UN General Assembly calls on Security Council to revive Palestinian bid for full membership

Update The United Nations General Assembly on Friday backed a Palestinian bid to become a full UN member by recognizing it as qualified to join. (Screenshot/UNTV)
The United Nations General Assembly on Friday backed a Palestinian bid to become a full UN member by recognizing it as qualified to join. (Screenshot/UNTV)
Short Url
Updated 11 May 2024
Follow

UN General Assembly calls on Security Council to revive Palestinian bid for full membership

UN General Assembly calls on Security Council to revive Palestinian bid for full membership
  • Assembly votes overwhelmingly in favor of resolution recognizing Palestine is qualified to be full member, urges Security Council to reconsider matter ‘favorably’
  • Resolution calls for Palestine to retain observer state status but rights to be enhanced to include most of those of full member, short of vote in assembly

NEW YORK CITY: The UN General Assembly erupted in applause on Friday when members voted overwhelmingly to adopt a resolution that called for recognition that Palestine is qualified to become the 194th full member and the enhancement of its rights and privileges, It also recommended that the Security Council reconsiders the matter “favorably.”

Last month, the US vetoed a widely backed draft Security Council resolution that proposed the State of Palestine be granted full membership of the UN.

The UN Charter requires that prospective members must be “peace-loving” and accept all obligations the charter places upon them, and that the admission of new members be recommended by the Security Council to the General Assembly for final approval.

Palestine currently has the status of non-member observer state at the UN, which was granted by the General Assembly in 2012.

Friday’s resolution, drawn up by UAE in its role as the chair of the UN’s Arab Group for the month of May, and seen by Arab News, calls for Palestine to retain its status of observer state but its rights within the UN to be enhanced to encompass almost all of those afforded to full members, except the right to vote in the General Assembly or be considered as a candidate for a seat on UN bodies such as the Security Council.

The additional rights and privileges it would receive include a seat in the General Assembly, the right to speak on all issues, not only those related to the Palestinians and Middle East, and the right for its representatives to be elected as officers on the assembly’s main committees. It would also give the Palestinians the right to participate in UN conferences and other international gatherings convened by the UN.

In the vote on the resolution by the 193-member General Assembly, 143 voted in favor, nine against, including the US, Israel, Micronesia and Palau, and 25 abstained. The long list of nations co-sponsoring the resolution included, notably, Belgium and Norway.

The Palestinian ambassador to the UN, Riyad Mansour, told the assembly prior to the vote: “A yes vote is a vote for Palestinian existence. It is not against any state but it is against the attempts to deprive us of our state.

“That is why the Israeli government is so opposed to it. Because they oppose our independence and the two-state solution altogether. It is an investment in peace and thus empowers the forces of peace.

“How can anyone explain that Israel was admitted to the United Nations 75 years ago on the power of a resolution that foresaw two states, and without awaiting an end of the conflict, and while continuing to deny our rights and our existence — and that the State of Palestine, 75 years later, is still required to wait and remains met by a closed door preventing it from being admitted to this organization?”

The US deputy ambassador to the UN, Robert Wood, made it clear earlier in the week that Washington was opposed to the resolution, saying that Arab countries and Palestinians were trying to sidestep the established process for full membership.

“We have said from the beginning the best way to ensure Palestinian full membership in the UN is to do that through negotiations with Israel. That remains our position,” he said.

Israel’s representative to the UN, Gilad Erdan, told the General Assembly: “As long as so many of you are ‘Jew-hating,’ you don’t really care that the Palestinians are not ‘peace-loving.’ Shame on you.”


UK’s Starmer defends Israel arms suspension as ‘legal decision’

An Israeli armored vehicle drives along a devastated street in Jenin in the occupied West Bank on September 4, 2024.
An Israeli armored vehicle drives along a devastated street in Jenin in the occupied West Bank on September 4, 2024.
Updated 56 min 6 sec ago
Follow

UK’s Starmer defends Israel arms suspension as ‘legal decision’

An Israeli armored vehicle drives along a devastated street in Jenin in the occupied West Bank on September 4, 2024.
  • “We will of course stand by Israel’s right to self-defense but it’s important that we are committed to the international rule of law,” Starmer said

