What to make of Israel’s puzzling new Gaza war strategy?

Special What to make of Israel’s puzzling new Gaza war strategy?
1 / 4
Confusion over Israeli troop withdrawal plans could be a sign the IDF has accepted that it has failed to achieve its stated war aims against the rulers of Gaza, Hamas. (AP)
Special What to make of Israel’s puzzling new Gaza war strategy?
2 / 4
Weeks of Israeli bombardment of Gaza City has seen hundreds of thousands of Palestinians flee to southern Gaza, where they cram into shelters and take refuge with friends and family. (AP)
Special What to make of Israel’s puzzling new Gaza war strategy?
3 / 4
Confusion over Israeli troop withdrawal plans could be a sign the IDF has accepted that it has failed to achieve its stated war aims against the rulers of Gaza, Hamas. (AP)
Special What to make of Israel’s puzzling new Gaza war strategy?
4 / 4
Confusion over Israeli troop withdrawal plans could be a sign the IDF has accepted that it has failed to achieve its stated war aims against the rulers of Gaza, Hamas. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 14 January 2024
Follow

What to make of Israel’s puzzling new Gaza war strategy?

What to make of Israel’s puzzling new Gaza war strategy?
  • Mixed messages seen in reduction of forces in some areas and switch to more targeted operations elsewhere
  • Moves could be a result of US pressure, economic necessity or simply proof that old strategy is not working

LONDON: Israel is sending mixed messages, announcing on the one hand that it is withdrawing some forces from Gaza, while also indicating the war will continue for many months, with a shift to more targeted operations and preparations for a full-scale conflict with Hezbollah.

Commentators are divided over the rationale behind the purported drawdown and the apparent signaling of a wider conflict, suggesting that the announcement could be the result of US pressure, economic necessity, or even an acceptance that the old strategy is simply not working.

In early January, a military spokesperson said the Israel Defense Forces would withdraw some units from the besieged Palestinian enclave as part of a shift toward “more targeted operations.”




Israeli military vehicles drive towards Gaza on January 13, 2024, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas. (REUTERS)

Daniel Hagari, an IDF spokesperson, later told The New York Times that “the war has shifted a stage, but the transition will be with no ceremony; it’s not about big announcements.”

Another IDF spokesperson later seemed to suggest that, at least for northern Gaza, the bombing campaign had reached its climax, claiming that Hamas in that part of the Gaza Strip had been “dismantled.”

Jordanian analyst Osama Al-Sharif told Arab News the scaling down had “yet to be verified,” but, should it occur, would likely equate to the withdrawal of roughly 7,000 troops.




Israeli security forces examine a road hit by a rocket fired from Lebanon, in Kiryat Shmona, northern Israel, on  Jan. 11, 2024. (AP

According to one military statement, the withdrawal of five brigades was intended to give “training and rest” to those who had been engaged in the ground offensive since the war began on Oct. 7.

By citing the need for training, the statement made clear that any suggestions the war will be brought to an imminent end, at least without pressure, will not be forthcoming from the Israeli side.

Indeed, an official quoted by Reuters news agency said the next stage of the offensive would “take six months at least and involve intense mopping-up missions against the terrorists. No one is talking about doves of peace being flown from Shujayea.”




Members of the Palestinian Ezzedine al-Qassam Brigades take part in a demonstration by supporters of the Hamas movement in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip, on October 27, 2022, a year before Hamas launched a massive attack against Israeli targets near the border. (AFP/File)

Al-Sharif said the withdrawals could mean “any number of things.” Since northern Gaza is now little more than “rubble,” there may simply be an insufficient number of targets to justify their continued presence, he said.

“It could also mean that some troops are being relocated to the north, where tensions are on the rise. It is clear that Hezbollah is not seeking an escalation and is aware of the terrible cost an all-out war with Israel could bring,” he added.

Shlomo Brom, a retired brigadier general previously in charge of Israel’s strategic military planning, suggested in a recent interview with Al Jazeera that the move could have been in response to US pressure.

Certainly, the withdrawal appears to have gone down well with the Biden administration.

Three US officials told Politico the move was seen as indicative of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu finally taking heed of Washington’s demands to reduce civilian casualties.

