Muslim shopfronts torn down in Mumbai after religious clashes 

Muslim shopfronts torn down in Mumbai after religious clashes 
Pedestrians walk past shops along a crowded street near Minara Masjid mosque in Mumbai, India, on January 25, 2024. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 25 January 2024
Follow

Muslim shopfronts torn down in Mumbai after religious clashes 

Muslim shopfronts torn down in Mumbai after religious clashes 
  • So-called ‘bulldozer justice’ has been an increasingly common tool of local officials in India to punish suspected criminals by demolishing their property 
  • Rights groups have condemned the practice as unlawful exercise in collective punishment that disproportionately targets the country’s Muslim minority 

MUMBAI: Authorities in India’s financial capital Mumbai have torn down several Muslim-owned makeshift shopfronts after religious clashes sparked by a divisive Hindu temple opened this week by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. 

Minor clashes broke out Sunday in parts of Mumbai, including one incident where Hindus chanting religious slogans passed through a Muslim neighborhood on the megacity’s outskirts. 

No serious injuries were reported in the melee but by Tuesday, authorities had called in excavators to knock down more than a dozen shopfronts belonging to Muslims in that locality, according to local media reports. 

The following evening another 40 shopfronts were knocked down on Mohammed Ali Road, a major downtown thoroughfare and center of local Muslim commerce that had also seen weekend clashes. 

“We were undertaking deep clearing of the road in which some temporary hawkers and so forth were removed,” a local municipal officer, who declined to be named, told AFP on Thursday. 

Numerous traders of all faiths often build makeshift shopfronts out of canvas and wood to shield their businesses and patrons from the city’s scorching sun and pounding monsoon rains. 

“I cannot fathom why this was done,” Abdul Haseeb Khan, owner of a restaurant hit in the clearance drive, told AFP. 

“If they didn’t want these structures here, they should have informed us and we would have removed it. This is no way to take action.” 

Municipal officials told local media that the campaign was “routine” and planned before Sunday’s clashes, and that it was aimed at clearing illegal encroachments and easing pedestrian traffic. 

So-called “bulldozer justice” has been an increasingly common tool of local officials in India to punish suspected criminals by demolishing their property. 

Rights groups have condemned the practice as an unlawful exercise in collective punishment that disproportionately targets the country’s Muslim minority. 

Aaker Patel of Amnesty International said in a statement that this week’s drive in Mumbai represented a “policy of arbitrarily and punitively demolishing Muslim properties following episodes of communal violence.” 

Demolition drives have been employed in numerous Indian states ruled by Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in recent years against the homes of people accused of participating in anti-government protests. 

Muslims make up the bulk of those targeted in the campaigns. 

Officials elsewhere in India customarily say that the demolitions are lawful as they only target buildings constructed without official approval. 

That is disputed by victims, who say they are not given the legally required notice period to dispute demolition orders. 

Sunday’s clashes happened on the eve of Modi’s inauguration of a new Hindu temple to the deity Ram in the northern city of Ayodhya. 

Processions in Mumbai had been celebrating the opening of the shrine, which was built atop a centuries-old mosque torn down by Hindu zealots in 1992 — an incident that sparked India’s most deadly sectarian riots since independence. 

Local media outlets said at least 13 people had been arrested for participating in the weekend clashes. 


Ethiopia is worried over a defense deal between Egypt and Somalia as tensions rise in Horn of Africa

Ethiopia is worried over a defense deal between Egypt and Somalia as tensions rise in Horn of Africa
Updated 16 sec ago
Follow

Ethiopia is worried over a defense deal between Egypt and Somalia as tensions rise in Horn of Africa

Ethiopia is worried over a defense deal between Egypt and Somalia as tensions rise in Horn of Africa
  • The first dispute — between Ethiopia and Egypt — is over Ethiopia’s construction of a $4 billion dam on the Blue Nile, a key tributary to the Nile River

