In Ghana, Sahel militants find refuge and supplies, sources say

In Ghana, Sahel militants find refuge and supplies, sources say
People take part in a march called by the opposition to protest against the security situation worsening and asking for a response to jihadist attacks, in Ouagadougou, on July 3, 2021. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 19 sec ago
Follow

In Ghana, Sahel militants find refuge and supplies, sources say

In Ghana, Sahel militants find refuge and supplies, sources say

NAIROBI/ACCRA: Militants fighting in Burkina Faso are discreetly using Ghana’s north as a logistical and medical rear base to sustain their insurgency, seven sources told Reuters, a move that could help them expand their footprint in West Africa.

The sources, who include Ghanaian security officials and regional diplomats, said Ghanaian authorities appeared to be mostly turning a blind eye to the insurgents crossing over from neighboring Burkina Faso to stock up on food, fuel and even explosives, as well as getting injured fighters treated in hospital.

But they said that approach, while so far sparing Ghana from the kind of deadly attacks that have plagued its neighbors, risks allowing militants to put down roots in the country and recruit in some marginalized local communities.

Ghana shares a 600 km (372 mile) border with Burkina Faso, the country at the heart of an insurgency that has killed thousands, displaced millions and, according to some experts, turned the Sahel region into the epicenter of global terrorism as factions loyal to Al-Qaeda and Daesh expand their presence.

Burkina Faso has lost control of over half its territory as a pro-Al-Qaeda group known as JNIM gained ground. A JNIM leader this week told French broadcaster RFI that it was aiming to push into Ghana, Togo and Benin.

Unlike Benin and Togo, Ghana has not suffered a major attack.


Thailand apologizes for 2004 massacre of 85 Muslims; UN rights experts fear justice fading

Thailand apologizes for 2004 massacre of 85 Muslims; UN rights experts fear justice fading
Updated 29 sec ago
Follow

Thailand apologizes for 2004 massacre of 85 Muslims; UN rights experts fear justice fading

Thailand apologizes for 2004 massacre of 85 Muslims; UN rights experts fear justice fading
  • UN rights experts "extremely alarmed that without further action” the cases “will end prematurely when a statute of limitations expires”
  • The massacre took place under the administration of Paetongtarn’s father, Thaksin Shinawatra, a key figure behind her ruling Pheu Thai Party

RIYADH: Thailand’s prime minister apologized on Thursday for the massacre of 85 Muslim protesters 20 years ago for which no one has ever been held responsible.

“I am deeply saddened for what happened and apologize on behalf of the government,” Paetongtarn Shinawatra said. The massacre took place under the administration of her father, Thaksin Shinawatra, a key figure in the ruling Pheu Thai Party.

The security crackdown in the southern town of Tak Bai in 2004 was one of the most high-profile events of a separatist insurgency that re-ignited that same year and has since killed more than 7,600 people.

The incident in predominantly Buddhist Thailand captured international attention and drew widespread condemnation.

It started when security forces opened fire on a crowd protesting outside a police station in Narathiwat, one of the Muslim-majority southern provinces Thailand colonized more than a century ago.

Seven people were killed by gunfire. Subsequently 78 people suffocated after they were arrested and stacked on top of each other in the back of Thai military trucks, face down and with their hands tied behind their backs.

It remains one of the deadliest days in the decades-long rebellion by Malay Muslims against rule by the Thai state, which rumbles on to this day.

Attempts to prosecute security personnel have failed, including two in the past two months.

In August, a court accepted a criminal lawsuit by victims’ families against seven senior officials, among them a retired general and ruling party lawmaker, but all of those failed to show up at a hearing. A separate case against eight other personnel filed by the attorney-general last month has made no progress.

The defendants last week missed their final scheduled court date before the deadline to try them, heightening the chance they will never face justice.

In their absence the court said that it was scheduling the next hearing for October 28, at which point the proceedings are expected to be dismissed.

Paetongtarn said the incident should not be politicized, adding the statue of limitations could not be extended because it would be a breach of the constitution.

Thai police have said they were actively tracking all 14 suspects and had issued Interpol red notices.

