F-16s will boost Ukraine defenses, but not a ‘silver bullet’

F-16s will boost Ukraine defenses, but not a ‘silver bullet’
The United States, the Netherlands and Denmark announced Wednesday that the transfer of the planes had begun, saying Ukraine “will be flying operational F-16s this summer.” (AP/File)
Short Url
Updated 11 July 2024
Follow

F-16s will boost Ukraine defenses, but not a ‘silver bullet’

F-16s will boost Ukraine defenses, but not a ‘silver bullet’
  • The logistics and support for these aircraft, including training etc., is a long-term process

WASHINGTON: F-16 warplanes being sent to Ukraine is a victory for President Volodymyr Zelensky and will help protect against Russian strikes, but they are not a one-stop solution for gaps in the country’s air defenses.
The United States, the Netherlands and Denmark announced Wednesday that the transfer of the planes had begun, saying Ukraine “will be flying operational F-16s this summer.”
Zelensky had repeatedly pushed for the US-made warplanes to help counter Russia’s invasion, with the United States eventually acceding last year after initially insisting that focusing on ground-based air defenses was a better use of resources.
“As a symbolic effort, it’s tremendously important... This was really the last item that Zelensky had highlighted as important for Ukrainian defense,” said Mark Cancian, a senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
He noted that there has been a series of weapons systems — HIMARS rocket launchers, Patriot air defense batteries, Abrams tanks, ATACMS missiles — that Washington was reluctant to provide but eventually agreed to donate to Kyiv.
“In each case, providing that weapon had an important symbolic and psychological impact, putting aside, you know, what the battlefield impact might be,” Cancian said.
“I think it will help for air defenses... but it’s not going to be a silver bullet,” he said of the F-16s, noting that there “just aren’t going to be enough of them.”
Zelensky said in an interview with AFP in May that Kyiv needed up to 130 F-16s to secure air parity with Russia, but Western countries have pledged fewer than 100 so far, and not all of them will arrive at once.
Russia has exploited gaps in Ukraine’s air defenses to carry out devastating strikes on civilians and infrastructure, as well as to pummel Kyiv’s troops on the front lines, leaving the country desperate for additional protection.
Highlighting the threat, more than 40 people were killed earlier this week by a wave of dozens of missiles that hit cities across the country and ripped through a children’s hospital in Kyiv.
The lack of air superiority has also hampered Ukrainian operations, with Kyiv pointing to that as a major factor limiting its forces’ ability to advance following a lackluster 2023 counter-offensive.
Zelensky hailed the announcement that F-16s were being transferred, saying the planes will “bring just and lasting peace closer, demonstrating that terror must fail everywhere and at any time.”
Cancian said air defense will likely be Ukraine’s main use for the planes, along with supporting frontline troops and a few “high-visibility deep strikes” inside Russia.
Michael Bohnert, an air and maritime acquisitions expert with the RAND Corporation, said the transfer of the F-16s “shows a long-term commitment” to Ukraine.
“The logistics and support for these aircraft, including training etc., is a long-term process, and it is a tangible, measurable way of showing a long-term commitment,” he said.
Bohnert said the F-16s will be able to help “chase down cruise missiles like those used in the attacks on Kyiv,” and also to defend areas where there are no ground-based systems.
The planes could also divert Russian resources toward countering them in the air and seeking to destroy them on the ground, he said.
Bohnert said “it’s not just one system, it’s a symphony. And right now, Ukraine, their air symphony’s a little thin, and they don’t have every instrument.”
“This is like adding brass instruments when you already have... percussion, strings, etc. It’s just adding another piece,” he added.


Biden unveils long-shot plan to overhaul US Supreme Court

Biden unveils long-shot plan to overhaul US Supreme Court
Updated 9 sec ago
Follow

Biden unveils long-shot plan to overhaul US Supreme Court

Biden unveils long-shot plan to overhaul US Supreme Court

AUSTIN: Joe Biden unveiled plans Monday for sweeping US Supreme Court reforms, as he seeks to cement his legacy in the twilight of his presidency despite Republicans branding the proposals dead on arrival.

Stung by shock rulings on abortion and other topics and by a series of scandals involving the conservative-dominated court, Biden called for 18-year term limits for justices and an enforceable ethics code.

