Does escalating tit for tat between Israel and Lebanon’s Hezbollah make a full-scale war inevitable?

Analysis Does escalating tit for tat between Israel and Lebanon’s Hezbollah make a full-scale war inevitable?
1 / 3
Fires burn as a result of rockets launched from Lebanon into northern Israel, next to the city of Kiryat Shmona near the Lebanon border, on June 3, 2024, amid ongoing cross-border clashes between Israeli troops and Hezbollah fighters. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 06 June 2024
Follow

Does escalating tit for tat between Israel and Lebanon’s Hezbollah make a full-scale war inevitable?

Does escalating tit for tat between Israel and Lebanon’s Hezbollah make a full-scale war inevitable?
  • In the absence of a diplomatic breakthrough, the violence has expanded both in scope and intensity in recent weeks
  • Since October, at least 455 people have died in Lebanon, including 88 civilians, and at least 14 soldiers and 11 civilians in Israel

DUBAI: Tit-for-tat exchanges between Israel and Lebanon’s Iran-backed Hezbollah militia have continued to escalate since violence along the shared border first erupted in the wake of the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on southern Israel that sparked the Gaza conflict.

In the absence of a diplomatic breakthrough, the low-intensity conflict has expanded both in scope and intensity in recent weeks, leading to fears of an imminent full-scale war.

The violence since early October has killed at least 455 people in Lebanon, mostly fighters but including 88 civilians, according to an AFP tally. On the Israeli side, at least 14 soldiers and 11 civilians have been killed, according to the army.

INNUMBERS

• 4,900 Attacks launched by Israel against southern Lebanon since Oct. 7.

• 1,100 Attacks by Hezbollah against Israel and Israeli occupied territories in Lebanon. Source: ACLED

Israel has carried out nearly 4,900 attacks in southern Lebanon since Oct. 7, according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data (ACLED) Project.

ACLED says Hezbollah has launched around 1,100 attacks on Israel as well as territories it has occupied in Lebanon over the same period.

Israeli strikes have made the entire border area in southern Lebanon a no-go zone, leading to the displacement of some 90,000 people, according to the UN migration agency, IOM. The same is true in northern Israel, where Hezbollah attacks have displaced 80,000 residents.




Israelis evacuated from northern areas near the Lebanese border due to ongoing cross-border tensions, rally near the northern Amiad Kibbutz, demanding to return home on May 23, 2024. (AFP)

Since the tit-for-tat attacks began, Lebanese officials and communities living along the border have been braced for a potential escalation into a conflict of a scale not seen since the 2006 war.

In recent months, influential Israeli officials have been calling on the government to mount a new military operation to push Hezbollah away from Israel’s northern border.

IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Herzi Halevi said on Tuesday that Israel is close to making a decision regarding Hezbollah’s daily attacks, according to the Times of Israel newspaper.




Israel's military Chief of the General Staff Herzi Halevi (C) walks among army officers during a situational assessment on the Lebanese border area on February 1, 2024, amid ongoing cross-border tensions between Israeli and Hezbollah forces. (Israeli Army handout via AFP) 

“We are approaching the point where a decision will have to be made, and the IDF is prepared and very ready for this decision,” Halevi said during an assessment with military officials and Fire Commissioner Eyal Caspi, at an army base in Kiryat Shmona.

“We have been attacking for eight months, and Hezbollah is paying a very, very high price. It has increased its strengths in recent days and we are prepared after a very good process of training … to move to an attack in the north.”

Former Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennett tore into Benjamin Netanyahu’s government this week, claiming the north of Israel had been abandoned. “We must save the north,” he said in a statement. “The Galilee is going up in flames. The fire is spreading.




Former Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennett, shown in this photo taken on January 15, 2024, claims that the north of Israel had been abandoned by the Netanyahu government. (AFP/File photo)

“Beautiful and flourishing places have turned into heaps of rubble. Some residents who were evacuated are already planning their lives elsewhere. This is a grave strategic event and can in no way be normalized.”