US success in convincing Netanyahu to shift from high-intensity operations to more targeted strikes would definitely help to explain the changes on the ground.

So far, however, this does not appear to have happened, sowing further confusion over the reasoning behind the troop withdrawal. Al-Sharif said it may be a sign the IDF has accepted that it has failed to achieve its stated war aims.

“We can say that the situation in Gaza remains a fluid one and Israel has not been able to achieve any of its declared targets,” he said. “But we can also say that it appears bent on carrying out mass destruction of the Gaza (refugee) camps as well as of Khan Younis. And while Hamas appears to be holding up quite well, this has been at a hefty cost to civilian life.”




Displaced Palestinians collect food at a refugee camp in Rafah, southern Gaza Strip, amid continuing battles between Israel and the militant group Hamas. (AFP/File)

Nevertheless, there have been other signals of shifting strategy, including a suspected Israeli drone strike in Beirut earlier this month that killed senior Hamas leader Saleh Al-Arouri.

This was followed by the killing of Wissam Al-Tawil, deputy head of Hezbollah’s Radwan Force, in a suspected Israeli drone strike on a vehicle in the southern Lebanese town of Khirbet Selm.

Then, on Jan. 9, Ali Hussein Burji, commander of Hezbollah’s aerial forces in southern Lebanon, was also killed in Khirbet Selm in another suspected Israeli airstrike.

FASTFACTS

Israel’s military confirmed on Jan. 8 that it was pulling thousands of troops out of the Gaza Strip.

Officials say the IDF is shifting from a large-scale ground and air campaign to a more targeted phase.

Israel says around 1,300 people, mostly civilians, died in Oct. 7 Hamas attack.

More than 23,350 people killed in Gaza in retaliatory military action by Israel.

These attacks did not come without consequences, however. In response, Hezbollah announced it had mounted a drone attack against an Israeli army base on Jan. 9, raising the possibility of a wider regional escalation.

Kobi Michael, a senior researcher at the INSS Tel Aviv University and Misgav Institute for National Security, is wary about the chances of an expanded war.




Israeli security forces examine a road hit by a rocket fired from Lebanon, in Kiryat Shmona, northern Israel, Thursday, Jan. 11, 2024. (AP Photo/Leo Correa)

“I do not think the withdrawal of troops from Gaza is connected to the prospect of the war expanding onto another front, and I do not think either Israel or Hezbollah want to be drawn into a war with one another, although there are clear red lines,” Michael told Arab News.

“It is important to understand that Israel’s relationship with Hezbollah is one I term ‘kinetic diplomacy.’ Each day each side sets these red lines and both sides seem keen to stick to them.”

While the two sides have been locked in their deadliest confrontation in 17 years, Hezbollah’s deputy leader Naim Qassem said that the group had no intention of expanding the war from Lebanon.

But if Israel expands it, the response is inevitable to the “maximum extent required to deter Israel,” he said in a live-streamed speech.

Al-Sharif, the Jordanian analyst, said the only party that would want to expand the war “at any cost” was Netanyahu, “and his far-right partners,” with the incumbent prime minister having failed to reverse what has been a marked deterioration in his poll ratings, which were already falling before the war began.

Oubai Shahbandar, a journalist and former Middle East defense adviser to the Pentagon, would not be drawn on the chances of a wider war, but warned it would bring new challenges for the IDF.

“Hezbollah is better armed, with more advanced weaponry and advantageous terrain, as well as a direct line of supply to Iranian weaponry, compared to Hamas, so prospects of an all-out war pose unique military challenges (for Israel),” Shahbandar told Arab News.




Hezbollah fighters stand near multiple rocket launchers during a press tour in the southern Lebanese village of Aaramta on May 21, 2023. (AFP/File)

While not denying the potential difficulties, Michael, the Israeli academic, seemed confident that the IDF was well placed to fight a war with Hezbollah should it come to this.

“Yes, Hezbollah is not Hamas. But the IDF has the capabilities to fight a war with Hezbollah, and it is also prepared to fight that war if it has to. Of course, it would rather resolve the situation in Gaza first, but it is constantly monitoring those red lines,” he said.

