Germany clears over $100m in arms exports to Israel amid legal challenge

Germany clears over $100m in arms exports to Israel amid legal challenge
Human right activists take part in a demonstration called by Amnesty International "For a just peace in Palestine and Israel - protect the civilian population, stop arms exports!’in front of the Central train station in Berlin, on October 18, 2024. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 12 sec ago
Follow

Germany clears over $100m in arms exports to Israel amid legal challenge

Germany clears over $100m in arms exports to Israel amid legal challenge

BERLIN: Germany has authorized over $100 million in military exports to Israel in the last three months, Foreign Ministry data showed on Thursday, coinciding with the latest legal challenge by human rights groups concerned about the potential use of these weapons in the Gaza war.

Germany has approved €94,052,394 ($101.61 million) in arms exports to Israel since August 2024, according to a government response to a parliamentary inquiry by left-wing lawmaker Sevim Dagdelen.

The new permits followed a significant drop in arms exports to Israel in the first half of the year.

The European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights said on Thursday it had filed an appeal at the Frankfurt Administrative Court on behalf of a Gaza resident, seeking to halt further arms exports.

The appeal says German weapons are contributing to civilian harm in Gaza. The plaintiff, a Gaza resident who lost his wife and daughter in Israeli airstrikes, says ongoing arms shipments place his life and the lives of others in danger, calling on Germany to stop facilitating these transfers.

The action aimed at Germany’s Federal Office of Economics and Export Control, the German government responsible for such approval, focuses on Germany’s approval of military exports that could be used in the conflict, the ECCHR said.

The ECCHR says Germany’s exports violate international law, citing the Arms Trade Treaty, which prohibits arms transfers if there is a significant risk they will be used to commit war crimes.


Putin says ball in Washington’s court on US-Russia ties

Putin says ball in Washington’s court on US-Russia ties
Updated 11 sec ago
Follow

Putin says ball in Washington’s court on US-Russia ties

Putin says ball in Washington’s court on US-Russia ties
“How Russian-American relations will develop after the election will depend on the United States,” Putin told reporters in Kazan
“If they are open, then we will also be open. And if they don’t want it, then fine”

KAZAN: Russian President Vladimir Putin said Thursday his relationship with the United States after the presidential elections would depend on what attitude Washington adopts, as he welcomed comments by Donald Trump on his desire to end the Ukraine conflict as “sincere.”
But the Kremlin leader struck a hard-line tone, warning the West it was an “illusion” to think Russia could be defeated on the battlefield and that any peace deal would have to recognize Russia’s control of swathes of Ukrainian territory.
Putin was speaking at the end of the BRICS summit in the city of Kazan, where he had faced calls from some of Russia’s most important allies for the fighting in Ukraine to end.
“How Russian-American relations will develop after the election will depend on the United States. If they are open, then we will also be open. And if they don’t want it, then fine,” Putin told reporters in Kazan.
Relations between the two superpowers have sunk to their lowest since the Cold War amid Moscow’s military offensive on Ukraine.
Next month’s US election is set to be critical to the course of future ties and the conflict in Ukraine.
Trump has repeatedly expressed skepticism over Washington’s multi-billion dollar aid to Ukraine and claimed that if elected he could end the fighting in a matter of hours.
Putin said Trump “spoke about his desire to do everything to end the conflict in Ukraine. I think he is being sincere. Of course we welcome statements like this, whoever they come from.”
Chinese President Xi Jinping and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi were among around 20 leaders that gathered for the BRICS summit, the largest diplomatic event in Russia since Putin ordered troops into Ukraine in February 2022.
The Kremlin leader said Moscow was open to considering peace initiatives and welcomed BRICS leaders offering to mediate.
But he said any deal must consider the “realities on the ground” — a reference to Ukrainian territory controlled by Russian forces.
“We are ready to look at any proposals for peace negotiations that are based on the realities on the ground. We won’t accept anything else,” he said.
Putin has previously demanded Kyiv effectively capitulate by pulling its troops back as a precondition to ceasefire talks.
And on Thursday he blasted the West for thinking Russia could be defeated on the battlefield.
Moscow’s opponents “do not conceal their aim to deal our country a strategic defeat,” he said.
“I will say directly that these are illusionary calculations, that can be made only by those who do not know Russia’s history.”
Russia has faced fresh accusations of escalating the conflict this week with the United States, South Korea, NATO and Kyiv all saying North Korea had sent troops to Russia.
Kyiv said Thursday it had intelligence that the soldiers had already been deployed to Russia’s western Kursk region, where Ukraine is mounting a cross-border offensive.
Putin refused to confirm or deny the reports on Thursday, instead accusing Ukraine and the West of aggravating the conflict.
Putin also held talks with United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres in the pair’s first meeting since April 2022.
The Kremlin did not broadcast opening remarks, though both sides had said the talks would cover Ukraine.
The UN chief had pleaded earlier for a “just peace” in Ukraine in a speech delivered in front of Putin.
“We need peace in Ukraine. A just peace in line with the UN Charter, international law and (UN) General Assembly resolution,” Guterres told the summit.
Ukraine has strongly criticized Guterres’s decision to meet the “criminal Putin.”
Guterres also demanded an “immediate ceasefire” in Gaza, the release of hostages and an “immediate cessation of hostilities” in Lebanon.
Other world leaders at the summit also called for an end to Israel’s wars in Lebanon and Gaza, with Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas saying Israel was trying to starve Gazan civilians and drive them from their territory.
Xi warned about “serious challenges” in the world and said he hoped BRICS countries could be a “stabilising force for peace.”
“We need to continue to push for a ceasefire in Gaza, relaunch the two-state solution and stop the spread of war in Lebanon. There should be no more suffering and destruction in Palestine and Lebanon,” Xi said.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian slammed the UN Security Council’s role in front of Guterres, saying international bodies “lack the necessary efficiency to extinguish the fire of this crisis.”