Hassan Nasrallah, the secretary-general of Hezbollah, has said the militia’s campaign will continue as long as the war rages in Gaza.

In a speech last week, he said the attacks are “pressuring Israel,” and that while the battle concerns Palestine, it also concerns “the future of Lebanon and its water and oil resources.”

Should a full-scale war break out, Nasrallah said Hezbollah has “surprises” in store for Israel. Indeed, many region watchers expect any conflict between Israel and Hezbollah to be far more devastating and costly for both sides than the war in Gaza.




Hassan Nasrallah (2nd from R), leader of Lebanon's Hezbollah militia, met with Iranian officials as Hezbollah supporters braced for a spike, right, in Israeli reprisals. (AFP)

Nasrallah’s comments followed statements by Yaov Gallant, Israel’s defense minister, who warned Lebanon would “pay the price” for Hezbollah’s actions, saying “if you will continue, we will accelerate.”

Although both sides have raised the rhetorical ante, Israeli analyst Ori Goldberg believes an all-out war with Hezbollah would be a disastrous overreach for Israel.

“Israel cannot afford a two-front war,” he told Arab News. “That is not sustainable. Hezbollah will be able to reach the Israeli heartland with its rockets. Israel is already imploding. More than 100,000 Israelis seem to have been permanently displaced.”

Nevertheless, if Prime Minister Netanyahu were to present a new war in Lebanon as the only viable option to allow displaced Israelis to return home, then “there is a good possibility that he can rally enough support,” said Goldberg.

“In a way, a war in Lebanon is something Israel’s professional warmongers have been pitching for years. Also, Israel is really hard up for solutions that would return people to the north. So popular support is there to be tapped.”




Map showing the border between Lebanon and Israel, where tit-for-tat bombardment between Israeli and Hezbollah forces had displaced tens of thousands of people on both sides. (AFP)

Amos Hochstein, a senior adviser to US President Joe Biden for energy and investment, who brokered the maritime boundary agreement between Lebanon and Israel in late 2022, recently proposed a road map to peace between Israel and Hezbollah.

“I’m not expecting peace, everlasting peace, between Hezbollah and Israel,” Hochstein said in an interview with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in March.

“But if we can reach a set of understandings and ... take away some of the impetus for conflict and establish for the first time ever, a recognized border between the two, I think that will go a long way.”

Hezbollah, however, has conditioned any agreement on a ceasefire in Gaza, arguing any deal would require the consent of both parties.

Michael Young, author and senior editor at Carnegie Middle East, believes that despite its continued provocations, Hezbollah does not want a full-scale war with Israel.

“Everything they’ve shown, up till now, proves that they are avoiding one at all costs,” Young told Arab News. “Sure, they have escalated in response to Israeli escalations, but clearly they are not looking for one.

“If there is war, I don’t think there will be support from large segments of Lebanese society, and Hezbollah knows this. Even though there is anger with Israel, they will not support one.

“There is criticism from outside the Shiite community. The reason why Hezbollah is careful not to engage in a full-scale war is that it knows support from society will dissolve very quickly.”

Hezbollah on Tuesday said one of its members who lived in the Naqoura area was killed in an Israeli strike, and that its fighters launched “a slew of explosive-laden drones” at Israeli positions in the annexed Golan Heights in retaliation for the attack on the coastal town.




People pray during the funeral of the two brothers, Ali and Mohammed Qassem, who were killed by an Israeli strike in the Lebanese village of Houla near the border with Israel on June 2, 2024. (REUTERS)

It also claimed other attacks on Israeli troops and positions.

The Israeli army said in a statement that “fighter jets struck a Hezbollah terrorist” in Naqoura as well as hitting other sites.

Over the weekend, Hezbollah said its fighters had mounted a rocket attack against an Israeli army base in the border town of Kiryat Shmona, “scoring direct hits, igniting a fire and destroying parts of it,” according to militia statements.

