Moscow says to block access to 81 EU media outlets, including AFP website

Russia has already blocked access to much of the Western media since sending troops to Ukraine, as well as to Western social media giants. (AFP/File)
Russia has already blocked access to much of the Western media since sending troops to Ukraine, as well as to Western social media giants. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 25 June 2024
Follow

Moscow says to block access to 81 EU media outlets, including AFP website

Moscow says to block access to 81 EU media outlets, including AFP website
  • The list also include France’s Le Monde, Germany’s Der Spiegel and Spain’s El Mundo
  • “Retaliatory measure” was taken in response to Brussels banning several Russian broadcasts, Moscos said

MOSCOW: Russia said that Tuesday it would block access to 81 EU media outlets, including AFP’s websites, as a “retaliatory measure” after Brussels imposed broadcasting bans on several Russian state media outlets.
The European Union in May said it had decided to block access to four Kremlin-controlled media for being “instrumental in bringing forward and supporting” Moscow’s Ukraine offensive.
Moscow said it was responding to that move.
“Counter-restrictions are being introduced on the access from Russian territory of broadcast resources of media outlets from EU member states,” Moscow’s foreign ministry said in a statement, publishing a list of media outlets and blaming Brussels for the restrictions.
The list included AFP’s homepage afp.com and its client portal afpforum.com.
France’s Le Monde, Germany’s Der Spiegel and Spain’s El Mundo were also among the media outlets named on the list.
Russia denounced the EU sanctions as “politically motivated” and said the bloc’s decisions were “forcing Moscow to take mirror and proportionate countermeasures.”
It said it would “revise” the restrictions if sanctions on Russian media were lifted.
Russia has already blocked access to much of the Western media since sending troops to Ukraine, as well as to Western social media giants.
Domestic media that are critical of President Vladimir Putin’s rule or his Ukraine offensive have also been banned, harassed and outlawed, and many independent media outlets and journalists have fled into exile.


Google reports strong growth driven by AI, cloud

Google reports strong growth driven by AI, cloud
The results showed that Google is holding its own despite worry that the search engine juggernaut has been caught short in the A
Updated 30 October 2024
Follow

Google reports strong growth driven by AI, cloud

Google reports strong growth driven by AI, cloud

San Francisco - USA
San Francisco, Oct 29, 2024 (AFP) -Google's parent company Alphabet reported robust third-quarter results on Tuesday, with revenue climbing 15 percent year-over-year to $88.3 billion, powered by strong performance from its crucial advertising business and growth in cloud services.
The technology giant's net income surged 34 percent to $26.3 billion, while earnings per share increased 37 percent to $2.12.
Operating margins expanded significantly, rising 4.5 percentage points to 32 percent, reflecting improved cost efficiency at one of the world's biggest companies.
"Our commitment to innovation, as well as our long-term focus and investment in AI, are paying off with consumers and partners benefiting from our AI tools," said CEO Sundar Pichai, referring to the burgeoning field of artificial intelligence.
The results showed that Google is holding its own despite worry that the search engine juggernaut has been caught short in the AI race.
Google also faces increasing pressure as its world-dominating search engine competes for ads with a widening array of platforms, including Meta, Amazon, Apple, TikTok and even streamers such as Netflix.
But Emarketer senior analyst Evelyn Mitchell-Wolf said Google proved that its defense "is locked in, and it heads into the holiday season well-positioned to win ad budgets."
The company also satisfied questions about whether its search engine will withstand the growing popularity of generative AI chatbots like ChatGPT, which can answer many queries directly in lieu of an internet search.
In response to these pressures, Google earlier this month reshuffled its search engine business, replacing the division chief after a four-year tenure.
The company also moved its Gemini chatbot team to Google DeepMind, separating it from the search group.
Pichai said that Google Search's AI Overviews, which display a snapshot of information at the top of the results page, was proving a success and available to one billion users in more than 100 countries.
"We are definitely expanding what's possible in search and it's been really heartening to see users adapt," Pichai told analysts.
Google Cloud emerged as a standout performer in the June-to-September period, with revenue jumping 35 percent to $11.4 billion, driven by increased adoption of AI infrastructure and solutions.
That business, which trails market leaders Amazon and Microsoft, provides businesses with computing power, data storage and AI tools delivered over the internet.
The company's core Google Services segment, which includes Search, YouTube, and other advertising products, grew 13 percent to $76.5 billion.
YouTube hit a significant milestone, with total advertising and subscription revenues exceeding $50 billion over the past four quarters for the first time.
After the release, investors sent Google's share price higher by five percent in after-hours trading.
Despite the solid earnings, Google faces significant legal challenges, at least in the long-term.
In August, a federal judge found that Google's search engine was an illegal monopoly, with the US government suggesting a company breakup might be appropriate.
A separate antitrust lawsuit challenges its dominance of online advertising.
Additionally, Google has been ordered to open Android-powered smartphones to rival app shops following a case brought by Fortnite-maker Epic Games, though that decision has been suspended pending appeal.
While those legal battles are expected to take years to resolve, they have raised questions about the company's long-term strategy and its heavy reliance on search engine advertising revenue.


