Russia, US accuse each other at UN Security Council meeting of sabotaging world order

Special Russia, US accuse each other at UN Security Council meeting of sabotaging world order
Russian FM Sergei Lavrov speaks to delegates as he chairs a meeting of the United Nations Security Council at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City, US, July 16, 2024. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 17 July 2024
Follow

Russia, US accuse each other at UN Security Council meeting of sabotaging world order

Russia, US accuse each other at UN Security Council meeting of sabotaging world order
  • Russian foreign minister says US ‘has long, through the words of its presidents, declared its own exceptionalism’ and ‘demands unquestioning obedience’ from allies
  • US condemns Russia for hosting a meeting to discuss the ideals of the UN while ‘actively engaged in a war of aggression against its neighbor’

NEW YORK CITY: The very foundations of the international legal order, strategic stability and the UN-centric system of global politics are being put to the test, Russia’s minister of foreign affairs said on Tuesday.
It will be “impossible” to resolve the conflicts that are multiplying around the world without getting to their root causes and restoring faith in the ability of nations to join forces in pursuit of the common good and justice for all, he added.
Sergey Lavrov accused the US and its allies of impeding international cooperation and efforts to build “a more just world.”
He added: “They’re taking entire countries and regions as hostages (and) distracting from the necessary joint efforts to regulate conflicts in the Middle East, Africa and other regions, in reducing global inequality, eliminating terrorism, drug trafficking and famine.”
As he chaired a signature meeting of the Security Council, of which Russia holds the rotating presidency this month, Lavrov said: “Not all states represented in this room recognize the key principle of the UN charter of the sovereign equality of all states.
“The United States has long, through the words of its presidents, declared its own exceptionalism. This also ties to Washington’s attitude toward its allies, from whom it demands unquestioning obedience, even to the detriment of their national interests.
“Rule America: That is the essence of the notorious rule-based order, which is a direct threat to multilateralism and international law.”
The high-level open debate, attended by more than 50 states including Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Kuwait, was titled “Multilateral cooperation in the interest of a more just, democratic and sustainable world order.”
Lavrov accused Western countries of interpreting the UN Charter in a “perverse and selective manner depending on what instructions are handed down from the White House.”
He added: “The sabotage of resolutions on the Middle East can be discussed endlessly. Everyone remembers the statement of the US permanent representative regarding the fact that Resolution 2728 of March 25, demanding an immediate ceasefire in the Gaza Strip, was not legally binding.
“In other words, these American rules are more important than Article 25 of the UN Charter.”
Quoting George Orwell’s allegorical novel “Animal Farm,” Lavrov said: “‘All animals are equal but some are more equal than others.’ If you fulfill and obey the will of the hegemon, you’re permitted to do anything you wish. But if you dare defend your national interests, you will be declared a pariah and sanctioned.
“Washington’s hegemonic policy has not changed for decades. Every Euro-Atlantic security arrangement, without exception, has been based on ensuring US dominance. This has included the subjugation of Europe and the containment of Russia.”
Lavrov accused NATO of subjugating the EU, and blamed the crisis in Ukraine — and what he described as the “coup d’etat” of 2014, referencing the protests in the country a decade ago that
culminated in the ousting of President Viktor Yanukovych after he rejected closer integration with the EU — on the “reckless expansion” of the military alliance.
He urged “all those genuinely interested in overcoming the Ukrainian crisis to take into account in their proposals the key issue of the rights of Russians and other national minorities. Silencing it devalues peace initiatives.”
Lavrov said that the West’s “illegal sanctions, multiple protection measures (and) restrictions in access to leading technologies are contrary to true multilateralism, and create serious obstacles to achieving the (UN’s) 2030 agenda” for sustainable development.
He accused Washington of “jettisoning” developing countries, the attributes of a free market economy, fair competition, the inviolability of the practice of private property, the presumption of innocence, and the free movement of people, goods and capital.
“Geopolitics have buried the once-sacred laws of the market for the West,” Lavrov added.
He called for reform of the multilateral system, including changes to the structure of the Security Council, in which he said “there’s a clear overrepresentation of the countries of the collective West,” to eliminate geographic imbalances and enhance the representation of Asia, Africa and Latin America.
Lavrov also advocated changes to the staffing policy of the UN Secretariat, the organization’s executive branch, “to eliminate the overrepresentation of nationals of the West.” The UN secretary-general’s “staff must adhere strictly to the principles of impartiality and neutrality,” he added.
The US representative to the UN, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, responded by saying she thought she was “in the wrong room, because this seemed to be a session whining about the United States and the West and I hardly heard the word multilateralism mentioned.”
She accused Russia of eroding confidence in global institutions, and violating the core tenets of the UN Charter, including territorial integrity, respect for human rights, and international cooperation.
She criticized Moscow for hosting a meeting to discuss the ideals of the UN while “actively engaged in a war of aggression against its neighbor. A war that has weaponized food, worsening food insecurity not only for Ukrainians but for tens of millions of hungry people around the world.
“A war that has killed thousands of innocent people, including dozens just last week at a pediatric hospital in Kyiv. A war that has facilitated the unlawful transfer of thousands upon thousands of people from their homes, including children. And a war that has caused Moscow to resort to nuclear brinkmanship and to violate international sanctions obligations.”
Thomas-Greenfield conceded that the UN is not perfect, as it “reflects a deeply imperfect world, one filled with conflict and contradiction. We need an effective United Nations to tackle the kind of borderless challenges that affect us all.”
She said her country is committed to “modernizing and strengthening” the UN to better reflect the priorities of all member states, including developing countries. This commitment, she added, includes working with multilateral development banks to address the economic barriers to achieving the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals, and the championing of efforts to reform the Security Council itself, to ensure it incorporates geographically diverse perspectives, including permanent representation of the Global South.
She pledged US commitment to international treaties and conventions, including international humanitarian law and World Trade Organization rules “not, as my Russian counterpart might argue, to keep other nations down but rather to help them build up to ensure that everyone plays
by the rules, and that the rules are fair to everyone, including the developing nations that have for far too long been used and abused by Russia.”


