Russian woman sentenced to 27 years for handing bomb to war blogger
Russian woman sentenced to 27 years for handing bomb to war blogger/node/2448076/world
Russian woman sentenced to 27 years for handing bomb to war blogger
Darya Trepova, a suspect in a bombing that killed a well-known Russian military blogger, talks with her lawyer during a court hearing at the 1st Western District Military Court in St. Petersburg on Jan. 25, 2024. (AP)
Russian woman sentenced to 27 years for handing bomb to war blogger
She showed no visible emotion in response to the sentence
Trepova said she had been set up, and had thought the statuette contained a listening device, not a bomb
Updated 25 January 2024
Reuters
ST PETERSBURG, Russia: A young Russian woman was jailed for 27 years on Thursday for delivering a bomb that exploded in the hands of a pro-war military blogger last year and killed him on the spot.
Darya Trepova, 26, was convicted by a St. Petersburg court of terrorism, handling explosives and using forged documents in connection with the death of blogger Vladlen Tatarsky.
She showed no visible emotion in response to the sentence, which Russian media said was the harshest given to any woman in the country’s modern history. Her defense team said they would appeal.
Tatarsky was killed by a bomb concealed inside a statuette in his likeness that Trepova had presented to him as a gift during a talk he was giving in a St. Petersburg cafe.
Trepova said she had been set up, and had thought the statuette contained a listening device, not a bomb.
She told the trial she was acting under orders from a man in Ukraine whom she knew as “Gestalt” (German for “Shape“), who had been sending her money and instructions for several months before the cafe bombing.
Russia accused Ukraine immediately after the attack of organizing the murder of Tatarsky, whose real name was Maxim Fomin. He was one of a group of prominent bloggers who have built up large online audiences as cheerleaders for Russia’s war in Ukraine, while sometimes criticizing its tactics.
Senior Ukrainian officials have neither claimed responsibility nor denied involvement in Tatarsky’s death, with presidential aide Mykhailo Podolyak describing it as “internal terrorism.”
Trepova said she had gone along with Gestalt’s instructions because she assumed the purpose of eavesdropping on Tatarsky was to find out more of what he knew about the war, which she opposed.
“I feel great pain and shame that my gullibility and my naivety led to such catastrophic consequences. I didn’t want to hurt anyone,” she told the court earlier this week, speaking directly to people who were wounded in the bombing and who have claimed substantial amounts in compensation from her.
“I feel especial pain and shame that a terrorist act was carried out by my own hands.”
The defense said Trepova too was a victim because, sitting only several meters from Tatarsky, she could herself have been killed or wounded.
The prosecution argued that she had known about the bomb and “acted deliberately with the aim of destabilising the Russian Federation and discrediting the special military operation” — the official name for Moscow’s war effort in Ukraine.
After the bomb went off, Trepova said she had panicked. Knowing that she risked arrest, she ignored an instruction from “Gestalt” to head to the airport and catch a flight.
Instead she called her husband, who asked a friend of his called Dmitry Kasintsev to let her stay at his apartment that night. She was arrested there the following day.
Kasintsev, 27, was sentenced on Thursday to one year and nine months for helping her to hide, despite testimony from Trepova that she had never met him before and he had nothing to do with the bomb.
Norway to ask ICJ to clarify Israel’s aid obligations to Palestinians
Updated 19 sec ago
OSLO: Norway on Tuesday said it would ask the UN’s International Court of Justice to clarify Israel’s aid obligations to Palestinians, a day after Israel banned the UN agency for Palestinian refugees. Despite international concerns, Israeli lawmakers on Monday overwhelmingly voted to bar the agency, UNRWA, from operating in Israel and east Jerusalem. For more than seven decades, UNRWA has provided critical support to Palestinian refugees. But it has faced mounting criticism from Israeli officials that has escalated since the start of the war in Gaza after Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack. Israel claims that a dozen UNRWA employees were involved in the deadly assault. Norway said it was “requesting that the ICJ pronounces on Israel’s obligations to facilitate humanitarian assistance to the Palestinian population, delivered by international organizations, including the UN and states,” Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store said in a statement. He said Norway would submit a resolution to the UN General Assembly with the request that the ICJ give an advisory opinion on the matter. Norway angered Israel in May when it recognized the Palestinian state, together with Ireland and Spain. And, unlike other donors, it increased its aid to UNRWA in June despite the controversy over whether the agency’s employees were involved in the October 7 attack. “The Israeli government’s policy is making it increasingly difficult for Palestinians to access life-saving assistance and basic services such as health care and education,” Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide said in the same statement. The UNRWA ban would have “severe consequences for millions of civilians already living in the most dire of circumstances,” he said, adding that it “also undermines the stability of the entire Middle East.” “Israel’s behavior contravenes international law and undermines efforts to establish a viable Palestinian state and the two-state solution,” Barth Eide said.