Russian military convoy attacked in Chechnya

Russian military convoy attacked in Chechnya
Updated 46 min 37 sec ago
Follow

Russian military convoy attacked in Chechnya

Russian military convoy attacked in Chechnya
  • Unknown assailants attacked the convoy on the outskirts of Grozny, the capital of Chechnya
  • Moscow fought a series of bloody wars over Chechnya in the 1990s and early 2000s

MOSCOW: One Russian soldier was killed in an attack on a military convoy in Chechnya on Thursday, Russian state media reported.
Unknown assailants attacked the convoy on the outskirts of Grozny, the capital of Chechnya in Russia’s mountainous North Caucasus.
“Unknown people attacked a military convoy in the Grozny suburbs,” the state-run RIA Novosti news agency quoted the local unit of the Rosgvardia, Russia’s National Guard, as saying.
“One serviceman was killed and a second was wounded,” it added.
“Measures are being taken to find and detain the attackers.”
Moscow fought a series of bloody wars over Chechnya in the 1990s and early 2000s, wiping out rebel forces that sought to secede from Russia and that the Kremlin blamed for insurgent attacks across the country.
Strongman local leader Ramzan Kadyrov has ruled the region for almost two decades, securing huge handouts from Moscow in exchange for his unwavering loyalty to President Vladimir Putin.
Independent rights groups say Kadyrov rules the region as his personal fiefdom, ruthlessly cracking down on his opponents and drastically curbing human rights.


Former UK minister of state criticizes Conservative leadership hopeful Jenrick’s stance on Palestine

Former UK minister of state criticizes Conservative leadership hopeful Jenrick’s stance on Palestine
Updated 24 October 2024
Follow

Former UK minister of state criticizes Conservative leadership hopeful Jenrick’s stance on Palestine

Former UK minister of state criticizes Conservative leadership hopeful Jenrick’s stance on Palestine
  • Alan Duncan was speaking in a video interview with Palestinian journalist Ahmed Alnaouq
  • Duncan highlighted Jenrick’s controversial statements at the Conservative Party conference earlier this month

LONDON: A former UK minister of state has condemned the Conservative Party leadership hopeful Robert Jenrick, calling him an “extremist” and warning that his position on Israel and Palestine would make him a “disaster” as leader of the party.

Alan Duncan was speaking in a video interview with Palestinian journalist Ahmed Alnaouq, which was published on Thursday by Palestine Deep Dive.

