Putin ally accuses NATO of already being party to Ukraine war

Update Putin ally accuses NATO of already being party to Ukraine war
NATO leaders attend the NATO-Ukraine Council during the NATO 75th anniversary summit at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center in Washington, DC, on July 11, 2024. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 13 September 2024
Follow

Putin ally accuses NATO of already being party to Ukraine war

Putin ally accuses NATO of already being party to Ukraine war
  • Vyacheslav Volodin: ‘They are waging war with our country’

MOSCOW: The chairman of Russia’s State Duma, the lower house of parliament, on Friday accused NATO of being a party to military action in Ukraine, suggesting it was already heavily involved in military decision-making.

The comments, by Vyacheslav Volodin, a close ally of President Vladimir Putin, came a day after Putin warned that the West would be directly fighting with Russia if it allowed Ukraine to strike Russian territory with Western-made long-range missiles, a move he said would alter the nature of the conflict.

Volodin, who did not reference documentary evidence to back his assertions, accused the US-led military alliance of helping Ukraine choose which Russian cities to target, of agreeing specific military action, and of giving Kyiv orders.

“The United States, Germany, Britain and France are discussing the possibility of strikes (by Ukraine) using long-range weapons on the territory of our country. This is nothing but an attempt to camouflage and conceal their direct participation in military action,” Volodin wrote on his official Telegram channel.

“In fact, the United States and its allies are actually trying to give themselves permission to carry out acts of aggression with missiles against Russia.”

He said the use in Ukraine of NATO advisers and instructors had now been complemented by what he called mercenaries and spoke of entire units armed with NATO weaponry.

Reuters could not independently confirm his assertions.

“They (NATO personnel) determine which cities in our country will be attacked, coordinate military actions and give orders. NATO has become a participant in military actions in Ukraine. They are waging war on our country,” said Volodin.


Starmer assures Ukraine's President Zelensky of Britain’s unwavering support after White House blowout

Updated 9 sec ago
Follow

Starmer assures Ukraine's President Zelensky of Britain’s unwavering support after White House blowout

Starmer assures Ukraine's President Zelensky of Britain’s unwavering support after White House blowout
  • Starmer spoke to both US President Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron after meeting Zelensky
  • Britain announces $2.84 billion loan to Kyiv for military procurement, with the money coming from the profits on frozen Russian assets

LONDON: British Prime Minister Keir Starmer embraced Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Saturday and told him he had the UK’s unwavering support, a day after the blowout at the White House with President Donald Trump.
Zelensky arrived to cheers from people who had gathered outside of 10 Downing St., where Starmer gave him a hug and ushered him inside. The two leaders met on the eve of a meeting of European leaders in London. Called to discuss how European nations can defend Ukraine — and themselves — if the US withdraws support, it has taken on new urgency following Trump’s televised berating of Zelensky.
“And as you heard from the cheers on the street outside, you have full backing across the United Kingdom,” Starmer told the leader of the war-torn country. “We stand with you, with Ukraine, for as long as it may take.”

Zelensky thanked him and the people of the UK for their support and friendship.
After the meeting, Britain announced it was extending a 2.26 billion pound ($2.84 billion) loan to Kyiv for military procurement, with the money coming from the profits on frozen Russian assets. It’s Britain’s contribution to a $50 billion package of support pledged by the G-7 group of wealthy industrialized nations.
Zelensky thanked Britain in a statement on X, saying: “This is true justice – the one who started the war must be the one to pay.”
Starmer spoke to both Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron on Saturday evening after meeting Zelensky, the prime minister’s office said.
The meeting comes the day after an extraordinary diplomatic meltdown when Trump and Vice President JD Vance blasted Zelensky in the Oval Office on live television for not being grateful enough for US support.

Zelensky had been poised to ink a deal to give the US access to mineral riches as Trump pressures Ukraine to reach a deal to end the war with Russia. But he left town without signing anything.
Zelensky had been scheduled to meet with Starmer on Sunday before the European summit, but the timetable for their bilateral meeting was apparently sped up in the aftermath of the Washington visit.
Zelensky will meet with King Charles III on Sunday before the meeting at Lancaster House, a 200-year-old mansion near Buckingham Palace.

