BBC boss interrogated by conservative MPs over Israel-Gaza coverage

During the meeting, Davie was confronted by UK Immigration Minister Robert Jenrick, who said he had “never been so disappointed” in the BBC. (AFP/File)
During the meeting, Davie was confronted by UK Immigration Minister Robert Jenrick, who said he had “never been so disappointed” in the BBC. (AFP/File)
Updated 26 October 2023
Follow

BBC boss interrogated by conservative MPs over Israel-Gaza coverage

BBC boss interrogated by conservative MPs over Israel-Gaza coverage
  • The meeting focused on the BBC’s coverage of the Israel-Gaza war and migration
  • Broadcaster defends ‘commitment to impartiality’

LONDON: BBC Director-General Tim Davie was interrogated on Thursday by Conservative members of Parliament over the BBC’s coverage of the Israel-Gaza conflict.

During the discussion with the 1922 Committee, Davie was challenged about the BBC’s refusal to label Hamas as “terrorists,” a stance that has drawn criticism from some Conservative MPs and Israeli President Isaac Herzog.

“There’s one thing today that’s united the whole of the backbenches and that’s a disagreement with the DG (director-general) about Hamas being a terrorist organization and the ability to say so,” one MP present at the discussion reported telling the BBC.

During the meeting, Davie was confronted by UK Immigration Minister Robert Jenrick, who said he had “never been so disappointed” in the BBC.

“I worry that the organization has lost the confidence of many people, and in particular the British Jewish community,” Jenrick said. “That loss of confidence began with the BBC’s refusal to call Hamas terrorists. Will you reconsider that and change your editorial policy?”

Davie dismissed the suggestions and upheld the current BBC policy, asserting the importance of maintaining broadcast impartiality.

A spokesperson for the BBC later added that the commitment to neutrality enabled the broadcaster to report from different regions, emphasising that being perceived as an arm of the UK government could undermine the credibility and trustworthiness of its journalism.

The spokesperson said that the BBC periodically reviewed its editorial guidelines, with a comprehensive assessment planned in the coming months.

The meeting was described as part of the routine engagement between the BBC and political parties, scheduled since July.

In a related development, BBC News Chief Executive Deborah Turness published a blog post affirming the BBC’s “commitment to impartiality” in its coverage of the Israel-Gaza conflict.

She said that BBC journalists were adjusting their approach by avoiding the term “militant” as a standard description for Hamas or Hezbollah combatants, though they did not ban such terms entirely.

Turness acknowledged that the BBC sought to uphold its long-standing commitment to impartiality but occasionally made mistakes.

“While we strive to hold true to our 100-year commitment to impartiality, we of course sometimes get it wrong,” she wrote.

“That’s when it’s important to acknowledge where we could have done better, and to learn from any mistakes.”

Since the beginning of the conflict, BBC has faced criticism of biased reporting from both sides.

On Friday, Israel issued a stern warning to the BBC, suggesting that the network might be prohibited from reporting in the country due to its refusal to classify Hamas as a terrorist organization.

Earlier this month, pro-Palestinian activists splattered the BBC’s Broadcasting House in London with red paint to protest the network’s “biased” reporting on events in Israel and Gaza.


Arab Fund for Arts and Culture ‘glad to expand our support to filmmakers’

Arab Fund for Arts and Culture ‘glad to expand our support to filmmakers’
Updated 02 September 2024
Follow

Arab Fund for Arts and Culture ‘glad to expand our support to filmmakers’

Arab Fund for Arts and Culture ‘glad to expand our support to filmmakers’
  • Netflix, AFAC team up to champion Arab women filmmakers
  • Scheme ‘underscores support for region’s talent,’ Netflix executive says

LONDON: Netflix and the Arab Fund for Arts and Culture have teamed up to launch an initiative aimed at supporting the professional growth of Arab women filmmakers.

“Women in Film – Bring Your Story to Life” will offer training and development opportunities to up to 25 women from Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt, Jordan and Kuwait.

Nuha Al-Tayeb, director of content for the Middle East, North Africa and Turkey at Netflix, said the initiative “underscores our unwavering support for authentic storytelling and the development of the region’s talent pipeline.”

