London mayor ‘not safe’ as Muslim politician in UK

London Mayor Sadiq Khan attends an anti-racism event hosted by Chelsea Football Club in London. (@MayorofLondon)
London Mayor Sadiq Khan attends an anti-racism event hosted by Chelsea Football Club in London. (@MayorofLondon)
Short Url
Updated 09 August 2024
Follow

London mayor ‘not safe’ as Muslim politician in UK

London Mayor Sadiq Khan attends an anti-racism event hosted by Chelsea Football Club in London. (@MayorofLondon)
  • Sadiq Khan: Politicians’ rhetoric has led to ‘heartbreaking’ return of bigotry in Britain
  • ‘It’s difficult to explain the ripples when you’ve been targeted because of your religion or colour of your skin’

LONDON: London Mayor Sadiq Khan has revealed that he is “not safe” as a Muslim politician in the UK after far-right riots engulfed the country this week.

He said rhetoric from politicians has led to a “heartbreaking” return of bigotry in Britain, and called on the government to introducer harsher legislation to tackle misinformation and hate speech on social media.

“Clearly I’m not safe, which is why I’ve got police protection,” Khan said at an anti-racism event hosted by Chelsea Football Club in London.

Unrest broke out across the UK following a knife attack last week that killed three children. Far-right agitators are thought to have spread false information online wrongly accusing the attacker of being a Muslim asylum-seeker.

This led to mosques, Muslim neighborhoods and businesses, and centers housing asylum-seekers being targeted by mobs.

When asked whether the use of language by MPs from the Reform and Conservative parties had played a part in stoking the violence, Khan said: “I think for the last few years we’ve seen politicians, including from the last government, use language that’s not guarded.”

Earlier this year, Reform Chief Whip Lee Anderson accused Khan of being beholden to “Islamists.”

Former Home Secretary Suella Braverman wrote in the Daily Telegraph: “The truth is that the Islamists, the extremists and the anti-Semites are in charge now.”

This week, Conservative leadership candidate Robert Jenrick said protesters shouting “Allahu Akbar” (God is great) on the streets of the UK should be arrested.

Khan called on Jenrick to withdraw his remarks, and previously said Braverman’s article was “a poisonous attempt to drive a wedge between our communities.”

At the Chelsea event, Khan said: “Talking about an invasion, talking about Islam running the country, talking about Islam running London — this sort of language leads to people believing some of this stuff. 

“I think good politicians, positive politicians address people’s fears, poor ones play on people’s fears, and these ones play on people’s fears with tropes and conspiracy theories, and they should reflect on the consequences of that.”

In an interview with The Guardian, he said what the UK had witnessed over the past few days is reminiscent of his childhood in London, when he and others had to contend with racist groups such as the National Front and the British National Party.

“What’s heartbreaking to me is my children’s generation had never experienced what I had, and they, for the first time, were scared,” he said. “I thought I’d be the last generation to be scared, simply for who I am. And it breaks my heart.

“I’m somebody who grew up in the 1970s and 80s and experienced the National Front and the BNP, and I thought that’s behind us.

“Like a lot of people of my generation, I felt triggered by the events of the last couple of weeks in particular.

“It’s difficult to explain the ripples when you’ve been targeted because of your religion or colour of your skin and you can’t change either of those things.”

Khan said the way misinformation has been spread online, including how far-right groups have used social media to organize violence, shows that current legislation requiring companies to take “robust action” against illegal activity is out of date.

“The way the algorithms work, the way that misinformation can spread very quickly and disinformation … that’s a cause to be concerned, we’ve seen a direct consequence of this,” he added.

“I think what the government should do very quickly is check whether the Online Safety Act is fit for purpose; I think it’s not fit for purpose.”

Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has called on social media companies to do more to tackle extremism, while Justice Secretary Heidi Alexander branded X owner Elon Musk as “deeply irresponsible” after the billionaire posted that “civil war is inevitable” in the UK in the wake of the riots.

Cabinet Office Minister Nick Thomas-Symonds said the government will keep the legislative framework for the Online Safety Act “under review.”