US imposes sanctions on 400 more targets for aiding Russia’s war effort

US imposes sanctions on 400 more targets for aiding Russia’s war effort
Updated 23 August 2024
Follow

US imposes sanctions on 400 more targets for aiding Russia’s war effort

US imposes sanctions on 400 more targets for aiding Russia’s war effort
  • Friday’s sanctions include measures against companies in China involved in shipping machine tools and microelectronics to Russia

WASHINGTON: The United States on Friday imposed sanctions on more than 400 entities and individuals for supporting Russia’s war effort in Ukraine, the State Department said, including Chinese firms that US officials believe are helping Moscow to skirt Western sanctions and build up its military.
Washington has repeatedly warned Beijing over its support for Russia’s defense industrial base and has already issued hundreds of sanctions aimed at restricting Moscow’s ability to exploit certain technologies for military purposes.
Friday’s sanctions include measures against companies in China involved in shipping machine tools and microelectronics to Russia, according to a State Department fact sheet outlining its sanctions against 190 targets. The Treasury Department was imposing the remaining sanctions, an official said.
The State Department’s sanctions include moves aimed at stifling Russia’s energy sector and against companies in Turkiye, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Central Asian economies that the US believes are helping Russia evade sanctions, the State Department said.
“Today’s actions hit Russia where it hurts — degrading its ability to generate revenue through its energy projects and disrupting its acquisition of materiel to supply its war machine,” said Aaron Forsberg, the State Department’s director for economic sanctions policy and implementation.
After seizing Crimea from Ukraine in 2014, Russia launched a full-scale invasion of its neighbor in 2022, triggering a host of new US economic sanctions on Moscow.
The war escalated on Aug. 6 when Ukraine sent thousands of soldiers over the border into Russia’s western Kursk region. Kyiv has since announced a string of battlefield successes, but Russian forces continue to steadily inch forward in eastern Ukraine, pressuring troops worn down by 2-and-a-half years of fighting.
Friday’s sanctions targets include the import-export arm of China’s Dalian Machine Tool Group, which the State Department said had supplied $4 million of dual-use items to Russian companies.
China says it has not provided weaponry to Russia for the war in Ukraine, but defends what it calls normal trade between China and Russia.
The latest US sanctions include measures against firms supplying components used in the Orlan drones that Russia is using in Ukraine.
Washington also sought with the sanctions to disrupt future energy projects in Russia and its shipment of liquefied natural gas (LNG). It targeted Russia’s $21 billion Arctic LNG 2 project, which has already been hit by Western sanctions that have curbed its access to ice-class tankers, and other companies involved in future energy projects in Russia, according to the fact sheet.
The sanctions also targeted companies involved in the shipments, like UAE-based White Fox Ship Management, which the US says recently acquired four tankers to ship LNG.


