UAE seeks consular services for arrested Telegram boss

UAE seeks consular services for arrested Telegram boss
Pavel Durov, CEO and co-founder of Telegram speaks onstage during day one of TechCrunch Disrupt SF 2015 at Pier 70 on September 21, 2015 in San Francisco, California. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 27 August 2024
Follow

UAE seeks consular services for arrested Telegram boss

UAE seeks consular services for arrested Telegram boss
  • Durov, the 39-year-old billionaire founder of the messaging platform, was arrested at the Paris airport late on Saturday
  • He is accused of failing to curb the spread of illegal content on Telegram, which has more than 900 million users

DUBAI: The UAE said on Tuesday it had requested consular services for Telegram’s Pavel Durov after the Dubai-based tech boss was arrested in France over alleged failings to curb criminality on the app.

“The UAE is closely following the case of its citizen Pavel Durov, founder of Telegram, who was arrested by the French authorities in Paris-Le Bourget Airport,” the UAE Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

“The UAE has submitted a request to the Government of the French Republic to provide him with all the necessary consular services in an urgent manner,” it added.

Durov, the 39-year-old billionaire founder of the messaging platform, was arrested at the Paris airport late on Saturday.

He is accused of failing to curb the spread of illegal content on Telegram, which has more than 900 million users. The company has rejected the accusations.

French President Emmanuel Macron on Monday denied there was a political aspect to Durov’s arrest as the internet mogul spent a second day in French custody.

French authorities extended his initial detention for questioning until Wednesday, according to a source close to the investigation.

Durov set up Telegram after leaving Russia a decade ago, and Forbes magazine estimates his current fortune at $15.5 billion.


Advocacy groups urge UN to investigate killing of Reuters video journalist in Lebanon

Advocacy groups urge UN to investigate killing of Reuters video journalist in Lebanon
Updated 13 September 2024
Follow

Advocacy groups urge UN to investigate killing of Reuters video journalist in Lebanon

Advocacy groups urge UN to investigate killing of Reuters video journalist in Lebanon
  • Ismail Abdallah was killed by Israeli tank shells while filming cross-border exchange in south Lebanon in October
  • Letter demands UN Commission to investigate possible war crimes, ensure accountability

LONDON: Advocacy groups have urged UN officials to investigate the death of Reuters video journalist Issam Abdallah, who was killed in southern Lebanon in October.

In a letter signed by 11 organizations, including the Committee to Protect Journalists, Reporters Without Borders and the Lebanese Center for Human Rights, the group requested the UN Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem and Israel, to examine the circumstances surrounding Israel’s Oct. 13 attack.

They also urged the commission to investigate potential war crimes committed against journalists since the start of the Israel-Gaza conflict on Oct. 7.

Abdallah, a 37-year-old video journalist, was killed by Israeli tank shells while filming a cross-border exchange.

Six other journalists were injured in the attack, including AFP photographer Christina Assi, who had her leg amputated.

Independent investigations by Reuters, AFP, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and RSF concluded that the attack was “deliberately” launched by Israeli forces on “clearly visible media members.”

The organizations condemned the attack as a violation of international law and called for a war crimes investigation.

A sixth investigation conducted by UNIFIL similarly concluded, according to a Reuters report published in March, that “an Israeli tank killed Reuters reporter Issam Abdallah in Lebanon by firing two 120 mm rounds at a group of ‘clearly identifiable journalists’ in violation of international law.”

The letter asked the UN to publicly identify the military unit responsible for the attack and criticized Israeli authorities for failing to hold the perpetrators accountable.

“We submit this request in the hope that the work of the Commission may contribute to ensuring accountability for the killing of Reuters journalist Issam Abdallah, who lost his life in that attack, and for the six other journalists injured alongside him: Agence France Presse (AFP) journalists Christina Assi and Dylan Collins; Al Jazeera journalists Carmen Joukhadar and Elie Brakhya; and Reuters journalists Maher Nazih and Thaer Al-Soudani,” the letter read.

“Over 10 months have passed since this potential war crime was committed, but no tangible steps have been taken by any judicial body to secure justice for the victims and accountability for the perpetrators.”

It added: “We believe this to be of crucial importance to ensure redress for all victims, as well as to end impunity for crimes committed against journalists since 7 October 2023, including the ongoing targeting of journalists in Gaza, where more than 100 media employees have been killed by Israeli forces.”


