US-Russian journalist convicted in a rapid, secret trial, gets 6 1/2 years in prison, court says

US-Russian journalist convicted in a rapid, secret trial, gets 6 1/2 years in prison, court says
Russian-American journalist for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) Alsu Kurmasheva, who is in custody after she was accused of violating Russia's law on foreign agents, attends a court hearing in Kazan, Russia May 31, 2024. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 23 July 2024
Follow

US-Russian journalist convicted in a rapid, secret trial, gets 6 1/2 years in prison, court says

US-Russian journalist convicted in a rapid, secret trial, gets 6 1/2 years in prison, court says
  • The swift and secretive trials of Kurmasheva and Gershkovich in Russia’s highly politicized legal system raised hopes for a possible prisoner swap between Moscow and Washington

A court has convicted Alsu Kurmasheva, a Russian-American journalist for the US government-funded Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, of spreading false information about the Russian army and sentenced her to 6½ years in prison after a secret trial, court records and officials said Monday.
Kurmasheva’s family, her employer and the US government have rejected the charges against her and have called for her release.
The conviction in Kazan, the capital of Russia’s central region of Tatarstan, came on Friday, the same day a court in the Russian city of Yekaterinburg convicted Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich of espionage and sentenced him to 16 years in prison in a case that the US called politically motivated.
Kurmasheva, a 47-year-old editor for RFE/RL’s Tatar-Bashkir language service, was convicted of “spreading false information” about the military after a trial that lasted just two days, according to the website of the Supreme Court of Tatarstan. Court spokesperson Natalya Loseva confirmed Kurmasheva’s conviction and revealed the sentence to The Associated Press by phone in the case classified as secret.
Kurmasheva was ordered to serve the sentence in a medium-security penal colony, Loseva said.
“My daughters and I know Alsu has done nothing wrong. And the world knows it too. We need her home,” Kurmasheva’s husband, Pavel Butorin, said in a post Monday on X.
He had said last year the charges stemmed from a book the Tatar-Bashkir service released in 2022 called “No to War” — “a collection of short stories of Russians who don’t want their country to be at war with Ukraine.” Butorin had said the book doesn’t contain any “false information.”
Matthew Miller, the US State Department spokesman, said Kurmasheva is being “targeted by Russian authorities for her uncompromising commitment to speaking the truth and her principled reporting.”
“We continue to make very clear that she should be released,” Miller added.
Asked about the case, RFE/RL President and CEO Stephen Capus denounced the trial and conviction of Kurmasheva as “a mockery of justice.” “The only just outcome is for Alsu to be immediately released from prison by her Russian captors,” he said in a statement to the AP.
“It’s beyond time for this American citizen, our dear colleague, to be reunited with her loving family,” Capus said.
Kurmasheva, who holds US and Russian citizenship and lives in Prague with her husband and two daughters, was taken into custody in October 2023 and charged with failing to register as a foreign agent while collecting information about the Russian military.
Later, she was also charged with spreading “false information” about the Russian military under legislation that effectively criminalized any public expression about the war in Ukraine that deviates from the Kremlin line. The legislation was adopted in March 2022, just days after the Kremlin sent troops into Ukraine, and has since been used to target Kremlin critics at home and abroad, implicating scores of people in criminal cases and sending dozens to prison.