“Extremism is undermining public confidence in the court’s decisions,” Biden said in a speech outlining the “bold” plans at the Lyndon Baines Johnson Presidential Library in Austin, Texas.

Making his first speech on the road since dropping out of the 2024 election, Biden also proposed a constitutional amendment to reverse the Supreme Court’s recent ruling backing Donald Trump’s claims of presidential immunity.

“There are no kings in America,” he said at the library — which celebrates the legacy of Johnson, or LBJ, the last incumbent US president not to seek a second term back in 1968.

Biden’s move follows a series of shock Supreme Court decisions, especially the 2022 repeal of the nationwide right to abortion, an issue which has become crucial in November’s election.

Vice President Kamala Harris, now the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, said in a statement that she and Biden both called on Congress to support the plans.

“These popular reforms will help to restore confidence in the court, strengthen our democracy, and ensure no one is above the law,” she said.

But Biden’s proposals have almost no hope of getting through a deeply divided US Congress, with Republicans holding a majority in the House of Representatives.

Republican Speaker Mike Johnson said in a statement that the “dangerous gambit of the Biden-Harris administration is dead on arrival in the House.”

Biden however retorted in his speech that Johnson’s “thinking is dead on arrival.”

The plans would see justices serve terms of 18 years with new justice appointed every two years. The ethics code would meanwhile force judges to declare gifts and possible conflicts of interest.

The US Supreme Court plays an outsize role in determining the lives of ordinary Americans, with justices appointed for life deciding on almost every key issue from reproductive health to the environment.

It currently has a 6-3 conservative majority, including three right-leaning justices appointed by Trump while he was president.

But public opinion has recently turned against an institution once seen as the last impartial arm of the US government, with a recent poll showing nearly two-thirds of Americans believe that the court’s decisions are mainly political.

As well as the abortion judgment, the court has also rolled back the power of federal agencies and blocked Biden’s signature student debt forgiveness plan.

It then partially ruled in early July in favor of Trump’s claims that he had immunity from prosecution for acts committed while president.

Trump is now using that ruling to challenge his recent criminal conviction in a porn star hush-money case and a series of other prosecutions.

Meanwhile the Supreme Court has been rocked by ethics scandals involving arch-conservative justices.

Justice Clarence Thomas recently admitted that two luxury vacations he took in 2019 were paid for by a billionaire Republican political donor.

Thomas, the longest-serving justice on the court, has also ignored calls to recuse himself from cases related to the 2020 election, after his wife took part in the drive to keep Trump in power despite his electoral loss.

And Justice Samuel Alito has rejected calls to recuse himself from some Trump-related cases after flags linked to the former president’s false election fraud claims were discovered to have been flown outside his home and vacation property.

Legal expert Steven Schwinn warned that Biden had a “close to zero” chance of getting the plan through Congress.

But Biden was probably trying to “raise public consciousness” and “introduce the Supreme Court as an election issue,” Schwinn, a law professor at the University of Illinois Chicago, told AFP.


Clock ticking for Kamala Harris to name running mate

Clock ticking for Kamala Harris to name running mate
Updated 58 min 12 sec ago
Follow

Clock ticking for Kamala Harris to name running mate

Clock ticking for Kamala Harris to name running mate

WASHINGTON:  Newly thrust into the race for the White House, Kamala Harris embarks Monday on a pivotal week for her campaign as she intensifies the search for a running mate.

The US vice president, who is all but certain to secure her party’s official nomination to challenge Donald Trump this November, is set to announce the number two on her ticket in the coming days.

Choosing a vice president is a critical step for any presidential hopeful, a chance to broaden their appeal to the electorate with a complementary partner.

It is a process that normally spans several months, involving meticulous vetting of contenders’ experience, their finances, hobbies — and any lurking scandals.

But with Biden’s late exit from the race, Harris faces a “compressed timetable” of mere weeks, says Joel Goldstein, a scholar of vice presidencies at Saint Louis University.

Harris is reportedly expected to reveal her choice by August 7 — less than 20 days after launching her campaign.

Speculation is rife about who will be selected, with political observers suggesting a likely choice will be a white man with executive experience “beyond the Beltway” — meaning outside Washington.

If she wins in November, Harris would make history as the first woman, the first person of South Asian descent, and the second Black person to serve as US president.

“One of the features of vice presidential selection often involves balance,” Goldstein told AFP.

