No reason for delay in forming Lebanese government, says leading Christian cleric

No reason for delay in forming Lebanese government, says leading Christian cleric
There is no reason for delaying the formation of a new Lebanese government, the country’s leading Christian cleric said on Sunday. (File/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 20 December 2020
Follow

No reason for delay in forming Lebanese government, says leading Christian cleric

No reason for delay in forming Lebanese government, says leading Christian cleric
  • Efforts to form a new government have been blocked by political factions, with Al-Rai making a personal intervention to dissolve the stalemate
  • He stressed the need for a government that was free of quotas, counter-conditions, and obstructions that paralyzed its decisions

BEIRUT: There is no reason for delaying the formation of a new Lebanese government, the country’s leading Christian cleric said on Sunday.
Efforts to form a new government have been blocked by political factions, with Maronite Patriarch Bechara Boutros Al-Rai making a personal intervention to dissolve the stalemate. 
Mustapha Adib quit as prime minister in September, less than a month after he was nominated to replace Hassan Diab, who took over from Saad Hariri at the end of January this year.
The cleric said that in all his communications during the past few days with President Michel Aoun, Prime Minister-designate Hariri and the head of the Free Patriotic Movement (FPM) Gebran Bassil, he had found “no reason for the delay in forming the government – not for a single day.”
He stressed the need for a government that was free of quotas, counter-conditions, and obstructions that paralyzed its decisions.
“This government must be non-political and non-partisan, with ministers who are known to civil society for their competence, achievements, and expertise, provided this government is formed in accordance with the provisions of the constitution and through consultation and pure intentions between the PM-designate and the president within the framework of an agreement, partnership, and rotating portfolios.”
Al-Rai said that the job of the new government was to “devote itself to implementing reforms, receive the planned and promised international aid, and prioritize rebuilding Beirut, which was destroyed by the (Aug. 4) explosion.”
On Dec. 9 Hariri suggested to Aoun a cabinet lineup of 18 ministers but, since that date, there has been no progress in forming a new government.
The past 48 hours have seen increased tensions between the FPM and the Future Movement, giving the impression that the process of forming a government was becoming more complicated and that the patriarch’s mediation would not lead to a breakthrough.
The FPM issued a statement accusing Hariri of “attempting to bypass the constitutional authority of the president as an equal partner in the process of forming the government and as the head of the country, in addition to insisting on heeding the covenant, not adopting clear and unified standards for dealing with all Lebanese people, having an intention to look right through national balances, and returning to a time of marginalization and eroding rights.” 
Its statement added: “This cannot be tolerated.”
Information leaked to the media said the FPM would agree to the formation of a government in exchange for three major ministries -  interior, defense and justice - that would put it in charge of Lebanon’s security portfolio.
The Future Movement accused the FMP leadership of “insisting on overthrowing the constitutional standard for forming governments.”
FPM lawmaker Ibrahim Kanaan announced after his meeting with Al-Rai on Sunday that the debates should not continue and that Aoun was ready to settle the government matter in accordance with the constitution and a French initiative aimed at rebuilding the country and salvaging the economy. But he did not give details.
He expected a meeting between Aoun and Hariri early next week in light of the clarifications and communication taking place, especially since the president was “determined to resolve the government formation issue” in accordance with the constitution and the French initiative.
Mustafa Alloush, the vice president of the Future Movement, addressed Aoun and his son-in-law Bassil on social media: “If the intention is to destroy the structure over everyone, then you have succeeded. But what is the point of passing the presidency down to the president’s son-in-law on the ruins of a homeland? All that deception of the constitution will not work. A government with a mission is the only way to stop the collapse and protect Lebanon – if you have a conscience.”
The squabbling and stalemate led Samir Geagea, who heads the Lebanese Forces party, to call for the president’s resignation.
After a meeting of his parliamentary bloc he said: “The ruling group is not fit to rule. It is corrupt, and this is what brought the country to where it is. If I were the president of the republic, I would have resigned. This applies to the whole group in power.”