Brazil, Colombia — but not US — favor fresh Venezuela elections

Brazil, Colombia — but not US — favor fresh Venezuela elections
Venezuelans living in Colombia take part in a protest against Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro's disputed victory in Venezuela's presidential elections during a rally in Medellin, Colombia, on August 7, 2024. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 16 August 2024
Follow

Brazil, Colombia — but not US — favor fresh Venezuela elections

Brazil, Colombia — but not US — favor fresh Venezuela elections

CARACAS: The presidents of Brazil and Colombia called Thursday for fresh elections in Venezuela after international condemnation of last month’s vote that the opposition says was stolen by strongman Nicolas Maduro.

From Washington, US President Joe Biden signalled he was also calling for a new vote, but hours later the White House walked back his comment.

The two South American leaders, who spoke on the phone Wednesday to discuss a possible “political exit” from Venezuela’s post-election crisis, independently urged Maduro to consider a new election.

But Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado said it would show “a lack of respect” for the popular will already expressed on July 28.

If Maduro “is sensible,” said Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, “he could try to appeal to the people of Venezuela, perhaps even organize elections.”

Lula told a Brazilian radio station there should be “criteria for participation of all candidates” in a new election, which should “allow observers from all over the world.”

For his part, Colombian President Gustavo Petro called on X for the lifting of all sanctions against Caracas, a “general national and international amnesty,” “new, free elections” and a “transitional cohabitation government.”

Biden meanwhile addressed the issue Thursday. Asked by a reporter whether he supported the idea of fresh Venezuelan elections, the US leader replied: “I do.”

But the White House suggested Biden meant something more general.

“The president was speaking to the absurdity of Maduro and his representatives not coming clean about the July 28 elections,” a spokesman said, adding it was “abundantly clear” that opposition candidate Edmundo Gonzalez Urrutia had won.

“The United States again calls for the will of the Venezuelan people to be respected and for discussions to begin on a transition back to democratic norms,” a National Security Council spokesman said.

Machado, who was replaced on the ballot by a proxy after being barred from seeking election by Maduro-friendly state institutions, told a virtual press conference that “to ignore what happened on July 28 shows a lack of respect for Venezuelans” who voted “in very adverse conditions where there was fraud and we still managed to win.”

Venezuela’s CNE electoral council proclaimed Maduro the winner of a third, six-year term, giving him 52 percent of votes cast but without providing a detailed breakdown of the results.

The opposition says polling station-level results show its candidate Gonzalez Urrutia, a 74-year-old retired diplomat, defeated Maduro by a wide margin.

Gonzalez Urrutia himself reaffirmed Thursday on X that he had won the election “by an overwhelming majority,” and that “we reiterate our commitment to democracy.”

Gonzalez Urrutia and Machado have been in hiding since the president accused them of seeking to foment a “coup d’etat” and demanded they be jailed.

Anti-Maduro protests have claimed 25 lives so far, with dozens injured and more than 2,400 arrested.

Maduro’s victory claim has been rejected by the United States, European Union and several Latin American countries.

Mexico’s President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, meanwhile, insisted Thursday the dispute was “up to the Venezuelans to resolve.”

Maduro has rejected the possibility of new elections and asked the country’s highest court, also viewed as loyal to him, to certify the outcome.

Meanwhile, Venezuela’s legislature on Thursday approved a law to regulate the registration and funding of NGOs described by Maduro’s regime as a “facade for the financing of terrorist actions.”

The law is part of several under consideration in the regime-friendly National Assembly that critics say are meant to criminalize opponents of the strongman.

National Assembly president Jorge Rodriguez has indicated he would also seek to ban future election observation missions from foreign countries.

The vast majority of the 277 lawmakers in the single-chamber National Assembly are loyal to Maduro, who had warned of a “bloodbath” if he lost his reelection bid.

United Nations human rights chief Volker Turk and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights have urged lawmakers not to pass laws they said would limit democratic freedoms.

Since coming to power in 2013, Maduro has presided over an economic collapse that has seen more than seven million Venezuelans flee the country, as GDP plunged 80 percent in a decade.


