Lankan chief justice comes before committee

Lankan chief justice comes before committee
Updated 24 November 2012
Follow

Lankan chief justice comes before committee

Lankan chief justice comes before committee

COLOMBO: Sri Lanka’s chief justice appeared on Friday for the first time before a parliamentary select committee considering an impeachment motion against her filed by the government.
The bid to impeach Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake, Sri Lanka’s first female head of the Supreme Court, has raised the risk of a destabilising clash between the President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s government and the judiciary.
The impeachment motion was filed on Nov. 6 after months of deteriorating relations between the chief justice and Rajapaksa, with the government complaining she over-stepping her authority and Bandaranayake’s supporters complaining of interference.
The motion contains 14 charges ranging from undeclared assets to violating constitutional provisions.
The United States, United Nations and the Commonwealth have raised concern over the impeachment and have called on the government to ensure the independence of the judiciary.
The 11-member select committee considering the charges includes seven ruling-party legislators. Bandaranayake did not comment after the sitting in parliament. Members of the media were not allowed to attend.
A source with knowledge of the proceedings told Reuters the session set out procedures and was adjourned to Dec. 4.
The Supreme Court on Thursday recommended that parliament defer the sitting until Dec. 11 as it is considering 12 cases challenging the legality of the impeachment and the composition of the select committee.
However, the select committee went ahead with the first sitting on Friday.
Bandaranayake recently came under criticism from government supporters for ruling against a bid by the central government to take control of an 80 billion rupees ($614.20 million) development budget, saying it had to be approved by the country’s nine provincial councils.
The block on the bill angered the government and its supporters, some of whom accused the judiciary of over stepping its authority.