Palestinian officials say Israel troops kill 5 in West Bank raid

Update Palestinian officials say Israel troops kill 5 in West Bank raid
An Israeli army armoured vehicle drives during a raid in the Tulkarem camp for Palestinian refugees in the occupied West Bank on July 23, 2024. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 23 July 2024
Follow

Palestinian officials say Israel troops kill 5 in West Bank raid

Palestinian officials say Israel troops kill 5 in West Bank raid
  • The deaths came when Israeli forces raided the Tulkarem camp in the northern West Bank

Palestinian officials said Israeli troops killed five Palestinians, including two women, in a pre-dawn raid on a refugee camp in the occupied West Bank on Tuesday.
The deaths came when Israeli forces raided the Tulkarem camp in the northern West Bank, the head of its popular committee, Faisal Salamah, told AFP. An activist at the camp confirmed the toll. The Israeli military did not immediately comment.
The Palestinian Red Crescent said it had treated a 30-year-old man for bullet wounds to the abdomen, thigh and hand, and three women for shrapnel wounds, one of them to the eye.
Palestinian official news agency Wafa said more than 25 military vehicles, including bulldozers, stormed the camp, scooping up rubble to block off its narrow alleys.
The town of Tulkarem is known as a hub of Palestinian militant activity and is frequently raided by Israeli troops.
Violence in the West Bank has spiked since Hamas's October 7 attack on Israel triggered war in Gaza.
At least 579 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli soldiers or settlers in the territory since the conflict began, according to health ministry figures.


How the hostage killings in Gaza have deepened Israel’s political divisions

How the hostage killings in Gaza have deepened Israel’s political divisions
Updated 31 sec ago
Follow

How the hostage killings in Gaza have deepened Israel’s political divisions

How the hostage killings in Gaza have deepened Israel’s political divisions
  • As anger over the prime minister’s handling of the Gaza hostage crisis mounts, internal splits in Israel deepen
  • Protests and strike action highlight growing public distrust of Netanyahu, but experts question if it will lead to his ouster

LONDON: The message on the placard held by one of the tens of thousands of Israelis who flooded on to the streets of Tel Aviv on Sunday was as clear as it was damning: “Bibi, their blood is on your hands.”

It is rare for any country at war to experience internal dissent on the scale of the protests that have convulsed Israeli society this week — let alone the state of Israel, whose citizens are famously patriotic.

But the sense of shock and grief that gripped the nation following the discovery on Saturday that six of the Israeli hostages held in Gaza had been shot dead turned quickly to anger — directed not at Hamas, but at “Bibi,” Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The world has watched extraordinary scenes unfolding on the streets of Israel.

At mass protests in Tel Aviv, speakers calling for a peace deal shared a stage with six coffins draped in the Israeli flag. Outside Netanyahu’s residence in Jerusalem a peaceful sit-down demonstration was broken up by police.

On Monday, Israel’s biggest trade union, Histadrut, staged a nationwide general strike that closed schools, businesses, government and municipal offices, and Ben Gurion International Airport.

The strike, backed by the Hostages and Missing Families Forum, was called with one aim — to put pressure on Netanyahu and his right-wing coalition government to reach a deal for the return of the remaining hostages.

A US-backed deal with Hamas has been on the table since May, and there is now a growing belief in Israel and around the world that Netanyahu is perpetuating the war with the sole aim of saving his own political skin.

On Monday, US President Joe Biden accused Netanyahu of not doing enough to secure a hostage deal. And, after months of trying to bring Israel and Hamas to an agreement, reports suggest that frustrated US negotiators plan to present Israel with a final “take it or leave it” deal.

In a statement issued before Monday’s general strike, Arnon Bar-David, the chairman of Histadrut, said he had “come to the conclusion that only our intervention can shake those who need to be shaken. A deal is not progressing due to political considerations, and this is unacceptable.”

