Iraq condemns Turkish military ‘incursions’ into north

Iraq condemns Turkish military ‘incursions’ into north
Iraqi authorities denounced Wednesday renewed Turkish military operations and “incursions” into northern Iraq. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 11 July 2024
Follow

Iraq condemns Turkish military ‘incursions’ into north

Iraq condemns Turkish military ‘incursions’ into north
  • Turkiye’s military operations, which sometimes take place deep inside Iraqi territory, have frequently strained bilateral ties

BAGHDAD: Iraqi authorities denounced Wednesday renewed Turkish military operations and “incursions” into northern Iraq, urging Ankara to solve security issues diplomatically.
The Turkish army has been mainly conducting strikes against the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), which is listed as a “terrorist” group by Ankara and several Western allies, in Iraq’s autonomous Kurdistan region.
On Wednesday, Iraq’s Prime Minister Mohamed Shia Al-Sudani chaired a meeting of the National Security Council during which officials discussed “the issue of interventions and violations by Turkish forces in the shared border areas,” General Yehia Rasool, military spokesman for the PM, said in a statement.
The council said it rejects “Turkish military incursions” in Iraqi territories and urged Ankara to “diplomatically engage with the Iraqi government for any security-related matters.”
A delegation led by the National Security Adviser will travel to the Kurdistan Region to “assess the general situation and develop a unified stance on this matter,” the statement added.
The PKK, which has fought a decades-long insurgency against the Turkish state, has a presence in northern Iraq, as does Turkiye, which has operated from several dozen military bases there against the Kurdish group.
Turkiye’s military operations, which sometimes take place deep inside Iraqi territory, have frequently strained bilateral ties.
In recent weeks, Iraqi local media have reported an increase in Turkish strikes, sparking several fires in border areas. Some reports mentioned Turkish forces establishing new positions.
Turkish forces “have advanced 15 kilometers into Iraqi Kurdistan territory,” said the Community Peacemakers Teams (CPT), an NGO registered in the United States, that monitors Turkish operations in northern Iraq.
In an interview earlier this week, Turkiye’s Defense Minister Yasar Guler said his country is “determined” to clear the border area with Iraq and neighboring Syria of “terrorists.”
In March, following a visit by senior Turkish officials to Iraq, Baghdad quietly listed the PKK as a “banned organization” — though Ankara demands that the Iraqi government do more in the fight against the militant group.
During a visit to Iraq in April, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan spoke of “expectations” of Iraq regarding the fight against the PKK, and Sudani mentioned “bilateral security coordination” that would meet the needs of both countries.
However, Iraqi Defense Minister Thabet Al-Abbasi ruled out in March “joint military operations” between Baghdad and Ankara.


Researchers name almost 3,000 killed in early days of Gaza war

Researchers name almost 3,000 killed in early days of Gaza war
Updated 7 sec ago
Follow

Researchers name almost 3,000 killed in early days of Gaza war

Researchers name almost 3,000 killed in early days of Gaza war
  • Palestinian casualties identified by Airwars researchers using local data, social media
  • 37.7% of recorded victims were children, 23.5% were women

LONDON: Nearly 3,000 Palestinians killed in Israel’s war on Gaza have been identified by an independent monitor.

UK-based organization Airwars, which assesses the impact on civilians in conflicts worldwide, analyzed almost 346 incidents in the first 17 days of the war, naming 2,993 victims of Israeli attacks.

It included 65 people killed in an airstrike on the Jabalia refugee camp on Oct. 9, the most deadly event of the campaign’s early days. 

Investigators used evidence including social media posts to identify the dead, including 19-year-old Imad Hamad after his father Ziyad posted on Facebook that his son had died while out buying bread.

“To lose my son, to lose my house, to sleep on the floor of a classroom? My children are wetting themselves, of panic, of fear, of cold. We have nothing to do with this. What fault did we commit? I raised my child, my entire life, for what? To see him die while buying bread,” Ziyad posted.

Emily Tripp, director of Airwars, said: “Militaries often tell us it is impossible to know who has been killed and how — but one of our key messages is to show that it is possible. The only thing holding us back is the size of our teams.”

She added: “Our job is to act as a bridge between chaos and justice, to serve civilian victims of military action around the world. We see what we are doing as essential initial work before further investigations can be done.”

As well as the attack on Jabalia, Airwars identified several other high-casualty attacks, including at Al-Taj and the Nuseirat refugee camp.

“Prior to this conflict, it was very rare to find cases where there were more than 10 civilians killed,” Tripp said.

“But here, suddenly, we found that in a third of our cases, there were reports of 10 civilians killed.” She added: “We know how and when each person was killed.”