Kurmasheva was initially stopped in June 2023 at Kazan International Airport after traveling to Russia the previous month to visit her ailing elderly mother. Officials confiscated her US and Russian passports and fined her for failing to register her US passport. She was waiting for her passports to be returned when she was arrested on new charges in October that year. RFE/RL has repeatedly called for her release.
RFE/RL was told by Russian authorities in 2017 to register as a foreign agent, but it has challenged Moscow’s use of foreign agent laws in the European Court of Human Rights. The organization has been fined millions of dollars by Russia.
The organization Reporters Without Borders said Kurmasheva’s conviction “illustrates the unprecedented level of despotism permeating a Russian judiciary that takes orders from the Kremlin.”
It called for Kurmasheva’s immediate release and said the purpose of the sentence was to dissuade journalists from traveling to Russia and put pressure on the United States.
In February, RFE/RL was outlawed in Russia as an undesirable organization. Its Tatar-Bashkir service is the only major international news provider reporting in those languages, in addition to Russian, to audiences in the multi-ethnic, Muslim-majority Volga-Urals region.
The swift and secretive trials of Kurmasheva and Gershkovich in Russia’s highly politicized legal system raised hopes for a possible prisoner swap between Moscow and Washington. Russia has previously signaled a possible exchange involving Gershkovich, but said a verdict in his case must come first.
Arrests of Americans are increasingly common in Russia, with nine US citizens known to be detained there as tensions between the two countries have escalated over fighting in Ukraine.
Gershkovich, 32, was arrested March 29, 2023, while on a reporting trip to the Ural Mountains city of Yekaterinburg. Authorities claimed, without offering any evidence, that he was gathering secret information for the US
He has been behind bars since his arrest, time that will be counted as part of his sentence. Most of that was in Moscow’s notorious Lefortovo Prison — a czarist-era lockup used during Josef Stalin’s purges, when executions were carried out in its basement. He was transferred to Yekaterinburg for the trial.
Gershkovich was the first US journalist arrested on espionage charges since Nicholas Daniloff in 1986, at the height of the Cold War. Foreign journalists in Russia were shocked by Gershkovich’s arrest, even though the country has enacted increasingly repressive laws on freedom of speech after sending troops into Ukraine.
US President Joe Biden said after his conviction that Gershkovich “was targeted by the Russian government because he is a journalist and an American.”
US Ambassador to the UN Linda Thomas-Greenfield accused Moscow last week of treating “human beings as bargaining chips.” She singled out Gershkovich and ex-Marine Paul Whelan, 53, a corporate security director from Michigan, who is serving a 16-year sentence after being convicted on spying charges that he and the US denied.
Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Friday that when it comes to Gershkovich, Whelan and other Americans wrongfully detained in Russia and elsewhere, the US is working on the cases “quite literally every day.”
Sam Greene of the Center for European Policy Analysis said the conviction and sentencing of Kurmasheva and Gershkovich on the same day “suggests — but does not prove — that the Kremlin is preparing a deal. More likely, they are preparing to offer up a negotiating table that Washington will find it difficult to ignore.”
In a series of posts on X, Greene stressed that “the availability of a negotiating table shouldn’t be confused with the availability of a deal,” and that Moscow has no interest in releasing its prisoners — but it is likely to “seek the highest possible price for its bargaining chips, and to seek additional concessions along the way just to keep the talks going.”
Washington “should obviously do what it can” to get Gershkovich, Kurmasheva, imprisoned opposition politician Vladimir Kara-Murza and other political prisoners out, he said, adding: “But if Moscow demands what it really wants — the abandonment of Ukraine — what then?”