He added: “If we need to act in relation to online safety laws — we will. Sadiq Khan’s challenge is that we quickly review it, consider it, and that’s exactly what we will do.”


Afghan woman teacher, jailed Tajik lawyer share top rights prize

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Afghan woman teacher, jailed Tajik lawyer share top rights prize

Afghan woman teacher, jailed Tajik lawyer share top rights prize
Zholia Parsi, a teacher from Kabul, shared the prize with lawyer Manuchehr Kholiqnazarov, who is serving a 16-year prison sentence in connection with his human rights work
The chairman of the prize jury, Hans Thoolen, said the pair were “exceptional laureates“

GENEVA: An Afghan teacher and a jailed lawyer from Tajikistan on Tuesday won the Martin Ennals Award, one of the world’s most prestigious rights prizes, with the jury hailing their “exceptional courage.”
Zholia Parsi, a teacher from Kabul who began protesting for women’s rights after the Taliban returned to power three years ago, shared the prize with lawyer Manuchehr Kholiqnazarov, who is serving a 16-year prison sentence in connection with his human rights work.
The chairman of the prize jury, Hans Thoolen, said the pair were “exceptional laureates” who had “paid too big a price for justice and equality to be respected in Afghanistan and Tajikistan, and the international community must support their efforts instead of battling geostrategic interests in the region.”
Parsi began her activism after losing her career and seeing her daughters deprived of their education in the wake of the Taliban takeover in August 2021.
She founded the Spontaneous Movement of Afghan Women (SMAW), which has mobilized communities in various provinces to resist the Taliban’s policies and practices, the jury said.
Parsi had “displayed remarkable leadership and resilience in organizing numerous public protests despite the risks involved,” it added.
She was arrested in the street by armed Taliban in September 2023 and detained along with her son, it said, adding that she was only released “after three months of torture and ill-treatment... which further strengthened her resolve to resist Taliban oppression and repression.”
Kholiqnazarov is a human rights lawyer belonging to the Pamiri ethnic group from the Gorno-Badakhshan Autonomous Oblast (GBAO) region in eastern Tadjikistan.
He headed the Lawyers Association of Pamir, and lobbied among other things for minority rights and the incorporation of international human rights standards into domestic law and practice.
He played a key role in investigating the November 2021 death of youth leader Gulbiddin Ziyobekov.
That investigation turned up critical evidence indicating the young man may have been the victim of an extrajudicial execution, the jury’s statement said.
It also pointed to unlawful use of force in the violent repression of the mass protest in the regional capital Khorog that followed Ziyobekov’s death, resulting in two deaths, 17 people injured and hundreds detained, it added.
Kholiqnazarov himself was arrested on May 28, 2022 “amid a widespread crackdown on local informal leadership and residents of the GBAO,” the prize jury said.
The Martin Ennals Award, named after the first secretary general of Amnesty International, was first given in 1994.
The jury comprises representatives from 10 leading human rights organizations, including Amnesty and Human Rights Watch.
The award ceremony will take place in Geneva on Thursday.

Trump’s hush money case should be paused, prosecutors say

Trump’s hush money case should be paused, prosecutors say
Updated 19 November 2024
Follow

Trump’s hush money case should be paused, prosecutors say

Trump’s hush money case should be paused, prosecutors say
  • The prosecutors had asked for more time to consider next steps in the case
  • Trump pleaded not guilty in the case, which he has long portrayed as a politically motivated attempt by Bragg, a Democrat, to interfere with his campaign