CNN issues apology after panelist’s ‘terrorist’ remark directed at Mehdi Hasan

CNN issues apology after panelist’s ‘terrorist’ remark directed at Mehdi Hasan
Updated 29 October 2024
Follow

CNN issues apology after panelist’s ‘terrorist’ remark directed at Mehdi Hasan

CNN issues apology after panelist’s ‘terrorist’ remark directed at Mehdi Hasan
  • Political commentator Ryan James Girdusky said he hoped Hasan’s ‘beeper doesn’t go off,’ in apparent reference to Israel’s pagers attack
  • ‘There is zero room for racism or bigotry at CNN,’ network said

LONDON: CNN issued an apology after a panelist on its program suggested that fellow guest Mehdi Hasan was a “terrorist.”

The incident occurred on Monday night’s broadcast of NewsNight, when conservative commentator Ryan James Girdusky told Hasan, the founder of the recently launched news site Zeteo and former MSNBC host, that he hoped his “beeper doesn’t go off.”

This appeared to reference Israel’s recent targeting of Hezbollah fighters in Lebanon using explosive pager devices, which killed 12 and injured many more.

“Did your guest just say I should be killed on live TV?” Hasan asked the show’s anchor, Abby Phillip.

After a commercial break, Phillip issued an on-air apology to Hasan and viewers and said Girdusky had been removed from the show.

“I want to apologize to Mehdi Hasan for what was said at this table. It was completely unacceptable,” she said. “I want to apologize to the viewers at home.”

Hasan also did not reappear on the show after the commercial break, leading to some speculation that he was also asked to leave, although Philip later said in a video on X, which was also reposted by Hasan, that the network “really wanted him to come back and finish the show.”

The exchange began when the two guests were invited to discuss the upcoming US election and ongoing conflicts in the Middle East.

Hasan referenced Donald Trump’s recent rally and accusations that the Trump campaign is spreading Nazi-style ideas.

Girdusky then accused Hasan, an outspoken advocate for Palestinian rights, of being “the most antisemitic person at this table,” a label Hasan said he frequently faces due to his views.

“Yeah, well, I hope your beeper doesn’t go off,” Girdusky then said, before attempting to justify his words by claiming he thought Hasan said he supported Hamas.

“You didn’t think I said Hamas. I said I’m a supporter of Palestinian rights,” Hasan said, adding, “At least have the guts to support your racist comment.”

In a later post on X, however, the conservative political consultant and writer appeared to double down on his remarks, saying, “You can stay on CNN if you falsely call every Republican a Nazi and have taken money from Qatar-funded media,” he said. “Apparently you can’t go on CNN if you make a joke. I’m glad America gets to see what CNN stands for.”