In total, 37.7 percent of recorded victims were children and 23.5 percent were women.

In the early days of the war, Gaza’s health authorities said as many as 7,000 people were killed by Israeli attacks, which Airwars said it believes to have been reasonably accurate.

Tripp said: “It is possible to believe the (Ministry of Health) figures, and you don’t have to wait many years to be sure.”

However, as the war has endured, the ability of authorities to tally casualties has broken down as infrastructure comes under ever-increasing strain, with hospitals and morgues overwhelmed.

Airwars says it has logged over 4,450 incidents since the start of the war, but has only been able to asses 550 so far, with its team of investigators numbering just 10-15.


British lawyer urges UK to stop arming Israel

An Israeli soldier checks a weapon at a position in the Israel-annexed Golan Heights near the border with Syria. (File/AFP)
An Israeli soldier checks a weapon at a position in the Israel-annexed Golan Heights near the border with Syria. (File/AFP)
Updated 57 min 15 sec ago
Follow

British lawyer urges UK to stop arming Israel

An Israeli soldier checks a weapon at a position in the Israel-annexed Golan Heights near the border with Syria. (File/AFP)
  • Philippe Sands spoke following ICJ ruling that UN member states should not aid any aspect of occupation of Palestinian territories
  • New UK govt overseeing review of Israel’s ‘compliance with international law’

LONDON: The UK should stop arming Israel after the International Court of Justice said member states should not “render aid or assistance” for the occupation of Palestinian territories, a British lawyer representing Palestine at the ICJ has said.

Philippe Sands KC said the ICJ advisory opinion will cause issues for the UK, which has failed to halt arms exports since the start of Israel’s war on Gaza that has killed around 40,000 Palestinians.

“The most immediate issue is the obligation in the advisory opinion on the states, which includes the United Kingdom, not to aid or assist in the maintenance of the current situation in the occupied territories of the West Bank, including (East) Jerusalem,” Sands told The Guardian.

“That legal obligation precludes sales of military material which could be used directly or indirectly to assist Israel in maintaining its unlawful occupation of the Occupied Palestinian Territories.”

Sands, a professor at University College London and a visiting professor at Harvard, said the ruling is not binding but it is likely that a vote will follow at the UN General Assembly on whether to adopt the position, and until then it will be “recognised as an authoritative statement of the law and one that the UN and its specialised agencies will follow as law.”

He added: “How does the UK vote on that? Will it vote against, or will it abstain? If the government is true to its word on respecting international law, given the nature and detail of the ICJ advisory opinion, you would expect them, at the very least, not to vote against.

“This could well be an early issue in relations with the United States, which will almost certainly vote against, despite the fact that the US judge was part of the large majority.”

He said it will also affect imports from Israeli settlements to the UK, adding: “Anything that is produced in the occupied territories, such as food, or that is sold there over the internet, is in principle subject to the international prohibition, if it can be said to aid or assist in the maintenance of the unlawful occupation.”

UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy has said the new Labour government is holding a “comprehensive review of Israel’s compliance with international humanitarian law,” with arms exports expected to be a focus of the review.

Labour also pledged in its recent election manifesto to recognize a Palestinian state, but has set no timeline on when that would happen.

In its advisory opinion, the ICJ cited “the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, including its right to an independent and sovereign state.”

Sands said: “Ultimately, the recognition of a state is a political matter, not a legal obligation, so there is a discretionary element.

“Nevertheless, the ICJ judges have clearly stated that self-determination means that the Palestinian people ‘have the right to an independent and sovereign state.’

“About 150 states (out of nearly 200) have recognised Palestine as a state, the UK is part of a small and diminishing group that refuses to do so.”

On July 19, the previous UK Conservative government responded to the ICJ’s opinion by saying it was “considering it carefully before responding.”

In 2023, it submitted a 43-page legal opinion opposing the ICJ’s investigation into the Israeli occupation.


Iran seizes oil tanker in Gulf, arrests crew

Iran seizes oil tanker in Gulf, arrests crew
Updated 29 July 2024
Follow

Iran seizes oil tanker in Gulf, arrests crew

Iran seizes oil tanker in Gulf, arrests crew
  • The Guards’ naval forces captured it near the Arash oil field
  • It is the second such seizure in less than a week