“What you have to remember, though, is that Israel already fights on seven fronts — against Hamas, Hezbollah, in Syria, the West Bank, west Iraq, and Yemen. And then there is Iran itself, which is the seventh front, and it is on this front that the fighting on all the others is determined. Iran is the hand that shakes the cradle. Iran determines the intensity on all the other fronts.”




Despite the enormous toll in Palestinian lives and suffering, Israel has indicated that the war will continue for many months, with a shift to targeted operations and preparations
for a clash along the Israel border. (Reuters)

Where Michael and Shahbandar agree is that any sort of wider regional war would lead to “massive, unprecedented stress on social-economic life in Israel.”

They see this as a possible motivating factor behind the IDF’s decision to withdraw some of its troops from Gaza, with Shahbandar pointing to the economic strain brought about by maintaining 300,000 reservists.

“A considerable percentage of the workforce was mobilized for this war and there is a need to rotate them back into civilian life for the sake of the economy,” he said.

Indices monitoring Israel’s economy have shown less-than-favorable ratings, even as the government says the economy can handle the demands of a war. The Israel Economy Index predicts a 2.2 percent drop in 2023’s national economic growth rate.




Despite the enormous toll in Palestinian lives and suffering, Israel has indicated that the war will continue for many months, with a shift to targeted operations and preparations
for a clash along the Israel border. (AP)

For Michael, the planned limited Israeli troop withdrawal reflects a shift in the conduct of the war. “One thing we can say accurately is that it is changing, not ending,” he said.

“Everything is so deeply dependent on developments on the ground. Consider, you have the leadership of Hamas in Khan Younis. If they are caught or killed, this will affect the manner in which the remaining fighters continue to action this war.

“Really, the aim is destroying Hamas’s center of operations. To achieve this, the IDF constantly goes through very intensive learning processes on the ground. I expect another change soon.”

Michael believes that such a shift could occur in as little as two to three weeks, and may revolve around further withdrawals of units operating inside Gaza and their relocation to emerging trouble spots.

 


Rebels control ‘most of’ Aleppo city, Syria war monitor says

Rebels control ‘most of’ Aleppo city, Syria war monitor says
Updated 30 November 2024
Follow

Rebels control ‘most of’ Aleppo city, Syria war monitor says

Rebels control ‘most of’ Aleppo city, Syria war monitor says
  • Syrian authorities closed Aleppo airport as well as all roads leading into the city on Saturday

BEIRUT: A monitor of Syria’s war said Saturday militant rebels now controlled a majority of Aleppo city, reporting Russian air strikes on parts of Syria’s second city for the first time since 2016.

“Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham (HTS) and allied factions... took control of most of the city and government centers and prisons,” said the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, adding that overnight, Russian “warplanes launched raids on areas of Aleppo city for the first time since 2016.”

Syrian authorities closed Aleppo airport as well as all roads leading into the city on Saturday, three military sources said, as rebels opposed to President Bashar Assad said they had reached the heart of Aleppo.

The opposition fighters, led by the Islamist militant group Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham, carried out a surprise sweep through government-held towns this week and reached Aleppo nearly a decade after having been forced out by Assad and his allies.

Russia, one of Assad’s key allies, has promised Damascus extra military aid to thwart the rebels, two military sources said, adding new hardware would start arriving in the next 72 hours.

The Syrian army has been told to follow “safe withdrawal” orders from the main areas of the city that the rebels have entered, three army sources said.

The rebels began their incursion on Wednesday and by late Friday an operations room representing the offensive said they were sweeping through various neighborhoods of Aleppo.

HIGHLIGHTS

• Rebels opposed to Assad return to city after nearly a decade

• Aleppo airport has been closed, military sources say

• Damascus expects Russian hardware to arrive soon, sources say

They are returning to the city for the first time since 2016, when Assad and his allies Russia, Iran, and regional Shiite militias retook it, with the insurgents agreeing to withdraw after months of bombardment and siege.
Mustafa Abdul Jaber, a commander in the Jaish Al-Izza rebel brigade, said their speedy advance this week had been helped by a lack of Iran-backed manpower in the broader Aleppo province. Iran’s allies in the region have suffered a series of blows at the hands of Israel as the Gaza war has expanded through the Middle East.
The opposition fighters have said the campaign was in response to stepped-up strikes in recent weeks against civilians by the Russian and Syrian air force on areas in rebel-held Idlib, and to preempt any attacks by the Syrian army.
Opposition sources in touch with Turkish intelligence said Turkiye, which supports the rebels, had given a green light to the offensive.
But Turkish foreign ministry spokesperson Oncu Keceli said on Friday that Turkiye sought to avoid greater instability in the region and had warned recent attacks undermined de-escalation agreements.
The attack is the biggest since March 2020, when Russia and Turkiye agreed to a deal to de-escalate the conflict.

