Biden’s Israel policy has eroded support for Democrats among Arab Americans: Survey

Palestinians flee to the southern Gaza Strip on Salah al-Din Street in Bureij, Gaza Strip, Friday, Nov. 10, 2023. (AP/File Photo)
Palestinians flee to the southern Gaza Strip on Salah al-Din Street in Bureij, Gaza Strip, Friday, Nov. 10, 2023. (AP/File Photo)
Short Url
Updated 13 sec ago
Follow

Biden’s Israel policy has eroded support for Democrats among Arab Americans: Survey

Biden’s Israel policy has eroded support for Democrats among Arab Americans: Survey
  • Poll illustrates how attitudes have switched from the Democrats to the Republicans
  • Perception is that the Biden administration has failed to rein in Israel or hold it to account

LONDON: When Arab Americans go to the polls on Nov. 5 to cast their vote for the next US president, more of them intend to vote for Republican candidate Donald Trump than his Democratic rival Kamala Harris.

The finding is one of several surprising results from a poll conducted for Arab News by YouGov. 

The Arab-American vote is virtually polarized. Asked which candidate they are most likely to vote for, 45 percent said Trump while 43 percent opted for Harris, although this gap could easily be narrowed — or made slightly wider — by the survey’s 5.93 percent margin of error.

“The fact that they’re so evenly split is surprising, particularly given what’s been happening in Gaza and now Lebanon,” Firas Maksad, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute in Washington, told the Arab News podcast “Frankly Speaking.”

He added: “You’d think that that would have an impact and would dampen the vote for somebody who is so staunchly pro-Israel like Donald Trump, but clearly that’s not the case.”

Instead, “the Arab-American public generally reflects the same trend here as the (general) American public. Many aren’t newly naturalized, they’re second, third and fourth-generation Arab Americans — some (families) came here in the mid-1800s, and so they very much reflect the general sentiment in the American population.”

What is highly significant, however, is what the finding reveals about how support for the Democrats has ebbed away over the course of the year-long war in Gaza, and the perception among Arab Americans that the Biden administration has failed to rein in Israel or hold it to account.

The slightly greater support for Trump than for Harris comes despite the fact that 40 percent of those polled describe themselves as Democrats, 28 percent as Republicans and 23 percent as independents.

This contradiction is amplified by the fact that 35 percent of respondents describe themselves as politically moderate, and 27 percent as liberal or very liberal. Only a third say they are conservative or very conservative.

The poll illustrates how many Arab Americans have switched their allegiance from the Democrats to the Republicans.

Thirty-seven percent of those polled voted for Trump in 2016, with 27 percent having backed Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton.

By 2020, however, Arab-American support for Trump had drained away after a presidency that saw his administration formally recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, moving the US Embassy there from Tel Aviv, and preside over the Abraham Accords, which were widely seen as favoring Israel and marginalizing the Palestinians.

Joe Biden, credited in various exit polls as having won the Muslim vote, was the clear beneficiary in 2020. 

This is reflected in the current YouGov poll, which found that in 2020, 43 percent of respondents backed Biden, with Trump’s share of the Arab-American vote down to 34 percent. 




Support for the Democrats has ebbed away over the course of the year-long war in Gaza, and the perception among Arab Americans that the Biden administration has failed to rein in Israel or hold it to account. (AP)

Now, it seems, the tide has turned back in favor of the Republican ticket, a vote perhaps not so much for Trump — who has announced an intention to expand his notorious 2017 ban on Muslim travelers and said if elected he would bar Palestinian refugees from the US — but against Biden’s record in the Middle East over the past year of conflict.

In September, the Muslim mayor of Hamtramck, in the battleground state of Michigan and known as the only Muslim-majority city in the US, reportedly surprised many in the Arab-American community when he publicly endorsed Trump for president — a decision that the current YouGov poll shows to be no real surprise at all.

“President Trump and I may not agree on everything, but I know he is a man of principles,” Amer Ghalib wrote on Facebook.

Ghalib had met Trump at a town hall meeting in Flint, Michigan, at which the two discussed issues of concern to Arab Americans. 

Michigan, with a large proportion of Arab-American voters, is one of several swing states that could decide the outcome on Nov. 5.

“The question is whether some of this is a protest vote against the Biden-Harris team for their inability, or lack of a political will, to rein in Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,” said Maksad.

“But what’s puzzling about this is that if this is a protest vote, you wouldn’t necessarily vote for Trump because he was even more pro-Israeli, so you’d go to a third-party candidate such as the Greens (Jill Stein).

“So I don’t know how much (of the support for Trump) can be ascribed to what has unfolded in the Middle East. One also has to think of all the other factors (such as) immigration and the economy.”

