Women lawyers top Philippines’ Shariah Bar exams

Women lawyers top Philippines’ Shariah Bar exams
Justice Maria Filomena Singh reads the results of the 2024 Philippine Shariah Bar examinations at the Supreme Court, Manila, on July 16, 2024. (Supreme Court/YouTube)
Short Url
Updated 17 July 2024
Follow

Women lawyers top Philippines’ Shariah Bar exams

Women lawyers top Philippines’ Shariah Bar exams

MANILA: Women have topped this year’s Shariah Bar examinations in the Philippines, with Supreme Court data showing that female examinees not only obtained the best score but also had the highest passing rate.

Shariah, or Islamic law, is partially implemented in the Philippines, applicable only to the Muslim community — about 10 percent of the 120 million of the country’s predominantly Catholic population.

A total of 853 candidates took part in the Shariah Bar exam in April and May, and 183 passed it. More than half of those who passed the exams were women, nine of whom were among the top 10 scorers.

Supreme Court Associate Justice Maria Filomena Singh announced the results on Tuesday, saying that “62.3 percent of the total passers are female. I’m very happy to announce that.”

This year’s exam also saw the “largest number of Shariah Bar examinees we have had in nearly 40 years,” Singh said.

“This is to strengthen and make the Shariah justice system more accessible by encouraging and giving more opportunities to aspiring Shariah councilors.”

Separate from the regular Bar tests for aspiring lawyers, the Shariah Bar exams are the professional licensure examination covering Islamic law for Shariah court councilor candidates.

Established under the 1977 Code of Muslim Personal Laws, the Islamic law courts are under the administrative supervision of the Supreme Court and have jurisdiction over the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region as well as other parts of the southern Mindanao island, which have significant Muslim populations.

The courts have application over personal status law, including marriage, as well as financial laws and halal certification.

The Supreme Court said last year that in its goal to “strengthen the Shariah justice system” under the Strategic Plan for Judicial Innovations 2022-2027, it was studying the possibility of expanding the mandate of Islamic courts to cover also criminal and commercial cases.


Denmark to close its embassies in Mali, Burkina Faso

Denmark to close its embassies in Mali, Burkina Faso
Updated 12 sec ago
Follow

Denmark to close its embassies in Mali, Burkina Faso

Denmark to close its embassies in Mali, Burkina Faso

COPENHAGEN: Denmark will close its embassies in Mali and Burkina Faso after a series of military coups over the past few years, the Danish Foreign Ministry said on Monday, as it formally launched a new strategy for its cooperation with the African continent.

Ruled by a military junta since 2020, Mali has been battling ethnic Tuareg rebels in its north alongside Russia’s Wagner mercenary group after it cut military cooperation ties with Western powers including EU countries.

Since then, relations between Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso and Western powers have deteriorated as the three turn to Russia for support.

Frustrations over authorities’ failure to restore security have contributed to coups in Mali and Burkina Faso, which the ministry said had created very limited room for maneuver in the Sahel region.

At the same time, the Danish ministry said it would open embassies in Rwanda, Senegal and Tunisia, and increase its diplomatic workforce in its embassies to Egypt, Kenya, South Africa, Nigeria and Ghana.

Separately, at least 100 villagers and soldiers were killed in central Burkina Faso during a weekend attack on a village by Al-Qaeda-linked terrorists, according to videos of the violence analyzed by a regional specialist, who’s described the assault as one of the deadliest this year in the conflict-battered West African nation.

Villagers in the Barsalogho commune which is 80 kilometers from the capital city were helping security forces dig trenches to protect security outposts and villages on Saturday when fighters with the Al-Qaeda-linked JNIM group invaded the area and opened fire on them, said Wassim Nasr, a Sahel specialist and senior research fellow at the Soufan Center security think tank.

Al-Qaeda claimed responsibility for the attack on Sunday, saying in a statement that it gained “total control over a militia position” in Barsalogho in Kaya, a strategic town security forces have used to fight off terrorists that have over the years tried to close in on the capital, Ouagadougou.


Hundreds of migrants swim into Ceuta enclave from Morocco

Hundreds of migrants swim into Ceuta enclave from Morocco
Updated 7 min 25 sec ago
Follow

Hundreds of migrants swim into Ceuta enclave from Morocco

Hundreds of migrants swim into Ceuta enclave from Morocco
  • Spain’s prime minister to visit West Africa to stem refugee surge

MADRID: Hundreds of migrants took advantage of a thick mist to swim to the Spanish enclave of Ceuta from neighboring Morocco on Sunday and early on Monday, local police said.

Spain’s two enclaves on Morocco’s Mediterranean coast, Ceuta and Melilla, share the only land borders of the EU with Africa. The enclaves sporadically experience waves of attempted crossings by migrants trying to reach Europe.