The Israeli army confirmed the attack had taken place, with images of damaged infrastructure published by local media.

On Sunday night, the social media account of Green Southerners, a Lebanese civil society group dedicated to preserving national heritage, released videos purportedly showing massive fires around the border village of Al-Adisa.

The group claimed the fires were caused by Israel’s use of the incendiary weapon white phosphorus, and accused Israel of committing an act of “ecocide,” as the fires destroyed trees, farmland and animal habitats.




An Israeli army soldier artillery shells at a position near the border with Lebanon in the upper Galilee region of northern Israel . Lebanon has accused Israel of using controversial white phosphorus rounds, in attacks authorities say have harmed civilians and the environment. (AFP)

Twenty four hours later, massive fires were ignited by suspected Hezbollah attacks on the Israeli side of the border around Kiryat Shmona. Civilians were ordered to evacuate as firefighters battled the flames.

Israeli officials said more than 2,500 acres of land were affected by the fires, claiming it could take years for the land to recover.

On Monday, Hezbollah said it had fired Katyusha rockets toward Israeli bases in the occupied Golan Heights. For the first time since the outbreak of violence in October, the militia said it had launched a squadron of drones.

The Israeli military confirmed the attacks, stating it had intercepted one drone carrying explosives while two others fell in northern Israel.

For as long as Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza rages and Hezbollah continues to pose a threat to the towns and villages of northern Israel, the potential for escalation remains high




A Lebanese firefighter from the Islamic Sanitary Committee douses a fire that swept over fields hit by Israeli shelling in southern Lebanon near the border with Israel on June 3, 2024. (AFP) 

The consequences, however, would be severe for all parties.

“I think Hezbollah has demonstrated it is committed to tit for tat,” said Israeli analyst Goldberg. “If Israel invades — and invade it must, if it wants a war — I think Hezbollah will likely retaliate in kind.”

And although Hezbollah has the means to cause significant damage to Israeli cities with its arsenal of Iranian-supplied weapons, it is crisis-wracked Lebanon that has the most to lose in the event of a full-scale war.

Indeed, the 2019 financial crisis and the failure to establish a new government has plunged much of the population into poverty, left public services and infrastructure in tatters, and even risked reopening old sectarian wounds.

“Should there be a war, it will be very difficult, if not impossible, to put Lebanon back together as it was or even as it is today,” said Young of Carnegie Middle East.

“Already the sectarian social contract is falling apart. How do you do this after a very destructive war?”


 


Israeli military admits to shooting at ambulances

Israeli military admits to shooting at ambulances
Updated 29 March 2025
Follow

Israeli military admits to shooting at ambulances

Israeli military admits to shooting at ambulances
  • Hamas spokesman Basem Naim accused Israel of carrying out “a deliberate and brutal massacre against Civil Defense and Palestinian Red Crescent teams in the city of Rafah”