Overall, 47 percent of those polled believe a Trump presidency would be better for the US economy, against 41 percent for Harris.

Surprisingly, the YouGov survey found little support for Stein, a vocal critic of Israel’s military offensives in Gaza and Lebanon whose running mate is Butch Ware, a history professor at the University of California and a leading academic authority on Islam. 

Despite the fact that Stein has spoken out frequently against Israel’s actions, a surprising 44 percent of Arab Americans said they do not know what her stance is toward the current Israeli government. 

Only 9 percent say they are unaware of the two main candidates’ attitudes to the Israeli government.

“Traditionally, some Arab Americans would like a third-party candidate,” Joseph Haboush, a former non-resident scholar at the Middle East Institute and Washington correspondent for Al Arabiya English, said on the Arab News-sponsored “Ray Hanania Radio Show.”

Haboush added: “But I think the chatter you hear about a third party is out of frustration. There were a lot of Arab Americans who thought a Democratic administration would be better, particularly those who care more about the Palestinian issue, and I think they’ve had a rude awakening.”

Only 4 percent said they will vote for Stein, although the survey reveals greater support for her among Arab-American voters in the Midwest (13 percent), reinforcing previous findings that her popularity among Muslims in key battleground states could significantly impact the two main candidates.

A survey carried out in late August by the Council on American-Islamic Relations found that in Michigan, a battleground Midwest state that is home to a large Arab-American community, 40 percent of Muslim voters back Stein, leaving Trump with 18 percent and Harris with 12 percent.

The CAIR survey also found significant support for Stein among Muslims in other key states, including Wisconsin (44 percent), Arizona (35 percent) and Pennsylvania (25 percent).

In the YouGov survey, Stein’s 13 percent Arab-American support in the Midwest comes chiefly at the expense of the two main candidates, costing Harris and Trump 7 percentage points apiece.

This could prove to be hugely significant. Stein stands no chance of winning the election, but in 2016, when she garnered only 1 percent of the vote, Democrats blamed her for taking crucial votes away from Clinton, costing her the presidency.


Survey finds 87 percent of Arab Americans intend to vote in US election

Survey finds 87 percent of Arab Americans intend to vote in US election
Updated 48 sec ago
Follow

Survey finds 87 percent of Arab Americans intend to vote in US election

Survey finds 87 percent of Arab Americans intend to vote in US election
  • Poll shows why election candidates would be well advised not take the Arab American vote for granted
  • Women’s engagement with the election process has increased significantly since 2016, when 32 percent did not vote

LONDON: A poll conducted for Arab News by YouGov reveals that 87 percent of Arab Americans intend to vote in next month’s presidential election.

Since 2016, Arab-American participation in presidential elections has grown steadily. Eight years ago, 67 percent of those surveyed turned out to vote, rising to 79 percent in 2020. This year, only 6 percent said they will not bother voting, with 7 percent still undecided.

The intention to vote on Nov. 5 is stronger among men (92 percent) than women (81 percent).  However, women’s engagement with the presidential election process has increased significantly since 2016, when 32 percent did not vote.

Since 2016, Arab-American participation in presidential elections has grown steadily. (AFP)

This fell to 26 percent in 2020, and now only 11 percent said they will not vote next month, with 8 percent still undecided. 

Older respondents are more likely to vote, with 90 percent of those over 55 years of age signaling their intention to do so, compared with 84 percent of 18-34-year-olds.

Most likely to head to the polls are those who live in the west and south (where 92 and 91 percent respectively intend to vote), people educated up to post-graduate level (97 percent), and those on an annual salary of $80,000 or more (94 percent).

Overall, 80 percent of those polled believe their vote matters. Seventy-four percent of Arab-American women believe their vote matters, compared with 86 percent of men.

Historically, many Arab Americans have felt that their vote did not count for much, “but that’s no longer the case at all because of where that constituency is,” Firas Maksad, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute, told the Arab News podcast “Frankly Speaking.”

Large Arab-American communities are found in “states like Michigan, that are going to be crucial, and even in Georgia (there is) a significant population and in Northern Virginia.

“So although the Arab-American community is relatively small — perhaps some 1 percent of the general American population — in elections so tightly contested as they are today, not only at the general national level but in the pivotal swing states like Michigan, Georgia and Pennsylvania, the margin here is 0.5 percent one way or the other, and that makes the Arab-American vote a crucial constituency to win.”

The poll shows that all candidates would be well advised not to take the Arab-American vote for granted — 84 percent say regardless of whether an election is looming, they keep up with political developments either most of the time (44 percent) or some of the time (40 percent).