CIVILIANS KILLED IN FIGHTING
On Friday, Syrian state television denied rebels had reached the city and said Russia was providing Syria’s military with air support.
The Syrian military said it was fighting back against the attack and had inflicted heavy losses on the insurgents in the countryside of Aleppo and Idlib.
David Carden, UN Deputy Regional Humanitarian Coordinator for the Syria Crisis, said: “We’re deeply alarmed by the situation unfolding in northwest Syria.”
“Relentless attacks over the past three days have claimed the lives of at least 27 civilians, including children as young as 8 years old.”
Syrian state news agency SANA said four civilians including two students were killed on Friday in Aleppo by insurgent shelling of university student dormitories. It was not clear if they were among the 27 dead reported by the UN official.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Friday that Moscow regarded the rebel attack as a violation of Syria’s sovereignty.
“We are in favor of the Syrian authorities bringing order to the area and restoring constitutional order as soon as possible,” he said.


Iran to begin enriching uranium with thousands of advanced centrifuges, UN watchdog says

Iran to begin enriching uranium with thousands of advanced centrifuges, UN watchdog says
Updated 57 min 40 sec ago
Follow

Iran to begin enriching uranium with thousands of advanced centrifuges, UN watchdog says

Iran to begin enriching uranium with thousands of advanced centrifuges, UN watchdog says
  • International Atomic Energy Agency only mentioned Iran enriching uranium with new centrifuges to 5 percent purity
  • Report further raises tensions over Tehran’s program as it enriches at near weapons-grade levels

DUBAI: Iran will begin enriching uranium with thousands of advanced centrifuges at its two main nuclear facilities at Fordo and Natanz, the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog said Friday, further raising tensions over Tehran’s program as it enriches at near weapons-grade levels.
The notice from the International Atomic Energy Agency only mentioned Iran enriching uranium with new centrifuges to 5 percent purity, far lower than the 60 percent it currently does — likely signaling that it still wants to negotiate with the West and the incoming administration of President-elect Donald Trump.
However, it remains unclear how Trump will approach Iran once he enters office, particularly as it continues to threaten to attack Israel amid its war on Hamas in the Gaza Strip and just after a ceasefire started in its campaign in Lebanon. Trump withdrew America from Iran’s nuclear deal with world powers in 2018, setting in motion a series of attacks and incidents across the wider Mideast.
Iran’s mission to the United Nations did not respond to a request for comment over the IAEA’s report. Tehran had threatened to rapidly advance its program after the Board of Governors at the IAEA condemned Iran at a meeting in November for failing to cooperate fully with the agency.
In a statement, the IAEA outlined the plans Iran informed it of, which include feeding uranium into some 45 cascades of its advanced IR-2M, IR-4 and IR-6 centrifuges.
Cascades are a group of centrifuges that spin uranium gas together to more quickly enrich the uranium. Each of these advanced classes of centrifuges enrich uranium faster than Iran’s baseline IR-1 centrifuges, which have been the workhorse of the country’s atomic program. The IAEA did not elaborate on how many machines would be in each cascade but Iran has put around 160 centrifuges into a single cascade in the past.
It’s unclear if Iran has begun feeding the uranium yet into the centrifuges. Tehran so far has been vague about its plans. But starting the enrichment at 5 percent gives Tehran both leverage at negotiations with the West and another way to dial up the pressure if they don’t like what they hear. Weapons-grade levels of enrichment are around 90 percent.
Since the collapse of Iran’s 2015 nuclear deal with world powers following the US’ unilateral withdrawal from the accord in 2018, it has pursued nuclear enrichment just below weapons-grade levels. US intelligence agencies and others assess that Iran has yet to begin a weapons program.
The US State Department said in a statement to The Associated Press it was “deeply concerned with Iran’s announcement that it is choosing the path of continued escalation as opposed to cooperation with the IAEA.”
“Iran’s continued production and accumulation of uranium enriched up to 60 percent has no credible civilian justification,” it added.
Iran, as a signatory to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, has pledged to allow the IAEA to visit its atomic sites to ensure its program is peaceful. Tehran also had agreed to additional oversight from the IAEA as part of the 2015 nuclear deal, which saw sanctions lifted in exchange for drastically limiting its program.
However, for years Iran has curtailed inspectors’ access to sites while also not fully answering questions about other sites where nuclear material has been found in the past after the deal’s collapse.
Iranian officials in recent months, including Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and reformist President Masoud Pezeshkian, had signaled a willingness to negotiate with the West. But Iran also has launched two attacks on Israel amid the war.
Kazem Gharibabadi, an Iranian diplomat, said in a post on the social platform X that he met with EU diplomat Enrique Mora, criticizing Europe as being “self-centered” while having “irresponsible behavior.”
“With regard to the nuclear issue of Iran, Europe has failed to be a serious player due to lack of self-confidence and responsibility,” Gharibabadi wrote.
For his part, Mora described having a “frank discussion” with Gharibabadi and another Iranian diplomat. Those talks included “Iran’s military support to Russia that has to stop, the nuclear issue that needs a diplomatic solution, regional tensions (important to avoid further escalation from all sides) and human rights,” he wrote on X.