London unveils design of city’s first memorial to victims of transatlantic slavery

London unveils design of city’s first memorial to victims of transatlantic slavery
Updated 23 August 2024
Follow

London unveils design of city’s first memorial to victims of transatlantic slavery

London unveils design of city’s first memorial to victims of transatlantic slavery
  • Memorial to be located at West India Quay, east London
  • Design inspired by cowrie shells, by artist Khaleb Brooks
  • Memorial to be supported by educational program on slavery

LONDON: London is set to have its first memorial to victims of transatlantic slavery, with the mayor’s office announcing on Friday the design of a long-awaited monument seen by advocates as a step toward confronting the past and its legacies.
The memorial will be located at West India Quay, in east London, where warehouses were built in the early 19th century to receive what the mayor’s office has described as “products of slavery,” such as sugar from plantations in the Caribbean. For over 300 years, British ships forcibly transported more than three million enslaved Africans across the Atlantic Ocean, and the City of London was the financial center of the trafficking.
“We know so much of London’s wealth has been built on the backs of enslaved people,” said London’s deputy mayor for communities and social justice, Debbie Weekes-Bernard, as she announced the winning design.
Inspired by the shape of cowrie shells, widely used as currency across Africa to trade enslaved people, ‘The Wake’, by Khaleb Brooks, will be a seven-meter (23 ft) tall bronze sculpture visitors will be able to enter.
Inside, the walls will list names of enslaved people.
“We are our history, it tells us where we’ve been, where we are and the direction we could go,” Brooks said.
The mayor’s office has pledged 500,000 pounds ($655,750.00) to fund the memorial — expected to be installed in 2026 — but it will also need private donations. The total requirement has not been set.
Weekes-Bernard said she hoped the memorial, which will be supported by an educational program about slavery, will be a “step” to help Britain have a wider conversation about its past.
She said confronting history could help tackle some its legacies today, including racial discrimination. “There needs to be a conversation... (about) how history connects to the experiences that Black communities have today.” There are over 900 representational public monuments, such as statues, busts and plaques, across Britain related to transatlantic slavery but the vast majority are linked to enslavers or white abolitionists, according to a survey mapping such monuments. After the US police killing of George Floyd in 2020, Black Lives Matter protests swept the world, with various statues of enslavers and colonizers being toppled, including the statue of trader Edward Colston in Bristol. Critics argued that such actions amounted to the censoring of history.
The idea of having a slavery memorial in London is not new. Campaign group Memorial 2007 had secured planning permission for a site in Hyde Park, and the backing of the then mayor Boris Johnson, but it did not receive government funding and has not yet been built.
Memorial 2007 campaigner Oku Ekpenyon said: “We just have to keep on pushing.”