During the interview, Duncan highlighted Jenrick’s controversial statements at the Conservative Party conference earlier this month, where Jenrick vowed to build the British Embassy in Jerusalem if the Foreign Office did not agree to relocate it.

“This man is an extremist. He does not believe in any kind of two-state solution although he says he does, he knows nothing about it. He takes his script entirely from the Conservative Friends of Israel and the Israelis, so he would be a disaster if he were leader of the Conservative Party,” Duncan said.

Duncan, who most recently served as UK minister of state for Europe and the Americas from 2016 to 2019 in the Conservative government of the time, also criticized the influence of lobbying organizations such as Conservative Friends of Israel, accusing them of shaping UK foreign policy on Israel.

He described how donor money and back channels have influenced Conservative Party decisions, saying: “It goes straight into number 10 Downing Street” and “tells the Foreign Office what to do.”

Duncan expressed skepticism about the Conservative government’s commitment to its official stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

While the UK’s stated policy views Israeli settlements as illegal and supports the establishment of a Palestinian state, Duncan claimed that senior Conservative officials did not genuinely believe in these policies.

“They didn’t really believe in international law as far as I can see,” he added, accusing them of hypocrisy when it came to Israel.

When asked about Kemi Badenoch, the other Conservative leadership contender, Duncan admitted that he was unsure of her stance on foreign policy. He lamented the lack of experience and understanding of the Middle East among UK politicians.

“I haven’t got a clue what her views are on foreign policy, I simply do not know,” he said. “And it’s one of the problems of all British politics now is that those in Parliament have got no real experience of the region, they haven’t really learned the history and they just have very, very simple attitudes and this is dangerous.”

Duncan’s scathing remarks underscored growing divisions within the Conservative Party over its approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, as leadership hopefuls such as Jenrick adopt increasingly hard-line positions.

He also took aim at former UK government minister Michael Gove.

“Now one thing that was a disgrace was (Michael Gove) when he was minister, who is another completely sold-out sympathizer of Israeli extremism,” he said.

“He passed a law which said that local councils were not allowed to have a policy of boycotting Israeli produce even if they’re illegal, so you end up with one arm of the UK government saying Palestinian settlements are illegal and another arm of British government protecting illegal activity in those Palestinian settlements, and Parliament was pathetic in opposing this piece of legislation.”

Duncan also said that not enough value was placed on Palestinian lives by the British political class.

“I don’t think people in Parliament are sitting there and thinking quite what the devastation of the Gaza Strip actually looks like and means to people in terms of human suffering,” he said.

“They don’t even stop to think about it. Someone like Jenrick says: ‘Oh well, you know Hamas are dreadful, we’ve got to eliminate them,’ as if you can. I mean, he says nothing about the origins of this problem. So, he is a disgrace,” he said.

The former minister also criticized the current Labour government’s lack of a genuine commitment to a two-state solution, dismissing the rhetoric from both major parties as “waffle” and a reflection of ignorance about the situation on the ground.

Duncan’s candid remarks are likely to reignite debate about the UK’s foreign policy direction, particularly as the Conservative Party prepares to select its next leader.


What led to Modi-Xi handshake and thaw in India-China ties

What led to Modi-Xi handshake and thaw in India-China ties
Updated 24 October 2024
Follow

What led to Modi-Xi handshake and thaw in India-China ties

What led to Modi-Xi handshake and thaw in India-China ties
  • Indian PM, Chinese president meet on sidelines of BRICS Summit in Kazan, Russia
  • First formal talk between parties since 2020 deadly clashes on disputed India-China border

NEW DELHI: After years of tensions, signs of a thaw are emerging in Indian-Chinese relations, experts say, following the meeting of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Xi Jinping in Russia.

Modi and Xi met on Wednesday on the sidelines of the BRICS Summit in Kazan. It was their first formal talk since the 2020 clashes on the disputed border between India and China led to a military buildup on both sides.

 

The 3,440 km-long Himalayan border has been a cause of tensions for decades and the two countries fought a war over it in 1962. The clash in Galwan Valley in 2020 was their worst confrontation since then, with at least 20 Indian and four Chinese soldiers killed.

The military standoff that followed affected bilateral business ties, leading to India banning several Chinese mobile apps, including TikTok, and stopping passenger flights to China.

