Syria, too, desperately needs a ceasefire, says UN commission of inquiry

Chairman of the United Nations Commission of Inquiry on Syria, Paulo Pinheiro gives a press conference to present the latest report on rights violations in Geneva. (AFP file photo)
Chairman of the United Nations Commission of Inquiry on Syria, Paulo Pinheiro gives a press conference to present the latest report on rights violations in Geneva. (AFP file photo)
Short Url
Updated 12 March 2024
Follow

Syria, too, desperately needs a ceasefire, says UN commission of inquiry

Syria, too, desperately needs a ceasefire, says UN commission of inquiry
  • Its latest report says recent escalations of violence have included attacks on civilians and essential infrastructure that could amount to war crimes
  • Commission chief Paulo Pinheiro calls for more intensive international efforts to halt the fighting in the country

NEW YORK CITY: In the past six months, Syria has experienced the worst surge of violence since 2020, the UN’s Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic said on Monday.
During that time, it added, various forces have targeted civilians and essential infrastructure across several battlefronts, committing acts that could amount to war crimes.
“Since October, Syria has seen the largest escalation in fighting in four years,” said the chair of the commission, Paulo Pinheiro, as he called for more intensive international efforts to halt the fighting. “Syria, too, desperately needs a ceasefire.”
Syrians cannot endure any further escalation of fighting as they continue to reel from the effects of an unparalleled humanitarian emergency that is pushing them further into despair, he added.
The latest report by the commission, published on Monday, said that more than 90 percent of Syrians now live in poverty, and more than 16.7 million are in need of humanitarian assistance to survive, the most since the conflict in the country began. Meanwhile, it added, the economy continues to be in free fall amid tightening international sanctions, and rising levels of lawlessness are driving armed forces and militias to engage in predatory behavior and extortion.
The surge in violence began on Oct. 5, when several explosions rocked a graduation ceremony at a military academy in the government-controlled city of Homs, killing at least 63 people, including 37 civilians, and injuring dozens.
Syrian government and Russian forces responded with bombardments targeting at least 2,300 sites in opposition-controlled areas in the space of just three weeks, killing or injuring hundreds of civilians. These targets of these “indiscriminate” attacks, which the commission said might amount to war crimes, included hospitals, schools, markets and camps for internally displaced persons. The attacks continue.
“Syrian government forces again used cluster munitions in densely populated areas, continuing devastating and unlawful patterns that we have documented in the past,” said Commissioner Hanny Megally.
The attacks have forced more than 120,000 people to flee, he added, many of whom had already been displaced several times, including by the devastating twin earthquakes in February last year.
“It should be no surprise that the number of Syrians seeking asylum in Europe last October reached the highest level in seven years,” Megally said.
“Syria remains the world’s largest displacement crisis, with over 13 million Syrians unable to return to their homes.”
Since the beginning of the war in Gaza in October last year, the report said, tensions have risen among the six foreign forces involved in Syria, in particular between Israel, Iran and the US, triggering fears of a wider regional conflict.
Israel has launched more than 30 strikes against Iran-affiliated forces and sites in Syria, and targeted Aleppo and Damascus airports, forcing the temporary suspension of crucial UN humanitarian air operations.
Meanwhile, pro-Iranian militias have attacked US bases in northeastern Syria more than 100 times, the report stated, prompting retaliatory airstrikes by American forces.
In addition, the Turkish army has intensified its attacks on the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces in retaliation for an attack in Ankara in October for which the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, also known as PKK, claimed responsibility.
Several civilians were killed in Turkish airstrikes on power plants that left nearly 1 million people without water or electricity for weeks, in what was denounced as a violation of international humanitarian law.
“Such attacks may amount to war crimes,” the commission said in its report.
Breakdowns of military alliances and intense clashes between the Syrian Democratic Forces and a coalition of tribal fighters in Dayr Al-Zawr additionally have led to numerous incidents of violence that caused civilian casualties. This ongoing conflict stems from longstanding grievances, with the cash-strapped, Kurdish-led administration that controls the area accused of failing to adequately deliver essential services and ensure basic rights.
In Central Syria, intensified assaults by Daesh have targeted military sites and civilians alike in urban areas with “attacks likely amounting to war crimes,” the commission said.
Confrontations between Jordanian forces and drug traffickers have also escalated along the border between Syria and Jordan, with casualties among civilians caught in the crossfire.
The commission’s report also said the Syrian government continues to disappear, torture and ill-treat detainees. It documented further examples of deaths in custody, including at the notorious Sednaya Prison.
“Four months after the International Court of Justice ordered the government to prevent torture and destruction of evidence, Syrian authorities still deliberately obstruct and profit from families’ efforts to ascertain the whereabouts and fate of their detained loved ones, engaging in extortion,” the commissioners said.
In Idlib, they added, Hayat Tahrir El-Sham militants continue to commit acts of torture, violence and unlawful detention, with reports of executions based on summary trials at which the charges have included witchcraft, adultery and murder.
Commissioner Lynn Welchman said: “And as much as the world may wish to forget, five years after the fall of Baghuz when (Daesh) lost its territorial control in Syria, almost 30,000 children are still held in internment camps, prisons or rehabilitation centers in northeast Syria.
“These children were already victimized during (Daesh’s) rule, only to be subjected to years of continued human rights violations and abuses.”
The commission concluded that living conditions in Al-Hawl and Al-Rawj camps amount to “cruel and inhuman treatment and outrages on personal dignity.”
Welchman said: “No child should ever be punished for their parents’ actions or beliefs. We urge all states to immediately allow all children, including Syrian children, to return home from the camps and take measures to ensure their reintegration into society, and accountability for the crimes they have suffered.
“These children were all only 12 years old or younger at the time of (Daesh’s) rule — what crimes could possibly justify their continued detention? End the inertia, now.”
Stephane Dujarric, spokesperson for UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, told Arab News: “I think these (reports) show how important these tools are to the international community, these commissions.
“For our part, I think the Secretariat has been talking about, and condemning very openly since the beginning of this conflict, all attacks against civilians in Syria.”
The Commission will present its latest mandate report to the UN Human Rights Council on March 18.
The Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic was established on Aug. 22, 2011, by the UN Human Rights Council. Its mandate is to investigate all alleged violations of international human rights law in the country since March 2011.