 


Trump-Zelensky clash divides US Republicans, dims aid prospects

Trump-Zelensky clash divides US Republicans, dims aid prospects
Updated 24 min 25 sec ago
Follow

Trump-Zelensky clash divides US Republicans, dims aid prospects

Trump-Zelensky clash divides US Republicans, dims aid prospects
  • Zelensky was in Washington to sign an agreement to jointly develop Ukraine’s rich natural resources with the United States
  • Zelensky was told to leave and the agreement was left unsigned

WASHINGTON: An angry White House clash between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Donald Trump divided the US president’s fellow Republicans and dimmed prospects that Congress will approve any further aid for Kyiv in its war with Russia.
On Saturday, Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski said there were “whispers from the White House that they may try to end all US support for Ukraine... I am sick to my stomach as the administration appears to be walking away from our allies and embracing Putin, a threat to democracy and US values around the world.” Other Republicans who had long supported Ukraine lashed out at Zelensky after Friday’s exchange, in which Trump and Vice President JD Vance berated the Ukrainian leader before the world’s media, accusing him of disrespect.
Senator Lindsey Graham called for Zelensky to change his tune or resign, just hours after attending a friendly meeting between Zelensky and a dozen senators.
“What I saw in the Oval Office was disrespectful, and I don’t know if we can ever do business with Zelensky again,” Graham, a close Trump ally, told reporters as he left the White House after the clash, which drove relations with Kyiv’s most important wartime ally to a new low.
“He either needs to resign and send somebody over that we can do business with, or he needs to change,” the South Carolina senator said.
Senator Bill Hagerty of Tennessee, who was ambassador to Japan during Trump’s first term, posted on X: “The United States of America will no longer be taken for granted.”
But even as most Republicans rallied behind Trump and Vance, some joined Democrats in defending Ukraine.
New York Representative Mike Lawler, in a post on X, called the Oval Office meeting “a missed opportunity for both the United States and Ukraine — an agreement that would undoubtedly result in stronger economic and security cooperation.”
Representative Don Bacon, a moderate Republican from Nebraska, threw his support behind Kyiv.
“A bad day for America’s foreign policy. Ukraine wants independence, free markets and rule of law. It wants to be part of the West. Russia hates us and our Western values. We should be clear that we stand for freedom,” he said in a statement.
Neither of the Republican lawmakers criticized Trump or Vance.

MINERALS DEAL
Zelensky was in Washington to sign an agreement to jointly develop Ukraine’s rich natural resources with the United States.
The Ukrainian leader had seen the meeting with Trump and Vance as an opportunity to persuade the US not to side with Russian President Vladimir Putin in his war with Moscow’s smaller neighbor. Instead, Zelensky was told to leave and the agreement was left unsigned.
Kyiv’s backers had hoped the deal would help win more support from Trump’s Republicans — who hold slim majorities in the Senate and House of Representatives — for future aid.
Congress has approved $175 billion in assistance since Putin launched his full-scale invasion three years ago, but the last measure passed in April, when Democrats controlled the Senate and Democrat Joe Biden was in the White House.
Even then, congressional Republicans slow-walked the bill under pressure from candidate Trump, who has been skeptical of further military aid to Ukraine, leading to delays in delivering weapons that put Ukrainian troops on the back foot in the battlefield.
If Trump, the party leader, had skin in the game and was promoting a “very big” minerals deal he had negotiated, analysts said, it would likely have rallied Republican support for Ukraine aid.
Some Republicans who have advocated for assisting Ukraine said they hoped relations could be rebuilt.
Representative Michael McCaul, chairman emeritus of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said he still hoped for a real and lasting peace that ensures Ukraine would be free from further Russian aggression.
“I also urge President Zelensky to sign the mineral deal immediately,” the Texas lawmaker posted on X. “It will create an economic partnership between the United States and Ukraine. It is in both of our interests to get this deal done.”