Rounds of negotiations taking place over the past four years had not yielded any resolution but during Wednesday’s meeting, Modi and Xi agreed to “explore a fair, reasonable and mutually acceptable solution to the boundary question,” the Indian Ministry of External Affairs said in a statement.

It was widely seen as a “positive first step” signaling a thaw, Manoj Kewalramani, chairperson of the Indo-Pacific Research Program and a China studies fellow at the Takshashila Institution in Bangalore, told Arab News.

“Having this sort of abnormality in the relationship does not suit either side in the long run. So, there has been this impetus that we need to find some pathway to arriving at some sort of a new balance in the relationship,” he said.

“From an Indian point of view, of course engaging with China is important … you can’t necessarily have an abnormal high-intensity tense border area with such a neighbor for a long period of time.”

 

For China, too, trying to normalize the relationship was needed, especially in the increasingly hostile external environment.

“Whether it is in the South China Sea, East China Sea; whether it’s the issues with Russia and Ukraine; or whether it’s tensions in the Middle East, there’s an increasingly strained external environment,” Kewalramani said. “It makes sense to have some sort of a tactical understanding with a country like India, at least to begin with, and try to normalize that relationship.”

Mohan Guruswamy, chairman of the Centre for Policy Alternatives in New Delhi, said it was mutual geopolitical and economic interests that had compelled the leaders of the world’s two most populous countries to officially shake hands for the first time in nearly five years.

“India realizes that its place in the new world order — which is emerging — cannot be rated high unless China agrees. For instance, Britain, America, France, (and) Russia all agreed to India’s being in the UN Security Council. Only China disagrees. If China takes out its objections, then there is no objection to India’s membership,” he said.

“There is a realization in India also that we need China. And China has a trade surplus with India which is almost $40-50 billion a year. They would like to keep that, and they would also like to invest in India, because they realize that India is a big market.”

If the normalization proceeds and if there is enough political will for it to continue, it will have an impact on international politics and relations, especially in the Global South.

“There will be some elements of collaboration,” said Prof. Varaprasad Sekhar Dolla from the Center for East Asian Studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi.

“It will have an impact on the multipolar world that is unfolding.”


Greece wants Turkish crackdown on migrant smugglers

Greece wants Turkish crackdown on migrant smugglers
Updated 24 October 2024
Follow

Greece wants Turkish crackdown on migrant smugglers

Greece wants Turkish crackdown on migrant smugglers
  • Greek Migration Minister Nikos Panagiotopoulos is expected to discuss the issue with Turkish Interior Minister Ali Yerlikaya in November
  • Disasters involving would-be asylum seekers occur regularly off the coast of Greece, one of the main countries through which people seek to enter the EU

ATHENS: Greece is to ask neighboring Turkiye to crack down harder on gangs trafficking would-be asylum seekers, a senior migration official said on Thursday.
“We are not doing enough about migrant smugglers. We are raising the issue with our European peers and our Turkish neighbors,” the official said on condition of anonymity.
“The cooperation which we intend to intensify with Turkiye will focus on the war against smuggling networks,” the source added.
Migration Minister Nikos Panagiotopoulos is expected to discuss the issue with Turkish Interior Minister Ali Yerlikaya in November.
More than 37,000 asylum seekers entered Greece in the first nine months of the year, mainly from Turkiye, according to ministry figures.
Arrivals are predicted to reach 50,000 by the end of the year.
Disasters involving would-be asylum seekers occur regularly off the coast of Greece, one of the main countries through which people fleeing poverty or war in Africa, Asia and the Middle East seek to enter the European Union.
Several people have drowned in migrant boat sinkings in recent days.
Greek government officials have stressed that the country’s camps — which can accommodate some 50,000 asylum seekers while their claims for refuge are processed — are not currently under pressure.
But two key new facilities have faced obstacles.
The EU in 2021 allocated 155 million euros ($167 million) to the Greek government to build new camps on the Aegean islands of Lesbos and Chios.
But work on both projects has been held up by local opposition.
In Chios, the plan may have to be scrapped altogether, the ministry official admitted on Thursday.
Lesbos, meanwhile, has faced an ongoing dispute about widening a road through a pristine forest to the new camp, which is nearly complete.