“Although the case is expiring, history and memories do not,” Ratsada Manooratsada a lawyer for the victims’ families told Reuters.

“(The families) will never forget because the perpetrators were not brought to justice.”

UN experts weigh in
In Geneva, UN rights experts said they were extremely concerned that no one would be held accountable over the massacre.
In a joint statement, the UN experts said they were “extremely alarmed that without further action,” the cases “will end prematurely when a statute of limitations expires.”
“Failure to investigate and bring perpetrators to justice is itself a violation of Thailand’s human rights obligations,” the UN experts said.
“International law also prohibits statutes of limitations for torture and other forms of ill-treatment.”
The statement was issued by the UN special rapporteurs on extrajudicial executions, the right to freedom of peaceful assembly, protecting freedoms while countering terrorism and freedom of opinion, as well as the working group on enforced disappearances.
UN experts are independent figures mandated by the Human Rights Council who do not speak on behalf of the United Nations itself.
“Families have waited for nearly two decades for justice,” the experts said, urging the Thai government “to prevent further delays in accountability and ensure their rights to truth, justice and reparations are upheld.”
They also called for further investigations into the fate of seven people who disappeared in the incident.

(With Agencies)
 


Germany clears over $100m in arms exports to Israel amid legal challenge

Germany clears over $100m in arms exports to Israel amid legal challenge
Updated 7 min 6 sec ago
Follow

Germany clears over $100m in arms exports to Israel amid legal challenge

Germany clears over $100m in arms exports to Israel amid legal challenge

BERLIN: Germany has authorized over $100 million in military exports to Israel in the last three months, Foreign Ministry data showed on Thursday, coinciding with the latest legal challenge by human rights groups concerned about the potential use of these weapons in the Gaza war.

Germany has approved €94,052,394 ($101.61 million) in arms exports to Israel since August 2024, according to a government response to a parliamentary inquiry by left-wing lawmaker Sevim Dagdelen.

The new permits followed a significant drop in arms exports to Israel in the first half of the year.

The European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights said on Thursday it had filed an appeal at the Frankfurt Administrative Court on behalf of a Gaza resident, seeking to halt further arms exports.

The appeal says German weapons are contributing to civilian harm in Gaza. The plaintiff, a Gaza resident who lost his wife and daughter in Israeli airstrikes, says ongoing arms shipments place his life and the lives of others in danger, calling on Germany to stop facilitating these transfers.

The action aimed at Germany’s Federal Office of Economics and Export Control, the German government responsible for such approval, focuses on Germany’s approval of military exports that could be used in the conflict, the ECCHR said.

The ECCHR says Germany’s exports violate international law, citing the Arms Trade Treaty, which prohibits arms transfers if there is a significant risk they will be used to commit war crimes.


Putin says ball in Washington’s court on US-Russia ties

Putin says ball in Washington’s court on US-Russia ties
Updated 42 min 35 sec ago
Follow

Putin says ball in Washington’s court on US-Russia ties

Putin says ball in Washington’s court on US-Russia ties
  • “How Russian-American relations will develop after the election will depend on the United States,” Putin told reporters in Kazan
  • “If they are open, then we will also be open. And if they don’t want it, then fine”