GAZA CITY, Palestinian Territories: Israel’s military admitted Saturday it had fired on ambulances in the Gaza Strip after identifying them as “suspicious vehicles,” with Hamas condemning it as a “war crime” that killed at least one person.
The incident took place last Sunday in the Tal Al-Sultan neighborhood in the southern city of Rafah, close to the Egyptian border.
Israeli troops launched an offensive there on March 20, two days after the army resumed aerial bombardments of Gaza following an almost two-month-long truce.
Israeli troops had “opened fire toward Hamas vehicles and eliminated several Hamas terrorists,” the military said in a statement to AFP.
“A few minutes afterward, additional vehicles advanced suspiciously toward the troops... The troops responded by firing toward the suspicious vehicles, eliminating a number of Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists.”
The military did not say if there was fire coming from the vehicles.
It added that “after an initial inquiry, it was determined that some of the suspicious vehicles... were ambulances and fire trucks,” and condemned “the repeated use” by “terrorist organizations in the Gaza Strip of ambulances for terrorist purposes.”
The day after the incident, Gaza’s civil defense agency said in a statement that it had not heard from a team of six rescuers from Tal Al-Sulta who had been urgently dispatched to respond to deaths and injuries.
On Friday, it reported finding the body of the team leader and the rescue vehicles — an ambulance and a firefighting vehicle — and said a vehicle from the Palestine Red Crescent Society was also “reduced to a pile of scrap metal.”
Hamas spokesman Basem Naim accused Israel of carrying out “a deliberate and brutal massacre against Civil Defense and Palestinian Red Crescent teams in the city of Rafah.”
“The targeted killing of rescue workers — who are protected under international humanitarian law — constitutes a flagrant violation of the Geneva Conventions and a war crime,” he said.
Tom Fletcher, head of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, said that since March 18, “Israeli airstrikes in densely populated areas have killed hundreds of children and other civilians.”
“Patients killed in their hospital beds. Ambulances shot at. First responders killed,” he said in a statement.
“If the basic principles of humanitarian law still count, the international community must act while it can to uphold them.”
 

 


Video obtained by AP shows settler assault on small Palestinian village with rare clarity

Palestinian Qusai Al-Amur sits in a hospital bed next to his relatives following an attack by Israeli settlers on his West Bank
Updated 29 March 2025
Follow

Video obtained by AP shows settler assault on small Palestinian village with rare clarity

Palestinian Qusai Al-Amur sits in a hospital bed next to his relatives following an attack by Israeli settlers on his West Bank
  • A number of settlers pile out of them and run out of the frame, and the screams of Palestinian women can be heard
  • Palestinians and rights groups say Israeli forces usually turn a blind eye or intervene on behalf of the settlers

JERUSALEM: Over a dozen Israeli settlers attacked a Palestinian village in the southern Israeli-occupied West Bank on Friday, beating residents with sticks and rocks, in an incident captured with rare clarity by security cameras. The video obtained by AP and testimonies from Palestinian witnesses appeared to conflict with the account of the attack provided by Israeli police and military, who arrested over 20 Palestinians afterwards.
The violence in the village of Jinba follows a settler attack earlier this week in a nearby village in which Hamdan Ballal, a Palestinian co-director of the Oscar-winning documentary “No Other Land,” was left bloodied and bruised before being detained by Israeli soldiers for about 20 hours.

The videos provide uncommonly stark images of the type of settler assault Palestinians in the West Bank say now occurs frequently. They say radical Jewish settlers rarely, if ever, face repercussions for attacking Palestinian communities, while Palestinians are often rounded up in droves and detained by Israeli forces.
Settlers descend on Jinba
AP obtained footage from two security cameras belonging to the Al-Amur family, whose home came under attack. Footage from one camera shows a jeep, an ATV and a white pick-up truck speed up to the edge of the village.
A number of settlers pile out of them and run out of the frame, and the screams of Palestinian women can be heard. The settlers then return into view, and at least 15 of them ascend a slope, getting closer to the camera.
Many are masked, at least three are carrying bats or sticks, and one is armed with an assault rifle. One can be seen throwing a rock, then bending to collect more.
The matriarch of the Al-Amur family, Oula Awad, said she saw the settlers approaching her house between 8:00 AM and 9:00 AM, as she was doing laundry outside with her daughter. Her son, Qusai, 17, and husband, Aziz, 63, were washing up to prepare for Ramadan prayers when the settlers pulled up in vehicles and emerged.
“The settler runs toward me and told me, ‘Don’t wave. Do not move forward. We will hit you,’” she said.
In security footage taken from a different camera at the house, she and her daughter, 16-year-old Handa, are seen screaming and waving clothes in the air, calling for help. At one point, Awad makes a motion waving her arms. It is not clear if she throws something at a settler rushing toward her.
The settlers are then seen converging on Qusai. One settler begins hitting him with a stick as he tries to run away. Another settler smashes his head with a rock, sending him to the ground. Four settlers then kick and beat him before running away.
Awad said the settlers locked her and her daughter in a side room as they beat her younger son, Ahmad, and her husband Aziz.
“They entered the room and hit the windows,” said Awad. They tried to burn the furniture. “My husband was standing on the stairs, and they started beating him.”
A video taken by Qusai and shared with the AP showed Ahmad on the ground with a head laceration. Aziz lies nearby, his face bloodied.
Five Palestinians remain in hospitals. Aziz had a chest injury and underwent surgery for skull fractures; Ahmed, 16, is in intensive care. Qusai suffered a broken arm, bruises and cuts. Another villager, Maher Mohammed, had cuts and bruises, as did his son Osama, who was also undergoing kidney examinations.
Nidal Younis, the head of the Masafer Yatta village council, witnessed part of the attack and was detained by police for two hours afterward. He said soldiers who arrived on scene following the attack prevented Palestinians from nearby villages from helping and threw stun grenades at homes, a claim to which the military did not respond.
Police and military provide a conflicting account