She said the participants would work in groups to create a short fiction film — from scriptwriting to post-production — with mentorship from industry professionals and a budget of $25,000 per team.

Al-Tayeb said the initiative was aligned with Netflix’s strategy of increasing female representation “both on and off camera” and that previous partnerships with the AFAC had “uncovered a generation of promising Arab talent.”

Rima Mismar, the fund’s executive director, said that over the past 18 years the organization had supported the production of more than 500 films by Arab artists and filmmakers.

“We are glad to be able to expand our support to filmmakers through this partnership with Netflix, coupling the financial support with mentorship and accompaniment and providing a platform for learning and experimenting for emerging women filmmakers,” she said.

Last year, Netflix and the AFAC launched the “Because She Created” initiative, which introduced emerging female talent to the creative filmmaking process and highlighted the various roles women can play behind the camera.

Applications for the new scheme are open to women under 28 who have directed no more than one short film outside their academic studies.

People can apply as teams with a complete project or as individuals for positions such as cinematographer or editor. A jury will select five projects while a matchmaking process will be used to help incomplete groups find the technical expertise they need.


Harris set to launch historic digital ad campaign as election approaches

Harris set to launch historic digital ad campaign as election approaches
Updated 02 September 2024
Follow

Harris set to launch historic digital ad campaign as election approaches

Harris set to launch historic digital ad campaign as election approaches
  • Democratic presidential candidate plans to spend $370 million in the next 2 months in largest ad campaign ever

LONDON: Kamala Harris is gearing up to launch the largest digital ad campaign in American political history, according to a report by the Financial Times on Sunday.

The Democratic presidential candidate has earmarked $370 million for advertising in the crucial period between early September and the US election in November.

Of this, $170 million is allocated for television ads across the nation, including key battleground states, while a significant $200 million is dedicated to digital advertising.

Harris campaign representatives confirmed on Sunday that they are “on pace to spend more on digital persuasion media than any political organization ever.

“These reservations are centered around early investments in the most sought out publishers and platforms like Hulu, Roku, YouTube, Paramount, Spotify and Pandora.”

“In making these early reservations, the campaign has secured the most premium inventory, locked in significantly more efficient pricing, and reserved before Trump and his allied groups had a chance to,” they said.

According to the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll published on Thursday, Harris has expanded her lead over Republican nominee Donald Trump by an additional 1 percentage point, bringing her total advantage to 4 percent.

Harris also leads in four out of seven battleground states, buoyed by a significant increase in enthusiasm among Democratic voters in recent weeks.

Jen O’Malley Dillon, the chair of Harris’ campaign, described the ad buy as part of a broader strategy to gain a “strategic advantage” on both the airwaves and online battlefronts, with plans to also purchase ad slots on Fox News.

Earlier in August, the Harris campaign announced a “significant eight-figure investment” in national TV placements, noting that these spots are less likely to be crowded with back-to-back political ads, a common issue as election day nears.

These latest reservations come on top of an already massive $150 million ad blitz across seven swing states, underscoring the campaign’s commitment to securing every possible voter in the upcoming election.


After Telegram founder’s arrest, Russians fear loss of ‘main information source’

After Telegram founder’s arrest, Russians fear loss of ‘main information source’
Updated 01 September 2024
Follow

After Telegram founder’s arrest, Russians fear loss of ‘main information source’

After Telegram founder’s arrest, Russians fear loss of ‘main information source’
  • Telegram has become one of the last bastions of free speech and uncensored information in Russiam, where Western social media such as Facebook, Instagram and X, formerly Twitter are banned

MOSCOW: France’s arrest of Telegram chief Pavel Durov has raised fears in Russia that the popular messaging app — used both by the Kremlin and its opponents — could be blocked, depriving them of one of the last sources of critical, uncensored news.
Since the start of its offensive in Ukraine in February 2022, Russia has cracked down on dissent and protest, leaving Russians without independent news outlets or access to Western social media such as Facebook, Instagram and X, formerly Twitter.
In that climate, Telegram — which was itself blocked for a period by the Kremlin for refusing to cooperate with Russian law enforcement agencies — has become one of the last bastions of free speech and uncensored information.
Moscow now fears for the fate of the messenger and its Russian-born founder Durov, charged late August with failing to curb extremist and illegal content on the platform.
Though he has been released on bail, he cannot leave the country and the Kremlin has warned France against turning the case against him “into political persecution.”
Durov’s arrest is not the only headache the privately-owned service faces.
The European Commission is also investigating whether Telegram has more EU users than claimed and must therefore comply with more stringent rules.