Germany recalls envoy to Iran over execution of dual national
Sharmahd, who also holds US residency, was sentenced to death in 2023 on charges of “corruption on earth,” a capital offense under Iran’s Islamic laws
Updated 18 min 15 sec ago
Reuters
BERLIN: Germany has recalled its ambassador to Iran over the execution of German Iranian national Jamshid Sharmahd and summoned the Iranian charge d’affaires to voice Berlin’s protest, the German foreign office said on Tuesday.
“We have sent our strongest protest against the actions of the Iranian regime & reserve the right to take further action,” the Foreign Ministry said in a post on X.
Germany’s ambassador in Tehran protested in the strongest possible terms against the killing of Sharmahd, the post said, adding that German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock had recalled the ambassador to Berlin for consultations. Iranian state media said on Monday Sharmahd was put to death after he was convicted of carrying out terrorist attacks. “No terrorist enjoys impunity in Iran. Even if supported by Germany,” Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said on X.
“Iranian national Jamshid Sharmahd openly and unashamedly led a terrorist attack on a mosque that killed 14 innocent people.”
Iranian state media reported on Tuesday that the German ambassador was summoned by the Foreign Ministry over “interventionist comments” made by German officials against the Iranian judiciary’s decision.
“Support for Sharmahd contradicts the German government’s claims in regards to the rule of law, the protection of human rights, and the fight against terrorism,” the Foreign Ministry said according to state media.
Sharmahd, who also holds US residency, was sentenced to death in 2023 on charges of “corruption on earth,” a capital offense under Iran’s Islamic laws.
He was accused by Iran of heading a pro-monarchist group accused of a deadly 2008 bombing and planning other attacks.
His daughter Gazelle Sharmahd, also on X, demanded proof of his execution and called for the immediate return of her father.
Police say British teen accused of fatally stabbing 3 girls also made poison and had a terror manual
Axel Rudakubana, 18, who is charged with murdering three girls and stabbing 10 other people on July 29, produced the deadly poison ricin that was later found in his home
Updated 41 min 22 sec ago
AP
LONDON: The teenager accused in a stabbing rampage that killed three girls at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in England has been charged with producing the deadly poison ricin and now faces a terror offense for possessing a jihadi training manual, police said Tuesday.
Axel Rudakubana, 18, who is charged with murdering three girls and stabbing 10 other people on July 29, produced the deadly poison ricin that was later found in his home, Merseyside Police said. Police also found he had a computer file with an Al-Qaeda training manual titled: “Military Studies in the Jihad Against the Tyrants.”
Ricin is derived from the castor bean plant and is one of the world’s deadliest toxins. It has no known vaccine or antidote and kills cells by preventing them from making proteins.
Police stressed that the stabbing attack has not been classed as a “terrorist incident,” which would require a motive to be known.
The stabbing occurred on the first week of summer vacation as girls aged about 6 to 11 participated in a two-hour session led by a yoga instructor and a dance instructor.
Witnesses described hearing blood-curdling screams and seeing children covered in blood running from the studio.
The first officers who arrived were shocked to find so many casualties, Chief Constable Serena Kennedy said.
Rudakubana already faced three counts of murder over the July deaths of Alice Dasilva Aguiar, 9, Elsie Dot Stancombe, 7, and Bebe King, 6, in the seaside town of Southport in northwest England.
He also has been charged with 10 counts of attempted murder for the eight children and two adults who were injured.
The stabbings were used by far-right activists to stoke anger at immigrants and Muslims after misinformation spread on social media identifying him as an asylum seeker and misreporting his name.
Violence spread from Southport and led to rioting across England and Northern Ireland that lasted a week.
Rudakubana was born in Wales to Rwandan parents, police said. British media reported that he was raised Christian.
Dr. Renu Bindra of the UK Health Security Agency said “there was no evidence that any victims, responders or members of the public were exposed to ricin either as part of the incident or afterwards,” and the risk to the public was low. No ricin was found at the site of the stabbing attack.
Ricin is estimated to be 6,000 times more poisonous than cyanide and can be fatal when inhaled, ingested, injected or swallowed. Two millionths of an ounce — roughly the weight of a grain of salt – is enough to kill an adult.
Several people have gone on trial around the world in recent years charged with attempting to use ricin for murder or terror plots, but examples of its successful fatal use are rare.