It is no surprise then that commentators expect Harris’s pick to come from a more Republican-leaning area than her home state of California, a Democratic stronghold.

Of the five names currently dominating discussion, four are Democratic governors: Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania, Roy Cooper of North Carolina, Andy Beshear of Kentucky and Tim Walz of Minnesota.

The fifth is US Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona, a former astronaut.

Cooper, Shapiro and Kelly all hail from swing states, critical battlegrounds on which the election hinges — while Beshear is in his second term in reliably Republican Kentucky.

Walz’s Minnesota has similar demographics to pivotal Midwest neighbors Michigan and Wisconsin.

Harris’s selection process is being scrutinized all the more closely given the troubles embroiling US Senator J.D Vance, Trump’s handpicked running mate.

The Ohio Republican, a graduate of Yale Law School who styles himself as a blue-collar hero, was chosen for his relative youth and fervent defenses of Trump, despite previously opposing the billionaire.

But the “Hillbilly Elegy” author’s popularity has taken a hit in recent weeks after damaging old videos resurfaced.

In one clip, he disparaged prominent Democratic women as “childless cat ladies,” provoking fury among women voters, including several celebrities.

Meanwhile, his past comments about being a “never Trump guy” who “never liked him” have been remixed into a trending song on TikTok.

For Goldstein, the turmoil engulfing Vance highlights a failure on the fundamentals of the vice presidential vetting process.

“I think the first questions have to be: can they get through the vetting screen? Are they a plausible president who’s ready for the national stage?” he said.

In fact, the primary role of a vice president is to replace the president in the event of their death or resignation.

To date, nine vice presidents have ascended to the presidency under such circumstances — most recently Gerald Ford, who took over after Richard Nixon resigned amid the Watergate scandal.

Apart from breaking tie votes in the US Senate, the role, as defined by the Constitution, remains quite limited.

The first US vice president, John Adams, complained bitterly about his fate in a 1793 letter to his wife: “My country has in its wisdom contrived for me the most insignificant office that ever the invention of man contrived or his imagination conceived.”


California’s largest fire of year rages in state’s north

California’s largest fire of year rages in state’s north
Updated 30 July 2024
Follow

California’s largest fire of year rages in state’s north

California’s largest fire of year rages in state’s north

LOS ANGELES:  Thousands of firefighters and hundreds of trucks were mobilized in California Monday to continue fighting the state’s largest blaze of the year, which has already burned an area larger than the city of Los Angeles.

The so-called Park Fire outside of Chico in the state’s north has been raging since Wednesday in a rural region about a three hours’ drive northeast from San Francisco.

It has now ravaged more than 370,000 acres (149,700 hectares) according to the Cal Fire agency, making it one of the largest fires in state history.

No casualties have been reported so far, and firefighters benefitted from a slight drop in temperatures over the weekend which allowed them to make a bit of progress, with the fire now 12 percent contained.

Nearly 4,900 firefighters have been mobilized, with 33 helicopters, 400 fire trucks and numerous planes battling the conflagration.

Meanwhile, about 4,200 residents are under evacuation orders, and authorities are calling for the utmost caution due to the situation’s risk of escalating at any moment.

“We ask that the public continue to be diligent and prepared due to erratic fire activity,” Cal Fire said.

The megafire progressed during the first 48 hours at the speed of a person walking and has spawned fire tornadoes as well as generated smoke clouds shaped like atomic mushrooms.

The fire was able to spread quickly following multiple heat waves that have struck California and the US West since the beginning of June.

Vegetation “is still super, super dry,” said Daniel Swain, an extreme weather specialist at the University of California, Los Angeles, adding that it was caused by “a month of record-breaking heat and evaporative demand.”

While the foothills of the Sierra Nevada Mountains burn regularly, there hasn’t been a fire for decades in the forests where the Park Fire is located, meaning there is plenty of fuel for the flames.

Despite the massive resources deployed by California, which has special expertise in firefighting, “it’s still beyond technology to address a fire at that scope,” Swain said.

The enormous Park Fire brings back bad memories: the town of Paradise, where 85 people died in 2018 in the deadliest fire in state history, is only about 12 miles (20 kilometers) from the flames. Its residents have already been put on alert.

In the meantime, some inhabitants of evacuated towns have chosen to stay until the last minute, such as Justin Freese, who is waiting with a firehose and 10,000 gallons of water at the ready.