Illustration shows Telegram app logo. (Reuters)

In Russia, Telegram channels widely cover subjects that are otherwise strictly censored in state media.
That includes everything from front-line reports of the conflict in Ukraine to trials of Kremlin critics and manifestos dispatched from political prisoners.
The most popular channels have millions of subscribers.
The Kremlin, government ministries and regional governors also use Telegram as their go-to public communications tool.
“Telegram is a very practical and reliable messaging service for all Russians, regardless of their political opinions,” said Alexei Venediktov, head of the Echo of Moscow radio station, blocked in Russia after its criticism of the Ukraine offensive.
The messaging service “is considered independent of the Russian state,” the veteran journalist — who has over 200,000 subscribers there — told AFP.
Blocking Telegram would be equivalent to “a measure of censorship,” he said.

Telegram’s popularity has grown steadily in Russia throughout the Ukraine conflict, after Russia blocked access to Instagram, Facebook and X, as well as the websites of several opposition media outlets.
It is the fourth most popular online service, ahead of YouTube and the Russian social network VKontakte, according to a study by Russian media research group Mediascope.
It is also heavily focused on news. Two-thirds of its Russian readers prefer to follow political and news channels, with only six percent preferring entertainment or cinema, for instance.
Mila, a 45-year-old psychologist, said she started using it after Facebook was blocked and she now subscribes to some 80 Telegram news channels. She also uses it to communicate privately with friends who are against the offensive in Ukraine.
“Today, it is my main source of information. If Telegram stops working, it will hurt me a lot,” Mila told AFP, speaking on condition her full name not be used.
Naida, a 56-year-old logistician said she trusts Telegram more than other messaging services.
“And all the news is there, you don’t need to have a VPN on all the time,” she said.
Telegram is now “the main source of information” for those seeking independent views, said political scientist Tatiana Stanovaya of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center.
“Telegram has no alternative” in Russia, she said, adding the free flow of information on the service is a throwback to before President Vladimir Putin began to crack down hard on dissent.

Amid the conflict in Ukraine, the platform has also become a key military communication tool.
Both Russia and Ukraine warn their populations of incoming air attacks via Telegram posts, while their armies use it to communicate and coordinate internally.
“Telegram has almost become the main way of commanding units on both sides of the front,” said Mikhail Zvinchuk, a former military officer whose Telegram blog on the conflict, Rybar, has more than 1.3 million subscribers.
Pro-Kremlin Russian journalist Andrei Medvedev also said Telegram was “the main messaging service” of the conflict.
“It is an alternative to the secret military communication system,” he said.
Thanks to its broad appeal across the political spectrum, the fate of Durov and the implications for the site have become a rare point of unifying concern.
Russian opposition politician Ilya Yashin, recently released as part of a historic prisoner exchange with the West, is among those who have taken Durov’s side.
“I do not consider Pavel Durov a criminal, and I hope that he will be able to prove his innocence,” Yashin said.
 


Countries where the X social network is banned

Photo illustration of the logo of the social media platform X (former Twitter) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil on August 30, 2024.
Photo illustration of the logo of the social media platform X (former Twitter) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil on August 30, 2024.
Updated 01 September 2024
Follow

Countries where the X social network is banned

Photo illustration of the logo of the social media platform X (former Twitter) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil on August 30, 2024.
  • Beijing banned Twitter in June 2009 — before it secured the prominent place it enjoyed in Western media and politics for much of the 2010s

PARIS: With its ban of X, which went into effect on Saturday, Brazil joins a small club of countries to have taken similar measures against the social network, most of them run by authoritarian regimes.
Beyond permanent bans, some nations have temporarily restricted access to X, formerly Twitter, which has often been used by political dissidents to communicate.
These have included Egypt in 2011 during the Arab Spring uprisings, Turkiye in 2014 and 2023, and Uzbekistan around that country’s 2021 presidential election.
Here is a list of some of the others.