The traumatized relatives of the Hostages and Missing Families Forum accused the government of cynically frustrating peace efforts with “delays, sabotage and excuses,” without which the six hostages found dead in a tunnel in Rafah on Saturday afternoon “would likely still be alive.”

The divisions in Israeli society run deeper than the fault lines that have opened up since Oct. 7, said Ahron Bregman, a senior teaching fellow in the Department of War Studies at King’s College London and a veteran of the Israeli military.

“The Gaza war coincides with a significant change in Israeli society that has been in the making for many years, namely the emergence of a new elite,” he told Arab News.

“The old elite, mainly left-wing or centrist Ashkenazi, Kibbutzniks, and so on, are now replaced by right-wing nationalists, with settlers being the most active and dominant among them.”

These groups, he said, “have been fighting each other for years, but now this fight has reached its climax, and it is out in the open for all to see. Netanyahu, by appointing people from the new elite, settlers like Itamar Ben-Gvir (national security minister) and Bezalel Smotrich (finance minister), to critical positions in his government, gave this change of guard a big push.

“And in the Gaza war, and particularly over the issue of the hostages, many of whom belong to the old elite, the new elite practically dictates Israel’s policies.”

To survive, Bregman said, “Netanyahu needs the war to continue, otherwise, his coalition partners, who want the war to continue, might abandon him. Therefore, whenever there’s progress in talks to have a ceasefire, which will include the release of Israeli hostages, Netanyahu puts new obstacles in the way.”

His “latest toy,” Bregman added, was the Philadelphi corridor, on the western edge of the Gaza Strip bordering Egypt, which Netanyahu insists must continue to be occupied by Israeli troops.

“This, of course, is nonsense and only an obvious attempt to kill a deal with Hamas. We now know that all the tunnels under Philadelphi have been blocked on the Egyptian side for years, and nothing came through.

“Whatever was smuggled into Gaza came through the Rafah crossing. And anyway, 80 percent of the weapons used by Hamas are produced inside the Strip.”

Iranian-Israeli author and commentator Meir Javedanfar, a lecturer at Israel’s Reichman University, agrees that “the government’s handling of the hostages and the war in general, has created incredible division within the State of Israel.”

One of the main causes is that “Netanyahu does not have much credibility with many Israelis,” Javedanfar told Arab News.

“He had already lost credibility prior to Oct. 7 because of the judicial reform crisis,” during which months of large-scale protests erupted last year after Netanyahu’s cabinet moved to weaken the ability of the Supreme Court to block “unreasonable” government decisions.

“Now people are concerned that, just as with the judicial reform, Netanyahu is acting to serve his personal political interest, which is mainly to stay in power as long as possible.”

But “while the demonstrations are putting pressure on him, I’m not optimistic that it’s going to make him reach a deal. Right now, the Israeli parliament is not in session, so he doesn’t have to worry about his government being toppled. But as we get closer to the next session, I think he will have to show more leniency, at least.”

The Knesset returns from a three-month recess on Oct. 27.

Chris Doyle, director of the Council for Arab-British Understanding, says it is important to remember that in Israel “there is a consensus and support for Israeli attacks on Hamas and that the government does have a mandate to go after them.”

Doyle told Arab News: “The opposition to Netanyahu is far more about the man than the policy against Hamas. Where a lot of these protesters differ with Netanyahu and his coalition is that they would have put the survival and the return of the hostages above politics, which is actually a strong tradition within Israel’s history.

“But if you look at the polling, there isn’t actually a lot of antipathy and opposition toward the actual conduct of the war amongst Israeli Jews. So the difference is, who’s prepared to pay a price in negotiations to get the hostages back, and who’s not?”

On Wednesday CAABU was one of 18 UK charities and NGOs that signed a joint statement welcoming the British government’s decision to suspend some arms licenses to Israel, but called for it to go further and “immediately end ALL arms transfers to Israel to prevent their use in violations of international law.”