 


At Security Council, concerns over ‘fragmentation’ of Sudan

At Security Council, concerns over ‘fragmentation’ of Sudan
Updated 3 min 51 sec ago
Follow

At Security Council, concerns over ‘fragmentation’ of Sudan

At Security Council, concerns over ‘fragmentation’ of Sudan
  • The war has triggered the world’s largest displacement and hunger crisis

UNITED NATIONS, United States: Several members of the UN Security Council on Wednesday voiced concern over the declaration of a parallel government by Sudan’s paramilitary Rapid Support Forces, while Kenya pushed back against accusations that it had recognized the entity.
RSF rebels and their allies fighting government forces on Sunday agreed to form a rival government, triggering diplomatic tensions between Sudan and Kenya.
The parties to the agreement, inked behind closed doors in Nairobi, said the charter establishes a “government of peace and unity” in rebel-controlled areas of the northeast African country.
“Attempts by the RSF and aligned actors to establish a government in RSF-controlled territory in Sudan are unhelpful for the cause of peace and security in Sudan, and risks a de facto partition of the country,” US Representative John Kelley told a Security Council meeting.
British Ambassador Barbara Woodward also expressed “deep concern” over the development.
“Respect for Sudan’s charter rights, its unity, sovereignty and territorial integrity is vital and will be necessary for a sustainable end to this war,” she said.
Envoys from France and China echoed that view, with Chinese Ambassador Fu Cong saying the move “risks increasing the fragmentation of the Sudan.”
Deputy Algerian Ambassador Toufik Laid Koudri, speaking on behalf of the Council’s three African members Algeria, Somalia, Sierra Leone as well as Guyana, urged “the RSF and their allies to put the unity and national interest of Sudan above all other considerations.”
Sudanese Ambassador to the UN Al-Harith Idriss Al-Harith Mohamed denounced the move as “an unprecedented violation of the UN Charter and the AU constitution,” and accused Kenya of taking “a step that aims to dismantle the Sudan.”
His Kenyan counterpart Erastus Lokaale denied the claim.
“I reiterate that neither President William Ruto nor the Government of Kenya has recognized any independent entities in the Sudan or elsewhere,” he said.
The war in Sudan, which has claimed tens of thousands of lives, erupted after a rift emerged between Burhan and Dagalo over the future structure of the government.
The war has triggered the world’s largest displacement and hunger crisis.
Both warring sides face accusations of committing grave atrocities against civilians, with their leaders sanctioned by the US.