Nigerian army rescues 13 hostages from extremist group

Nigerian army rescues 13 hostages from extremist group
Updated 14 September 2024
Follow

Nigerian army rescues 13 hostages from extremist group

Nigerian army rescues 13 hostages from extremist group
  • Kidnappings have become common in parts of northern Nigeria, where dozens of armed groups take advantage of a limited security presence to carry out attacks in village

ABUJA, Nigeria: Nigerian troops have rescued 13 hostages who were kidnapped by an extremist group in the northwestern state of Kaduna, the country’s army said on Saturday.
The army said in a statement that “the troops successfully overwhelmed the terrorists, forcing them to abandon their captives.”
Several kidnappers were killed and others captured, the military added. It didn’t specify what armed group the kidnappers belonged to.
The rescued hostages were taken to a military facility for a medical assessment before being reunited with their families. Weapons, ammunition, solar panels and cash were also discovered during the rescue operation.
Kidnappings have become common in parts of northern Nigeria, where dozens of armed groups take advantage of a limited security presence to carry out attacks in villages and along major roads. Most victims are released only after the payment of ransoms that sometimes run into the thousands of dollars.
At least 1,400 students have been taken from Nigerian schools since the 2014 kidnapping of 276 schoolgirls by Boko Haram militants in the village of Chibok in Borno state shocked the world.
Boko Haram, Nigeria’s homegrown jihadi rebels, launched its insurgency in 2009 to establish Islamic Shariah law in the country. At least 35,000 people have been killed and 2.1 million people displaced as a result of the extremist violence, according to UN agencies in Nigeria.


G7 foreign ministers condemn Iran’s export of ballistic missiles to Russia

G7 foreign ministers condemn Iran’s export of ballistic missiles to Russia
Updated 14 September 2024
Follow

G7 foreign ministers condemn Iran’s export of ballistic missiles to Russia

G7 foreign ministers condemn Iran’s export of ballistic missiles to Russia
  • Iran has provided Russia with a large number of powerful surface-to-surface ballistic missiles

ROME: The foreign ministers of the Group of Seven (G7) industrialized powers condemned on Saturday “in the strongest terms” Iran’s export and Russia’s procurement of Iranian ballistic missiles.
Iran has provided Russia with a large number of powerful surface-to-surface ballistic missiles, deepening the military cooperation between the two countries, which are both under US sanctions.
“Iran must immediately cease all support to Russia’s illegal and unjustifiable war against Ukraine and halt such transfers of ballistic missiles, UAVs (drones) and related technology, which constitute a direct threat to the Ukrainian people as well as European and international security more broadly,” the G7 ministers said in a statement.
“We remain steadfast in our commitment to hold Iran to account for its unacceptable support for Russia’s illegal war in Ukraine that further undermines global security. In line with our previous statements on the matter, we are already responding with new and significant measures.”
Italy currently holds the presidency of the G7 group of wealthy nations which also includes the United States, Japan, Germany, Britain, France and Canada.


British PM breached parliament’s rules over clothing donations to wife — Sunday Times

British PM breached parliament’s rules over clothing donations to wife — Sunday Times
Updated 14 September 2024
Follow

British PM breached parliament’s rules over clothing donations to wife — Sunday Times

British PM breached parliament’s rules over clothing donations to wife — Sunday Times
  • Sunday Times said those donations were declared but the clothes given to his wife were not

LONDON: British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has breached parliamentary rules by not declaring a wealthy businessman and Labour Party donor bought high-end clothes for his wife Victoria, the Sunday Times reported on Saturday.
According to the Sunday Times, Starmer, in power since July, faces an investigation after “neglecting to disclose” that major Labour donor Waheed Alli covered the cost of a personal shopper, clothes and alterations for his wife.
The premier’s registered financial interests, listed on the parliament’s website, show that he has received several donations from Alli, including multiple pairs of glasses, work clothes and accommodation.
The Sunday Times said those donations were declared but the clothes given to his wife were not.
A spokesperson for 10 Downing Street said in a statement sent to Reuters that Starmer and his team had sought advice from authorities on coming to office, and believed they had been compliant.
“However, following further interrogation this month, we’ve declared further items,” the spokesperson said.
Alli is British media entrepreneur and former chairman of the online fashion retailer ASOS.
Under the House of Commons code of conduct, members of parliament have to provide information about financial interests which might reasonably be thought to influence their work.
A Conservative Party spokesperson called for a full investigation over “apparent serious breaches of parliamentary rules.”