Toronto festival drops Russian war film screenings over threats

Toronto festival drops Russian war film screenings over threats
Updated 13 September 2024
Follow

Toronto festival drops Russian war film screenings over threats

Toronto festival drops Russian war film screenings over threats
  • Desicion was taken after receiving ‘significant threats to festival operations and public safety’
  • Film features a Russian battalion as it advanced across eastern Ukraine in February 2022

OTTAWA: The Toronto International Film Festival said Thursday it was pausing all upcoming screenings of controversial documentary “Russians at War” after receiving “significant threats.”
“We have been made aware of significant threats to festival operations and public safety,” festival organizers said in a statement, pointing to reports they received “indicating potential activity in the coming days that pose significant risk.”
“This is an unprecedented move for TIFF,” read the statement.
“Given the severity of these concerns, we cannot proceed as planned.”
Anastasia Trofimova first presented “Russians at War” at the Venice Film Festival.
In the film, she embedded with a Russian battalion as it advanced across eastern Ukraine after Moscow launched its invasion in February 2022.
It was to have its North American premiere in Toronto on Friday, followed by additional screenings on Saturday and Sunday.
Both in Venice and Toronto it has sparked outrage in Ukrainian cultural and political circles against what many consider a pro-Kremlin film that seeks to whitewash and justify Moscow’s assault on its neighbor.
Ukraine’s presidential chief of staff, Andriy Yermak, said he felt the festival should have dropped the film.
“The threat is Russian propaganda,” he wrote on Telegram, adding that the film should be “banned.”
Canada’s deputy prime minister, Chrystia Freeland, criticized the planned screening in Toronto.
“There can be no moral equivalency in our understanding of this conflict,” she said.
Canadian public broadcaster TVO, which had helped fund the documentary, pulled its support for the film and said it would not be airing it.
Meanwhile, Ukraine’s state film agency appealed to TIFF to drop the film, which it said was “a dangerous tool for public opinion manipulation.”
Trofimova has rejected the criticisms, telling AFP the Canada-France production was “an anti-war film” that showed “ordinary guys” who were fighting for Russia.
The soldiers depicted appear to have little idea of why they have been sent to the front, and are shown struggling to make Soviet-era weapons serviceable.
Others chain-smoke cigarettes and down shots of alcohol amid the deaths and wounds of their comrades.
Producer Sean Farnel said on X that the decision to cancel the screenings was “heartbreaking.”
He blamed officials’ public criticisms for having “incited the violent hate that has led to TIFF’s painful decision to pause its presentation of ‘Russians at War.’“


Investigation casts doubt on Israeli forces’ account of US-Turkish activist’s death

Investigation casts doubt on Israeli forces’ account of US-Turkish activist’s death
Updated 13 September 2024
Follow

Investigation casts doubt on Israeli forces’ account of US-Turkish activist’s death

Investigation casts doubt on Israeli forces’ account of US-Turkish activist’s death
  • Washington Post investigation suggests Aysenur Ezgi Eygi’s was the result of a ‘mischaracterization’ of events by soldiers
  • Reconstruction of events reveals Eygi was shot about 20 minutes after protesters had retreated

LONDON: Turkish-American activist Aysenur Ezgi Eygi’s death was the result of a “mischaracterization” of events by Israeli forces, raising fresh doubts about the official account, according to an investigation by the Washington Post.

Eygi was fatally shot in the head in early September while participating in a protest against Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

Although Israeli authorities initially described her death as likely “indirect and unintentional,” the Post’s investigation, based on 13 eyewitness testimonies and over 50 videos and photos provided by the International Solidarity Movement, paints a different picture.

The report indicates that the protests had largely subsided before Israeli soldiers opened fire.

Eygi was shot roughly 30 minutes after the height of confrontations, and about 20 minutes after protesters had retreated down the main road, some 200 yards (183 meters) away from Israeli forces.

Eygi herself had withdrawn to an olive grove far from the soldiers, approximately 180 meters away, before being struck by a bullet.

Witnesses claimed that a Palestinian teenager standing about 18 meters away from Eygi may have been the intended target of Israeli fire.

The Israeli army declined to comment on the investigation.

According to one of her colleagues, Eygi had explicitly decided beforehand she did not want to be “near any action.”

The report described chaotic scenes of violence following Friday prayers in the town of Beita, near Nablus, in the West Bank.

After young Palestinians erected barricades and threw rocks, Israeli soldiers responded with teargas and live ammunition.

Eygi, however, had moved to an olive grove far from the confrontation when she was hit by the fatal bullet.

The Post’s findings cast doubt on the justification for using live fire in this case, highlighting concerns about the broader use of excessive force by Israeli soldiers in the West Bank.

Israeli rights groups have noted that soldiers are often given broad discretion to open fire, even based on perceived future threats from suspects.

The incident has prompted international criticism, including from US President Joe Biden, who expressed sadness and anger over the death, though he echoed the Israeli account that the shooting was accidental.

Eygi’s family, however, has rejected this explanation, accusing the US government of accepting Israel’s narrative without independent investigation.

“President Biden is still calling her killing an accident based only on the Israeli military’s story. This is not only insensitive and false, it is complicit in the Israeli military’s agenda to take Palestinian land and whitewash the killing of an American,” the family said in a statement earlier this week.

Tensions between the US and Israel have grown more strained in recent months, particularly as violence in the West Bank has surged since the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attacks.