Beijing banned Twitter in June 2009 — before it secured the prominent place it enjoyed in Western media and politics for much of the 2010s.
The block came two days before the 20-year anniversary of the government’s crushing of pro-democracy demonstrations in the capital’s Tiananmen Square.
Since then, many Chinese people have turned to home-grown alternatives such as Weibo and WeChat.

Twitter was also blocked by Tehran in 2009, as a wave of demonstrations broke out following a contested June presidential election.
The network has nevertheless been used since then to pass information to the outside world about dissident movements, including the demonstrations against Iran’s repression of women’s rights since late 2022.

Isolated Central Asian country Turkmenistan blocked Twitter in the early 2010s alongside many other foreign online services and websites.
Authorities in Ashgabat surveil closely citizens’ usage of the Internet, provided through state-run monopoly operator TurkmenTelecom.

Pyongyang opened its own Twitter account in 2010 in a bid to woo foreigners interested in the country.
But the application has been blocked along with Facebook, Youtube and gambling and pornography websites since April 2016.
Internet access beyond a few government websites is under tight government watch in the hermit regime, with access restricted to a few high-ranking officials.

X has been blocked since February 2021, when authorities took aim at the app for its use by opponents of the military coup that overthrew Aung San Suu Kyi’s civilian government.
Since then, the junta has kept a tight grip on Internet access in Myanmar.

Access to Twitter was throttled from 2021 by Moscow, which complained the site was allowing users to spread “illegal content.”
A formal ban came in March 2022, just after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
Many Russian users continue to connect to X via VPN services that allow them to get around the block.

X has been banned since parliamentary polls in February this year.
Pakistan’s government, backed by the army, say the block is for security reasons.
Former prime minister Imran Khan — now in jail — was targeted by widespread allegations of fraud spread via the platform against his opposition party.

Nicolas Maduro, who was declared winner of July’s presidential election despite grave suspicions of fraud, ordered access to X suspended for 10 days on August 9 as security forces were violently putting down nationwide demonstrations.
The block has remained in place beyond the expiry of the 10-day period.

The country’s block on X has come from the judiciary, via Supreme Court judge Alexandre de Moraes.
He has highlighted the reactivation of accounts that had been ordered suspended by Brazilian courts.
Users connecting to X via a VPN face a fine of 50,000 reais ($8,900) per day.

 


On the first day without X, many Brazilians say they feel disconnected from the world

On the first day without X, many Brazilians say they feel disconnected from the world
Updated 01 September 2024
Follow

On the first day without X, many Brazilians say they feel disconnected from the world

On the first day without X, many Brazilians say they feel disconnected from the world
  • Brazil is one of the biggest markets for X, with tens of millions of users