 

Following the incident, Israeli police said they detained 22 Palestinians from the village on suspicion of stone throwing and brought them in for further investigation.
They said Palestinians had attacked two settler shepherds nearby, minorly injuring them.
“The security forces view the series of attacks in the area seriously, and will take strong action to bring those involved to justice,” the police said. They did not respond when asked by the AP why no Israeli civilians were arrested.
The military gave a somewhat different account, saying an Israeli civilian had been attacked and injured by militants near an Israeli settlement.
Then, it said “a violent confrontation developed between a number of Israeli civilians and Palestinians,” injuring another Israeli civilian.
Masafer Yatta was designated by the Israeli military as a live-fire training zone in the 1980s, and the military has ordered the expulsion of the residents, mostly Arab Bedouin. Around 1,000 residents have largely remained in place, but soldiers regularly come in to demolish homes, tents, water tanks and olive orchards.
Palestinians and rights groups say Israeli forces usually turn a blind eye or intervene on behalf of the settlers.
The war in Gaza has sparked a surge of violence in the West Bank, with the Israeli military carrying out widescale military operations that have killed hundreds of Palestinians and displaced tens of thousands. There has been a rise in settler violence as well as Palestinian attacks on Israelis.

 


Macron blasts Israel strikes on Beirut after Paris talks with Aoun

Macron blasts Israel strikes on Beirut after Paris talks with Aoun
Updated 28 March 2025
Follow

Macron blasts Israel strikes on Beirut after Paris talks with Aoun

Macron blasts Israel strikes on Beirut after Paris talks with Aoun
  • French president: ‘We recognize and stand with Lebanon’s challenges’
  • Syrian leader Ahmad Al-Sharaa joins Aoun, Macron in Paris by video call to discuss broader situation

BEIRUT: French President Emmanuel Macron declared his “solidarity with the people of Beirut following Israel’s targeting of the southern suburb of Beirut on Friday.

Macron on Friday criticized Israel for what he called “unacceptable strikes on Beirut” that he said did not respect the ceasefire and played into Hezbollah’s hands.

He said that the strikes on Beirut “are unacceptable.”

Macron made the comments at a joint press conference in Paris with President Joseph Aoun.

Developments on the ground in Lebanon overshadowed Aoun’s talks in Paris on Friday.

Aoun began his meeting at the Elysee Palace with Macron and held a direct call with Syrian President Ahmad Al-Sharaa.

FASTFACT

President Joseph Aoun began his meeting at the Elysee Palace with President Emmanuel Macron and held a direct video call with President Ahmad Al-Sharaa.

They were later joined by the Cypriot President and the Greek Prime Minister in five-party discussions.

The talks in Paris aim to raise the issue of Syrian refugees and explore ways to address it, a source in the Lebanese presidency told Arab News.