NEW YORK: The case in which Donald Trump was convicted on criminal charges stemming from hush money paid to a porn star should be paused in light of his election victory to allow Trump to seek dismissal, New York prosecutors said on Tuesday.
Trump, 78, is hoping to enter office for a second term unencumbered by any of the four criminal cases he has faced and which some said would derail his 2024 candidacy to return to the White House.
The Republican Trump was convicted in May of falsifying business records to cover up a $130,000 payment his former lawyer Michael Cohen made to porn star Stormy Daniels for her silence before the 2016 election about a sexual encounter she says she had with Trump, who denies it.
The case marked the first time a US president — former or sitting — had been convicted of or charged with a criminal offense.
Trump had been scheduled to be sentenced on Nov. 26, but Merchan last week put all proceedings in the case on pause at the request of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office.
The prosecutors had asked for more time to consider next steps in the case, citing the need to balance the “competing interests” between having the criminal case go forward and protecting the office of the president.
Trump pleaded not guilty in the case, which he has long portrayed as a politically motivated attempt by Bragg, a Democrat, to interfere with his campaign.
His defense lawyers urged Merchan to dismiss the case, arguing that having it loom over him while he was president would cause “unconstitutional impediments” to his ability to govern.
Trump’s lawyers also argued his conviction should be vacated and the charges dismissed because of the US Supreme Court’s ruling in July that presidents cannot be prosecuted over their official acts, and that evidence of their official acts cannot be used in trials over personal behavior.
Bragg’s office said that its case dealt with purely personal conduct.
Falsification of business records is punishable by up to four years in prison. Before he was elected, experts said it was unlikely — but not impossible — that Trump would face time behind bars, with punishments such as a fine or probation seen as more likely.
Trump’s victory over Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris in the Nov. 5 election made the prospect of imposing a sentence of jail or probation even more politically fraught and impractical, given that a sentence could have impeded his ability to conduct the duties of the presidency.
Trump was indicted on three separate slates of state and federal charges in 2023, one involving classified documents he kept after leaving office and two others involving his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss.
A Florida-based federal judge in July dismissed the documents case. The Justice Department is now evaluating how to wind down the federal election-related case. Trump also faces state criminal charges in Georgia over his bid to reverse his 2020 loss in that state, but the case remains in limbo.


Russia’s nuclear threats ‘irresponsible’: EU’s Borrell

Russia’s nuclear threats ‘irresponsible’: EU’s Borrell
Updated 19 November 2024
Follow

Russia’s nuclear threats ‘irresponsible’: EU’s Borrell

Russia’s nuclear threats ‘irresponsible’: EU’s Borrell
  • “It is not the first time that Putin plays the nuclear gamble,” the outgoing foreign policy chief told reporters
  • “Russia has subscribed to the principle that a nuclear war cannot be won, and so must never be fought,” he said

BRUSSELS: EU top diplomat Josep Borrell accused Russia on Tuesday of issuing “completely irresponsible” nuclear threats, after President Vladimir Putin broadened the scope for Moscow’s use of atomic weapons.
“It is not the first time that Putin plays the nuclear gamble,” the outgoing foreign policy chief told reporters following defense minister talks in Brussels on the 1,000th day of the conflict.
“Russia has subscribed to the principle that a nuclear war cannot be won, and so must never be fought,” he said, warning that “any call for nuclear warfare is an irresponsibility.”
The EU talks — dominated by the need to ramp up support for Ukraine’s fight — came as Kyiv confirmed it had fired US-supplied long-range missiles into Russian territory, in what Russia said marked “a new phase” in the war.
Borrell had pressed member states ahead of time to align with Washington in allowing Ukraine to strike inside Russia using donated missiles — something France appears to be considering.
Addressing reporters afterwards, Borrell gave no indication of a shift on the sensitive issue.
But he said EU states had agreed “by an overwhelming majority” that “the fate of Ukraine will determine the destiny of the European Union.”
“If Putin could be successful in Ukraine, we will pay a very high bill, much more expensive than any kind of military support that we could provide today,” he said.
Borrell said a “big majority” of EU member states had shown “their determination to continue supporting Ukraine” — with Donald Trump’s imminent White House return throwing US support for Kyiv into question.
“Certainly we are in a different scenario with a different president in the White House, which seems to have ideas about how to end the war,” he said.
Ministers were joined by NATO chief Mark Rutte who warned that Putin must not be allowed to “get his way” in Ukraine and reiterated his call for Europe to “ramp up the defense industry.”
More than two and a half years after Moscow’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, now 23 of the 32 NATO members reach the target of spending two percent of gross domestic product on defense — up from just three a decade ago.
But the growing consensus is that Europe will have to do more to make sure it can stand on its own.
Borrell said it was made clear by Rutte that given “the challenges we are facing, this landmark, this mythic figure of two-percent will not be enough, and we need to take more action.”
“Europeans have to do more and quicker in order to increase their defense capacity, not just to support Ukraine, but for our own security,” said the EU top diplomat, who hands over next month to his designated successor Kaja Kallas.