Is Hezbollah sincere in ceding ‘resistance’ to Lebanon’s government?

Is Hezbollah sincere in ceding ‘resistance’ to Lebanon’s government?
Updated 6 sec ago
Follow

Is Hezbollah sincere in ceding ‘resistance’ to Lebanon’s government?

Is Hezbollah sincere in ceding ‘resistance’ to Lebanon’s government?
  • Hezbollah remains Lebanon’s dominant armed force, raising questions about whether the government can reclaim full control
  • The group has professed confidence in the new administration, but many doubt it will coordinate with the army to implement ceasefire deal

DUBAI: Thousands gathered in Beirut on Sunday to mourn Hezbollah’s founding leader, Hassan Nasrallah, as his body was finally laid to rest nearly five months after his killing. The elaborate funeral, held under the watchful eye of Israeli fighter jets overhead, served as a stark reminder of the Iran-backed group’s ongoing conflict with Israel.

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz made it clear that figures like Nasrallah would continue to meet their demise, stating: “You will specialize in funerals, and we will in victories.”

Last November, Hezbollah’s new leader, Sheikh Naim Qassem, pledged to coordinate closely with the Lebanese army to implement a ceasefire deal between the governments of Lebanon and Israel. “There will be high-level coordination between the Resistance (Hezbollah) and the Lebanese army to implement the commitments of the deal,” he said in an address to supporters.

But as the dust settles from Nasrallah’s funeral, a critical question emerges: Is Hezbollah truly committed to ceding control of “resistance” to the Lebanese state, as many assumed?

Long the dominant force in Lebanon, Hezbollah suffered heavy losses during its 14-month conflict with Israel from Oct. 8, 2023, the day after a Hamas-led attack by Palestinian militants on Israel. Nasrallah was killed on Sept. 27, 2024, when Israeli forces bombed a building in southern Beirut where he was meeting with Hezbollah commanders.

But as the dust settles from Nasrallah’s funeral, a critical question emerges: Is Hezbollah truly committed to ceding control of “resistance” to the Lebanese state, as many assumed? (AFP)



What made matters worse was the fall in December of ally Bashar Assad in Syria, a reliable conduit for Middle East militant groups for weapons from Iran.

It is undeniable that Hezbollah is facing mounting challenges. A recent Wall Street Journal report cited an anonymous source close to Hezbollah as saying that fighters not originally from the south had been told to vacate their positions and that the Lebanese Armed Forces would be allowed to take control of the area as per the terms of the ceasefire.

The source also said the war had emptied Hezbollah’s coffers, making it impossible for it to fulfill its financial obligations to the families of slain soldiers, and supporters who lost their businesses and homes during the war.

The WSJ report also quoted residents as saying that Al-Qard Al-Hassan, Hezbollah’s primary financial institution, had “frozen payments for compensation checks that had already been issued.”

At the same time, Israel has extended its presence in five strategic positions on the Lebanese side of the Blue Line, citing security concerns. Nadav Shoshani, an Israeli military spokesperson, described it as a “temporary measure” to protect displaced northern Israeli communities.

Lebanese officials, however, view it as an “occupation” and are engaged in diplomatic efforts with Washington and Paris to secure a full Israeli withdrawal.