MOGADISHU, Somalia: Ethiopia is increasingly concerned over a recent defense deal between Egypt and Somalia, two countries that Addis Ababa is embroiled in disputes with amid rising tensions in the Horn of Africa region.
Cairo and Mogadishu earlier this month signed a security agreement during a visit to the Egyptian capital by Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, who held talks with his Egyptian host, President Abdel-Fatah El-Sisi.
Details of the deal have not been made public but Ali Abdi Aware, the Somali ambassador to Cairo, told a radio station in Mogadishu that the arrival of military equipment from Egypt to Somalia this week was “the first practical step to implementing” that deal.
Speaking by phone from Cairo to Arlaadi Media radio on Tuesday, he also asserted that under the agreement, Egyptian troops would be deployed to Somalia after Dec. 31, when an African Union’s peacekeeping mission to Somalia ends.
There was no confirmation of such plans from Egypt, which has been seeking to strengthen its influence in the Horn of Africa. Cairo has also not confirmed sending military equipment to Somalia.
The prospect of having Egyptian troops next door has raised concerns in Ethiopia. The foreign ministry in Addis Ababa issued a statement saying the country “cannot stand idle while other actors are taking measures to destabilize the region.”
There are two key disputes involving the three African countries.
The first dispute — between Ethiopia and Egypt — is over Ethiopia’s construction of a $4 billion dam on the Blue Nile, a key tributary to the Nile River. Egypt fears it will have a devastating effect on its water and irrigation supply downstream unless Ethiopia takes its needs into account. Ethiopia is using the dam to generate badly needed electricity.
The second dispute — between Ethiopia and Somalia — is over Somalia’s breakaway region of Somaliland.
Somalia has sought to block landlocked Ethiopia’s ongoing efforts to gain access to the Red Sea via a contentious agreement with Somaliland to lease a stretch of land along Somaliland’s coastline, where Ethiopia would establish a marine force base. In return, according to Somaliland authorities, Ethiopia would recognize Somaliland as an independent country.
Somaliland seceded from Somalia more than 30 years ago but is not recognized by the African Union or the United Nations as an independent state. Somalia still considers Somaliland part of its territory.
Somalia’s federal government has since 2007 been supported by an African Union peacekeeping mission in fighting the Islamic extremist group Al-Shabab, which has ties with Al-Qaeda and is responsible deadly attacks across the country.
Even after the AU peacekeepers leave, troops from countries such as Uganda and Burundi may stay in Somalia under bilateral deals.
Ethiopia said Wednesday it was “vigilantly monitoring developments in the region that could threaten its national security” and accused Somalia of “colluding with external actors” to undermine regional stability.
Somaliland also issued a statement Thursday saying it “strongly objects” to any deployment of Egyptian troops in Somalia.

 


Pro-Palestinian groups to protest Harris campaign stops, Trump debate

Pro-Palestinian groups to protest Harris campaign stops, Trump debate
Updated 31 August 2024
Follow

Pro-Palestinian groups to protest Harris campaign stops, Trump debate

Pro-Palestinian groups to protest Harris campaign stops, Trump debate

WASHINGTON, Aug 30 : Kamala Harris’ strong support for Israel as it continues its war in Gaza is fueling calls for a fresh round of protests at campaign stops, universities and public events in the weeks ahead, activists told Reuters, describing what they said was her failure to listen to pro-Palestinian voices.
Arab Americans, Muslims and their allies, shut out of a Democratic National Convention speaking slot in Chicago, plan to show up in force during Harris’ debate against Donald Trump in Philadelphia on Sept. 10 and in major cities and college campuses on the Oct. 7 anniversary of the Hamas attack.
On Thursday, they interrupted Harris’ speech at a Savannah, Georgia rally.
Since replacing President Joe Biden at the top of the Democratic ticket, Harris has made it clear she will not consider cutting arms sales to Israel, one of the main asks of pro-Palestinian groups. She reiterated the position in a Thursday interview with CNN, saying “No, we have to get a (ceasefire and hostage) deal done,” when asked about limiting weapons.
Harris’ firmly stated position threatens to open the same cracks in the Democratic coalition that faced Biden before he ended his campaign on July 21, despite a huge surge in enthusiasm from Democrats when she took over the ticket.
“That’s right. War crimes and genocide will continue,” Representative Rashida Tlaib, a Democrat and the first Palestinian-American woman elected to Congress, said about Harris’ CNN interview on her personal account on X.
Campaign officials say Harris and top campaign officials have met with pro-Palestinian advocates, and approved space for a panel on the issue during the DNC. Harris has hired two officials in recent weeks to reach out to the Arab American and Muslim communities, but declined to make them available for interviews.
Protests that roiled college campuses last spring are bubbling up in Michigan, Pennsylvania and other battleground states. Democratic party insiders fear Harris will lose needed votes in the Nov. 5 presidential election, which is expected to be decided by slim margins in a handful of states.
Harris has pulled ahead of Republican Donald Trump nationally in most recent polls, but trails in some polls of battleground states that will decide the 2024 winner. Until now, she has mostly avoided the same protests over Gaza that shadowed Biden events, as likely voters hoped she would craft a foreign policy more empathetic to Palestinians.