Former 2016 Trump campaign adviser is charged over his work for sanctioned Russian TV

Former 2016 Trump campaign adviser is charged over his work for sanctioned Russian TV
Updated 2 min 45 sec ago
Follow

Former 2016 Trump campaign adviser is charged over his work for sanctioned Russian TV

Former 2016 Trump campaign adviser is charged over his work for sanctioned Russian TV

WASHINGTON: The Justice Department has charged a Russian-born US citizen and former adviser to Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign with working for a sanctioned Russian state television network and laundering the proceeds.
Indictments announced Thursday allege that Dimitri Simes and his wife received over $1 million dollars and a personal car and driver in exchange for work they did for Russia’s Channel One since June 2022. The network was sanctioned by the US in 2022 over Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
Simes, 76, and his wife, Anastasia Simes, have a home in Virginia and are believed to be in Russia.
“These defendants allegedly violated sanctions that were put in place in response to Russia’s illegal aggression in Ukraine,” US Attorney Matthew M. Graves said in a statement announcing the charges. “Such violations harm our national security interests — a fact that Dimitri Simes, with the deep experience he gained in national affairs after fleeing the Soviet Union and becoming a US citizen, should have uniquely appreciated.”
The indictments come at a time of renewed concern about Russian efforts to meddle with the upcoming US election using online disinformation and propaganda. On Wednesday federal authorities announced charges against two employees of the Russian media organization RT accused of covertly funding a Tennessee company that produced pro-Russian content.
Simes and the Washington think tank he led, the Center for the National Interest, figured prominently in special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and potential ties to the Trump campaign.
The report chronicles interactions that the Soviet-born Simes, who immigrated to the US in the 1970s, had with assorted figures in Trump’s orbit, including Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner.
Before one such meeting, according to the Mueller report, Simes sent Kushner a letter detailing potential talking points for Trump about Russia and also passed along derogatory information about Bill Clinton that was then forwarded to other representatives of the campaign.
Simes’s think tank, which was founded by former President Richard Nixon, helped arrange a foreign policy speech at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington at which Simes introduced Trump, according to the report. Among those present was Sergei Kislyak, then the Russian ambassador to the US
Simes was never charged with any crime in relation to the investigation.
After the report was released, Simes defended himself in an interview in The Washington Post: “I did not see anything in the Mueller report that in any way that would indicate any questionable activity on my part or on the center’s part.”
A second indictment alleges that Anastasia Simes, 55, received funds from sanctioned Russian businessman Alexander Udodov. Udodov was sanctioned last year for his support for the Russian government. He is the former brother-in-law of Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin and has been linked to business dealings with both of them. Udodov also has been investigated for money laundering.
It was not immediately clear if either defendant had a lawyer who could speak on their behalf. An attorney who previously represented Simes said he was no longer representing him. The Trump campaign did not immediately return a message seeking comment Thursday.
In an interview with The New York Times before the charges were announced, Simes, who appears regularly on Channel One, defended the work he was doing.
“I assumed that what I was saying on Russian TV would not be to the liking of the Biden administration, but I also assumed that as long as it was just my opinion and was presented as such, it was not something for which I could be prosecuted,” he told the newspaper.


Meta body rules pro-Palestine phrase ‘from the river to the sea’ is not hate speech

Meta body rules pro-Palestine phrase ‘from the river to the sea’ is not hate speech
Updated 05 September 2024
Follow

Meta body rules pro-Palestine phrase ‘from the river to the sea’ is not hate speech

Meta body rules pro-Palestine phrase ‘from the river to the sea’ is not hate speech
  • Firm’s Oversight Board says ‘blanket ban’ would hinder ‘protected political speech’
  • Board seeks better access to Meta data for independent monitoring of moderation

DUBAI: Meta’s Oversight Board ruled on Wednesday that posts with the phrase “from the river to the sea” do not necessarily violate the company’s policies and therefore should not automatically be removed.

The independent board reviewed three Facebook posts containing the pro-Palestinian phrase. Meta had decided to keep the posts up after users wanted them removed, leading to an appeal.

On Wednesday, the board concluded its review and said it upholds Meta’s decision to leave the posts up. And found that they did not violate the company’s rules on hate speech, violence and incitement, or support of dangerous organizations and individuals.

The three posts contain “contextual signs of solidarity with Palestinians” and “do not glorify or even refer to Hamas, an organization designated as dangerous by Meta,” the board stated.

While a majority of the board believes that the phrase has multiple meanings, a minority believes that its use in a post should “be presumed to constitute glorification of a designated entity, unless there are clear signals to the contrary.”

This minority view was based on the phrase’s presence in the 2017 Hamas charter and in light of the October 2023 attacks.

The board acknowledged that the phrase was often used as a “political call for solidarity, equal rights and self-determination of the Palestinian people, and to end the war in Gaza,” and therefore “cannot be understood as a call to violence against a group.”

It argued that Hamas’ use of the phrase does not make it inherently violent or hateful, and because it is used in a variety of different ways, a “blanket ban” would hinder “protected political speech.”

In addition to upholding Meta’s decision to leave the posts up, the board also advocated for better data access to independently monitor Meta’s moderation.

For example, it said that it used Meta’s public data analysis tool CrowdTangle for some research during the case. Meta discontinued the tool in August and directed users to the Meta Content Library.

The board said it was concerned with “Meta’s decision to shut down the tool while there are questions over the newer Meta Content Library as an adequate replacement.”

In addition, the board recommended that Meta process applications for access to its Content Library in a timely manner and ensure it was a suitable replacement for CrowdTangle.