Nasrallah’s successor Sheikh Naim Qassem told supporters his group’s resistance will continue. (AFP)

In his televised address to mourners on Sunday, Qassem vowed to continue in his predecessor’s footsteps, asserting that “the resistance is not over.” He accused the Lebanese government of bowing to American pressure, particularly in preventing two Iranian planes from landing at Beirut’s Rafic Hariri International Airport.

That decision, reportedly influenced by US warnings of an imminent Israeli strike, sparked protests, with Hezbollah supporters storming the streets and attacking a UN convoy, injuring two peacekeepers.

The attack on UNIFIL peacekeepers prompted swift condemnation. President Joseph Aoun called it a “flagrant violation of international law” and vowed that security forces would act against those destabilizing the country. Meanwhile, Hezbollah dismissed the government’s actions as merely following “an Israeli order.”

Lebanon’s new government finds itself in a precarious position, balancing the need for international credibility with the reality of Hezbollah’s entrenched power.

On Tuesday, Lebanon’s parliament began a two-day debate on the government’s ministerial statement, which sets out the objectives of the new administration.

Israel has extended its presence in five strategic positions on the Lebanese side of the Blue Line. (AFP)


Opening the debate, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam reiterated the state’s monopoly on the use of force, emphasizing the need to enforce UN Resolution 1701, which calls for Hezbollah’s disarmament south of the Litani River, and to his commitment to Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Deputy Speaker Elias Bou Saab, meanwhile, called for national unity, warning that “if the state fails to act, alternative forces will take over.”

In a sign that Hezbollah is perhaps willing to work with the new administration for the collective good of Lebanon, Mohammad Raad, head of the group’s parliamentary bloc, issued a statement on Tuesday in support of Salam’s government.

“We give our confidence to the government,” said Raad, expressing hope the new administration would “succeed in opening the doors to real rescue for the country.”

“We are keen on cooperating to the greatest extent to preserve national sovereignty and its stability and achieve reforms and take the state forward,” he added.

FASTFACTS

• Hassan Nasrallah, who helped found Hezbollah in 1982, following Israel’s invasion of Lebanon, was killed on Sept. 27 last year. 

• Nasrallah’s funeral was held on Sunday at the 48,000-seat Camille Chamoun Sports City Stadium located in southern Beirut. 

• The funeral also honored Hashem Safieddine, who led Hezbollah for just a week after Nasrallah’s death before he was killed by Israel.


While Prime Minister Salam has reaffirmed Lebanon’s commitment to UN Resolution 1701, there is little indication that the state can enforce this mandate without Hezbollah’s consent.

“The current government has a limited life and has several priorities; implementing the ceasefire agreement is at the top of them,” Nadim Shehadi, an economist and political adviser, told Arab News.

“How quick this will be is as much a logistical as it is a political question. It is wrong to assume that the Lebanese army can disarm Hezbollah without its political consent. There are competing interpretations of the ceasefire agreement.”

Shehadi added: “Nasrallah’s funeral on Sunday was significant. It was a political show of force accompanied by a defiantly uncompromising speech by Qassem.”

Sheikh Naim Qassem, pledged to coordinate closely with the Lebanese army. (AFP)


The US has made clear its stance on Hezbollah’s disarmament, tying Lebanon’s financial aid to progress on this front. The Trump administration recently froze all foreign aid through the State Department and USAID, citing misalignment with US interests.

In 2024, Lebanon received $219 million from USAID and an additional $17 million from the State Department. President Donald Trump’s decision to suspend aid was seen by many as a means to pressure Lebanon into fully implementing Resolution 1701 and preventing Hezbollah’s rearmament.

“American aid cuts are less chaotic than expected and are in fact linked to performance. The devil is everywhere, including the details,” Shehadi said. “Given the amount of bureaucracy involved and the immensity of cuts that the administration is carrying out across the board, one worries more about the implementation than about the principle.”

Hezbollah’s massive turnout for Nasrallah’s funeral underscored its continued influence. “Our struggle in support of Gaza is part of our faith in the liberation of Palestine,” Qassem, the new Hezbollah chief, told the mourners.

“We confront the Zionist regime and its supporter, the great tyrant, the US, which is conspiring against Gaza, Palestine, Lebanon, Iraq, and Iran.”