“Yes, the demonstrations are large, but they are in the more liberal Israeli Jewish cities, such as Tel Aviv, and not in the more conservative right-wing ones,” Doyle said.

“Netanyahu is Israel’s longest-serving prime minister. I disagree with him politically and morally, but in terms of Israeli politics he is a superb political operator.

“I thought that in the immediate aftermath of Oct. 7 he would have to go, because of the colossal failure on his watch. But one underestimates him at one’s peril. He is a survivor, he’s very obstinate and not somebody who is going to give up. He would have to be forced out.

“He knows that these protesters aren’t the people who support him, or are ever likely to. So what would finish Netanyahu is not protests, but more likely any rifts within his coalition.”

A poll published by Israel’s Channel 12 news on Saturday, carried out before the discovery of the six murdered hostages, illustrated this dynamic.

Although a large majority of Israelis — 69 percent ­— said they believed this should be Netanyahu’s last term in office, opinion was more finely balanced among supporters of his coalition parties, with an almost 50-50 split between those who believed he should go and those who wanted him to run again.

The same poll also revealed a telling split between the 18 percent of respondents who supported the state ceremony being planned to commemorate the events of Oct. 7 and the 60 percent who favored the alternative ceremony being organized by the families of the dead and hostages. Only a quarter of Israelis plan to watch the government event on TV.

Bregman, who served six years in the Israeli army, believes that “only civil resistance in Israel could force Netanyahu to reach a deal with Hamas” ­— and that such an event is now more a possibility than ever before in a fundamentally divided Israel.

“A violent, bloody civil war in Israel is a real possibility, as the Israeli tribes disagree on so many things and, in many cases, literally hate each other,” he said.

“And now, ‘thanks’ to the initiative of Ben-Gvir, Israeli society is armed to the teeth, as he has distributed weapons left and right.”

Since Oct. 7, Ben-Gvir’s ministry has issued hundreds of thousands of gun permits to private Israeli citizens and distributed thousands of assault rifles to “civilian security teams,” including those operated by right-wing settler groups in the West Bank.

“In the past, external threats, such as wars, used to unite the Israelis, bringing them together,” said Bregman.

“But now, the Gaza war seems to have worked in the opposite direction, leading to ever-growing divisions among Israelis over a possible ceasefire and the release of Israelis from Hamas captivity.”

Sir John Jenkins, former British ambassador to Iraq and Saudi Arabia and UK consul-general in Jerusalem, cautions that one should not forget that Hamas also has a big say in how events might unfold in the weeks and months ahead.

Dividing Israeli society over the issue of hostages “was certainly one of Hamas’s aims,” he told Arab News.

“They know from long experience the importance Israel attaches to freeing hostages and captives. The hostages are a powerful card they think they can play into the game when it best suits them.

“Even shooting hostages gives Hamas the chance to exert moral pressure on Israel, as we’ve just seen.”

But “Hamas needs to end the fighting and the hostages are a wasting asset. The tactic hasn’t worked so far, and Netanyahu shows no sign of relenting, and that means continued fighting is almost certain — and continued suffering for the people of Gaza.

“Hamas could end this immediately by releasing all the hostages, of course. But I guess they think that if they wait then something else will turn up — a war in Lebanon, an Iranian attack on Israel, a new US president or whatever — that will benefit them.”


German foreign minister heads to Middle East in Gaza truce push

German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock has set off for a diplomatic tour of the Middle East as efforts continue toward truce.
German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock has set off for a diplomatic tour of the Middle East as efforts continue toward truce.
Updated 20 min 21 sec ago
Follow

German foreign minister heads to Middle East in Gaza truce push

German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock has set off for a diplomatic tour of the Middle East as efforts continue toward truce.
  • Baerbock said the “nightmare” of the conflict must end and called for all efforts needed “toward a humanitarian ceasefire”