A third of Arab Americans support one-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict: Poll

A third of Arab Americans support one-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict: Poll
Updated 6 sec ago
Follow

A third of Arab Americans support one-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict: Poll

A third of Arab Americans support one-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict: Poll
  • Half of those surveyed support the long-proposed two-state solution, with one for Israelis and one for Palestinians
  • But 34 percent favor the creation of a single state in which Palestinians and Israelis would have equal rights

LONDON: One of the biggest surprises to emerge from a survey conducted for Arab News by YouGov is the extent of support among Arab Americans for a one-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Half of those surveyed support the long-proposed two-state solution, “one for Israelis and one for Palestinians with shared governance over the city of Jerusalem.” 

But 34 percent favor the creation of a single state in which Palestinians and Israelis would have equal rights.

The one-state solution gains most support among the younger generation — 43 percent of those aged 18-34, against 23 percent among those aged 55 or older.

Surprisingly, 6 percent support no change to the current situation, “with one state for Israelis and no state for Palestinians,” while 9 percent do not know.

In May, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump said he no longer supports a two-state solution. 

He told Time magazine: “There was a time when I thought two states could work. Now I think two states is going to be … much tougher to get.”

Four years ago, he said: “You had a lot of people that liked the idea. Today, you have far fewer people (who like it).”

But as yet, Trump has offered no alternative solution. According to the YouGov survey, his stance on the issue does not appear to have harmed his popularity among Arab Americans, who are as likely to vote for him as for his Democratic opponent Kamala Harris.

Nevertheless, Trump’s remarks are calculated to appeal directly to the influential pro-Israel lobby in the US. 

His comments were welcomed by Israel’s extreme right, pro-settler Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, who opposes Palestinian statehood.

“I congratulate … Donald Trump for his clear words and his return from his support for the establishment of a Palestinian state,” Smotrich tweeted.

“A Palestinian state would be a terrorist state that would endanger the existence of Israel and the international pressure to establish it is an injustice on a historical scale of the Western countries who are willing to endanger the only Jewish state due to internal political interests.”

Trump’s view about the two-state solution is directly opposed to that of Harris. During a televised debate with him on Sept. 10, Harris said she would work for a two-state solution “round the clock.”

She added: “We must have a two-state solution where we can rebuild Gaza, where the Palestinians have security, self-determination and the dignity they so rightly deserve.”


India, China reach pact to resolve border conflict, Indian foreign minister says

India, China reach pact to resolve border conflict, Indian foreign minister says
Updated 21 October 2024
Follow

India, China reach pact to resolve border conflict, Indian foreign minister says

India, China reach pact to resolve border conflict, Indian foreign minister says
  • The news came on the eve of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Russia for a regional summit
  • Relations between the two nations have been strained since 2020 clashes on largely undemarcated frontier

NEW DELHI: India and China have reached a deal on patrolling their disputed frontier to end a four-year military stand-off, the Indian foreign minister said on Monday, paving the way for improved political and business ties between the Asian giants.
The news came on the eve of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Russia for an Oct. 22-24 summit of the BRICS regional grouping, during which he could hold talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping, Indian officials said.
Relations between the world’s two most populous nations — both nuclear powers — have been strained since clashes between their troops on the largely undemarcated frontier in the western Himalayas left 20 Indian and four Chinese soldiers dead in 2020.
The two sides had since stopped patrolling several points along the border in the Ladakh region to avoid new confrontations, while moving tens of thousands of new troops and military equipment closer to the freezing highlands.
“We reached an agreement on patrolling, and with that we have gone back to where the situation was in 2020 and we can say ... the disengagement process with China has been completed,” Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar said at a NDTV media conclave.
The “understanding was reached only today,” he said, adding: “We always said that if you disturb the peace and tranquility how can the rest of the relationship go forward?“
To avoid clashes, the two militaries will patrol contested points along the border according to an agreed schedule, a senior Indian military officer aware of the details told Reuters.
Both sides will monitor the area in Ladakh to ensure that there are no violations, the officer added.
Authorities in Beijing offered no immediate response to India’s remarks.
REGULAR REVIEW, MONITORING
Officials in New Delhi said the pact clears the path for a likely bilateral meeting between Modi and Xi on the sidelines of the BRICS summit, which will be their first since 2020.
The senior military officer said that both sides would pull back their troops a little from current positions to avoid face-offs, but would be allowed to patrol these areas according to a schedule that is being worked out.
Monthly review meetings and regular monitoring of the contested areas by both sides would ensure there are no violations, he added.
Deependra Singh Hooda, a retired senior Indian army officer who was a commander for a part of the China frontier, said that while the two sides would need fresh confidence-building measures, “at least the impasse has been broken.”
Slow progress during talks over the last four years to end the stand-off damaged business ties between the two large economies, with New Delhi tightening scrutiny of investment by Chinese firms and halting major projects.
India’s tougher vetting of all Chinese investment after the clashes effectively turned away billions of dollars from the likes of carmakers BYD and Great Wall Motor, and added more red tape in Indian firms’ interactions with Chinese stakeholders.
However, Indian imports from China have surged 56 percent since the 2020 border clash, nearly doubling New Delhi’s trade deficit with Beijing to $85 billion. China remains India’s biggest source of goods and was its largest supplier of industrial products last year.
Asked about the impact of Monday’s pact on trade with and investment from China, Jaishankar said: “It has just happened. There will be meetings to see what the next steps will be. I wouldn’t go so fast.”