By contrast, President Aoun told a visiting Iranian delegation that was in Beirut for the funeral that Lebanon was “tired” of external conflicts playing out on its territory. “Lebanon has grown tired of the wars of others on its land,” he said, according to an official statement.

“Countries should not interfere in the internal affairs of other countries.”

In a recent op-ed for Arab News, Dania Koleilat Khatib, a specialist in US-Arab relations, said: “The US should be wise enough to realize that the continued presence of Israeli forces in Lebanon and their operations aimed at eliminating Hezbollah members will only strengthen the group in the long run.

Hezbollah’s massive turnout for Nasrallah’s funeral underscored its continued influence. (AFP)


“For stability, Israel must withdraw, and the Lebanese state must be strengthened. If this happens, Hezbollah will eventually be decommissioned as an armed movement.”

Despite Hezbollah’s assurances that it would coordinate closely with the Lebanese government to implement the ceasefire, its words and actions tell a different story.

Even now, it remains Lebanon’s most powerful armed entity, seen by its critics as undermining the state’s sovereignty while blaming external actors for its challenges.

The group’s financial troubles may weaken it in the long term, but for now its grip on Lebanon’s security landscape appears as firm as ever.

Whether the Lebanese government can assert full control over national defense — or whether Hezbollah will remain a state within a state — remains an open and pressing question.

 


Morocco announces $2.9 billion deal for French, Spanish and South Korean trains

Morocco announces $2.9 billion deal for French, Spanish and South Korean trains
Updated 33 min 15 sec ago
Follow

Morocco announces $2.9 billion deal for French, Spanish and South Korean trains

Morocco announces $2.9 billion deal for French, Spanish and South Korean trains
  • They include 18 high-speed trains from Alstom
  • The ONCF said the purchases aimed to contribute to “the successful joint organization of the 2030 FIFA World Cup“

RABAT: Morocco announced on Wednesday it would buy up to 168 trains from Spain’s CAF, South Korea’s Hyundai and France’s Alstom for $2.9 billion as part of preparations for the 2030 FIFA World Cup it is co-hosting with Spain and Portugal.
The National Railway Office (ONCF) said in a statement that it had awarded the contracts for the “new train acquisition program, with a total cost of 29 billion dirhams, as part of the development plan for 2030.”
They include 18 high-speed trains from Alstom, sealing a deal first mentioned during French President Emmanuel Macron’s visit to Rabat in October.
Morocco already has one 350-kilometer (220-mile) high-speed railway line between the coastal cities of Tangier and Casablanca, and is planning a second that will extend 400 kilometers (250 miles) from Kenitra on the coast to Marrakech in the interior.
The first line, built by Alstom, has been in operation since 2018.
The contract with Spain’s CAF is for 30 intercity trains with an option for a further 10, while the deal with Hyundai Rotem is for 110 commuter trains.
The ONCF said the purchases aimed to contribute to “the successful joint organization of the 2030 FIFA World Cup.”
It said it also aimed to develop the domestic railway industry, with a local factory for commuter trains and “the ambition to export trains in the medium and long term.”


Gaza reconstruction needs political clarity, stability, UAE’s Gargash says

Gaza reconstruction needs political clarity, stability, UAE’s Gargash says
Updated 26 February 2025
Follow

Gaza reconstruction needs political clarity, stability, UAE’s Gargash says

Gaza reconstruction needs political clarity, stability, UAE’s Gargash says
  • Gaza does need a reconstruction plan, a massive one, but that reconstruction plan cannot really take place without a clear path to a two-state solution