KAZAN: Russian President Vladimir Putin said Thursday his relationship with the United States after the presidential elections would depend on what attitude Washington adopts, as he welcomed comments by Donald Trump on his desire to end the Ukraine conflict as “sincere.”
But the Kremlin leader struck a hard-line tone, warning the West it was an “illusion” to think Russia could be defeated on the battlefield and that any peace deal would have to recognize Russia’s control of swathes of Ukrainian territory.
Putin was speaking at the end of the BRICS summit in the city of Kazan, where he had faced calls from some of Russia’s most important allies for the fighting in Ukraine to end.
“How Russian-American relations will develop after the election will depend on the United States. If they are open, then we will also be open. And if they don’t want it, then fine,” Putin told reporters in Kazan.
Relations between the two superpowers have sunk to their lowest since the Cold War amid Moscow’s military offensive on Ukraine.
Next month’s US election is set to be critical to the course of future ties and the conflict in Ukraine.
Trump has repeatedly expressed skepticism over Washington’s multi-billion dollar aid to Ukraine and claimed that if elected he could end the fighting in a matter of hours.
Putin said Trump “spoke about his desire to do everything to end the conflict in Ukraine. I think he is being sincere. Of course we welcome statements like this, whoever they come from.”
Chinese President Xi Jinping and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi were among around 20 leaders that gathered for the BRICS summit, the largest diplomatic event in Russia since Putin ordered troops into Ukraine in February 2022.
The Kremlin leader said Moscow was open to considering peace initiatives and welcomed BRICS leaders offering to mediate.
But he said any deal must consider the “realities on the ground” — a reference to Ukrainian territory controlled by Russian forces.
“We are ready to look at any proposals for peace negotiations that are based on the realities on the ground. We won’t accept anything else,” he said.
Putin has previously demanded Kyiv effectively capitulate by pulling its troops back as a precondition to ceasefire talks.
And on Thursday he blasted the West for thinking Russia could be defeated on the battlefield.
Moscow’s opponents “do not conceal their aim to deal our country a strategic defeat,” he said.
“I will say directly that these are illusionary calculations, that can be made only by those who do not know Russia’s history.”
Russia has faced fresh accusations of escalating the conflict this week with the United States, South Korea, NATO and Kyiv all saying North Korea had sent troops to Russia.
Kyiv said Thursday it had intelligence that the soldiers had already been deployed to Russia’s western Kursk region, where Ukraine is mounting a cross-border offensive.
Putin refused to confirm or deny the reports on Thursday, instead accusing Ukraine and the West of aggravating the conflict.
Putin also held talks with United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres in the pair’s first meeting since April 2022.
The Kremlin did not broadcast opening remarks, though both sides had said the talks would cover Ukraine.
The UN chief had pleaded earlier for a “just peace” in Ukraine in a speech delivered in front of Putin.
“We need peace in Ukraine. A just peace in line with the UN Charter, international law and (UN) General Assembly resolution,” Guterres told the summit.
Ukraine has strongly criticized Guterres’s decision to meet the “criminal Putin.”
Guterres also demanded an “immediate ceasefire” in Gaza, the release of hostages and an “immediate cessation of hostilities” in Lebanon.
Other world leaders at the summit also called for an end to Israel’s wars in Lebanon and Gaza, with Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas saying Israel was trying to starve Gazan civilians and drive them from their territory.
Xi warned about “serious challenges” in the world and said he hoped BRICS countries could be a “stabilising force for peace.”
“We need to continue to push for a ceasefire in Gaza, relaunch the two-state solution and stop the spread of war in Lebanon. There should be no more suffering and destruction in Palestine and Lebanon,” Xi said.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian slammed the UN Security Council’s role in front of Guterres, saying international bodies “lack the necessary efficiency to extinguish the fire of this crisis.”


Russian military convoy attacked in Chechnya

Russian military convoy attacked in Chechnya
Updated 24 October 2024
Follow

Russian military convoy attacked in Chechnya

Russian military convoy attacked in Chechnya
  • Unknown assailants attacked the convoy on the outskirts of Grozny, the capital of Chechnya
  • Moscow fought a series of bloody wars over Chechnya in the 1990s and early 2000s

MOSCOW: One Russian soldier was killed in an attack on a military convoy in Chechnya on Thursday, Russian state media reported.
Unknown assailants attacked the convoy on the outskirts of Grozny, the capital of Chechnya in Russia’s mountainous North Caucasus.
“Unknown people attacked a military convoy in the Grozny suburbs,” the state-run RIA Novosti news agency quoted the local unit of the Rosgvardia, Russia’s National Guard, as saying.
“One serviceman was killed and a second was wounded,” it added.
“Measures are being taken to find and detain the attackers.”
Moscow fought a series of bloody wars over Chechnya in the 1990s and early 2000s, wiping out rebel forces that sought to secede from Russia and that the Kremlin blamed for insurgent attacks across the country.
Strongman local leader Ramzan Kadyrov has ruled the region for almost two decades, securing huge handouts from Moscow in exchange for his unwavering loyalty to President Vladimir Putin.
Independent rights groups say Kadyrov rules the region as his personal fiefdom, ruthlessly cracking down on his opponents and drastically curbing human rights.