White House: Biden ‘deeply concerned’ about release of documents on Israel’s possible attack plans

White House: Biden ‘deeply concerned’ about release of documents on Israel’s possible attack plans
Updated 21 October 2024
Follow

White House: Biden ‘deeply concerned’ about release of documents on Israel’s possible attack plans

White House: Biden ‘deeply concerned’ about release of documents on Israel’s possible attack plans
  • US officials confirmed on Saturday that the administration is investigating an unauthorized release of classified documents

WASHINGTON DC: President Joe Biden is “deeply concerned” about the release of classified documents on Israel’s preparation for a potential retaliatory attack on Iran, according to a White House spokesman.
US officials confirmed on Saturday that the administration is investigating an unauthorized release of classified documents that assess Israel’s plans to attack Iran.
White House national security spokesman John Kirby said on Monday that the administration was still not certain if the classified information that became publicly disclosed was leaked or hacked.
Kirby added that administration officials don’t have any indication at this point of “additional documents like this finding their way into the public domain.” He added the Pentagon is investing the matter.
“We’re deeply concerned and the president remains deeply concerned about any leakage of classified information into the public domain. That is not supposed to happen and it’s unacceptable when it does,” Kirby said.
The documents are attributed to the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency and National Security Agency, and note that Israel was still moving military assets in place to conduct a military strike in response to Iran’s blistering ballistic missile attack on Oct. 1. They were sharable within the “Five Eyes,” which are the US, Great Britain, Canada, New Zealand and Australia.
The documents, which are marked top secret, were posted to the Telegram messaging app.


India, China reach border patrolling agreement on disputed frontier

India, China reach border patrolling agreement on disputed frontier
Updated 21 October 2024
Follow

India, China reach border patrolling agreement on disputed frontier

India, China reach border patrolling agreement on disputed frontier
  • Modi, Xi could hold bilateral talks this week, as they attend BRICS summit in Russia
  • Tensions broke out between India and China after clashes at Himalayan border in 2020

New Delhi: India and China have reached a patrolling agreement along their disputed border in the Himalayas, Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri announced on Monday, saying it can lead to disengagement and resolution of a conflict that began in 2020.

The latest development comes on the eve of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Russia for a meeting of the BRICS bloc of developing economies, where he could hold talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping on the sidelines.

India-China ties have been strained since 2020, following deadly clashes on their de facto Himalayan border known as the Line of Actual Control.

Both countries have since deployed thousands of troops to the area and downscaled engagements, while their officials have engaged in multiple talks aiming to resolve the standoff.

“I can share with you that over the last several weeks Indian and Chinese diplomatic and military negotiators have been in close contact with each other in a variety of forums,” Misri told a press conference in New Delhi.

“As a result of these discussions, agreement has been arrived at on patrolling arrangements along the Line of Actual Control in the India-China border areas, leading to disengagement and a resolution of the issues that had arisen in these areas in 2020,” he added, without providing more details.

India and China have been unable to agree on their 3,500-km border since they fought a war in 1962.

India’s Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar and his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi last met in July to try and resolve their border issues.

The specifics of the latest agreement are key to evaluating the most recent developments, said Manoj Kewalramani, a fellow in China studies and chairperson of the Indo-Pacific Studies Programme at the Takshashila Institution.

“If it covers all friction points and the wider boundary, then it is a positive step. Implementation, of course, will be the key. Let’s see how that plays out in the weeks and months ahead,” he told Arab News.

The announcement “clearly indicates” that a meeting between Modi and Xi is likely to take place this week, he added.

India’s Foreign Ministry has yet to confirm plans for bilateral talks on the sideline of BRICS and said it is still “looking into” Modi’s final agenda in Russia.

“They have not had a formal bilateral meeting since October 2019. Ties have worsened significantly since April-May 2020. It is important for both countries to have a broad-based and sustained dialogue process,” Kewalramani said.

“A meeting of the two leaders is important for that, (though) the fundamental nature of the relationship will remain competitive.”