BERLIN: German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock on Wednesday set off for a diplomatic tour of the Middle East as efforts continue toward a deal between Israel and Hamas to end the Gaza war.
Pressure has mounted on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to agree to a deal to end the fighting, days after Israel’s military recovered six killed hostages from a Gaza tunnel.
Baerbock said the “nightmare” of the conflict must end and called for all efforts needed “toward a humanitarian ceasefire that will lead to the release of the hostages and put an end to the deaths.”
A ceasefire plan proposed by US President Joe Biden in May “must now finally be adopted,” Baerbock said.
The trip will be Baerbock’s ninth to Israel and her 11th to the Middle East since the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel that triggered the war.
Baerbock set off first for Saudi Arabia, where she was due to meet Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan Al-Saud, ministry spokeswoman Kathrin Deschauer said.
The ministers will discuss “the dramatic situation in the region” and “the ongoing attacks by the radical Islamist Houthi militia from Yemen on international shipping,” Deschauer said.
Baerbock will then head to Jordan and meet her counterpart Ayman Safadi to discuss “in particular the issue of coordinating humanitarian aid for the people in Gaza.”
She will then travel to Israel and meet Foreign Minister Israel Katz before heading to the occupied West Bank, the site of recent heavy clashes.
There she will meet Palestinian Authority prime minister Mohammed Mustafa to discuss “how an imminent escalation of violence in the West Bank can be prevented.”
“Nothing will be gained if a new, young generation becomes radicalized because they have to watch the destruction on their doorstep,” Baerbock said.
“The Palestinians have a right to live in security and dignity.”
The October 7 Hamas attack resulted in the deaths of 1,205 people, mostly civilians and including hostages killed in captivity, according to an AFP tally based on Israeli official figures.
Israel’s campaign against Hamas since October 7 has killed at least 40,861 people in Gaza, according to the territory’s health ministry. The UN rights office says most of the dead are women and children.


UK’s Starmer defends Israel arms suspension as ‘legal decision’

An Israeli armored vehicle drives along a devastated street in Jenin in the occupied West Bank on September 4, 2024.
An Israeli armored vehicle drives along a devastated street in Jenin in the occupied West Bank on September 4, 2024.
Updated 04 September 2024
Follow

UK’s Starmer defends Israel arms suspension as ‘legal decision’

An Israeli armored vehicle drives along a devastated street in Jenin in the occupied West Bank on September 4, 2024.
  • “We will of course stand by Israel’s right to self-defense but it’s important that we are committed to the international rule of law,” Starmer said

LONDON: UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer defended Wednesday his government’s partial suspension of arms exports to Israel over fears they could be used in a breach of humanitarian law as “a legal decision.”
Starmer said that Monday’s announcement to suspend 30 of 350 arms exports licenses did not signify a change in UK support for Israel’s right to self-defense.
He also said that allies “understand” the UK’s move.
“This is a difficult issue, I recognize that, but it’s a legal decision, not a policy decision,” Starmer told lawmakers during the weekly Prime Minister’s Questions session in parliament.
He said the decision was taken following a review by the foreign ministry into Israel’s conduct of its war against Hamas militants in the Gaza Strip.
The review was begun shortly after Starmer’s center-left Labour party swept to power in a landslide general election victory over the Conservatives in early July.
“We will of course stand by Israel’s right to self-defense but it’s important that we are committed to the international rule of law,” Starmer said.
The partial ban covers items that could be used in the current conflict in Gaza including fighter aircraft, helicopters and drones but not parts for advanced F-35 stealth fighter jets.
The decision has angered Israel, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu slamming it as “shameful.”
Starmer also denied that the move indicated a spilt with the United States.
On Monday, US National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said London had informed Washington of its move before it was announced.
“We’ll let other nations decide for themselves if they’re going to support Israel and to what degree,” Kirby told reporters. “That’s what sovereignty is all about.”
He added that for its part there had been “no determination” by the United States that Israel had violated humanitarian law.
In London, Starmer told MPs: “We have talked this through with our allies, they understand, they have a different legal system, that is the point they have made.”
Starmer’s government is pursuing a more nuanced approach to the Middle East conflict than his predecessor Rishi Sunak’s Tory administration.
It has similarly repeatedly called for a ceasefire and for speeding up aid deliveries to Gaza, and demanded that Hamas release all hostages seized in its October 7 attacks.
But it has also resumed funding for the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA) and dropped a legal challenge over international arrest warrants for senior Israeli figures, including Netanyahu.