Pope Francis calls for lasting solution to Palestinian cause

Pope Francis calls for lasting solution to Palestinian cause
Updated 14 September 2024
Follow

Pope Francis calls for lasting solution to Palestinian cause

Pope Francis calls for lasting solution to Palestinian cause
  • Pope commended King Abdullah’s ongoing diplomatic efforts

LONDON: Pope Francis has reiterated the need for a just and lasting resolution to the Palestinian issue, warning that failure to achieve this goal would only lead to continued violence and instability in the region, it was reported by the Catholic Center for Studies and Media in Jordan on Saturday.

The pope highlighted the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the West Bank, and praised Jordan’s King Abdullah II’s support for the Palestinian people.

The king has facilitated daily humanitarian aid to the area, delivered by the Jordan Armed Forces via air and land, since the conflict between Israel and Hamas broke out in October.

The pope commended King Abdullah’s ongoing diplomatic efforts, noting his active role in international forums where he consistently advocates for Palestinian rights.

According to Pope Francis, the king has repeatedly warned that true peace, security, and prosperity in the Middle East can only be achieved by resolving the Palestinian issue, including the establishment of an independent Palestinian state.

Pope Francis also lauded Jordan’s clear and firm stance on the Palestinian cause, highlighting the country’s efforts to keep global attention on the issue and to condemn violations against the Palestinian people under occupation.

He also expressed deep concern over the prolonged war on Gaza. He voiced regret over the international community’s failure to take meaningful action to end the war and achieve peace.

Addressing Israel’s bombing of schools that sheltered displaced civilians, the pope condemned the attacks, particularly when such strikes are justified by the presumption of fighters being present.

“It is bad, it is bad, it is bad,” he said. The pope also rejected the argument that the ongoing war is purely defensive, highlighting the number of children among the victims.


Pro-Palestine protester found not guilty of racial abuse over coconut poster

Pro-Palestine protester found not guilty of racial abuse over coconut poster
Updated 14 September 2024
Follow

Pro-Palestine protester found not guilty of racial abuse over coconut poster

Pro-Palestine protester found not guilty of racial abuse over coconut poster
  • Hussain defended the placard as a form of “light-hearted political banter"

LONDON: A British teacher who carried a placard depicting Rishi Sunak and Suella Braverman as coconuts during a pro-Palestine demonstration in London was acquitted on Friday of a racially aggravated public order offense.

Marieha Hussain, 37, attended the protest in November, where her placard showed the faces of the then prime minister and home secretary superimposed onto coconuts beneath a palm tree.

Hussain, from High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, denied the prosecution’s claim that the placard was “racially abusive,” insisting it was meant to be satirical and humorous. On Friday, Westminster Magistrates’ Court cleared her of the charges, The Guardian newspaper reported.

Speaking outside the court, Hussain expressed frustration over the ordeal: “The damage done to my reputation and image can never be undone.” She criticized what she described as the misuse of hate speech laws, claiming they were being “weaponized to target ethnic minorities.”

Reflecting on the personal impact of the trial, she added: “This ordeal has been agonizing for my family and I. Instead of enjoying my pregnancy, I’ve been vilified by the media, lost my career, and been dragged through the court system.”

Despite the challenging experience, Hussain voiced her continued commitment to activism, particularly in support of Palestine.

“Nearly a year on from the genocide in Gaza, and despite this trial, I’m more determined than ever to continue using my voice to defend Palestine,” she said.

During the trial, Hussain defended the placard as a form of “light-hearted political banter,” explaining it was a satirical way of addressing serious issues.

Her defense lawyer, Rajiv Menon, argued that the case was a troubling attack on freedom of expression.

Menon said: “This prosecution of Ms Hussain is a disturbing attack on the right to peaceful protest, the right to criticize politicians, and the right to satirise in a British context.”

He highlighted the contrast between Hussain’s prosecution and the perceived leniency shown to figures such as Suella Braverman, Nigel Farage and Tommy Robinson, who have made controversial statements without facing similar consequences.

Expert testimony was heard in court regarding the use of the term “coconut” and whether it constitutes a racial slur.

Menon contended that the placard was a satirical critique of the policies and rhetoric employed by Sunak and Braverman, particularly in relation to race and immigration.

The district judge, Vanessa Lloyd, ultimately found that the placard fell within the realm of political satire.

“I find that it was part of the genre of political satire, and, as such, the prosecution has not proved to the criminal standard that it was abusive,” she said.