SAO PAULO: The blocking of social media platform X in Brazil divided users and politicians over the legitimacy of the ban, and many Brazilians on Saturday had difficulty and doubts over navigating other social media in its absence.
The shutdown of Elon Musk’s platform started early Saturday, making it largely inaccessible on both the web and through mobile apps after the billionaire refused to name a legal representative to the country, missing a deadline imposed by Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes. The blockade marks an escalation in a monthslong feud between Musk and de Moraes over free speech, far-right accounts and misinformation.
Brazil is one of the biggest markets for X, with tens of millions of users.
“I’ve got the feeling that I have no idea what’s happening in the world right now. Bizarre,” entertainment writer and heavy X user Chico Barney wrote on Threads. Threads is a text-based app developed by Instagram that Barney was using as an alternative. “This Threads algorithm is like an all-you-can-eat restaurant where the waiter keeps serving things I would never order.”
Bluesky, a social media platform that was launched last year as an alternative to X and other more established sites, has seen a large influx of Brazilians in the past couple of days. The company said Friday it has seen about 200,000 new users from Brazil sign up during that time, and the number “continues to grow by the minute.” Brazilian users are also setting records for activities such as follows and likes, Bluesky said.
Previous users of other platforms welcomed Brazilians to their ranks. “Hello literally everyone in Brazil,” a user wrote on Threads. “We’re a lot nicer than Twitter here,” said another.
Platform migration isn’t new for Brazilians. They were huge adopters of Orkut and, when Orkut went kaput, they very gladly moved to other platforms.
X is not as popular in Brazil as Facebook, Instagram, YouTube or TikTok. However, it remains an important platform on which Brazilians engage in political debates and is highly influential among politicians, journalists and other opinion makers.
It’s also where they share their sense of humor. Many of the country’s most famous memes originate from posts on X before spreading to other social networks. Last week, for instance, Brazilians collaboratively crafted an absurd storyline for a fictional telenovela, complete with a theme song created using artificial intelligence tools.
Pop stars and their fanbases were also hit by Brazilians being left off the platform.
“Wait a lot of my fan pages are Brazilian!!! Come back hold up!!,” Cardi B said Friday on X. A fan page dedicated to Timothée Chalamet, known by the handle TimotheeUpdates, said it would temporarily cease updating as all of its administrators are Brazilian.
De Moraes said X will stay suspended until it complies with his orders, and he also set a daily fine of 50,000 reais ($8,900) for people or companies using virtual private networks, or VPNs, to access it. Some legal experts questioned the grounds for that decision and how it would be enforced. Others suggested the move was authoritarian.
The Brazilian Bar Association said Friday in a statement that it would request the Supreme Court review the fines imposed on all citizens using VPNs or other means to access X without due process. Brazil’s bar association argued that sanctions should never be imposed summarily before ensuring an adversarial process and the right to full defense.
“I’ve used VPNs a lot in authoritarian countries like China to continue accessing news sites and social networks,” Maurício Santoro, a political science professor at the State University of Rio de Janeiro, said on the platform before its shutdown. “It never occurred to me that this type of tool would be banned in Brazil. It’s dystopian.”
A search Friday on X showed hundreds of Brazilian users inquiring about VPNs that could potentially enable them to continue using the platform by making it appear they are logging on from outside the country.
“Tyrants want to turn Brazil into another commie dictatorship but we won’t back down. I repeat: do not vote on those who don’t respect free speech. Orwell was right,” right-wing congressman Nikolas Ferreira, one of former President Jair Bolsonaro’s closest allies, published before X went off. Musk replied with an emoji suggesting agreement: “100”.
Ferreira is a 28-year-old YouTuber who received the most votes of the 513 elected federal lawmakers in the 2022 election. De Moraes ordered the block of his social media accounts after a mob of Bolsonaro supporters attacked Brazil’s Congress, presidential palace and Supreme Court in January 2023 seeking to overturn the election.
Lawmaker Bia Kicis said “the consequences of Alexandre de Moraes’ attacks to Elon Musk, X and Starlink will be regrettable for Brazilians.” She also urged Rodrigo Pacheco, the president of the country’s Senate, to act. Kicis has repeatedly urged Pacheco to open impeachment proceedings against the Supreme Court justice.
“We need to leave this state of apathy and stop the worst from happening,” the pro-Bolsonaro lawmaker, whose profiles were temporarily blocked by de Moraes in 2022, also said.
The former president said Saturday on Instagram that X’s departure from Brazil was “another blow to our freedom and legal security.”
“It not only affects our freedom of expression, but also undermines the confidence of international companies in operating on Brazilian soil, with impacts ranging from national security to the quality of the information that reaches our citizens,” Bolsonaro said.
On Friday, President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva backed de Moraes’ decision and took aim at Musk for positioning himself as though he was above the law during an interview with Radio MaisPB.
“Any citizen, from anywhere in the world, who has investments in Brazil, is subject to the Brazilian Constitution and Brazilian laws. Therefore, if the Supreme Court has made a decision for citizens to comply with certain things, they either have to comply or take another course of action,” Lula said. “It’s not because the guy has a lot of money that he can disrespect it.”
Ana Júlia Alves de Oliveira, an 18-year-old student, shared that many young people like her no longer watch newscasts or read newspapers, relying solely on social media platforms like X for their news. Without this platform, she felt disconnected.
“I kind of lost touch with what’s going on around the world,” she said. “I saw a lot of entertainment there too, so this is a new reality for me.”