Former UK minister of state criticizes Conservative leadership hopeful Jenrick’s stance on Palestine

Former UK minister of state criticizes Conservative leadership hopeful Jenrick’s stance on Palestine
Updated 24 October 2024
Follow

Former UK minister of state criticizes Conservative leadership hopeful Jenrick’s stance on Palestine

Former UK minister of state criticizes Conservative leadership hopeful Jenrick’s stance on Palestine
  • Alan Duncan was speaking in a video interview with Palestinian journalist Ahmed Alnaouq
  • Duncan highlighted Jenrick’s controversial statements at the Conservative Party conference earlier this month

LONDON: A former UK minister of state has condemned the Conservative Party leadership hopeful Robert Jenrick, calling him an “extremist” and warning that his position on Israel and Palestine would make him a “disaster” as leader of the party.

Alan Duncan was speaking in a video interview with Palestinian journalist Ahmed Alnaouq, which was published on Thursday by Palestine Deep Dive.

During the interview, Duncan highlighted Jenrick’s controversial statements at the Conservative Party conference earlier this month, where Jenrick vowed to build the British Embassy in Jerusalem if the Foreign Office did not agree to relocate it.

“This man is an extremist. He does not believe in any kind of two-state solution although he says he does, he knows nothing about it. He takes his script entirely from the Conservative Friends of Israel and the Israelis, so he would be a disaster if he were leader of the Conservative Party,” Duncan said.

Duncan, who most recently served as UK minister of state for Europe and the Americas from 2016 to 2019 in the Conservative government of the time, also criticized the influence of lobbying organizations such as Conservative Friends of Israel, accusing them of shaping UK foreign policy on Israel.

He described how donor money and back channels have influenced Conservative Party decisions, saying: “It goes straight into number 10 Downing Street” and “tells the Foreign Office what to do.”

Duncan expressed skepticism about the Conservative government’s commitment to its official stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

While the UK’s stated policy views Israeli settlements as illegal and supports the establishment of a Palestinian state, Duncan claimed that senior Conservative officials did not genuinely believe in these policies.

“They didn’t really believe in international law as far as I can see,” he added, accusing them of hypocrisy when it came to Israel.

When asked about Kemi Badenoch, the other Conservative leadership contender, Duncan admitted that he was unsure of her stance on foreign policy. He lamented the lack of experience and understanding of the Middle East among UK politicians.

“I haven’t got a clue what her views are on foreign policy, I simply do not know,” he said. “And it’s one of the problems of all British politics now is that those in Parliament have got no real experience of the region, they haven’t really learned the history and they just have very, very simple attitudes and this is dangerous.”

Duncan’s scathing remarks underscored growing divisions within the Conservative Party over its approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, as leadership hopefuls such as Jenrick adopt increasingly hard-line positions.

He also took aim at former UK government minister Michael Gove.

“Now one thing that was a disgrace was (Michael Gove) when he was minister, who is another completely sold-out sympathizer of Israeli extremism,” he said.

“He passed a law which said that local councils were not allowed to have a policy of boycotting Israeli produce even if they’re illegal, so you end up with one arm of the UK government saying Palestinian settlements are illegal and another arm of British government protecting illegal activity in those Palestinian settlements, and Parliament was pathetic in opposing this piece of legislation.”

Duncan also said that not enough value was placed on Palestinian lives by the British political class.

“I don’t think people in Parliament are sitting there and thinking quite what the devastation of the Gaza Strip actually looks like and means to people in terms of human suffering,” he said.

“They don’t even stop to think about it. Someone like Jenrick says: ‘Oh well, you know Hamas are dreadful, we’ve got to eliminate them,’ as if you can. I mean, he says nothing about the origins of this problem. So, he is a disgrace,” he said.

The former minister also criticized the current Labour government’s lack of a genuine commitment to a two-state solution, dismissing the rhetoric from both major parties as “waffle” and a reflection of ignorance about the situation on the ground.

Duncan’s candid remarks are likely to reignite debate about the UK’s foreign policy direction, particularly as the Conservative Party prepares to select its next leader.