At the joint press conference following the meeting, Aoun said: “The Israeli attacks on the southern suburb of Beirut and the threats are a continuation of Israel’s violation of the ceasefire agreement sponsored by France and the US.

“The international community must put an end to these aggressions and force Israel to adhere to the agreement, as Lebanon is committed to it.”

At Friday’s press conference, Aoun called for “forcing the concerned states to compel Israel to cease its hostilities on Lebanon.”

Macron emphasized that France was standing with Lebanon because it recognized its immense challenges.

He indicated that “the tension on both sides of the Blue Line is a turning point, and France remains by Lebanon’s side to preserve its sovereignty, ensure full security, and implement the ceasefire reached with Israel.”

He stressed that “the Israeli army must withdraw from the five points in southern Lebanon,” noting that “the strikes on Beirut are unacceptable.”

He said: “We will present practical and realistic proposals, considering the expectations of Lebanon and Israel.

“We have proposed that UNIFIL troops be deployed in sensitive areas in the south, in coordination with the army and under the supervision of the monitoring committee.”

Macron said: “Aid to Lebanon is linked to restoring the functionality of its institutions, as this is the key to obtaining aid from the international community.”

He added: “We believe in the importance of the reform agenda set by the Lebanese president, and we will meet with Lebanon’s friends to support the framework initiated by the Lebanese executive authorities to implement a first set of aid.”

He said that Lebanon “needs an efficient energy sector to avoid remaining vulnerable to economic instability and to attract investments. France is ready to offer its expertise and companies to assist in this field.”

Aoun told Le Figaro that Lebanon “cannot tolerate being part of any axis.”

When asked if Lebanon was out of the so-called “Iranian-Shiite axis,” Aoun replied: “Lebanon, due to its geographical location, cannot tolerate being part of any axis.

“The importance of Lebanon lies in its diversity, and in the solidarity and internal unity of its people. It is this unity that will protect it from all dangers.

“In my oath of office, I spoke about Lebanon’s neutrality. However, neutrality does not mean we do not stand in solidarity with Arab states.”

Asked about the disarmament of Hezbollah, President Aoun said that “the Lebanese army has already dismantled several Hezbollah-aligned or pro-Iranian Palestinian camps, including one near Beirut, two in the north near Tripoli, and three others in the Bekaa Valley.”

“More than 250 weapons seizures have taken place in areas south of the Litani River, with many of the confiscated arms either destroyed or, if in a good state, transferred to the Lebanese Army. The army, which must be strengthened to 77,000 personnel, is carrying out its duty,” Aoun added.

He also said: “The Council of Ministers has approved the recruitment of 4,500 additional soldiers to bolster security in the south.

“However, the entire country needs defense and protection, not just the south.

“The issue of Palestinian weapons remains unresolved, and we must address it in coordination with the Palestinian Authority. We want our army to have control over all Lebanese territory.

“The state alone must hold the monopoly on arms and the legitimate use of force. This demand is as national as it is international.”

Aoun emphasized Lebanon’s full commitment to UN Resolution 1701 and criticized Israel’s ongoing violations of the agreement.

“We learned our lesson from our past experiences with Israel. Therefore, we continue to work diplomatically with France, the US, and the international community to ensure Israel’s full withdrawal from southern Lebanon, the release of Lebanese hostages, and the final demarcation of land borders.”

Aoun also announced that Lebanon “will begin addressing the demarcation of the Lebanese-Syrian land and sea borders, as well as the issue of Syrian refugees.”

Also on Friday, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam met Defense Minister Michel Menassa.

According to Salam’s media office, Menassa visited Jeddah on Wednesday night with a security delegation and met his Syrian counterpart, Marhaf Abu Qasra.

The two sides signed an agreement on the importance of border demarcation, forming joint legal committees in various fields and activating coordination mechanisms.