Bulgarian defector Georgi Markov was killed in London in 1978 when a pinhead-sized pellet laced with ricin was injected into his thigh — reportedly by a rigged umbrella.
Which presidential candidate do Jewish Americans support for peace in the Middle East?
Updated 57 min ago
Jonathan Gornall
LONDON: On Oct. 7, the first anniversary of the Hamas-led attack on Israel, Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris and her Jewish husband Doug Emhoff planted a small pomegranate tree in the grounds of the vice president’s residence at the US Naval Observatory.
The solemn occasion, and the tree itself, was freighted with symbolic meaning.
In Judaism, the fruit of the pomegranate tree is a symbol of righteousness and hope, traditionally served on Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish new year. The fruit is said to contain 613 seeds — exactly the same number of the commandments, or mitzvot, found in the Torah, the first five books of the Hebrew Bible.
Harris, who said she was planting the tree to remind future vice presidents “not only of the horror of Oct. 7, but (also) of the strength and endurance of the Jewish people,” dedicated it “to the 1,200 innocent souls who, in an act of pure evil, were massacred by Hamas terrorists.”
A few weeks earlier, her rival Donald Trump had made an altogether less subtle pitch for the votes of Jewish Americans. Addressing the Israeli-American Council summit in Washington at an event also held to commemorate Oct. 7, he told his audience that “anybody who’s Jewish and loves being Jewish and loves Israel is a fool if they vote for a Democrat.”
In fact, he added, any Jew who voted for Harris “should have your head examined.”
Trump said: “Anybody who’s Jewish and loves being Jewish and loves Israel is a fool if they vote for a Democrat.” (AFP)
In truth, with precious votes to be had from Jewish and Arab voters alike in the seven key battleground states of Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, both candidates are walking a tightrope between the regional sensibilities that could have such an impact on a presidential election taking place almost 10,000 km away.
And, as the recent Arab News-YouGov poll revealed, Arab American voters in particular are hard pressed to decide which of the two candidates, with their very different rhetorical styles, are likely to be better for the Middle East in general if elected president. Both Harris and Trump are each supported by exactly 38 percent of those polled.
As a mark of the general uncertainty about the real plans and intentions of either candidate once in office, supporters of both parties are switching their traditional allegiances just days before the election.
On Oct. 14, the Arab American Political Action Committee, which has consistently backed Democratic presidential nominees, announced that for the first time since its foundation in 1998 it would be endorsing neither candidate.
“Both candidates have endorsed genocide in Gaza and war in Lebanon,” AAPAC said in a statement. “We simply cannot give our votes to either Democrat Kamala Harris or Republican Donald Trump, who blindly support the criminal Israeli government.”
Meanwhile, Trump’s bravura performance at the Israeli American Council summit on Sept. 20, at which he cast himself as Israel’s “big protector” and suggested a Harris presidency would spell “annihilation” for the state, appears to have backfired.
Opinion
This section contains relevant reference points, placed in (Opinion field)
His comments earned rebukes from organizations including the Anti-Defamation League and the Jewish Council for Public Affairs.
Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO of the ADL, addressed Trump’s remarks in a statement, saying that “preemptively blaming American Jews for your potential election loss does zero to help American Jews (and) increases their sense of alienation in a moment of vulnerability.”
As if to illustrate just how tricky the electoral tightrope is, strung as it is against the background of events in the Middle East, a poll commissioned by the Jewish Democratic Council of America at the beginning of October found that 71 percent of Jewish voters in the seven battleground states intended to vote for Harris, with only 26 percent backing Trump.
This is an intriguing development, especially when set alongside the findings of the Arab News-YouGov poll, which found a similar swing away from traditional voting intentions among Arab Americans, a slim majority of whom intend to vote for Trump.
The slight majority support for Trump (45 percent vs. 43 percent for Harris) is despite the fact that 40 percent of those polled described themselves as natural Democrats, and only 28 percent as Republicans.
It reflects disappointment in the Arab American community at the perceived failure of the Biden-Harris administration to adequately rein in Israel or hold it to account. In 2020, 43 percent of respondents had backed Biden, with only 34 percent voting for Trump.
Kamala Harris and her Jewish husband Doug Emhoff planted a small pomegranate tree in the grounds of the vice president’s residence. (AFP)
As Firas Maksad, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute in Washington D.C., told a recent edition of the Arab News podcast “Frankly Speaking,” “the fact that they are so evenly split is surprising, particularly given what’s been happening in Gaza and now Lebanon.
“You’d think that that would have an impact and would dampen the vote for somebody who is so staunchly pro-Israel, like Donald Trump, but clearly that’s not the case.”