Fishers at a Lebanese port hope ceasefire with Israel means normal life is returning

Fishers at a Lebanese port hope ceasefire with Israel means normal life is returning
Updated 30 November 2024
Follow

Fishers at a Lebanese port hope ceasefire with Israel means normal life is returning

Fishers at a Lebanese port hope ceasefire with Israel means normal life is returning
  • Israel earlier imposed a siege on southern Lebanon that kept hundreds of fishers on shore, upending their lives and the industry
  • The possibility of renewed Lebanese fishing on the country’s southern coast is helping fuel hope for a brighter future

TYRE, Lebanon: The ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah brought hope for normality back to many in southern Lebanon on Friday, including fishermen who have long launched their single-engine wooden boats into the Mediterranean at dawn.
During the last two months of its year fighting Hezbollah, Israel imposed a siege on southern Lebanon that kept hundreds of fishers at this ancient Phoenician port on shore, upending their lives and the industry.
While less important than destruction and displacement, the port siege cut many people off from the key ingredients for traditional Lebanese dishes like sayadiyeh — fish and rice boiled in fish sauce — or fried and grilled fish eaten with dips such as hummus and tabbouleh or fattoush salads.
The loss of fish damaged a deep association with home, but now the possibility of renewed Lebanese fishing on the country’s southern coast is helping fuel hope for a brighter future.
On Friday, a few boats went out close to the shore as fishers in the port worked on the nets of small boats painted white, blue or red.
Hussein Sukmani, 55, said Friday that he was considering going to sea in coming days but was waiting to see how things unfold.
He hasn’t dared set sail since the Israel-Hezbollah war dramatically intensified on Sept. 23. “They were days of fear and horror,” he said. “They were the most difficult days of our lives.”
A week ago, a drone strike killed two young fishers in the city as they prepared their nets on the coast, and some fishermen said Friday that the Lebanese army told them that they if headed out it would be at their own risk .
Among those who sailed near the coast on Friday was Walid Darwish, who returned to the port with two plastic boxes filled with mullet.
“Today is the first time that we sail,” Darwish said, adding that fishers had missed the prime season in October and November.
“We lost it,” he said.
The Israeli army barred any boats from an area 50 kilometers (31 miles) from the border in October and has not said whether the warning is still in effect.
Sukmani said that most of the 700 fishers who work on the 270 boats at the port have not sailed out of concern since then.
The area around the port is a predominantly Christian neighborhood that has been spared much of the airstrikes on other parts of Tyre that leveled buildings in this city.
In peaceful times, the port is a major tourist attraction, beloved by Lebanese and foreigners who come for the views, the restaurants and the beaches.
On Friday, Mohammed Hammoud walked along the coast of Tyre carrying his fishing rod.
“It is enough that someone is able to stand in this beautiful area,” he said, pointing to the white sands. “Fishing is everything for me,” added Hammoud, who went to fish several times in the area north of the city of Sidon that was not part of the siege.
In the old market of Tyre, Gilbert Spiridon watched from inside his shop as people came to buy freshly brought fish. Before the war, it took hours to sell all his fish to people from around Lebanon.
“All I wish is that the war has ended and we are back on track to the old good days,” he said.