New prospects for Afghanistan as UAE, Kazakhstan accept credentials of Taliban envoys

New prospects for Afghanistan as UAE, Kazakhstan accept credentials of Taliban envoys
Updated 23 August 2024
Follow

New prospects for Afghanistan as UAE, Kazakhstan accept credentials of Taliban envoys

New prospects for Afghanistan as UAE, Kazakhstan accept credentials of Taliban envoys
  • Only UAE, China have so far accepted Taliban diplomats as full ambassadors
  • In 1996-2001, Taliban rule was recognized by Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, UAE

Kabul: New political and economic prospects are expected to open for Afghanistan, experts said on Friday, following the acceptance of the credentials of Taliban-appointed diplomats as the ambassador to the UAE and charge d’affaires to Kazakhstan.
Afghanistan has faced global sanctions since the Taliban took over and American-led international forces withdrew in August 2021, two decades after the US invaded the country.
Unrecognized on the international stage, the Taliban administration has been dealing on a bilateral level with regional countries, including neighboring Pakistan, India, and China, as well as Central Asian republics.
For the past three years, it has also engaged with the Middle East, mainly Qatar and the UAE.
An official Taliban delegation visited Abu Dhabi and met UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed last week.
On Wednesday, the Afghan Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement that Mawlawi Badruddin Haqqani submitted his credentials to the UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
A UAE official confirmed to Reuters on Thursday that accepting “the credentials of the ambassador of Afghanistan” reaffirms the Gulf state’s determination to build bridges and help Afghans, including through development and reconstruction projects.
Also on Wednesday, Kazakh Deputy Foreign Minister Alibek Bakayev said that Kazakhstan accredited Muhammad Ur Rehman Rahmani as charge d’affaires of Afghanistan in Astana, “guided by the crucial goal for both countries of expanding trade, economic, and humanitarian cooperation.”
Other countries that have accepted Taliban diplomats are China, which formally received the credentials of their ambassador in January, as well as Qatar, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and Russia, where Taliban diplomats serve as charge d’affaires. Turkiye and Tajikistan have also recognized Taliban officials, but so far only at the consular level.
“Countries are concerned about the security and stability of Afghanistan as it’s directly connected to the stability in the whole region. Therefore, they are interested in engagement with the Taliban-led government, considering the rivalries and the appetite for balance of power across the region,” Sohaib Raufi, executive director of the Center for Strategic and Regional Studies in Kabul, told Arab News.
“These steps are clear signs of increasing trust between the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan and countries in the region and beyond. The trade-oriented foreign policy of the Islamic Emirate is a key factor in enhancing its relations with the world.”
During the first Taliban stint in power in 1996-2001, their administration was recognized by three countries: Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE.
The growing international engagement may be seen as initial steps for further recognition of the current government.
“But there’s a long way ahead before reaching that stage,” Raufi said. “A wider engagement of the world countries is required to reduce the current isolation of Afghanistan on a larger political level.”
In the short term, however, the new official relations, especially with the UAE, are expected to have an impact on Afghanistan’s reeling economy.
“Afghanistan’s economic relations have been limited due to the political restrictions imposed on the country after August 2021. Increasing political engagement with more countries will no doubt have a positive impact on the country’s exports and imports through accessing diversified economic corridors,” said Tayeb Khan, economics lecturer at Kateb University in Kabul.
“Afghanistan’s relations with the UAE, as a global trade hub, will give Afghanistan easy access to a wider market in the Arab countries and beyond, creating increased opportunities for utilizing Afghanistan’s human capital as well.”


Protesters rally again in Indonesia as tempers flare over political maneuvers

Protesters rally again in Indonesia as tempers flare over political maneuvers
Updated 23 August 2024
Follow

Protesters rally again in Indonesia as tempers flare over political maneuvers

Protesters rally again in Indonesia as tempers flare over political maneuvers
  • Protests take aim at longtime president’s influence
  • Demonstrators fear another change in rules
  • Protests cap off week of drama in Indonesian politics