The board also said the ability to assess the extent of the surge in antisemitic, Islamophobic, racist and hateful content on Meta’s platforms remains limited.

As such, it urged Meta to fully implement a recommendation from consultancy Business for Social Responsibility’s “Human Rights Due Diligence” report.

This states that Meta should “develop a mechanism to track the prevalence of content” which constitutes antisemitic, Islamophobic, anti-Arab, and homophobic attacks.

 


Empowering Saudi content creators: AI summit bridges innovation and collaboration

Empowering Saudi content creators: AI summit bridges innovation and collaboration
Updated 05 September 2024
Follow

Empowering Saudi content creators: AI summit bridges innovation and collaboration

Empowering Saudi content creators: AI summit bridges innovation and collaboration

RIYADH: The American Embassy in Riyadh hosted the event “AI Summit for Content Creators” on Sept. 4 at Beast House, inviting social media influencers and YouTubers to engage with experts from Google and Microsoft with the aim of helping Saudi content creators understand artificial intelligence tools.

The event offered networking opportunities, followed by a discussion panel and training sessions led by Google and Microsoft, focusing on their AI programs such as Gemini and ChatGPT.

The discussion panel featured prominent speakers including Zainab Al Amin, vice president of national digital transformation at Microsoft; Marwa Khost Jarkas, AI communication lead at Google MENA; and Hady Hajjar, co-founder of HuManagment. The panel was moderated by YouTuber Mohammed Salem.

American Ambassador Michael Ratney opened the ceremony, sharing his experiences with social media and expressing his interest in AI’s role in content creation.

“It’s great to see everybody here. Thank you to Google and Microsoft for being our partners today. It’s truly wonderful to have you as part of this gathering of big, famous US companies. There are more out there eager to connect with Saudi Arabia as well,” he said.

He highlighted the numerous opportunities for US companies in Saudi Arabia, especially amid the burgeoning tech partnership between the two nations.

“Today, we’re discussing artificial intelligence, a force that’s becoming integral to our society and economy, especially in a dynamic place like Saudi Arabia. We thought it would be valuable to explore how AI impacts our lives, our work, and specifically, how it will influence your roles in social media and content creation,” Ratney added.

The discussion panel addressed AI’s presence in Saudi Arabia and the country’s initiatives to promote AI education among its citizens.

Al Amin said: “Saudi Arabia aims to become the leading hub for artificial intelligence in the region and globally. We are actively pursuing this goal by collaborating closely with the government sector. We have engaged with key organizations, including the Communications and Information Technology Commission, the Communications and Space Commission, the Ministry of Communications, and the Council of Chambers of Commerce, through an initiative called Advisory Groups.”

The groups consist of representatives from major companies and the government, focusing on identifying challenges related to modern technologies, including AI. “Our objective is to explore the barriers to AI adoption in the Kingdom and to develop initiatives that will enhance its integration and growth,” Al Amin said.

The panel also highlighted the importance of learning prompt engineering, noting that many free resources are available through Google, Microsoft, and LinkedIn.
Jarkas, of Google MENA, elaborated on the challenges of learning AI: “I view AI through three lenses — how to use it intelligently, safely, and responsibly. We often get emotionally drawn to new technologies and rush into using them, forgetting safety and responsibility. We must master prompt engineering and use requests thoughtfully, providing adequate detail.”

She advised caution, stating: “When interacting with AI, we should not disclose our entire identity. This is an essential part of using AI safely.”

HuManagement’s Hajjar discussed AI’s potential benefits for content creators, such as generating new video ideas. However, he cautioned: “We must adapt the content to align with our unique work; AI is merely a tool to assist us. Saudi Arabia is one of the highest consumers of content, making it crucial for creators to leverage AI tools to streamline their content creation process.”

He also noted the emergence of AI-generated social media influencers, presenting a challenge for human content creators and underscoring the importance of understanding AI in today’s landscape.