Following the exchange, CNN announced that it would no longer feature appearances from Girdusky.

“There is zero room for racism or bigotry at CNN or on our air,” the network said in a statement. “We aim to foster thoughtful conversations and debate including between people who profoundly disagree with each other in order to explore important issues and promote mutual understanding.

“But we will not allow guests to be demeaned or for the line of civility to be crossed. Ryan Girdusky will not be welcomed back at our network.”

The incident prompted widespread condemnation, with several people describing the comments as an overtly racist attack.

Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib, who is Muslim and Palestinian-American, wrote on X: “CNN has played a central role in normalizing this kind of open anti-Arab, anti-Muslim, and anti-Palestinian hate, and it’s sadly totally unsurprising to see such disgusting statements aired so casually on its network now.”


Report: Washington Post loses more than 200,000 subscriptions following non-endorsement

Report: Washington Post loses more than 200,000 subscriptions following non-endorsement
Updated 29 October 2024
Follow

Report: Washington Post loses more than 200,000 subscriptions following non-endorsement

Report: Washington Post loses more than 200,000 subscriptions following non-endorsement
  • The reported loss of subscriptions of that magnitude would be a blow to a news outlet that is already facing financial headwinds

NEW YORK: More than 200,000 people have canceled subscriptions to The Washington Post since the newspaper announced its decision last week not to endorse a candidate for president, a published report said Monday.
NPR reported the figure, citing “two people at the paper with knowledge of internal matters.”
The reported loss of subscriptions of that magnitude would be a blow to a news outlet that is already facing financial headwinds. The Post had more than 2.5 million subscribers last year, the bulk of them digital, making it third behind The New York Times and Wall Street Journal in circulation.
A Post spokeswoman, Olivia Peterson, would not comment on the report when contacted by The Associated Press.
The Post’s editorial staff had reportedly prepared an endorsement of Democrat Kamala Harris before announcing instead Friday that it would leave it up for readers to make up their own minds. The timing, less than two weeks before Election Day, led critics to question whether Post owner and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos had been concerned about whether Republican Donald Trump might retaliate if he were elected president.
The Post’s retired former editor, Marty Baron, had denounced the decision on social media as “cowardice, with democracy as its casualty.”
Some journalists, including Post columnist Dana Milbank, urged readers not to express their anger at the decision by canceling subscriptions, for fear it could cost reporters or editors their jobs.
The Post’s decision came only days after the Los Angeles Times also said it would not endorse a presidential candidate, which the newspaper has acknowledged has cost them thousands of subscribers.
An article on the Post’s website about the fallout from the non-endorsement had more than 2,000 comments, many of them from readers saying they were leaving.
“I am unsubscribing after 70 years,” wrote one commenter, claiming to have lost hope and belief that the Post would publish the truth.


Veteran editor Othman Al Omeir honored at UK Parliament

Veteran editor Othman Al Omeir honored at UK Parliament
Updated 28 October 2024
Follow

Veteran editor Othman Al Omeir honored at UK Parliament

Veteran editor Othman Al Omeir honored at UK Parliament
  • Othman Al Omeir was awarded the Legacy of Change Medal by the Parliamentary Society for Arts

LONDON: Celebrated journalist and editor Othman Al Omeir was awarded the Legacy of Change Medal by the Parliamentary Society for Arts last week.

The ceremony, held in Committee Room 14, an esteemed space within the House of Parliament usually reserved for significant political announcements, acknowledged Al Omeir’s contributions to media and advocacy.

The assembly was organized by Rebeca Riofrio, chairwoman of the Parliamentary Society for Arts, and brought together leaders from the creative industries.

Among the distinguished guests was Minister for Victims and Violence Against Women and Girls Alex Davies-Jones, who delivered an impassioned speech underscoring the UK government’s commitment to addressing the issue of violence in the arts. Her speech highlighted the importance of advocacy for all artists, echoing the assembly’s overarching theme of resilience and protection within the creative sectors.