JAKARTA: Thousands of people rallied in several cities in Indonesia on Friday, pressuring its poll body to issue rules for regional elections amid outrage over an attempt by parliamentary allies of President Joko Widodo to change them in their favor.
The protests followed a day of demonstrations in which 301 people were detained and tear gas and water cannon used to disperse angry crowds outside parliament, which on Thursday shelved its controversial plan to amend eligibility rules on candidates, citing absence of a quorum.
The protests were accompanied by fury on social media at the influential Jokowi, as the president is known, who stood to gain from proposed changes that would have allowed his son to seek office in Central Java, and blocked an influential government critic from running for the high-profile post of Jakarta governor.
The demonstrations capped a dramatic week in politics in which anger has mounted over what Jokowi’s critics say is an attempt to further consolidate his power as he prepares to make way for successor Prabowo Subianto in October.
Jokowi’s popularity and outsized influence after a decade in charge was instrumental in Prabowo winning February’s election by a big margin, in what was widely seen as a quid-pro-quo to ensure the outgoing leader retains a political stake long after he leaves office.
’This is nepotism’
Student protester Diva Rabiah, 23, was among hundreds of people who gathered outside the election commission in Jakarta urging it to issue clear rules on candidates, concerned that regulations could be changed before registration opens next week.
“This bothers me because they eased the way for the president’s son to run in the regional elections. This is nepotism,” she said of the earlier plan by lawmakers.
Demonstrations were also held on Friday in the cities of Medan, Makassar and in Surabaya, where students threw rocks and bottles at police, calling for the poll body to issue the rules.
It is unclear what role Jokowi will play when he leaves office, but he is expected to wield influence through the Golkar Party, the largest member of Prabowo’s parliamentary alliance, which on Wednesday appointed the president’s right-hand man Bahlil Lahadalia as its leader.
Jokowi has yet to commented on the protests. On Wednesday, when asked about the attempt by parliament to change the election rules, he said he respected Indonesia’s democratic institutions.
The push by lawmakers to change the election rules would have effectively been a reversal of a Constitutional Court decision on Tuesday, which upheld the minimum age of 30 for candidates, and made it easier for parties to make nominations.
That ruling opens the door for Prabowo’s presidential election rival Anies Baswedan to be nominated for Jakarta governor, a post he held from 2017-2022, but means Jokowi’s 29-year-old son Kaesang Pangarep cannot run in regional polls.
The election commission would issue rules in line with Tuesday’s court ruling, but after a consultation with parliament next week, its acting chief Mochammad Afifuddin said in a press conference.


Russian court sentences five men for anti-Israel riots at Dagestan airport

Russian court sentences five men for anti-Israel riots at Dagestan airport
Updated 23 August 2024
Follow

Russian court sentences five men for anti-Israel riots at Dagestan airport

Russian court sentences five men for anti-Israel riots at Dagestan airport
  • The men, who were given sentences ranging from just over six years to nine years for engaging in rioting, did not admit guilt
  • The trial was moved from Dagestan to Krasnodar due to the sensitivity of the case

MOSCOW: A court in southern Russia on Friday sentenced five men to more than six years in prison each in the first convictions related to a mass anti-Israel protest last October at an airport in the predominantly Muslim Dagestan region.
The men, who were given sentences ranging from just over six years to nine years for engaging in rioting, did not admit guilt, the court in the Krasnodar region said. One protester was also found guilty of committing violence against a government official.
The trial was moved from Dagestan to Krasnodar due to the sensitivity of the case.
Last October hundreds of anti-Israel protesters stormed an airport in the city of Makhachkala where a plane from Tel Aviv had just arrived in a spate of unrest in the North Caucasus over Israel’s war against the Palestinian militant group Hamas in Gaza.
Video footage showed the protesters, mostly young men, waving Palestinian flags, breaking down glass doors and running through the airport shouting “Allahu Akbar” (God is greater).
The crowd converged on the airport after a message on a local Telegram channel urged Dagestanis to meet the “uninvited guests” in “adult fashion” and to get the plane and its passengers to turn around and fly somewhere else.
The channel, which was later banned by Telegram, did not use the word “Jew” but referred to the plane’s passengers as being “unclean.”
More than 20 people were injured before security forces could contain the unrest. No passengers on the plane were hurt.
Police arrested dozens of people, whose cases are now making their way through Russian courts.
President Vladimir Putin blamed the West and Ukraine for the unrest, without providing evidence. Kyiv denied any role and the United States strongly condemned the violence.