TEHRAN: Iran’s Revolutionary Guards have seized a Togo-flagged oil tanker in the Gulf and arrested its nine-person crew over alleged fuel smuggling, the military force said Monday on its Sepahnews website.
“On Friday morning, an oil tanker named Pearl G, carrying the flag of the African country of Togo... was seized by judicial order,” said the Guards’ statement.
The vessel is “owned by an Iraqi resident of Dubai, United Arab Emirates,” and it was carrying 700,000 liters of fuel, the statement added.
The Guards’ naval forces captured it near the Arash oil field “while loading smuggled fuel from Iranian barges,” it said.
“This oil tanker along with its nine crew members who are of Indian nationality have been transferred to Imam Khomeini harbor and are under surveillance.”
It is the second such seizure in less than a week.
On July 22, the Guards seized another Togo-flagged oil tanker and arrested its 12 crew members, also over alleged fuel smuggling.
The fate of both the vessel and the crew remains unclear.
Iranian naval forces regularly announce the detention of vessels transporting fuel in the Gulf.
In late January, Iran seized a vessel carrying two million liters of allegedly smuggled fuel.
In May, Iran released seven crew members from a Portuguese-flagged container ship, seized on April 13, after accusing them of links to its arch-foe Israel.
Fuel prices in Iran are among the lowest globally, increasing the profitability of smuggling operations.


Berlin calls on Iran and others to prevent Middle East escalation

Members of the Druze community look at the damaged fence at a football pitch on July 28, 2024 in the Druze town of Majdal Shams
Members of the Druze community look at the damaged fence at a football pitch on July 28, 2024 in the Druze town of Majdal Shams
Updated 29 July 2024
Follow

Berlin calls on Iran and others to prevent Middle East escalation

Members of the Druze community look at the damaged fence at a football pitch on July 28, 2024 in the Druze town of Majdal Shams
  • The strike over the weekend has raised fears of a wider conflict in the region, where tensions have intensified due to Israel’s war in Gaza

BERLIN: The German government has called on all parties to the Middle East conflict, in particular Iran, to prevent an escalation after a rocket attack in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights killed 12 children and teenagers last week, a spokesperson said on Monday.
Berlin “assumes with certainty” that the deadly attack on a football field in the Golan Heights was conducted by Lebanon-based Hezbollah, which is backed by Iran, a Foreign Ministry spokesperson said during a regular press conference.
Recent actions by the Yemen-based Houthi militia, also backed by Iran, had also contributed significantly to instability in the region in recent weeks, he added.
The strike over the weekend has raised fears of a wider conflict in the region, where tensions have intensified due to Israel’s war in Gaza, which began more than nine months ago.
German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock has talked to several people including her Lebanese counterpart in an effort to “mitigate the situation and prevent it from escalating,” the spokesperson said.
German citizens in Lebanon, of which there are estimated to be about 1,300, are “urgently advised” to leave the country while still possible, the spokesperson said.
“We are very concerned about the situation of the Germans on the ground and are preparing what needs to be prepared,” he added.


Yemen port damage estimated at $20 mn after Israel strike: official

Yemen port damage estimated at $20 mn after Israel strike: official
Updated 29 July 2024
Follow

Yemen port damage estimated at $20 mn after Israel strike: official

Yemen port damage estimated at $20 mn after Israel strike: official
  • Port official Nasr Al-Nusairi relayed the results of a preliminary damage assessment,
  • The sum does not factor in losses incurred by the destruction of fuel storage facilities

HODEIDA: An Israeli strike on Yemen’s Houthi-held Hodeida port has caused at least $20 million in damage, adding to losses due to the destruction of fuel storage facilities, a port official has said.
The July 20 attack on Hodeida, the main harbor under the control of the Iran-backed Houthis, destroyed most of the port’s oil storage capacity and triggered a massive inferno that burned for days.
Nine people were killed in the strike, according to the militia, the first attack ever claimed by Israel on Yemen which came a day after a deadly Houthi attack on Israel.
Speaking to AFP on Sunday from the harbor after operations resumed last week, port official Nasr Al-Nusairi relayed the results of a preliminary damage assessment, saying two cranes were destroyed, a small vessel was burnt and a number of buildings were torched.
“There is also damage to the docks,” said Nusairi, the vice president of the Yemen Red Sea Ports Corporation which runs the Hodeida harbor.
Nusairi estimated the cost of port damage to “exceed $20 million,” noting, however, that the sum does not factor in losses incurred by the destruction of fuel storage facilities which “is the responsibility of the oil ministry.”
The port damage caused a temporary interruption of activities but operations resumed quickly, Nusairi said.
The first two container ships docked in Hodeida three days after the Israeli raid, according to Houthi officials.
The port appeared to be operational on Sunday, with container ships anchored on its docks and workers unloading containers using cranes, according to an AFP photographer who toured the area.
The Houthis have launched attacks on ships in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden since November, in a campaign they say is to signal their solidarity with Palestinians in the Gaza war.