US destroys Houthi missile system in Yemen

US destroys Houthi missile system in Yemen
Updated 04 September 2024
Follow

US destroys Houthi missile system in Yemen

US destroys Houthi missile system in Yemen
  • “It was determined this system presented an imminent threat to US and coalition forces, and merchant vessels in the region,” CENTCOM said
  • Local media and people reported hearing loud explosions and seeing heavy smoke pouring from a Houthi military facility in the province of Ibb

AL-MUKALLA: The US Central Command said on Wednesday that its forces had destroyed a missile system in a Houthi-held Yemeni territory that was targeting ships in international waters.
This is the second time in the past 24 hours that the US military has said that it is targeting Houthi missile systems in undefined locations in Houthi-controlled Yemeni territory.
“It was determined this system presented an imminent threat to US and coalition forces, and merchant vessels in the region,” CENTCOM said.
Local media and people reported hearing loud explosions and seeing heavy smoke pouring from a Houthi military facility in the province of Ibb on Tuesday, apparently struck by the US, as CENTCOM announced the destruction of two Houthi missile systems on the ground in Yemen.
Since January, the US and the UK have launched dozens of strikes on Houthi targets in Sanaa, Hodeidah, Saada, Ibb and other Yemeni provinces held by the Houthis, reportedly striking drone and missile launchers and storage facilities, as well as remotely controlled and explosives-laden boats preparing to target ships in international shipping lanes off Yemen.
Houthi leader Mohammed Ali Al-Houthi on Tuesday night denied that their troops had targeted the Saudi oil ship Amjad in the Red Sea on Monday and accused the US military of “spreading false information.”
This came as Saudi shipping company Bahri said that its vessel, Amjad, was in the Red Sea when another oil tanker was targeted, and that it was not the target.
Since November, the Houthis have destroyed two commercial ships, including one carrying more than 21,000 tons of fertilizer, seized another, and fired hundreds of ballistic missiles, drones, and drone boats at more than 100 ships in Yemen’s commercial channels.
The Yemeni militia claims that they exclusively target ships with links to Israel to put pressure on Israel to halt its war in the Gaza Strip.
Similarly, Yemen’s government has asked that the Houthis be designated as a terrorist group and their leaders’ assets frozen for attacking ships and endangering the environment off Yemen’s coast.
In a post on X, Yemeni Information Minister Muammar Al-Eryani said the Houthi attack on the MV Blue Lagoon I oil tanker is the 10th attack on oil and chemical tankers since the start of their campaign, and that the attack on the tanker is a “systematic terrorism” that risks an environmental, economic, and humanitarian disaster that would primarily affect Yemenis.
“The Houthi militia’s repeated targeting of oil and chemical product tankers demonstrates its disregard for the catastrophic consequences of any oil spill in the Red Sea, Bab Al-Mandab Strait, and Gulf of Aden on our country’s economic, agricultural, and fisheries sectors,” the Yemeni minister said.


