.

“Local government plays a vital role in providing essential services, fostering inclusivity, and ensuring that every voice is heard.

“I want to contribute to a township that supports families, businesses and individuals through practical, non-partisan solutions.”

She added: “I think many people, regardless of background, are feeling more compelled to step up and serve.

“Civic engagement is growing across the board, and people want to be part of the decision-making process that shapes their communities. Representation is important, but so is the desire to bring positive change.”

Suzan Atallah, who is running for a seat on the District 118 school board serving Palos, said she wants to make the schools and community better for all families and children.

“My family and I chose to live in District 118 because of the wonderful reputation of the schools. What motivated me to run are my very own kids in 118, coupled with my strong background in education as a teacher at Stagg High School for over 14 years,” she told Arab News.

“I believe people of different backgrounds should be afforded the opportunity to have a seat at the table, as reflection in the demographic is crucial in understanding student and taxpayer needs.”

While it is encouraging to see more Arabs and Muslims run for elected offices, Sows stressed that many non-Arab and non-Muslim elected officials have “stood by the community to support their needs and fight for their rights,” and should not be forgotten.


Judge rejects immediately restoring AP’s access to White House but urges government to reconsider

Judge rejects immediately restoring AP’s access to White House but urges government to reconsider
Updated 25 February 2025
Follow

Judge rejects immediately restoring AP’s access to White House but urges government to reconsider

Judge rejects immediately restoring AP’s access to White House but urges government to reconsider
  • The AP says it is adhering to the “Gulf of Mexico” terminology because its audience is global and the waters are not only in US territory, but it is acknowledging Trump’s rechristening as well

WASHINGTON: A federal judge on Monday refused to immediately order the White House to restore The Associated Press’ access to presidential events, saying the news organization had not demonstrated it had suffered any irreparable harm. But he urged the Trump administration to reconsider its two-week-old ban, saying that case law “is uniformly unhelpful to the White House.”
US District Judge Trevor N. McFadden’s decision was only for the moment, however. He told attorneys for the Trump administration and the AP that the issue required more exploration before ruling.
McFadden peppered both sides with questions during arguments over a lawsuit the AP filed Friday saying that its First Amendment rights were being violated by the ban, which began gradually two weeks ago. President Donald Trump said it was punishment for the agency’s decision not to entirely follow his executive order renaming the Gulf of Mexico as the “Gulf of America.”
McFadden, discussing the composition of the “press pool” that is chosen by the White House Correspondents’ Association, questioned why the government was obligated to follow those choices. “It feels a little odd that the White House is somehow bound by the decisions this private organization is making,” the judge told AP attorneys.
He also questioned AP’s noting of its longtime membership in the White House press pool. “Is this administration somehow bound by what happened with President McKinley?” the judge asked. But he noted that the correspondents’ group had been tasked by the White House to choose the members of its pool.
“The White House has accepted the correspondents’ association to be the referee here, and has just discriminated against one organization. That does seem problematic,” McFadden said in an exchange with government attorney Brian Hudak.
Later, McFadden warned the government’s attorney to reconsider its position, saying “case law in this circuit is uniformly unhelpful to the White House.”
The AP says it is adhering to the “Gulf of Mexico” terminology because its audience is global and the waters are not only in US territory, but it is acknowledging Trump’s rechristening as well.
AP says the issue strikes at the very core of the US Constitution’s First Amendment, which bars the government from punishing speech. The White House says access to the president is a privilege, not a right.
Earlier this month, the Trump administration began barring the AP from the Oval Office, Air Force One and other areas that have been open to the agency for a century as part of the White House press pool. The dispute stems from AP’s refusal to change its style in referring to the Gulf of Mexico, which Trump decreed the “Gulf of America” via an executive order.
The AP named three Trump officials – White House chief of staff Susan Wiles, deputy chief of staff Taylor Budowich and press secretary Karoline Leavitt – as defendants. The agency, a nonprofit news outlet in operation since 1846, called the White House’s move a “targeted attack” of the sort barred by the First Amendment.
“The press and all people in the United States have the right to choose their own words and not be retaliated against by the government,” the AP said in its lawsuit.
The White House says its move to restrict AP is not an infringement of free-speech rights. “The only person who has the absolute right to occupy those spaces is the president of the United States,” Wiles wrote to Julie Pace, AP’s executive editor, in an email included in the agency’s lawsuit. “For the rest of us, it’s a privilege, and to suggest otherwise is wrong.”

 


Algerian TikTok influencer convicted in France for inciting terrorism

This photograph shows a police car in Paris, on March 29, 2024. (AFP)
This photograph shows a police car in Paris, on March 29, 2024. (AFP)
Updated 25 February 2025
Follow

Algerian TikTok influencer convicted in France for inciting terrorism

This photograph shows a police car in Paris, on March 29, 2024. (AFP)
  • TikTok has said it banned the account from which the video was uploaded, for posting several videos that broke its rules on hate speech

BREST, France: A French court on Monday found an Algerian online influencer guilty of inciting terrorism on TikTok, sentencing him to 18 months in jail.
The 25-year-old man, identified by officials as Youcef A. and known on social media as Zazou Youssef, had been charged in the western city of Brest with “advocating an act of terrorism” on the platform.
Prosecutor Camille Miansoni had recommended a prison sentence of two years for the charge that is punishable by up to seven years.
Youssef appeared in a video posted on the popular platform on December 31 calling for attacks in France and violence in Algeria.
The police prefect in France’s western Finistere region, Alain Espinasse, ordered a judicial investigation after officers made him aware of the video.
According to authorities, Youssef had been living in France on a temporary residency permit and had appealed against a previous sentence for vandalism during riots in 2023.
In addition to the jail term, the court said Youssef could not reside in France for 10 years.
TikTok has said it banned the account from which the video was uploaded, for posting several videos that broke its rules on hate speech.