The Saudi Press Agency reported that the meeting took place under the directives of King Salman and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

Saudi Defense Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman attended the meeting.

 


UN chief calls for action over ‘perfect storm’ engulfing South Sudan

UN chief calls for action over ‘perfect storm’ engulfing South Sudan
Updated 28 March 2025
Follow

UN chief calls for action over ‘perfect storm’ engulfing South Sudan

UN chief calls for action over ‘perfect storm’ engulfing South Sudan
  • War-torn country ‘at a crossroads,’ Antonio Guterres warns amid escalating violence, attacks on civilians
  • ‘Horn of Africa cannot afford another conflict,’ Guterres says after urging an end to ‘politics of confrontation’

NEW YORK: UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Friday urged both South Sudan’s leadership and the international community to act swiftly to prevent further devastation in the war-torn country, warning that ethnic and political targeting by security forces could spiral into a broader regional conflict.
Referring to the escalating violence in South Sudan, including airstrikes on civilians, Guterres said: “All the dark clouds of a perfect storm have descended upon the people of the world’s newest country — and one of the poorest.”
On Wednesday, an armed convoy led by the nation’s top security officials, including its defense minister, entered the home of First Vice President Riek Machar in Juba, disarmed his bodyguards and placed him under house arrest.
Tensions between Machar and President Salva Kiir had been worsening for several weeks. In August 2018, the two leaders reached a peace agreement that ended a five-year civil war between their forces, which had resulted in almost 400,000 deaths.
However, In the seven years since, their relationship has grown more strained due to ethnic conflicts and occasional outbreaks of violence. Machar’s party said his detention effectively signaled the collapse of the peace deal.
This week, the UN reported that barrel bombs thought to contain highly flammable liquid were used in airstrikes during clashes between the army and a rebel group formerly associated with Machar.
Speaking to reporters in New York, Guterres said that “the peace agreement is in shambles,” and called for the immediate release of all detained officials and the full restoration of the Government of National Unity, which he described as crucial to moving toward peace.
“The Horn of Africa is already in turmoil and cannot afford another conflict,” he warned, “and nor can the people of South Sudan.”
Directly addressing the South Sudanese leadership, Guterres said: “End the politics of confrontation. Release detained military and civilian officials now. Fully restore the Government of National Unity. And vigorously implement the promises you made through your commitments to the peace agreement — which is the only legal framework to peaceful, free and fair elections in December 2026.”
The humanitarian situation in South Sudan is alarming, with almost 75 percent of the population requiring aid and at least half facing severe food insecurity. A cholera outbreak is adding to the crisis.
Over 1 million refugees have fled to neighboring countries, primarily Sudan, since fighting erupted. Guterres also noted a catastrophic economic collapse, with oil revenues plummeting and inflation soaring to 300 percent.
With the world’s youngest country facing such dire circumstances, the UN secretary-general warned of the potential for a repeat of the civil wars in 2013 and 2016.
Guterres called for renewed diplomatic efforts, emphasizing the need for dialogue and de-escalation.
“South Sudan is at a crossroads,” he said. “For the sake of the long-suffering people, it is time for all parties to put down the weapons and focus on rebuilding the country.”
The UN chief said that he had spoken with the chairperson of the African Union Commission and expressed strong support for the AU’s initiative to deploy the “Panel of the Wise” and for continuing efforts by Kenyan President William Ruto’s special envoy.
Despite the urgency of the situation, Guterres lamented that South Sudan has largely faded from international attention. He pleaded for increased diplomatic and financial support to address the mounting crisis.
“The people of South Sudan are close to my heart. They had enormous hopes and aspirations, but sadly, they have not had the leadership they deserve.”
There have been increasing international calls for a unified stance on the peace process in South Sudan, with the UN, AU, and the Intergovernmental Authority on Development trade bloc all urging the restoration of peace and stability.