 


Lawyers sue to block Trump administration from sending 10 migrants to Guantanamo Bay

Lawyers sue to block Trump administration from sending 10 migrants to Guantanamo Bay
Updated 02 March 2025
Follow

Lawyers sue to block Trump administration from sending 10 migrants to Guantanamo Bay

Lawyers sue to block Trump administration from sending 10 migrants to Guantanamo Bay
  • The migrant detention center at Guantanamo operates separately from the US military’s detention center and courtrooms for foreigners detained under President George W. Bush during what Bush called its war on terror

Civil rights attorneys sued the Trump administration Saturday to prevent it from transferring 10 migrants detained in the US to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, their second legal challenge in less than a month over plans for holding up to 30,000 immigrants there for deportation.
The latest federal lawsuit so far applies only to 10 men facing transfer to the naval base in Cuba. Like a lawsuit the same attorneys filed earlier this month for access to migrants already detained there, the latest case was filed in Washington and is backed by the American Civil Liberties Union.
At least 50 migrants have been transferred already to Guantanamo Bay, and the civil rights attorneys believe the number now may be about 200. They have said it is the first time in US history that the government has detained noncitizens on civil immigration charges there. For decades, the naval base was primarily used to detain foreigners associated with the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
Trump has said Guantanamo Bay, also known as “Gitmo,” has space for up to 30,000 immigrants living in the US and that he plans to send “the worst” or high-risk “criminal aliens” there. The administration has not released specific information on who is being transferred, so it is not clear what crimes they are accused of committing in the US and whether they have been convicted in court, or merely charged or arrested.
The 10 men involved in the lawsuit came to the US in 2023 or 2024. Seven are from Venezuela, and the lawsuit said two had been tortured by the Venezuelan government for their political views. A man from Afghanistan and one from Pakistan came to the US, the lawsuit said, because of threats from the Taliban. One man fled Bangladesh because he was threatened over his political party membership, the lawsuit said.
“The purpose of this second Guantanamo lawsuit is to prevent more people from being illegally sent to this notorious prison, where the conditions have now been revealed to be inhumane,” said Lee Gelernt, an ACLU attorney and lead counsel on the case. “The lawsuit is not claiming they cannot be detained in US facilities, but only that they cannot be sent to Guantanamo.”
The White House and the Defense and Homeland Security departments did not immediately respond to emails Saturday seeking comment about the lawsuit. The two agencies, Secretaries Pete Hegseth and Kristi Noem, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement and its acting director are the defendants.
In a Jan. 29 executive order expanding operations at Guantanamo Bay, Trump said that one of his goals is to “dismantle criminal cartels.” But the men’s attorneys said none of them have gang affiliations, and the lawsuit said four of them were falsely identified as gang members based on their tattoos, including one of a Catholic rosary.
Transfer to Guantanamo violates constitutional right, attorneys say
Their attorneys described their latest lawsuit as an emergency filing to halt imminent transfers and challenge the Trump administration’s plans. They contend that the transfers violate the men’s right to due legal process, guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution
The latest lawsuit also argues that federal immigration law bars the transfer of non-Cuban migrants from the US to Guantanamo Bay and that the US government has no authority to hold people outside its territory, and the naval base remains part of Cuba legally. The transfers are also described as arbitrary.
In addition, the lawsuit argues that Guantanamo Bay “does not have the infrastructure” to hold even the 10 men.
“The reason for doing so is solely to try to instill fear in the immigrant population,” the lawsuit said.
The men’s attorneys allege that many of the people who have been sent to Guantanamo Bay do not have serious criminal records or even any criminal history. Their first lawsuit, filed Feb. 12, said migrants sent to the naval base had “effectively disappeared into a black box” and couldn’t contact attorneys or family. The Department of Homeland Security said they could reach attorneys by phone.
In another, separate federal lawsuit filed in New Mexico, a federal judge on Feb. 9 blocked the transfer of three immigrants from Venezuela being held in that state to Guantanamo Bay. Their attorneys said they had been falsely accused of being gang members.
Guantanamo ‘perfect place’ to house migrants, secretary of defense says
The migrant detention center at Guantanamo operates separately from the US military’s detention center and courtrooms for foreigners detained under President George W. Bush during what Bush called its war on terror. It once held nearly 800 people, but the number has dwindled to 15, including 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.
Hegseth, who was assigned to Guantanamo when he was on active duty, has called it a “perfect place” to house migrants. Trump has described the naval base as “a tough place to get out of.”
A United Nations investigator who visited the military detention center in 2023 said conditions had improved, but military detainees still faced near constant surveillance, forced removal from their cells and unjust use of restraints, resulting in “ongoing cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment under international law.” The US said it disagreed “in significant respects” with her report.