Cross-border attacks by Israeli forces and Hezbollah resume after period of uneasy calm

Israeli soldiers evacuate an injured man following a cross-border attack from Lebanon into Israel.
Israeli soldiers evacuate an injured man following a cross-border attack from Lebanon into Israel.
Updated 04 September 2024
Follow

Cross-border attacks by Israeli forces and Hezbollah resume after period of uneasy calm

Israeli soldiers evacuate an injured man following a cross-border attack from Lebanon into Israel.
  • Research center in Israel says 281 attacks on the country originated from Lebanon in August, compared with 259 in July
  • In Israel, sirens sounded in the settlements of Zar’it, Shtula, Netu’a, Dishon and Al-Malikiyah, and in Ramot Naftali in western Galilee

BEIRUT: Israeli forces resumed shelling in southern Lebanon on Wednesday following a period of uneasy, relative calm, targeting border towns, valleys and forests.
Two people were injured in an airstrike on the town of Khiam and taken to Marjayoun Hospital. Aircraft also hit Wadi Hujeir and carried out strikes on the outskirts of the town of Qabrikha, on the area between the towns of Aainata and Kounine, and on the outskirts of the town of Bani Haiyyan.
The Israeli army said “warplanes shelled rocket-launch platforms in the areas of Kounine and Qabrikha in southern Lebanon.” Israeli artillery also targeted the outskirts of the villages of Beit Lif and Ramyah.
In Israel, sirens sounded in the settlements of Zar’it, Shtula, Netu’a, Dishon and Al-Malikiyah, and in Ramot Naftali in western Galilee.
The Israeli army said that “60 rockets were launched from Lebanon toward the northern region, causing fires in several settlements in Upper Galilee, which firefighting teams worked to extinguish.”
Hezbollah said it shelled “the headquarters of the Sahel Battalion in the Beit Hillel barracks, and enemy artillery positions in Dishon with volleys of Katyusha rockets,” and launched attacks “targeting Israeli soldiers in the Zar’it barracks (the headquarters of the battalion affiliated with the Western Brigade) with artillery shells, hitting them directly.”
Israeli media reported “two injuries in the Dishon area in Galilee, where several rockets fell after being launched from Lebanon.” There were also reports that “a rocket fell in the Kfar Blum area in Upper Galilee,” “a fire broke out in the Kiryat Shmona settlement due to rockets launched from Lebanon,” and additional rockets struck between Kiryat Shmona and Beit Hillel.
Israeli army media advised settlers in Kiryat Shmona “to remain near shelters and avoid moving around the city until further notice.” Upper Galilee Regional Council similarly urged citizens in several towns to “stay close to shelters, avoid gatherings and decrease movement.”
In its latest report, the Alma Research and Education Center in Israel said 281 attacks on the country originated from Lebanon in August, compared with 259 in July.
“Most of these attacks were carried out by Hezbollah, along with other organizations,” it said. “The average number of daily attacks reached nine in August, compared with 8.3 attacks in July, with Hezbollah confirming its responsibility for the vast majority of them.”
The Hezbollah attacks resulted in “the deaths of three Israelis and injuries to 30 others” last month, it added.
“The middle of the month saw an escalation in Hezbollah’s assaults, which continued until Aug. 25, when Israeli forces conducted a preemptive strike to thwart Hezbollah’s response to the assassination of (its military leader) Fuad Shukr,” the research center said.
The report noted a subsequent “decline in attacks,” suggesting that “the intensity of these attacks coincided with the Israeli military’s targeting of Hezbollah operatives” and were “potentially aimed at exhausting Israeli defense systems in preparation for a planned retaliatory strike on Aug. 25.”
It added: “Kiryat Shmona was an important target for Hezbollah attacks, which resulted in the death of one civilian and injuries to 28 others, in addition to heavy losses to industrial facilities, educational institutions, residential properties, cemeteries and commercial complexes.”
The report also stated: “During August, Hezbollah used the term ‘appropriate weapons’ to refer to various types of armaments. Previously, this term in their statements was specifically associated with anti-tank missiles. In August, however, it became evident that the term encompassed artillery fire, anti-tank missiles and drones.”
Last month, it added, there was “an increase in (Hezbollah’s) utilization of long-range missiles, with 176 missiles launched compared with 137 in July. Additionally, the number of drone attacks rose to 62 in August, up from 56 in July. Throughout August, Hezbollah employed surface-to-air missiles and sniper fire.”