Other notable figures such as Joshua Kane and Marine Tanguy were also honored for their impactful contributions to arts and culture.

Born in Saudi Arabia and a British citizen for the past 40 years, Al Omeir has spent decades shaping the Arab world’s media.

He has been closely connected with the Parliamentary Society for the past five years and has long championed initiatives to protect creatives and uphold the integrity of journalism. His presence, alongside influential figures such as Minister Davies-Jones, Princess Katarina of Yugoslavia, Dame Tessy Antony de Nassau, and Lady Paris Smith, underscored his dedication to advancing a free and supportive media landscape.

As the founder of Elaph, the first independent Arabic e-newspaper, Al Omeir sought to break free from censorship and provide a space for liberal perspectives, promoting open dialogue on issues affecting the Arab region and beyond.

Nowadays, he serves as one of the advisers for the Parliament News Magazine, a publication that has gained recognition for addressing critical social issues since 2019.

In his ongoing work, Al Omeir uses his platforms to encourage the industry to work collectively to safeguard its talent, highlighting the pervasive challenges that creatives can face, such as violence and substance abuse.

Reflecting on the award, Al Omeir stated: “To receive this recognition in such a revered space as Committee Room 14 is deeply meaningful. Media is not just about information; it’s a powerful force for justice and societal progress. We must use this influence to protect those who bring creativity and truth into our world, ensuring they can express themselves without fear.”


Lebanon complains to UN over latest deadly Israel strike on journalists

Lebanon complains to UN over latest deadly Israel strike on journalists
Updated 28 October 2024
Follow

Lebanon complains to UN over latest deadly Israel strike on journalists

Lebanon complains to UN over latest deadly Israel strike on journalists
  • Lebanon submitted “a complaint to the Security Council regarding the latest Israeli attacks that targeted journalists and media facilities in Hasbaya in south Lebanon

BEIRUT: Lebanon said Monday it had submitted a complaint to the United Nations Security Council over an Israeli strike last week that killed three journalists in the country’s south.
The strike early Friday hit a complex in the Druze-majority town of Hasbaya in south Lebanon where more than a dozen journalists from Lebanese and Arab media outlets were sleeping.
The Israeli army said Friday that the strike was “under review,” maintaining it had targeted Hezbollah militants.
Lebanon submitted “a complaint to the Security Council regarding the latest Israeli attacks that targeted journalists and media facilities in Hasbaya in south Lebanon, and the Ouzai area” in Beirut’s southern suburbs, a statement from the foreign ministry said on social media platform X.
“The repeated Israeli targeting of media crews is a war crime” and Israel must be “held to account and punished,” the statement added.
Cameraman Ghassan Najjar and broadcast engineer Mohammad Reda from pro-Iran, Beirut-based broadcaster Al-Mayadeen, and video journalist Wissam Qassem from Hezbollah’s Al-Manar television, were killed in the strike on the complex in Hasbaya, relatively far from the Israel-Hezbollah war’s main flashpoints.
Prime Minister Najib Mikati said the attack was deliberate and both he and Information Minister Ziad Makary labelled it a war crime.
Days earlier, Al-Mayadeen said an Israeli strike hit an office the broadcaster had vacated near Ouzai in south Beirut.
Israel launched an intense air campaign in Lebanon last month and later launched ground incursions following a year of cross-border clashes with the Iran-backed Hezbollah group over the Gaza war.
In October last year, Reuters journalist Issam Abdallah was killed by Israeli shellfire while he was covering southern Lebanon, and six other journalists were wounded, including AFP’s Dylan Collins and Christina Assi, who had to have her right leg amputated.
Last November, Israeli bombardment killed Al-Mayadeen correspondent Farah Omar and cameraman Rabih Maamari, the channel said.
Lebanese rights groups said five more journalists and photographers working for local media had been killed in Israeli strikes on the country’s south and Beirut’s southern suburbs.