LONDON: UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer defended Wednesday his government’s partial suspension of arms exports to Israel over fears they could be used in a breach of humanitarian law as “a legal decision.”
Starmer said that Monday’s announcement to suspend 30 of 350 arms exports licenses did not signify a change in UK support for Israel’s right to self-defense.
He also said that allies “understand” the UK’s move.
“This is a difficult issue, I recognize that, but it’s a legal decision, not a policy decision,” Starmer told lawmakers during the weekly Prime Minister’s Questions session in parliament.
He said the decision was taken following a review by the foreign ministry into Israel’s conduct of its war against Hamas militants in the Gaza Strip.
The review was begun shortly after Starmer’s center-left Labour party swept to power in a landslide general election victory over the Conservatives in early July.
“We will of course stand by Israel’s right to self-defense but it’s important that we are committed to the international rule of law,” Starmer said.
The partial ban covers items that could be used in the current conflict in Gaza including fighter aircraft, helicopters and drones but not parts for advanced F-35 stealth fighter jets.
The decision has angered Israel, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu slamming it as “shameful.”
Starmer also denied that the move indicated a spilt with the United States.
On Monday, US National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said London had informed Washington of its move before it was announced.
“We’ll let other nations decide for themselves if they’re going to support Israel and to what degree,” Kirby told reporters. “That’s what sovereignty is all about.”
He added that for its part there had been “no determination” by the United States that Israel had violated humanitarian law.
In London, Starmer told MPs: “We have talked this through with our allies, they understand, they have a different legal system, that is the point they have made.”
Starmer’s government is pursuing a more nuanced approach to the Middle East conflict than his predecessor Rishi Sunak’s Tory administration.
It has similarly repeatedly called for a ceasefire and for speeding up aid deliveries to Gaza, and demanded that Hamas release all hostages seized in its October 7 attacks.
But it has also resumed funding for the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA) and dropped a legal challenge over international arrest warrants for senior Israeli figures, including Netanyahu.


US destroys Houthi missile system in Yemen

US destroys Houthi missile system in Yemen
Updated 04 September 2024
Follow

US destroys Houthi missile system in Yemen

US destroys Houthi missile system in Yemen
  • “It was determined this system presented an imminent threat to US and coalition forces, and merchant vessels in the region,” CENTCOM said
  • Local media and people reported hearing loud explosions and seeing heavy smoke pouring from a Houthi military facility in the province of Ibb

AL-MUKALLA: The US Central Command said on Wednesday that its forces had destroyed a missile system in a Houthi-held Yemeni territory that was targeting ships in international waters.
This is the second time in the past 24 hours that the US military has said that it is targeting Houthi missile systems in undefined locations in Houthi-controlled Yemeni territory.
“It was determined this system presented an imminent threat to US and coalition forces, and merchant vessels in the region,” CENTCOM said.
Local media and people reported hearing loud explosions and seeing heavy smoke pouring from a Houthi military facility in the province of Ibb on Tuesday, apparently struck by the US, as CENTCOM announced the destruction of two Houthi missile systems on the ground in Yemen.
Since January, the US and the UK have launched dozens of strikes on Houthi targets in Sanaa, Hodeidah, Saada, Ibb and other Yemeni provinces held by the Houthis, reportedly striking drone and missile launchers and storage facilities, as well as remotely controlled and explosives-laden boats preparing to target ships in international shipping lanes off Yemen.
Houthi leader Mohammed Ali Al-Houthi on Tuesday night denied that their troops had targeted the Saudi oil ship Amjad in the Red Sea on Monday and accused the US military of “spreading false information.”
This came as Saudi shipping company Bahri said that its vessel, Amjad, was in the Red Sea when another oil tanker was targeted, and that it was not the target.
Since November, the Houthis have destroyed two commercial ships, including one carrying more than 21,000 tons of fertilizer, seized another, and fired hundreds of ballistic missiles, drones, and drone boats at more than 100 ships in Yemen’s commercial channels.
The Yemeni militia claims that they exclusively target ships with links to Israel to put pressure on Israel to halt its war in the Gaza Strip.
Similarly, Yemen’s government has asked that the Houthis be designated as a terrorist group and their leaders’ assets frozen for attacking ships and endangering the environment off Yemen’s coast.
In a post on X, Yemeni Information Minister Muammar Al-Eryani said the Houthi attack on the MV Blue Lagoon I oil tanker is the 10th attack on oil and chemical tankers since the start of their campaign, and that the attack on the tanker is a “systematic terrorism” that risks an environmental, economic, and humanitarian disaster that would primarily affect Yemenis.
“The Houthi militia’s repeated targeting of oil and chemical product tankers demonstrates its disregard for the catastrophic consequences of any oil spill in the Red Sea, Bab Al-Mandab Strait, and Gulf of Aden on our country’s economic, agricultural, and fisheries sectors,” the Yemeni minister said.