Syrian army closes airport and roads as rebels sweep into Aleppo

Syrian army closes airport and roads as rebels sweep into Aleppo
Updated 30 November 2024
Follow

Syrian army closes airport and roads as rebels sweep into Aleppo

Syrian army closes airport and roads as rebels sweep into Aleppo
  • Opposition fighters carried out surprise sweep through government-held towns this week
  • Russia, a key ally of Assad, has promised Damascus extra military aid to thwart the rebels

AMMAN: Syrian authorities closed Aleppo airport as well as all roads leading into the city on Saturday, three military sources told Reuters, as rebels opposed to President Bashar Assad said they had reached the heart of Aleppo.
The opposition fighters, led by the Islamist militant group Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham, carried out a surprise sweep through government-held towns this week and reached Aleppo nearly a decade after having been forced out by Assad and his allies.
Russia, one of Assad’s key allies, has promised Damascus extra military aid to thwart the rebels, two military sources said, adding new hardware would start arriving in the next 72 hours.
The Syrian army has been told to follow “safe withdrawal” orders from the main areas of the city that the rebels have entered, three army sources said.
The rebels began their incursion on Wednesday and by late Friday an operations room representing the offensive said they were sweeping through various neighborhoods of Aleppo.

They are returning to the city for the first time since 2016, when Assad and his allies Russia, Iran, and regional Shiite militias retook it, with the insurgents agreeing to withdraw after months of bombardment and siege.
Mustafa Abdul Jaber, a commander in the Jaish Al-Izza rebel brigade, said their speedy advance this week had been helped by a lack of Iran-backed manpower in the broader Aleppo province. Iran’s allies in the region have suffered a series of blows at the hands of Israel as the Gaza war has expanded through the Middle East.
The opposition fighters have said the campaign was in response to stepped-up strikes in recent weeks against civilians by the Russian and Syrian air force on areas in rebel-held Idlib, and to preempt any attacks by the Syrian army.
Opposition sources in touch with Turkish intelligence said Turkiye, which supports the rebels, had given a green light to the offensive.
But Turkish foreign ministry spokesperson Oncu Keceli said on Friday that Turkiye sought to avoid greater instability in the region and had warned recent attacks undermined de-escalation agreements.
The attack is the biggest since March 2020, when Russia and Turkiye agreed to a deal to de-escalate the conflict.

CIVILIANS KILLED IN FIGHTING
On Friday, Syrian state television denied rebels had reached the city and said Russia was providing Syria’s military with air support.
The Syrian military said it was fighting back against the attack and had inflicted heavy losses on the insurgents in the countryside of Aleppo and Idlib.
David Carden, UN Deputy Regional Humanitarian Coordinator for the Syria Crisis, said: “We’re deeply alarmed by the situation unfolding in northwest Syria.”
“Relentless attacks over the past three days have claimed the lives of at least 27 civilians, including children as young as 8 years old.”
Syrian state news agency SANA said four civilians including two students were killed on Friday in Aleppo by insurgent shelling of university student dormitories. It was not clear if they were among the 27 dead reported by the UN official.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Friday that Moscow regarded the rebel attack as a violation of Syria’s sovereignty.
“We are in favor of the Syrian authorities bringing order to the area and restoring constitutional order as soon as possible,” he said.