At least 634 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces during this period, according to the UN.


Musk calls Australian government ‘fascists’ over misinformation law

Musk calls Australian government ‘fascists’ over misinformation law
Updated 13 September 2024
Follow

Musk calls Australian government ‘fascists’ over misinformation law

Musk calls Australian government ‘fascists’ over misinformation law
  • Australia’s Labor government unveils legislation which could fine Internet platforms up to 5 percent of their global revenue
  • The proposed law would require tech platforms to set codes of conduct to stop dangerous falsehoods spreading and be approved by a regulator

SYDNEY: Elon Musk, owner of social media platform X, on Friday called Australia’s center-left government “fascists” over proposed legislation to slap fines on social media firms for failing to prevent the spread of misinformation online.
Australia’s Labor government on Thursday unveiled legislation which could fine Internet platforms up to 5 percent of their global revenue for enabling misinformation, joining a worldwide push to rein in borderless tech giants.
The proposed law would require tech platforms to set codes of conduct to stop dangerous falsehoods spreading and be approved by a regulator. The regulator would set its own standard if a platform failed to do so and fine firms for non-compliance.
Musk, who views himself as a champion of free speech, responded to a post by an X user linking the Reuters story about the misinformation law with one word: “Fascists.”
A spokesperson for Communications Minister Michelle Rowland said by email that companies operating in Australia must comply with Australian laws.
“This bill improves the transparency and accountability of platforms for users and the Australian people,” Rowland said.
Musk’s comment on the push against misinformation drew criticism and ridicule from other government lawmakers.
“Elon Musk’s had more positions on free speech than the Kama Sutra. When it’s in its commercial interests, he is the champion of free speech and when he doesn’t like it ... he’s going to shut it all down,” Government Services Minister Bill Shorten told Channel Nine’s breakfast show.
Social media platforms should not publish scam content, deepfake materials and livestream violence in the name of free speech, Assistant Treasurer Stephen Jones told ABC television.
In a previous clash with the Australian government, X in April went to court to challenge a cyber regulator’s order for the removal of some posts about the stabbing of a bishop in Sydney, prompting Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to call Musk an “arrogant billionaire.”
The regulator later dropped its challenge against X after a setback in the federal court.
X had blocked Australian users from viewing the posts about the stabbing but refused to remove them globally on the grounds that one country’s rules should not control the Internet.


Seeing isn’t believing: AI Summit’s warning on deepfakes

Seeing isn’t believing: AI Summit’s warning on deepfakes
Updated 12 September 2024
Follow

Seeing isn’t believing: AI Summit’s warning on deepfakes

Seeing isn’t believing: AI Summit’s warning on deepfakes

RIYADH: The use of deepfakes — images or recordings that have been altered or manipulated to depict real or nonexistent people — raised worrying ethical questions, but could also bring positive, life-changing benefits, the Global AI Summit in Riyadh was told on Thursday. 
In a panel titled “Deepfakes: Navigating Ethical, Technical, and Social Implications” Thomas Schneider, ambassador and director of international affairs at the Swiss Federal Office of Communications, said that definitions of a “deepfake” can have a political, technical, or legal basis.

The technology has deep ethical implications depending on “whether it’s a piece of art or (if it is) insulting someone.” 

On the same panel, Jennifer Williams, assistant professor at the University of Southampton, said that deepfakes could have “minuscule edits, minor alterations.” 

“It only takes three to five seconds of your voice in order to create a deepfake that can bypass automatic speaker verification systems that we use, for example in the UK,” she said.

Williams said that deepfakes are not always designed to be misleading or illicit.  

The rise of speech synthesis technology, a form of deepfake, is leading to growing demand in a number of companies, she said.  

Benefits of the technology include use in voice reconstruction, voice privacy that involves sourcing biometric information from the speech signal, and screening readers for those who are visually impaired through speech synthesis technology. 

Williams warned that deepfake technology could also lead to a rise in mental health issues due to fake media consumption.  

“One of my concerns is that we might see various new types of mental health issues surrounding how we question our reality. I don’t know if the younger generation is going to come up to speed as quickly as we have with the changing world and how that might impact how they handle information or just each other,” she said.

Walid Magdy, co-founder and CTO at Alan AI, said that deepfakes have been put to negative use on social media platforms, such as a TikTok account operated by a man impersonating US actor Tom Cruise.  

The slow response in removing deepfakes from platforms poses problems, he said. 

“To convince the people to remove the harm will take even longer. It’s the same with fake news — it propagates among people, and they think it’s true and act on it. 

“Don’t believe everything you see; you have to double check many times.” 

At the end of the panel, Schneider discussed the future of AI, saying: “We need to learn and step up. It’s a mix of measures. We need to technically develop standards that help us. We need to legally develop standards that help us. We need to develop our own skills and common sense. We have no choice.”