ABU DHBAI: Anwar Gargash, the diplomatic adviser to UAE’s president, said on Wednesday a Gaza reconstruction plan cannot happen without a clear path to a two-state solution for Israel and the Palestinians.
Investment in the project would need political stability, he added in remarks to the Investopia 2025 conference in Abu Dhabi.
“Gaza does need a reconstruction plan, a massive one, but that reconstruction plan cannot really take place without a clear path to a two-state solution. So, clearly here, you need political stability of a roadmap in order for these big investments to come to place,” Gargash said.
Arab states are weighing a post-war plan for Gaza to counter US President Donald Trump’s proposal to redevelop the strip under US control and displace Palestinians, a prospect that has angered regional leaders. The mainly Egyptian proposal may include up to $20 billion in funding over three years from the region, sources familiar with the discussions have said.
Egypt and Jordan held discussions with Gulf states in Riyadh last week to discuss the proposal ahead of an emergency summit to be held in Egypt on March 4 to discuss Gaza reconstruction.
Gargash added: “You know, you can’t just go and sort of invest billions without that political clarity and come back to see yet another conflict. I think that position is very clear.”
When asked if Trump’s proposal for Gaza was intentionally provocative to force Arab states to come up with a plan, Gargash said: “President Trump is a disruptor in many areas and the Arab, let’s say state system, was up to the challenge in my opinion. And I think it allowed the Arab state system to step up.”


Lebanon’s government wins confidence vote, says only armed forces should defend country in war

Lebanon’s government wins confidence vote, says only armed forces should defend country in war
Updated 26 February 2025
Follow

Lebanon’s government wins confidence vote, says only armed forces should defend country in war

Lebanon’s government wins confidence vote, says only armed forces should defend country in war
  • Salam said the government asserts that Lebanon has the right to defend itself in case of any “aggression” and only the state has the right to have weapons
  • He also said the government takes measures to liberate land occupied by Israel “through its forces only”

BEIRUT: Lebanon’s new government on Wednesday won a confidence vote in Parliament, with the support of Hezbollah’s bloc, even though the government statement adopted took a swipe at the group’s weapons.
Ninety-five out of 128 lawmakers supported the government of Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, a prominent jurist who previously headed the International Court of Justice. He was appointed last month to form a new government after a devastating war between Israel and Hezbollah, which killed over 4,000 people and caused widespread destruction.
The government statement adopted said that only Lebanon’s armed forces should defend the country in case of war. Unlike previous statements, it did not include the phrase “armed resistance,” which had been seen as legitimizing Hezbollah’s possession of weapons outside of state control.
Hezbollah has kept its weapons over the past decades saying they are necessary to defend the country against Israel. Calls for the group’s disarmament, however, intensified during the latest war, which ended with a US-brokered ceasefire on Nov. 27, 2024.
Hezbollah did not support Salam’s bid to be prime minister. But Hezbollah’s parliamentary leader, Mohammad Raad, on Tuesday announced his bloc’s confidence in his Cabinet on Tuesday.
Salam said the government asserts that Lebanon has the right to defend itself in case of any “aggression” and only the state has the right to have weapons. He also said the government takes measures to liberate land occupied by Israel “through its forces only.”
Legislators from the Amal movement, led by parliamentary speaker Nabih Berri — who brokered the ceasefire and is allied with Hezbollah — also voted for the new government. Hezbollah and the Amal Movement collectively hold about 27 seats designated for the Shi’ite community.
The Marada Movement, a Christian political party aligned with Hezbollah, and the Syrian Social Nationalist Party, a secular nationalist party aligned with Hezbollah, also offered the government their confidence.
The Lebanese Forces and the Kataeb, Christian parties that oppose Hezbollah and call for its disarmament and reduced Iranian influence, also backed Salam’s government.
Meanwhile, 12 legislators withheld support while four others abstained from voting, criticizing the ministerial statement as vague and lacking a clear plan. The “Strong Lebanon” bloc led by Gebran Bassil of the Free Patriotic Movement, previously aligned with Hezbollah, voted against the new government.
Among the key issues raised by parliamentarians for the government to address are Israel’s ceasefire violations and demands for its full withdrawal from Lebanese territory. While Israeli troops pulled out under the ceasefire terms, they remain in five strategic outposts along the border and continue to conduct airstrikes, saying they are targeting Hezbollah fighters and weapons caches.
Legislators also urged the government to tackle reconstruction following the war, Lebanon’s severe economic and banking crisis and implement long-overdue judicial and banking reforms.