“I’m prepared, but I’m not stupid,” he told the New York Times. “If there’s a 100-foot wall of flames coming, I’m not going to stay put and melt my skin.”

The Park Fire was caused by arson, according to authorities. A 42-year-old man was takin into custody Thursday morning after being spotted pushing a burning car into a ravine, according to the local prosecutor’s office.

The United States is presently battling about 100 large fires according to the National Interagency Fire Center, mainly in the west of the country and in particular Oregon, where an airplane pilot fighting the fires died last week.

The smoke generated by the fires has prompted the weather service to issue air quality alerts in many places.

In California, a fire that broke out last week nearly razed the historic gold-mining town of Havilah in the state’s center over the weekend, but caused no casualties.

Repeat heat waves and extreme weather events are accelerated by climate change, which is linked to humanity’s reliance on fossil fuels, according to scientists.


Panama expects more Venezuelan migrants after disputed election

Panama expects more Venezuelan migrants after disputed election
Updated 30 July 2024
Follow

Panama expects more Venezuelan migrants after disputed election

Panama expects more Venezuelan migrants after disputed election

PANAMA CITY: Panama’s president on Monday predicted an increase in the number of US-bound Venezuelan migrants making the dangerous jungle trek from South America after their country’s disputed election.

“I think, and I hope I’m wrong, that the flow of Venezuelans will increase for obvious reasons,” Jose Raul Mulino told a news conference.

“We have to make the necessary decisions to protect their lives... and give expedited passage to people who want to immigrate to the United States,” he added.

The Darien Gap between Colombia and Panama has become a key corridor for Venezuelans and other migrants traveling overland from South America to the United States.

Despite the dangers posed by treacherous terrain and violent criminal gangs, more than half a million undocumented migrants crossed the Darien last year.

So far this year, more than 200,000 people have made the journey, mostly Venezuelans, according to Panamanian authorities.

Mulino vowed during his election campaign to deport migrants and close the key route.

After he took office on July 1, the conservative lawyer signed an agreement with Washington that pledged $6 million in US funding for repatriating undocumented migrants from Panama.

Mulino later appeared to soften his tone, however, saying, “We cannot forcibly repatriate” migrants.

Panama announced that it would withdraw its diplomats from Venezuela and suspend diplomatic ties after President Nicolas Maduro declared victory in Sunday’s election, which was disputed by opposition claims of fraud.


Pakistan arrests top leader of radical party on charge of ordering the killing of the chief justice

Pakistan's chief justice Qazi Faez Isa. (PTV News/News)
Pakistan's chief justice Qazi Faez Isa. (PTV News/News)
Updated 30 July 2024
Follow

Pakistan arrests top leader of radical party on charge of ordering the killing of the chief justice

Pakistan's chief justice Qazi Faez Isa. (PTV News/News)
  • Esa has been the target of criticism by extremists in Pakistan in recent months after he granted bail to an Ahmadi blasphemy suspect
  • Pakistan’s Parliament declared Ahmadis non-Muslims in 1974

LAHORE, Pakistan: Pakistan’s police on Monday arrested the deputy chief at a radical Islamist party on the charge of ordering the killing of the chief justice over his alleged support to the minority Ahmadi community, officials said.
Zaheerul Hassan Shah was arrested a day after a video went viral on social media, showing him telling a gathering of his supporters from the Tehreek-e-Labaik Pakistan that he would personally give 10 million rupees ($36,000) to anyone who beheads Qazi Faez Esa, the Chief Justice at the Supreme Court.
Esa has been the target of criticism by extremists in Pakistan in recent months after he granted bail to an Ahmadi blasphemy suspect.
Pakistan’s Parliament declared Ahmadis non-Muslims in 1974. Since then, they have been repeatedly targeted by Islamic extremists, drawing condemnation from domestic and international human right groups.
A senior police officer, Zaheer Asghar, told reporters that Shah was arrested in Okara, a city in the eastern Punjab province. He said a case has been registered against Shah on charges of threatening to kill Esa and inciting people to violence.
Shah’s party has been behind violent protests against any change in Pakistan’s strict blasphemy laws, which carry the death penalty.
Last week, a UN-backed panel of independent experts expressed grave concern about increased discrimination and violence against the minority Ahmadi community in Pakistan and urged authorities to ensure their protection.