Climate deal The story “Catastrophe if no climate deal” (Oct. 20) shows that Gordon Brown is either ignorant of the true science of climate change or is merely playing the politically correct game. Like so many articles of its genre, it jumps about between science and politics. One paragraph goes on about the apocalyptic doomsday scenarios associated with global warming, and in the next one it is on about “rich” nations cutting their carbon emissions and giving aid to “poor” nations. Meanwhile, in his letter “Global Warming” (Oct. 20), Iqbal Paul states Peter Jones has chosen “....to ignore the findings of top scientists from the science academies....” Jones and I could equally accuse Paul of the very same thing. Furthermore, Paul names not one of those scientists or the institutions for which they work. While Sharif Dua in his letter “Baseless assertions” (Oct. 20) states that I “.....got a long-list of scientists, science institutes, documentation, studies and books that support the fact of global warming....” Well I must have missed something! Perhaps Dua could name a few of these scientists, science institutes, documentation, studies and books and jog my memory a bit. I have quoted plenty of these but my detractors have not. Dua claims that the BNP does not support global warming theory. Could he provide the proof that this is party policy? My rejection of global warming has nothing to do with my membership of the BNP. Dua has introduced a real non-sequitur here. People like Iqbal Paul and Sharif Dua need to understand that the Earth’s climate is highly complex and that it has been constantly changing over the eons. During the Miocene period the Earth was far hotter than it is now; there were palm trees and alligators, tigers and elephants in Northern Europe and Australia was less arid than it is now. Man-made carbon emissions had nothing to do with that! The Earth has also undergone a number of ice ages, the last one ended around 10,000 years ago. So the Earth has in its history been an ice house and a hot house and humans have had nothing to do with it. In Sweden a recent study (published by Haakan Grudd of the University of Stockholm’s Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology) confirms that the Arctic today is not any warmer than it was in previous historical periods centuries before coal power plants or motor cars. Grudd’s study concludes that “The late-twentieth century is not exceptionally warm in the new record: On decadal-to-centennial timescales, periods around A.D. 750, 1000, 1400, and 1750 were equally warm, or warmer. The 200-year long warm period centered on A.D. 1000 was significantly warmer than the late-twentieth century and is supported by other local and regional paleoclimate data.” |