‘Everybody is hurting’
Ahmet Tekelioglu, executive director of the Council of American Islamic Relations (CAIR)-Philadelphia, said he expected thousands of protesters to show up on the day of the Harris-Trump debate.
Student protesters made a noisy return to Columbia University in recent days, the epicenter of the pro-Palestinian student movement.
Elena Nissan Thomas, 19, a student at Indiana University, who drove to Chicago to take part in a DNC protest, said she was ready to continue protesting as the school year begins.
“I don’t understand Vice President Harris saying she supports a ceasefire and doing nothing to do an arms embargo,” she said.
Political strategists estimate nearly a million Muslims cast a ballot in the 2020 presidential election, many of them concentrated in battleground states, with about 70 percent backing President Joe Biden.
The war began on Oct. 7 when Hamas attacked Israel, killing about 1,200, according to Israeli tallies. Israel’s retaliatory strikes on Gaza, aided by US support, have since killed 40,000 Palestinians, Gaza health officials say, displacing nearly its entire 2.3 million population and creating a famine crisis.
Tanjina Islam, a delegate to the DNC from Georgia, said she wants to support Harris, but is devastated by the lack of concern for Palestinians.
“Everybody is hurting. A lot of people are leaning toward the third party — Jewish Voice for Peace, students, Black Muslims, the Muslims, the Arabs. Everybody is hurting. And these are majority Democrat voters,” she said. “So if Harris loses Georgia, the only reason would be that people did not go out to vote, or people voted for the third party.”


Senegal seeks Europe’s help to fight extremists in the Sahel

Senegal's President Bassirou Diomaye Faye attends a press conference in Dakar, Senegal, Thursday, Aug. 29, 2024. (AP)
Senegal's President Bassirou Diomaye Faye attends a press conference in Dakar, Senegal, Thursday, Aug. 29, 2024. (AP)
Updated 30 August 2024
Follow

Senegal seeks Europe’s help to fight extremists in the Sahel

Senegal's President Bassirou Diomaye Faye attends a press conference in Dakar, Senegal, Thursday, Aug. 29, 2024. (AP)
  • “The situation in the Sahel in the face of terrorism calls for a global mobilization of the international community,” said Faye, who is the ECOWAS-appointed facilitator in negotiations with the three states

DAKAR: Senegalese President Bassirou Diomaye Faye asked for more European support to tackle instability in the Sahel as Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez wrapped up a visit to West Africa.
The troubled Sahel states of Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger are plagued by extremist violence and ruled by juntas who took power in a string of coups since 2020.
Military leaders in the three countries have increasingly turned their backs on the West, breaking away from the West African bloc ECOWAS to form their confederation.
“The situation in the Sahel in the face of terrorism calls for a global mobilization of the international community,” said Faye, who is the ECOWAS-appointed facilitator in negotiations with the three states.
He called for more European backing, saying, “it is well known that the continents of Africa and Europe have a linked security destiny,” during a press conference with Sanchez.
Sanchez lauded Senegal’s mediation efforts in the Sahel, adding: “This region is of the utmost strategic importance for my country ... and we wish to contribute to its stability and prosperity.”
Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger have severed ties with former colonial ruler France, expelling French troops fighting jihadists turned to what they call their “sincere partners” — Russia, Turkiye and Iran.
Senegal was the third and final leg of Sanchez’s three-day West African tour, focused on curbing a surge in irregular migrant arrivals from the region.
Spain signed “circular migration” agreements with Mauritania and The Gambia on Tuesday and Wednesday, establishing a framework for regular entry into Spain based on labor needs.
Senegal already had a migration agreement with Spain aimed at regularising arrivals.
Sanchez announced the signing of a new accord with Dakar covering new economic sectors, including training for Senegalese who settle in Spain.
Senegal is one of the main departure points for the thousands of Africans who attempt the dangerous Atlantic route each year to reach Europe, mainly through Spain’s Canary Islands.
Senegal’s army on Wednesday announced the latest rescue operation off the Moroccan coast involving a stranded boat carrying 41 migrants, including 28 Malians, 12 Senegalese, and one Ivorian.

