By HEM RAJ JAIN, BY E-MAIL

Avoiding a war

Indian media have printed an article by Sherry Rehman, a member of the National Security Committee of Parliament of Pakistan and a former information minister prescribing some measures for settling Kashmir dispute and improving Indo-Pak relations.

But these have been rendered meaningless and ineffective in view of some recent developments.

India is simply not interested in a Muslim-majority Kashmir. This is the only explanation for India not trying to militarily retrieve the part of Kashmir under Pakistan's control. Pakistan, on the other hand, has tried to capture the Indian side of Kashmir in 1947-48, 1965, 1971, during Kargil war and through the ongoing proxy war. 

India has taken out Hindus (Kashmiri Pundits) from Kashmir Valley citing terrorism as a reason and left Muslims in the valley at the mercy of its military. It has so far avoided any meaningful dialogue with Pakistan on Kashmir. At the same time New Delhi has warded off all US pressures to act as mediator.

The change in the situation is the recent London conference on Afghanistan. This has emboldened Taleban and other jihadis to bleed India by thousand cuts through terrorist attacks. 

Any assurance to India from the civilian leadership in Pakistan does not carry much credibility in India due to the all-powerful military (and ISI) of Pakistan. 

Therefore Indians are mentally preparing themselves for a most likely war between India and Pakistan. But India and Pakistan are nuclear powers and a war will prove catastrophic to both. Therefore, the upcoming Nuclear Security Summit to be hosted by US President Barack Obama in Washington on April 12 and 13 has not come a day soon. Obama, who has received such an unprecedented love from the rest of the world, should gird himself up in order to install an "anti-nuclear weapons global regime" (not as ineffective as IAEA or NPT regime etc.) which will ensure that the nuclear weapons of the entire world (with those from India and Pakistan on first priority) shall be brought under the control of this "anti-nuclear weapons global regime." This regime will not allow any county to produce nuclear arms. It will also ensure that the existing ones are eliminated in a time-bound program.

 

Comments

DAVE

Report abuse
First of all Kashmiri Pundits have fled Kashmir and not evacuated. Second India does not believe in might is right and has hence not retrieved PoK by force and not attemted to attack and subjugate Pakistan. Third this list of anti-nukes should be headed by US andChina which have the biggest arsenal of nuclear weapons.

SOURABH

Report abuse
buddy... you don't know anything ...how can you write article about this problem?

CHANDRA

Report abuse
Why should India be interested in muslim majority Kashmir, would be interested in Hindu majority arab world?

FINDIA

Report abuse
Kashmir does not belong to India; it is someone else's land that India has grabbed illegally and forcibly. Why should India be interested to grab the remaining portion of Kashmir controlled by Pakistan. Kashmir is an occupied territory, and India will be happy with the stolen portion of Kashmir if people stop calling India as dacoit. India has almost abandoned Kashmir only that it has more than 800,000 troops to forcibly suppress and retain Kashmir

ZAF

Report abuse
The matter of J&K should be resolved under UN Resolutions giving Kashmiris their right to self determination and not be forced to this or that eithr by India or Pakistan. What happened to all the lovers of democracy and also the so caled biggest democracy int he world. Let us applyt he same to Kashmir.

ABRAR

Report abuse
It's about the region.India continues to oppose third party mediation on Kashmir. It continues to harp on bilateral talks with Pakistan .When talks do happen it refuses to discuss a solution to the issue,only preferring to talk on its own agenda.

India's official policy is "kashmir is part of India and pakistan is occupying the small portion under its control".. Unless this farcial Indian stand is not challenged and pressure is exerted for Indians to acknowledge the dispute and resolve it...regional stability will not improve.

AKSHAY

Report abuse
With over $100 billions of arms purchase in next 5 years, I do solemnly agree with the writer that India is preparing for a massive war with Pakistan. Post 26/11, India & the Indians have realized that the war with Pakistan is inevitable. The world is after all too small for both of them.

DANISH ALI AHMAD

Report abuse
very serious mistake. indian are never ready or willing to have fight with Pakistan. if you have heared about CHANAKIA doctrine, you would know what i mean. it is the other wise, Pakistan public is willing and ready to fight the indian army may be with weapons or not. as far as Nuke regime goes, india will never sign this, which will give Pakistan a good excuse.
it depends on US strategy not obama, if they want INDIA to sign this treaty. since they want india good enough to counter china.

I think the writer of the above article is Naive or hallucinating.

N. AHMAD

Report abuse
Only sulotion. Just merge POK & IOK and create one country - Kashmir.
Post your comment

required

required (email will never be displayed)

Please enter the following characters in the box provided (case sensitive). This helps us prevent automated programs from creating accounts and sending spam.

All comments are subject to approval

Terms and conditions

Blogs
Newsletter

Yes, I would like to receive daily news updates from Arab News in my mailbox.

Latest comments