With just days to go until the election, however, it remains almost impossible to say with any certainty which of the candidates would be best for the Middle East in general, and in particular for resolving the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Even the experts are struggling to predict how a Harris administration and a Trump administration might differ in their approach to the Middle East.
“When you dig a little deeper into things beyond our headlines, beyond our polarized politics, President Trump’s and Vice President Harris’ positions on a variety of important issues in the Middle East — whether it’s the two-state solution, whether it’s US policy toward Iran, whether it’s regarding human rights and promotion of democratic reform in the region — are not all that different from each other,” said Steven Cook, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, speaking in a Foreign Policy magazine election debate on Monday.
“On the two-state solution they obviously have very different visions of what that would look like, based on President Trump’s ‘deal of the century’ that he tabled during his one term in office. But nevertheless, they’re both supportive of a two-state solution to bring the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians to an end.”
Similarly, although in 2018 Trump pulled out the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the nuclear deal adopted by Iran and the P5+1 countries in 2015, both candidates now appear committed to reinvigorating it.
FASTFACTS
• A poll conducted in October by the conservative Manhattan Institute had Harris leading Trump 67% to 31% among likely Jewish voters.
• Polls of Jewish voters in 7 battleground states conducted for the Jewish Democratic Council of America had Harris leading Trump 71% to 26%.
“President Trump was often bellicose about Iran,” said Cook. “But his bellicosity hid the fact that what he was most interested in was putting pressure on the Iranians to bring them back to the negotiating table so that he can negotiate a better deal than the JCPOA.
“The administration that Vice President Harris has served has for the past two and a half years sought to draw the Iranians back into a JCPOA deal that would put limits on Iran’s nuclear program.
“So, on those big issues there may be a difference in style, a difference in rhetoric, but the ultimate policy goal of both candidates seems to me very much the same.”
Speaking in the same debate, Sanam Vakil, director of the Middle East and North Africa Program at the Chatham House policy institute, said that there were still many question marks hanging over Harris’ approach to the region.
“She’s very cautious; she’s a bit of a black box and so we can read whatever we want into her,” she said. “But there’s also no guarantee as to what will come out from President Trump (on) the Middle Eastern landscape.
“Both candidates have endorsed genocide in Gaza and war in Lebanon,” AAPAC said in a statement. (AFP)
“I think there is a lot of expectation that he will stop the war, because he has implied as much, and for a lot of leaders around the region, but more broadly for citizens across multiple Middle Eastern countries, this is urgent.
“They would like to see the violence coming to an end, regular humanitarian aid being delivered to Gaza, and, of course, the violence also stopped in Lebanon, and that is the expectation, that Trump is going to pick up the phone to Prime Minister Netanyahu and put an end to this conflict.”
There is also an anticipation that Trump “will try to find some way around his previous engagement in the region to invest in an Israeli-Saudi normalization process,” she said. “But here there’s a caveat.
“Over the past year and particularly over the past few weeks the Saudi leadership have made it very clear that normalization is going to be predicated not on a process but on (Palestinian) statehood, and so there will (have to) be negotiation on what all of that means.”
On Oct. 14, the Washington-based Council on Foreign Relations, an independent, non-partisan think tank, published a report comparing and contrasting the two candidates’ positions on a series of global issues, including Israel, Gaza and the Middle East.
Harris, it summarized, “backs Israel’s right to self-defense but has also been outspoken about the toll on Palestinian civilians amid the war between Israel and Hamas.”
Even the experts are struggling to predict how a Harris administration and a Trump administration might differ in their approach to the Middle East. (AFP)
As a result, many of her policy positions have been contradictory. For example, she called for an Israel-Hamas ceasefire in March, a month ahead of President Biden, criticized Israel’s leadership for the “humanitarian catastrophe” in Gaza and called for a two-state solution “where the Palestinians have security, self-determination and the dignity they so rightly deserve.”
She has also said Israel must bring to justice “extremist settlers” responsible for violent attacks against Palestinians in the West Bank.
Yet Harris has also said she “will always give Israel the ability to defend itself” and fully supports US military aid to Israel (worth more than $12 billion since Oct. 7, 2023), which she has vowed to continue providing if elected president.
In the past, Trump’s support for Israel, “a cherished ally,” has raised hackles across the region.
In 2017 he recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and moved the US embassy there. In 2019 he reversed decades of US policy and recognized Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, seized from Syria by Israel in 1967.
In 2020 his Abraham Accords were widely seen as favoring Israel and patronizing the Palestinians, while from an Arab perspective the fatal flaw in a two-state peace initiative he unveiled that same year was that it proposed granting Israel sovereignty over much of the occupied territories.