 


UN releases $100 million for humanitarian emergencies in 10 countries around the world

UN releases $100 million for humanitarian emergencies in 10 countries around the world
Updated 30 August 2024
Follow

UN releases $100 million for humanitarian emergencies in 10 countries around the world

UN releases $100 million for humanitarian emergencies in 10 countries around the world
  • More than one-third of the new funding from the Central Emergency Response Fund known as CERF will go to Yemen

UNITED NATIONS, New York: The United Nations released $100 million on Friday for humanitarian emergencies in 10 countries in Africa, the Middle East, Asia and the Caribbean.
Acting UN humanitarian chief Joyce Msuya said a lack of funding in these countries is preventing aid agencies from providing life-saving assistance, “and that is heart-wrenching.”
More than one-third of the new funding from the Central Emergency Response Fund known as CERF will go to Yemen, where a civil war is now in its 10th year, and Ethiopia, where government forces are fighting several rebel groups in its regions as well as ethnic-related insurgencies. Yemen is getting $20 million and Ethiopia $15 million.
Humanitarian operations in countries engulfed in years of conflict and displacement, exacerbated by climate shocks will also be getting funds: Myanmar ($12 million), Mali ($11 million), Burkina Faso ($10 million), Haiti ($9 million), Cameroon ($7 million) and Mozambique ($7 million).
So will two countries suffering severe food insecurity from an El Niño-induced drought and flooding, Burundi ($5 million) and Malawi ($4 million).
This was CERF’s second release of $100 million in emergency funding for humanitarian emergencies this year. In February, that money went to Chad, Congo, Honduras, Lebanon, Niger, Sudan and Syria.
But the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, known as OCHA, which manages CERF, said the $200 million released this year is the lowest amount in the last three years, “underscoring the growing gap between humanitarian needs and the donor funding CERF receives to meet them.”
This year, the humanitarian community appealed for $49 billion to reach 187 million people in crises worldwide but has received just 29 percent, leaving a $35 billion gap, OCHA said.
In addition to releasing funds to the 10 countries on Friday, the UN and its partners have launched emergency appeals to reach 14.5 million people in southern Africa affected by El Niño: Zambia, Zimbabwe, Mozambique and Malawi.


Thailand’s anti-graft body opens new probe into embattled political opposition

Thai anti-government protesters scuffle with a police during a protest in Bangkok on Saturday. (AFP)
Thai anti-government protesters scuffle with a police during a protest in Bangkok on Saturday. (AFP)
Updated 30 August 2024
Follow

Thailand’s anti-graft body opens new probe into embattled political opposition

Thai anti-government protesters scuffle with a police during a protest in Bangkok on Saturday. (AFP)
  • The National Anti-Corruption Commission, which has a broad remit that goes beyond graft, said no charges had yet been filed and not all 44 would be summoned

BANGKOK: Thailand’s anti-graft body on Friday said it was investigating 44 members of the disbanded Move Forward party, following a complaint seeking their lifetime bans from politics for backing legislation aimed at amending a law against royal insults.
It comes less than a month after a court ordered the dissolution of the popular Move Forward, the surprise winners of last year’s election, over its campaign pledge to amend the law, which shields the powerful crown from criticism.
Among the 44 under investigation are 25 current lawmakers of the People’s Party, Move Forward’s latest incarnation and the largest party in parliament.
Thailand’s lese-majeste law, or Article 112 of the criminal code, is among the strictest of its kind in the world and carries punishments of up to 15 years in jail for each perceived insult of the royal family. Critics of the law say it has been misused for political purposes to stifle opposition.

BACKGROUND

Thailand’s lese-majeste law, or article 112 of the criminal code, is among the strictest of its kind in the world and carries punishments of up to 15 years in jail for each perceived insult of the royal family.

The National Anti-Corruption Commission, which has a broad remit that goes beyond graft, said no charges had yet been filed and not all 44 would be summoned.
“We have started calling relevant individuals to hear the facts,” its Deputy Secretary-General Sarote Phuengrampan told Reuters.
“This step is to collect evidence, but no one has been charged yet.”
Under its procedures, if the panel finds sufficient evidence of unethical behavior, it would then charge people, who can present a defense before a decision is taken on whether to prosecute them in court.
If the Supreme Court finds they committed the offense, they could be banned from politics for life, the same fate suffered last year by a Move Forward politician who made social media posts that were deemed disrespectful to the monarchy.
The latest case was brought by conservative activists in February, two days after the Constitutional Court ordered Move Forward to drop its campaign to change the lese-majeste law.
Move Forward’s anti-establishment policies including military reform and undoing business monopolies, earned it huge urban and youth support, but clashed with powerful interests in Thailand, as demonstrated when lawmakers allied with the royalist military blocked it from forming a government.
Senior People’s Party lawmaker Sirikanya Tansakul said she was preparing a legal defense and was not worried about the threat of a lifetime ban.
“What’s more concerning is that (an unfavorable) decision would set a new precedent: trying to amend can mean a serious ethical violation,” she said.
“Amending section 112 or any law would be impossible.”