US working with partners including Saudi Arabia to end fighting in Sudan

US working with partners including Saudi Arabia to end fighting in Sudan
Updated 28 March 2025
Follow

US working with partners including Saudi Arabia to end fighting in Sudan

US working with partners including Saudi Arabia to end fighting in Sudan
  • Washington focused on bringing much-needed assistance to Sudanese people, State Dept. deputy spokesperson tells Asharq Al-Awsat
  • US expects all foreign parties to play constructive role in resolving the crisis, Mignon Houston said

WASHINGTON: The US is fully committed to ending the conflict in Sudan, working closely with regional and international partners — including Saudi Arabia — to bring about a cessation of hostilities and pave the way for a civilian-led government, an official said on Friday.

Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, Mignon Houston, the deputy spokesperson for the US State Department, said Washington’s priority in Sudan was to “stop the fighting.”

She said that the new administration of President Donald Trump has remained deeply engaged in Sudan and has not taken sides in the conflict, instead focusing on supporting the Sudanese people’s aspirations for a democratic and stable future.

“We know the situation in Sudan is catastrophic. It’s the largest humanitarian crisis in the world. What we’re seeing in Sudan is deplorable, and it’s important for observers and the world to know that the US remains very engaged in this issue,” Houston said.

The US is working through multiple diplomatic channels, engaging with the African Union, the UN, the Intergovernmental Authority on Development, Saudi Arabia, and other key regional actors, Houston told the newspaper.

“Our diplomatic efforts include engaging with these organizations and governments to push for a cessation of hostilities because we know this is the only way to achieve lasting peace in Sudan, create a unified Sudan, and give the Sudanese people the future they deserve,” she added.

Houston made it clear that Washington expected all foreign parties to play a constructive role in resolving the crisis, warning against engaging in negative interference.

“We have been very explicit about the need for the intervention of partners and other countries in the crisis to be constructive and lead to a cessation of hostilities. Otherwise, these countries will be complicit in prolonging the conflict, complicit in creating more suffering for the Sudanese people, and complicit in creating more instability — this will not lead to peace,” she said.

The US has also been applying diplomatic pressure through economic measures, with 31 sanctions currently imposed on both the Sudanese Armed Forces and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces.

Houston described these as a crucial tool in pushing both sides toward the negotiating table and an eventual ceasefire.

Beyond efforts through diplomatic channels, Houston highlighted the need for much-needed humanitarian assistance, revealing that Washington was actively working with international partners to support Sudanese civilians and refugees in neighboring countries.

“The US administration is also working on the humanitarian front, with significant work being done with implementing partners to support the vital needs of people in Sudan, as well as refugees in neighboring countries, and to support their efforts to accept refugees,” she said.

Houston said that during the first two weeks of March alone, 1.2 million people facing the risk of famine received life-saving humanitarian aid.

However, she added that no meaningful economic recovery or investment into Sudan could take place until the violence was stopped.

“At this time, we will focus on the Sudanese people and ending the fighting. Both parties are responsible for the destruction in Sudan and for regional instability. Therefore, our focus remains on bringing the parties to the negotiating table to create the conditions for humanitarian assistance to reach those who need it, above all else.”

Houston made it clear that Washington held both warring factions accountable for the devastation in Sudan.

“We have been very clear in this position that both sides have engaged in harmful actions that have destabilized the country and created a state of general instability,” she said.

“We have called on both sides to work together to create a political process that will lead to the establishment of a civilian-led government.”

She also underscored the role of Washington’s regional partners in mediating the crisis, urging them to prioritize the needs of the Sudanese people above political interests.

“What is more important than anything else is focusing on the needs of the Sudanese people; their needs right now should come first,” she said.

Houston also said that under the leadership of Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the State Department continues to work with humanitarian organizations and is calling on donor nations to increase their support.

“The department also continues to call on regional actors and international governments to do more, and on donor countries to do more, because what we are seeing in Sudan and South Sudan demonstrates the importance of a concerted global effort to resolve the crisis.”