Ukraine hits Russia with US ATACMS missiles for first time on war’s 1,000th day

Ukraine hits Russia with US ATACMS missiles for first time on war’s 1,000th day
Updated 19 November 2024
Follow

Ukraine hits Russia with US ATACMS missiles for first time on war’s 1,000th day

Ukraine hits Russia with US ATACMS missiles for first time on war’s 1,000th day
  • Ukraine said it had struck a Russian arms depot around 110 km inside Russia in an attack that caused secondary explosions
  • The Ukrainian military did not publicly specify what weapons it had used
Ukraine said it had struck a Russian arms depot around 110 km inside Russia in an attack that caused secondary explosions
The Ukrainian military did not publicly specify what weapons it had used

KYIV: Ukraine used US ATACMS missiles to strike Russian territory on Tuesday, taking advantage of newly granted permission from the outgoing Biden administration on the war’s 1,000th day.
Russia said its forces shot down five of six of the missiles, which were fired at a military facility in the Bryansk region. Debris of one hit the facility, starting a fire that was swiftly put out and caused no casualties or damage, it said.
Ukraine said it had struck a Russian arms depot around 110 km (70 miles) inside Russia in an attack that caused secondary explosions. The Ukrainian military did not publicly specify what weapons it had used, but a Ukrainian official source and a US official later confirmed it had used ATACMS.
President Joe Biden gave approval just this week for Ukraine to use the ATACMS, the longest-range missiles Washington has supplied, for such attacks inside Russia. Moscow has described their potential use as an escalation that would make Washington a direct combatant in the war and prompt its retaliation.
The attack took place as Ukraine marked 1,000 days of war, with weary troops at the front, Kyiv besieged by airstrikes, a fifth of Ukrainian territory in Moscow’s hands and doubts about the future of Western support as Donald Trump heads back to the White House.
Military experts say using the US missiles to attack positions at such a depth in Russia can help Ukraine defend a pocket of Russian territory it has captured as a bargaining chip, but is not likely to have a decisive impact on the course of the 33-month-old war.
Moscow has said such weapons cannot be used without direct operational support from the United States, and therefore their use would make Washington a direct participant in the war.
On Tuesday, President Vladimir Putin signed a new nuclear doctrine apparently intended as a warning to Washington. It lowers the threshold under which Russia might use atomic weapons to include responding to attacks that threaten its territorial integrity.
Washington said the update to the nuclear doctrine was
no surprise
and cited “more of the same irresponsible rhetoric from Russia.”