Many of the migrants were intercepted near or on El Tarajal beach next to the Ceuta-Morocco border, a spokesperson for the Guardia Civil police said.

“There was pressure and we handled it with Morocco,” he said. The spokesperson added that the mist had lifted by Monday morning.

Police have intercepted an average of around 700 migrants trying to enter Ceuta each day since Thursday, with up to 1,500 people making the attempt on Sunday night, according to Cristina Perez, the Spanish government’s representative in Ceuta.

Moroccan nationals detained during the crossings are immediately sent back to Morocco unless they are underage or seeking asylum, Perez said.

People of other nationalities are taken to special centers where they are given shelter and released after a few days.

Another unknown number of people have managed to sneak illegally into the enclave without being detained by the police, a spokesperson for Perez’s office said.

Two years ago, at least 23 people died in a stampede when about 2,000 migrants tried to storm into Melilla, pushing down the border fence. 

Meanwhile, Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez will start his second visit this year to West Africa on Tuesday, aiming to curb migration to the Canary Islands and to counter the Russian presence in the Sahel region.

The West African migration route has seen a 154 percent surge this year, with 21,620 people crossing to the Canary Islands in the first seven months, according to data from the European Union border agency Frontex.

The wave has stretched resources on the Spanish archipelago, with local authorities saying they may have to house migrants in military camps or even in tents ahead of an expected rise in arrivals due to calmer conditions in the Atlantic Ocean.

Spanish authorities fear that as many as 150,000 more migrants from Africa may be set to make the perilous crossing in the coming months.

According to Frontex data, nearly half of the new arrivals are Malians, forced out of their country by a conflict and economic crisis in which the Russian mercenary group Wagner is involved.

Sanchez is focusing on strengthening relations with Mauritania, Senegal, and Gambia, the main departure points for migrant boats. The first two share land borders with Mali.


Modi discusses Ukraine visit with Biden

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky speakS with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the Mariinskyi Palace.
Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky speakS with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the Mariinskyi Palace.
Updated 26 August 2024
Follow

Modi discusses Ukraine visit with Biden

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky speakS with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the Mariinskyi Palace.
  • Modi, who angered Ukrainians by hugging Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow recently, visited Kyiv on Friday

WASHINGTON: Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Monday spoke with US President Joe Biden about his visit to Ukraine, as the White House voiced hope that he embraced Kyiv’s view on ending Russia’s invasion.
Modi, who angered Ukrainians by hugging Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow recently, visited Kyiv on Friday and told President Volodymyr Zelensky that “no problem should be solved on the battlefield.”
Briefing Biden by telephone on his trip, Modi “reiterated India’s consistent position in favor of dialogue and diplomacy and expressed full support for (an) early return of peace and stability,” an Indian foreign ministry statement said.
Asked about Biden’s response, National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said that the United States supported all countries listening to Zelensky’s perspectives on ending the war.
“We welcome any other country that wants to help President Zelensky work toward this just peace,” Kirby told reporters.
Zelensky has called for the return of all territory seized by Russia, which launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
India has not explicitly backed Zelensky’s stance. Despite increasingly close relations with Washington, India has refused to join US sanctions on Moscow, with which it has historic relations, and instead has embraced Russia as a cheaper source of oil.
India said that Modi and Biden also discussed Bangladesh, where leader Sheikh Hasina, a close ally of New Delhi, resigned and fled earlier this month after mass protests against her increasingly authoritarian rule.
The Indian statement said that Modi and Biden “emphasized restoration of law and order and ensuring safety and security of the minorities, particularly Hindus, in Bangladesh.”
Hindus have faced attacks since the fall of Sheikh Hasina, whose secular rule enjoyed minority support.
The United States had repeatedly criticized Sheikh Hasina for backsliding on democracy but, knowing that India was far more invested in Bangladesh, had been careful not to clash openly with New Delhi.


Bangladesh floods leave 23 dead, 5.7 million people affected

Bangladesh floods leave 23 dead, 5.7 million people affected
Updated 26 August 2024
Follow

Bangladesh floods leave 23 dead, 5.7 million people affected

Bangladesh floods leave 23 dead, 5.7 million people affected
  • As floodwaters recede slowly, many of the 5.7 million affected people remain isolated and in urgent need of food, clean water, medicine and dry clothes
  • Bangladesh Meteorological Department said that flood conditions could persist if the monsoon rains continued, as water levels were receding very slowly