Cross-border attacks by Israeli forces and Hezbollah resume after period of uneasy calm

Israeli soldiers evacuate an injured man following a cross-border attack from Lebanon into Israel.
Israeli soldiers evacuate an injured man following a cross-border attack from Lebanon into Israel.
Updated 04 September 2024
Follow

Cross-border attacks by Israeli forces and Hezbollah resume after period of uneasy calm

Israeli soldiers evacuate an injured man following a cross-border attack from Lebanon into Israel.
  • Research center in Israel says 281 attacks on the country originated from Lebanon in August, compared with 259 in July
  • In Israel, sirens sounded in the settlements of Zar’it, Shtula, Netu’a, Dishon and Al-Malikiyah, and in Ramot Naftali in western Galilee

BEIRUT: Israeli forces resumed shelling in southern Lebanon on Wednesday following a period of uneasy, relative calm, targeting border towns, valleys and forests.
Two people were injured in an airstrike on the town of Khiam and taken to Marjayoun Hospital. Aircraft also hit Wadi Hujeir and carried out strikes on the outskirts of the town of Qabrikha, on the area between the towns of Aainata and Kounine, and on the outskirts of the town of Bani Haiyyan.
The Israeli army said “warplanes shelled rocket-launch platforms in the areas of Kounine and Qabrikha in southern Lebanon.” Israeli artillery also targeted the outskirts of the villages of Beit Lif and Ramyah.
In Israel, sirens sounded in the settlements of Zar’it, Shtula, Netu’a, Dishon and Al-Malikiyah, and in Ramot Naftali in western Galilee.
The Israeli army said that “60 rockets were launched from Lebanon toward the northern region, causing fires in several settlements in Upper Galilee, which firefighting teams worked to extinguish.”
Hezbollah said it shelled “the headquarters of the Sahel Battalion in the Beit Hillel barracks, and enemy artillery positions in Dishon with volleys of Katyusha rockets,” and launched attacks “targeting Israeli soldiers in the Zar’it barracks (the headquarters of the battalion affiliated with the Western Brigade) with artillery shells, hitting them directly.”
Israeli media reported “two injuries in the Dishon area in Galilee, where several rockets fell after being launched from Lebanon.” There were also reports that “a rocket fell in the Kfar Blum area in Upper Galilee,” “a fire broke out in the Kiryat Shmona settlement due to rockets launched from Lebanon,” and additional rockets struck between Kiryat Shmona and Beit Hillel.
Israeli army media advised settlers in Kiryat Shmona “to remain near shelters and avoid moving around the city until further notice.” Upper Galilee Regional Council similarly urged citizens in several towns to “stay close to shelters, avoid gatherings and decrease movement.”
In its latest report, the Alma Research and Education Center in Israel said 281 attacks on the country originated from Lebanon in August, compared with 259 in July.
“Most of these attacks were carried out by Hezbollah, along with other organizations,” it said. “The average number of daily attacks reached nine in August, compared with 8.3 attacks in July, with Hezbollah confirming its responsibility for the vast majority of them.”
The Hezbollah attacks resulted in “the deaths of three Israelis and injuries to 30 others” last month, it added.
“The middle of the month saw an escalation in Hezbollah’s assaults, which continued until Aug. 25, when Israeli forces conducted a preemptive strike to thwart Hezbollah’s response to the assassination of (its military leader) Fuad Shukr,” the research center said.
The report noted a subsequent “decline in attacks,” suggesting that “the intensity of these attacks coincided with the Israeli military’s targeting of Hezbollah operatives” and were “potentially aimed at exhausting Israeli defense systems in preparation for a planned retaliatory strike on Aug. 25.”
It added: “Kiryat Shmona was an important target for Hezbollah attacks, which resulted in the death of one civilian and injuries to 28 others, in addition to heavy losses to industrial facilities, educational institutions, residential properties, cemeteries and commercial complexes.”
The report also stated: “During August, Hezbollah used the term ‘appropriate weapons’ to refer to various types of armaments. Previously, this term in their statements was specifically associated with anti-tank missiles. In August, however, it became evident that the term encompassed artillery fire, anti-tank missiles and drones.”
Last month, it added, there was “an increase in (Hezbollah’s) utilization of long-range missiles, with 176 missiles launched compared with 137 in July. Additionally, the number of drone attacks rose to 62 in August, up from 56 in July. Throughout August, Hezbollah employed surface-to-air missiles and sniper fire.”