JITTERS IN MARKETS
Reports of the Ukrainian attack caused jitters in markets, with share indexes sliding in Europe and safe haven assets rallying.
Trump has criticized the scale of US aid to Kyiv and said he will end the war quickly, without saying how. Both sides appear to anticipate his return in two months will be accompanied by a push for peace talks, which are not known to have taken place since the war’s early months.
The warring sides have both been escalating in recent weeks in an attempt to secure a stronger position at any negotiations. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky says Kyiv must do everything for the war to end diplomatically next year.
“At this stage of the war, it is being decided who will prevail. Whether us over the enemy, or the enemy over us Ukrainians... and Europeans. And everyone in the world who wants to live freely and not be subject to a dictator,” he said in an address to parliament on Tuesday marking 1,000 days of war.
A candle-lit commemoration was planned for later on Tuesday.
Thousands of Ukrainian citizens have died, over six million live as refugees abroad and the population has fallen by a quarter since Putin ordered the invasion by land, sea and air that began Europe’s biggest conflict since World War Two.
Military losses have been huge, although casualty figures remain closely guarded secrets. Public Western estimates based on intelligence reports say hundreds of thousands have been wounded or killed on each side.
“In the frozen trenches of the Donetsk region and in the burning steppes of the Kherson region, under shells, hail, and anti-aircraft guns, we are fighting for the right to live,” Ukraine’s top commander Oleksandr Syrkyi wrote on Telegram.
Tragedy has touched families in every corner of Ukraine, where military funerals are commonplace in cities and far-flung villages, and people are exhausted by sleepless nights of air raid sirens and anguish.
In the first year after the invasion, Ukrainian troops pushed Russian forces back from the outskirts of Kyiv and recaptured swathes of territory with surprise military successes against a larger and better-armed foe.
But since then, the enemies have settled into relentless trench warfare that has ground eastern Ukrainian cities to dust. Russian forces still occupy a fifth of Ukraine and for the past year they have steadily gained ground.
Kyiv now hopes to gain leverage from a sliver of territory in Russia’s Kursk region it captured after launching its first major cross-border assault in August. It says Russia has deployed 50,000 troops there to try to take it back.
In a move decried in the West as an escalation, Russia has now deployed 11,000 North Korean troops, some of whom Kyiv says have clashed with Ukrainian forces in Kursk. Zelensky said Pyongyang could send 100,000 soldiers.
Russia for its part continues to advance village by village in eastern Ukraine, claiming to have captured another settlement on Tuesday.
With winter setting in, Moscow on Sunday renewed its aerial assault on Ukraine’s struggling power system, firing 120 missiles and 90 drones in the biggest barrage since August.
Publicly there has been no narrowing of the gulf in the enemies’ negotiating positions. Kyiv has long demanded full Russian withdrawal from all occupied territory, and security guarantees from the West comparable to membership in NATO’s mutual defense treaty to prevent future Russian attacks.
The Kremlin says Ukraine must drop all ambitions to join NATO and withdraw all troops from provinces Russia claims to have annexed since its invasion.

Donald Trump expected to consider recognizing Somaliland independence, former UK defense minister says

Donald Trump expected to consider recognizing Somaliland independence, former UK defense minister says
Updated 19 November 2024
Follow

Donald Trump expected to consider recognizing Somaliland independence, former UK defense minister says

Donald Trump expected to consider recognizing Somaliland independence, former UK defense minister says
  • Gavin Williamson has reportedly been lobbying Trump’s team for recognition of former British protectorate

LONDON: Donald Trump is expected to consider recognizing Somaliland as an independent country once he assumes office, according to the former UK defense secretary, it was reported on Tuesday.

Gavin Williamson, who served as Britain’s defense minister from 2017 to 2019, has reportedly been lobbying Trump’s team for the recognition of the former British protectorate.

Somaliland declared independence from Somalia in 1991 but its status remains unrecognized by every country except Ethiopia, and it remains contentious, with Somalia claiming the territory.

Williamson, a vocal advocate for Somaliland’s recognition, has expressed optimism about progress once Trump assumes office in January, and noted that Trump’s opposition to Biden’s policies in Somalia might play a role in influencing the decision, The Independent reported.

“They should agree to it, though when he assumes office it will probably all take a little longer than we hope, but had really good meetings with his policy leads so fingers crossed,” Williamson said.

“One of Trump’s last orders as president was to withdraw troops from Somalia but then Biden countermanded that order. There is nothing that Trump hates more than someone overruling him so I used that to push the argument,” he said.

Sources in Washington told The Independent that the US State Department had “warmed up” to supporting Somaliland’s claim in the days following Trump’s victory.

Somaliland opposition leader, Abdirahman Cirro, defeated incumbent president, Muse Bihi Abdi, in an election last week, setting up a handover of power as the region continues its push for global recognition.

“I am sure this will be up for review after the inauguration. Similarly, a smooth election in Somaliland will, in addition to its other achievements, undoubtedly strengthen its case in an overall policy review,” said Peter Pham, a senior adviser in Trump’s first administration and a former US special envoy to the Sahel region.

The Trump administration previously considered recognition during his first term, and a move to do so now would increase pressure on the UK and other nations to follow suit, according to reports.

A Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office source said: “It would be wrong to speculate on any policy decisions that the incoming administration of President-elect Trump may make.”

The source added: “The UK, alongside others in the international community, does not recognize Somaliland’s unilateral declaration of independence. It is for authorities in Mogadishu and Hargeisa to resolve Somaliland’s status through dialogue and broad consultation.”