YouTube tightens safety features for teens on weight and fitness videos

YouTube tightens safety features for teens on weight and fitness videos
Updated 05 September 2024
Follow

YouTube tightens safety features for teens on weight and fitness videos

YouTube tightens safety features for teens on weight and fitness videos
  • Google-owned platform updated algorithm to stop repeated recommendation of such videos

LONDON: YouTube has announced stricter safety measures for teen users around weight and fitness-related videos, aiming to protect young viewers from potentially harmful content.

The Google-owned platform said it has updated its algorithm to prevent these videos from being recommended to users aged 13 to 17, though the videos will not be banned outright.

This decision comes after experts raised concerns about the negative impact of repeated exposure to content that promotes unrealistic beauty or fitness standards.

“As a teen is developing thoughts about who they are and their own standards for themselves, repeated consumption of content featuring idealized standards that starts to shape an unrealistic internal standard could lead some to form negative beliefs about themselves,” explained Dr. Garth Graham, YouTube’s global head of health.

While such content does not violate YouTube’s guidelines, the platform acknowledged that excessive viewing could be harmful to some users’ mental well-being.

The new rules, developed with input from YouTube’s youth and family advisory committee, target content that promotes unrealistic physical ideals or encourages aggressive behavior.

In addition, YouTube said it is introducing the Family Center Hub, a tool to help parents monitor and manage their children’s activity on the platform, including insights into their kids’ subscriptions, comments, and video uploads.

These updates are set to roll out globally, including in the Middle East.


Russian lawmakers denounce US sanctions against Russian state media network

Russian lawmakers denounce US sanctions against Russian state media network
Updated 05 September 2024
Follow

Russian lawmakers denounce US sanctions against Russian state media network

Russian lawmakers denounce US sanctions against Russian state media network
  • US justice department on Wednesday filed money-laundering charges against two employees of Russian state media network RT
  • Previous US intelligence assessments have found that Moscow tried to meddle in the 2016 and 2020 elections

MOSCOW: Russian lawmakers denounced as an infringement of freedom of speech US punitive measures against state media group RT as part of what officials in Washington described as a campaign to influence the November presidential election.
The US justice department on Wednesday filed money-laundering charges against two employees of Russian state media network RT for what was described as a scheme to hire a US company to produce online content to influence the election.
Previous US intelligence assessments have found that Moscow tried to meddle in the 2016 and 2020 elections. Russian officials have suggested that the United States has also meddled in its domestic affairs.
The Kremlin and the Russian Foreign Ministry have repeatedly said that Moscow has not meddled in the US election, but is watching it closely.
Konstantin Kosachev, Deputy Chairman of Russia’s upper house of parliament, told RIA news agency that the US moves were aimed at preventing alternative views from being made known.
“Russian media in this sense have become increasingly popular and in demand,” Kosachev told RIA.
“That is the reason behind the rabid reaction of the US authorities, which is totally at odds with the principles of freedom of speech and defending the rights of journalists.”
Leonid Slutsky, chairman of the State Duma lower house’s foreign affairs committee, branded the sanctions “a witch-hunt, pressure on freedom of speech and vulgar censorship.”
“The agents of the ‘empire of lies’ are waging war on everyone who tells the truth about the policy of contemporary neo-colonialists,” said Slutsky.
There was no immediate Kremlin reaction to the sanctions.
The Kremlin in June dismissed as absurd US intelligence assertions that Russia sought to meddle in the election and has said that US spies were intent on casting Russia as an enemy.
President Vladimir Putin had suggested in the past that, for Russia, Joe Biden would have been preferable to Donald Trump, though he spoke with irony about Biden.
Ahead of the announcement of the sanctions, Russian lawmaker Maria Butina said any suggestion of meddling in the election was nonsense. Moscow, she said, felt that the only winner of the election would be the US military-industrial complex.
“The US claims were and are pure rubbish and a witch hunt,” Butina, who spent 15 months in US prison for acting as an unregistered Russian agent and is now a lawmaker for the ruling United Russia party, told Reuters.
“Russia thinks it does not matter who wins the US elections – the only winner is the US private military-industrial complex. That is what matters – and nothing else,” Butina said.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said in an interview published on Sunday that Russia saw US Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris as a more predictable opponent than Trump, but said there was no prospect of an improvement in relations with Washington anyway.