Egypt rejects Netanyahu’s demand on Philadelphi Corridor

Egypt rejects Netanyahu’s demand on Philadelphi Corridor
Updated 04 September 2024
Follow

Egypt rejects Netanyahu’s demand on Philadelphi Corridor

Egypt rejects Netanyahu’s demand on Philadelphi Corridor
  • An Egyptian government spokesman accused Netanyahu of making the demand to distract Israeli public opinion
  • Hamas has rejected any Israeli presence in the area

CAIRO: Egypt has categorically rejected the statements issued by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sept. 2, in which he insisted that Israeli forces must retain control over the Philadelphi Corridor along the Egypt-Gaza border, vowing “not to give in to pressure” over the issue in Gaza ceasefire talks.
An Egyptian government spokesman accused Netanyahu of making the demand to distract Israeli public opinion, obstruct reaching a ceasefire and a hostage-detainee exchange deal, and impede the mediation efforts being carried out by Egypt, Qatar, and the US.
Hundreds of thousands of Israelis protested on Monday, and US President Joe Biden said Netanyahu needed to do more after nearly 11 months of fighting.
The issue of the so-called Philadelphi Corridor, on the southern edge of the Gaza Strip bordering Egypt, has been a major sticking point in efforts to secure a deal to halt the fighting in Gaza and return Israeli hostages held by Hamas.
Hamas has rejected any Israeli presence in the area.
The spokesman said that Egypt “holds the Israeli government responsible for the consequences of issuing such statements that further aggravate the situation and aim to justify the aggressive and provocative policies, which lead to further regional escalation.”
Egypt, he said, has affirmed its keenness to lead the peace process in a way that achieves security and stability “for all the region’s peoples.”
Netanyahu’s stance on the truce negotiations, which have been continuing for weeks while showing little sign of a breakthrough, has frustrated allies, including the US, and has widened a rift with his own Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.


Israel’s ‘scorched earth’ policy in Gaza forcing West to ‘walk tightrope:’ Official

Israel’s ‘scorched earth’ policy in Gaza forcing West to ‘walk tightrope:’ Official
Updated 04 September 2024
Follow

Israel’s ‘scorched earth’ policy in Gaza forcing West to ‘walk tightrope:’ Official

Israel’s ‘scorched earth’ policy in Gaza forcing West to ‘walk tightrope:’ Official
  • ‘The way Israel has prosecuted the fight will make it less safe in the world’
  • ‘The relentlessness and ferocity have made this so difficult to manage for Israel’s allies’

LONDON: Israel’s “scorched earth” policy in Gaza is forcing Western countries to “walk a tightrope” in their relations with Tel Aviv, a Western official has told The Times.

Speaking anonymously, the official warned that Israel’s brutal assault on Gaza would make the country less safe.

More than 40,000 people have been killed in the Palestinian enclave since Israel launched its invasion in the wake of the Oct. 7 Hamas attack.

The UK angered Israel by banning 30 arms export licenses to the country this week.

In response, the official told The Times: “This is such a tightrope walk for all the Western democracies: Imperative to show support for Israel in this tragic moment of need, but the civilian casualties, the rules of engagement, the relentlessness and ferocity have made this so difficult to manage for Israel’s allies.

“Ultimately, the way Israel has prosecuted the fight will make it less safe in the world and for a country that can and has been so stealthy about striking back at its enemies, it continues to be a head-scratcher for me why the leadership there thinks this scorched-earth policy is the best way to manage it all.”

In executing the arms export ban, the UK government considered public statements by far-right members of the Israeli government, including National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir.

He has called for the killing of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli detention, and proposed the building of an illegal Jewish-only settlement in Gaza.

Israel receives the vast majority of its arms imports from the US and Germany. In August, the Biden administration approved more than $20 billion in new weapons sales to Israel.

The figure includes components to make more than 100 million artillery shells, with Israel exhausting much of its stockpile in Gaza since last year.