DHAKA: The death toll from devastating floods caused by relentless monsoon rain and overflowing rivers in Bangladesh has risen to 23, with around 1.24 million families stranded across 11 districts, officials said on Monday.
As floodwaters recede slowly, many of the 5.7 million affected people remain isolated and in urgent need of food, clean water, medicine and dry clothes, above all in remote areas where blocked roads have hindered rescue and relief efforts.
The Bangladesh Meteorological Department said that flood conditions could persist if the monsoon rains continued, as water levels were receding very slowly.
Around 470,000 people have taken refuge in 3,500 shelters in the flood-hit districts, where around 650 medical teams are on the ground to provide treatment, with the army, air force, navy, and the South Asian country’s border guard assisting in rescue and relief operations, authorities said.
Vast areas of land are submerged, posing a significant threat to crops if the floodwaters linger for an extended period, agriculture ministry officials said.
An analysis in 2015 by the World Bank Institute estimated that 3.5 million people in Bangladesh, one of the world’s most climate-vulnerable countries, were at risk of annual river flooding. Scientists attribute the exacerbation of such catastrophic events to climate change.
“Countries like Bangladesh with negligible emissions and whose people have shown super resilience deserve immediate funds to address the impacts of climate change and frequent disasters,” said Farah Kabir, director of ActionAid Bangladesh.
“We need to recover from the losses and damage we have faced, as well as build resilience to future impacts and take on green development pathways.”
In one of the worst-hit districts, Noakhali, 56-year-old Shukuri Begum lost her home as it was swept into a pond by the floodwaters, according to ActionAid. Terrified, she fled with her grandchildren to a neighbor’s house, but couldn’t stay there long as it was no longer safe.
“I have a son with physical disabilities, and we couldn’t bring him with us. We had to stack beds and leave him on top, hoping he would be safe. I don’t know what’s waiting for us,” ActionAid quoted her as saying.


Harris and Trump squabble over muted mics at upcoming debate

Harris and Trump squabble over muted mics at upcoming debate
Updated 26 August 2024
Follow

Harris and Trump squabble over muted mics at upcoming debate

Harris and Trump squabble over muted mics at upcoming debate
  • Both Harris and Trump are under pressure to deliver a strong performance next month in Philadelphia
  • Current dispute centers on the muting of microphones when a candidate isn’t speaking

The campaigns of Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump are arguing in advance of their high-stakes Sept. 10 debate over whether microphones should be muted except for the candidate whose turn it is to speak.
While it’s common for campaigns to quibble beforehand over debate mechanics, both Harris and Trump are under pressure to deliver a strong performance next month in Philadelphia. The first debate during this campaign led to President Joe Biden’s departure from the race.
Trump on Sunday night raised the possibility that he might not show up on ABC, posting on his Truth Social network that he had watched the network’s Sunday show with a “so-called Panel of Trump Haters” and posited, “why would I do the Debate against Kamala Harris on that network?” and urging followers to “Stay tuned!!”
The current dispute centers on the muting of microphones when a candidate isn’t speaking, a condition both Biden and Trump accepted for their June debate hosted by CNN. Both sides are accusing the other of gaming the system to protect their candidate.
Biden’s campaign team made microphone muting a condition of its decision to accept any debates this year, and some aides now regret the decision, saying voters were shielded from hearing Trump’s outbursts during the debate. That move likely would not have helped the incumbent Democrat’s disastrous performance.
The Harris campaign now wants microphones to be live all the time, according to Harris spokesman Brian Fallon, who issued a statement needling Trump.
“Trump’s handlers prefer the muted microphone because they don’t think their candidate can act presidential for 90 minutes on his own,” Fallon said. Harris “is ready to deal with Trump’s constant lies and interruptions in real time. Trump should stop hiding behind the mute button.”
Trump spokesman Jason Miller retorted that the Republican nominee had “accepted the ABC debate under the exact same terms as the CNN debate.” He alleged Harris’ representatives sought “a seated debate, with notes, and opening statements.”
Miller then took a shot at Harris not sitting for an interview or holding a news conference since Biden ended his reelection and endorsed her, arguing her campaign now wants “to give her a cheat sheet for the debate.”
The Harris campaign denied Miller’s claim that she wanted notes.
During a stop Monday in the Washington area following a visit to Arlington National Cemetery, Trump said “we agreed to the same rules” in terms of the Sept. 10 debate, adding: “The truth is they’re trying to get out of it.”
Complicating the negotiations this year is that debates are being orchestrated on an ad hoc basis by host networks, as opposed to the bipartisan Commission on Presidential Debates, through which debate rules were negotiated privately.
Microphones have been unmuted for both candidates for most of televised presidential debate history. The debate commission announced that its October 2020 debate would have microphones muted when candidates were not recognized to speak after the first Biden-Trump contest descended into a shouting match. The second 2020 debate with the microphone muting rules was widely celebrated for being more substantive than the earlier matchup.