France’s Macron urges calm after Trump and Zelensky clash

France’s Macron urges calm after Trump and Zelensky clash
Updated 01 March 2025
Follow

France’s Macron urges calm after Trump and Zelensky clash

France’s Macron urges calm after Trump and Zelensky clash
  • Macron had also spoken to British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, European Council President Antonio Costa and NATO chief Mark Rutte
  • “I think that beyond the frayed nerves, everybody needs to calm down, show respect and gratitude,” Macron said

PARIS: French President Emmanuel Macron spoke to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and US President Donald Trump on Saturday and called for calm in an interview following Friday’s clash between the US and Ukrainian leaders at the White House.
The French presidency said Macron had also spoken to British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, European Council President Antonio Costa and NATO chief Mark Rutte, on the eve of a meeting of European leaders on Ukraine on Sunday in London.
In an extraordinary Oval Office meeting on Friday, Trump threatened to withdraw support for Ukraine, three years after Russia invaded its smaller neighbor, alarming Europeans who fear a rushed ceasefire would embolden an expansionist Russia.
“I think that beyond the frayed nerves, everybody needs to calm down, show respect and gratitude, so we can move forward concretely, because what’s at stake is too important,” Macron said in an interview with several Sunday newspapers.
Macron and Starmer had taken the lead in Europe to convince Trump not to rush to a ceasefire and to provide security guarantees to Ukraine, presenting him with a plan to deploy peacekeepers in Ukraine during meetings in Washington this week.
Macron said in the interview that Zelensky had told him he was willing to “restore dialogue” with the United States, including on a deal giving US access to revenues from Ukraine’s natural resources, but did not say what Trump told him in the call.
“America’s manifest destiny is to be alongside Ukrainians, I have no doubts about that,” he was quoted as saying by La Tribune Dimanche. “I want the Americans to understand that withdrawing support to Ukraine is not in their interest.”
Macron also said that at a planned European Union summit on March 6 he hoped there would be unanimous support for a joint debt plan at the EU level to raise “several hundred billion euros” for European defense.


At least 23 killed in terror attack in DR Congo

At least 23 killed in terror attack in DR Congo
Updated 01 March 2025
Follow

At least 23 killed in terror attack in DR Congo

At least 23 killed in terror attack in DR Congo
  • The UN agency’s emergencies director, Mike Ryan, said an investigation was underway, but tests had been negative for hemorrhagic fevers such as Marburg and Ebola

BUNIA: At least 23 people were killed and about 20 taken hostage this week in the northeast of the Democratic Republic of the Congo by a group linked to Daesh, local sources said.
The attacks by the Allied Democratic Forces, or ADF, were carried out on Tuesday and Wednesday in the Ituri province along the border with Uganda.
“A total of 23 people executed by these rebels” in the villages of Matolo and Samboko, Jospin Paluku, coordinator of one of the leading civil society organizations in Mambasa territory, said, specifying that the toll is provisional.
At least another 20 civilians were “taken hostage, including the son of the village chief of Matolo,” he added.
Humanitarian groups confirmed the numbers and said they were likely to rise.

FASTFACT

The attacks by the Allied Democratic Forces were carried out in the Ituri province along the border with Uganda.

The victims were mostly farmers working in the fields, police said.
ADF, which is made of former Ugandan rebels, has been implanted since the mid-1990s in the northeast of the DRC, where it has killed thousands of civilians despite the deployment of the Ugandan army alongside the Congolese armed forces.
At the end of 2021, Kampala and Kinshasa launched a joint military operation against the ADF, called “Shujaa,” without so far managing to end their operations.
Paluku said it was the first ADF attack since the start of the year, after a three-month lull.
Meanwhile, the World Health Organization said that poisoning was suspected in an unexplained illness outbreak in the western DR Congo.
The health scare is the latest to befall the country that has seen outbreaks including mpox, as well as deadly violence in its conflict-wracked east.
In the western province of Equateur, there have been nearly 1,100 illnesses and 60 deaths since the start of the year, with symptoms including fever, headaches, joint pain, and body aches, according to the WHO.
The UN agency’s emergencies director, Mike Ryan, said an investigation was underway, but tests had been negative for hemorrhagic fevers such as Marburg and Ebola.
It “appears very much more like a toxic type event, either from a biologic perspective like meningitis or from chemical exposure,” Ryan said.
He said that local authorities had indicated that “there is a very strong level of suspicion of a poisoning event” related to a water source in a village.
“Clearly, at the center of this, it would appear that we have some kind of poisoning event,” he added.