What to know about sudden rebel gains in Syria’s 13-year war and why it matters

What to know about sudden rebel gains in Syria’s 13-year war and why it matters
Updated 30 November 2024
Follow

What to know about sudden rebel gains in Syria’s 13-year war and why it matters

What to know about sudden rebel gains in Syria’s 13-year war and why it matters
  • It was the first opposition attack on Aleppo since 2016, when an air campaign by Russian warplanes helped Syrian President Bashar Assad retake the northwestern city
  • The roughly 30 percent of the country not under Assad is controlled by a range of opposition forces and foreign troops, including Turkish and US forces and their allies

WASHINGTON: The 13-year civil war in Syria has roared back into prominence with a surprise rebel offensive on Aleppo, one of Syria’s largest cities and an ancient business hub. The push is among the rebels’ strongest in years in a war whose destabilizing effects have rippled far beyond the country’s borders.
It was the first opposition attack on Aleppo since 2016, when a brutal air campaign by Russian warplanes helped Syrian President Bashar Assad retake the northwestern city. Intervention by Russia, Iran and Lebanon's Hezbollah militia and other groups has allowed Assad to remain in power, within the 70 percent of Syria under his control.
The surge in fighting has raised the prospect of another violent front reopening in the Middle East, at a time when US-backed Israel is fighting Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Robert Ford, the last-serving US ambassador to Syria, pointed to months of Israeli strikes on Syrian and Hezbollah targets in the area, and to Israel’s ceasefire with Hezbollah in Lebanon this week, as factors providing Syria’s rebels with the opportunity to advance.
Here’s a look at some of the key aspects of the new fighting:
Why does the fighting at Aleppo matter?
Assad has been at war with opposition forces seeking his overthrow for 13 years, a conflict that’s killed an estimated half-million people. Some 6.8 million Syrians have fled the country, a refugee flow that helped change the political map in Europe by fueling anti-immigrant far-right movements.
The roughly 30 percent of the country not under Assad is controlled by a range of opposition forces and foreign troops. The US has about 900 troops in northeast Syria, far from Aleppo, to guard against a resurgence by the Daesh group. Both the US and Israel conduct occasional strikes in

 

Syria against government forces and Iran-allied militias. Turkiye has forces in Syria as well, and has influence with the broad alliance of opposition forces storming Aleppo.
Coming after years with few sizeable changes in territory between Syria’s warring parties, the fighting “has the potential to be really quite, quite consequential and potentially game-changing,” if Syrian government forces prove unable to hold their ground, said Charles Lister, a longtime Syria analyst with the US-based Middle East Institute. Risks include if Daesh fighters see it as an opening, Lister said.
Ford said the fighting in Aleppo would become more broadly destabilizing if it drew Russia and Turkiye — each with its own interests to protect in Syria — into direct heavy fighting against each other. 

The US and UN have long designated the opposition force leading the attack at Aleppo — Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham, known by its initials HTS — as a terrorist organization.
Its leader, Abu Mohammed Al-Golani, emerged as the leader of Al-Qaeda’s Syria branch in 2011, in the first months of Syria’s war. His fight was an unwelcome intervention to many in Syria’s opposition, who hoped to keep the fight against Assad’s brutal rule untainted by violent extremism.
Golani early on claimed responsibility for deadly bombings, pledged to attack Western forces and sent religious police to enforce modest dress by women.
Golani has sought to remake himself in recent years. He renounced his Al-Qaeda ties in 2016. He’s disbanded his religious police force, cracked down on extremist groups in his territory, and portrayed himself as a protector of other religions. That includes last year allowing the first Christian Mass in the city of Idlib in years.
What’s the history of Aleppo in the war?
At the crossroads of trade routes and empires for thousands of years, Aleppo is one of the centers of commerce and culture in the Middle East.
Aleppo was home to 2.3 million people before the war. Rebels seized the east side of the city in 2012, and it became the proudest symbol of the advance of armed opposition factions.
In 2016, government forces backed by Russian airstrikes laid siege to the city. Russian shells, missiles and crude barrel bombs — fuel canisters or other containers loaded with explosives and metal — methodically leveled neighborhoods. Starving and under siege, rebels surrendered Aleppo that year.
The Russian military’s entry was the turning point in the war, allowing Assad to stay on in the territory he held.
This year, Israeli airstrikes in Aleppo have hit Hezbollah weapons depots and Syrian forces, among other targets, according to an independent monitoring group. Israel rarely acknowledges strikes at Aleppo and other government-held areas of Syria.