Trump’s “Peace to Prosperity: A vision to improve the lives of the Palestinian and Israeli people,” which he unveiled alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, received a mixed reaction.
It was rejected by the Arab League and denounced by President Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestinian Authority as a “conspiracy deal,” but received more positive reviews from Gulf states.
Harris has also said she “will always give Israel the ability to defend itself” and fully supports US military aid to Israel. (AFP)
The UAE’s ambassador to Washington called it “a serious initiative that addresses many issues raised over the years,” while Saudi Arabia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said it “appreciates the efforts of President Trump’s administration to develop a comprehensive peace plan.”
The plan, three years in the making, was never implemented. Intriguingly, however, it remains on the shelf, an oven-ready initiative that would allow a new Trump administration to hit the ground running in pursuit of his claim that only he is capable of bringing peace to the region.
It was, perhaps, telling that in the middle of campaigning in the knife-edge presidential race, Trump took time out last week to give an exclusive interview to Saudi TV channel Al Arabiya — recalling that his first overseas trip as president in 2017 had been to the Kingdom.
“I want to see the Middle East get back to peace but peace that’s going to be a lasting peace and I feel really truly confident it’s going to happen, and I believe it’s going to happen soon,” he told Al Arabiya’s Washington bureau chief, Nadia Bilbassy-Charters.
He stressed his admiration for, and friendship with, the Saudi crown prince, adding: “I was respected over there and (had) great relationships with so many including (Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman) and (if elected on Nov. 5) we’re going to get it done and it’s going to get done properly.”
The US election, he predicted, “is going to make a big difference.”
JAKARTA: Indonesia called on the UN Security Council on Tuesday to halt Israel’s ban on the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, a move Jakarta says violates the world organization’s charter and immunity of its bodies.
On Monday evening, the Israeli parliament — the Knesset — passed two bills; one barring UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees from operating on territories occupied by Israel, and another banning Israeli authorities from any contact with the UN agency.
The bans, set to take effect in 90 days, are expected to severely restrict UNRWA from operating in the regions where it is supporting the Palestinian population in the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza strip.
“This decision clearly violates and contradicts the UN Charter and the 1946 Convention on the immunities of UN agencies,” the Indonesian Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement.
“Indonesia urges the international community, especially the UN Security Council, to immediately halt Israel’s actions and ensure its compliance with obligations under international law, UN Security Council resolutions, and the ICJ (International Court of Justice) rulings to end the occupation in Palestine.”
In July, the ICJ ruled that Israel’s occupation of the occupied Palestinian territories is unlawful and should come to an end “as rapidly as possible.”
Indonesia has been increasing its contributions to UNRWA since Israel’s war on Gaza escalated last October.
“UNRWA is an agency mandated by the United Nations to serve an irreplaceable role in providing education, healthcare, and aid to millions of Palestinian refugees. Indonesia reaffirms its commitment to continue supporting UNRWA in discharging its mandate,” the ministry said.
UNRWA was established by the UN General Assembly in 1949, originally to support 700,000 Palestinians who were forced from their homes during the creation of Israel.
Today, it serves some 5.9 million people and operates in the occupied Palestinian territories, as well as Syria, Lebanon and Jordan, with contributions from UN member states.
Since Israel escalated its attacks on Gaza more than a year ago, nearly all Palestinians in the area have relied on UNRWA for basic necessities.
This includes reliance on food, water and hygiene supplies, while almost half of the enclave’s 2.2 million population have been sheltered in the UN agency’s schools, clinics and public facilities.
Israeli forces have killed at least 233 UNRWA staff in the year-long war, during which Tel Aviv launched an intense campaign to delegitimize the UN body.
This includes accusing UNRWA employees of association with the Gaza-based militant group Hamas, which earlier this year had led to some countries, including the US, suspending funding for the agency.
Most nations have since restored their contributions, with the exception of Washington, its biggest donor.
Monday’s vote by the Israeli parliament “sets a dangerous precedent,” said UNRWA head, Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini.
He wrote on X that it “will only deepen the suffering of Palestinians, especially in Gaza where people have been going through more than a year of sheer hell.”
Israel’s relentless air and ground attacks on Gaza have killed over 43,000 Palestinians and injured more than 101,000. The real death toll is suspected to be much higher, with estimates published by medical journal The Lancet indicating that, as of July, it could be more than 186,000.
“Failing to push back these bills will weaken our common multilateral mechanism established after World War 2,” Lazzarini said. “This should be a concern to all.”
